Enhanced recovery after liver surgery

Optimal results through enhanced recovery: Achieving textbook outcomes with high compliance in elective liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Existing studies suggest a positive correlation between high compliance with enhanced recovery programs (ERP) and improved outcomes. While individual outcome measures have advantages, composite benchmarks, such as textbook outcome (TO), offer a more comprehensive assessment of healthcare performance. Given the link between ERP and postoperative outcomes, this study aims to investigate the impact of ERP on TO attainment after liver surgery (LS).

METHODS

A prospective multicenter cohort of patients undergoing LS and exposed to ERP from 2016 to 2022 in France was analyzed. The primary outcome was to compare the rates of TO achieved between patients with high ERP compliance (>70%) and those with low ERP compliance (<70%) after LS.

RESULTS

A total of 706 patients were included in the study, and 217 (30.7%) achieved TO: 170 patients with high ERP compliance (24%) versus 47 patients (6.6%) with low ERP compliance attained TO (p < 0.001). High ERP compliance was associated to an increased likelihood of achieving TO [odds ratio (OR) = 1.49 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.24); p = 0.049], while cholangiocarcinoma [OR = 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.39); p = 0.003], high complexity LS [OR = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.36); p < 0.001], intraoperative hypotension requiring vasopressors [OR = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.68); p = 0.010], and post-operative ileus [OR = 0.08 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.37); p = 0.013] were negatively associated to the likelihood of achieving TO.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high ERP compliance after LS experience elevated rates of TO, compared to those with low ERP compliance.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy for patients with hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Background

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) provides an effective alternative procedure for the management of complex hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an evidence-based approach that was developed to reduce surgical stress and accelerate postoperative recovery. However, little is known regarding PTCSL in the context of ERAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PTCSL within ERAS programs.

Patient and methods

The clinical data of patients who underwent PTCSL within ERAS programs consulted at our hospital between November 2017 and November 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Individualized perioperative ERAS items were evaluated for all patients. The demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 43 patients who underwent PTCSL were included in the study. There were 13 men and 30 women aged between 39 and 89 years with an average age of 60 years (60.49 ± 12.37). The stone clearance rate was 77 % after the first operation, and the final clearance rate was 95 %. The incidence of complications in this study is 18.6 % (8/43), including 6 patients with Clavien-Dindo I-II, and 2 patients with Clavien-Dindo III. Pleural effusion, abdominal effusion, infection, bile leakage, and biliary bleeding are the most common complications, however, all patients recovered after aggressive treatment.

Conclusion

PTCSL is a relatively safe, feasible, and efficient method for treating complex hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis within ERAS programs. Individualized ERAS entries and precise disease management are required to minimize the occurrence of complications and to provide effective treatment.

Impact of enhanced recovery program implementation on postoperative outcomes after liver surgery: a monocentric retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

It is still unclear whether enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) reduce postoperative morbidity after liver surgery. This study investigated the effect on liver surgery outcomes of labeling as a reference center for ERP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Perioperative data from 75 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy in our institution after implementation and labeling of our ERP were retrospectively compared to 75 patients managed before ERP. Length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and adherence to protocol were examined.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative data were similar in the two groups. Our ERP resulted in shorter length of stay (3 days [1-6] vs. 4 days [2-7.5], p = 0.03) and fewer postoperative complications (24% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.0067). This reduction in postoperative morbidity can be attributed exclusively to a lower rate of minor complications (Clavien-dindo grade < IIIa), and in particular to a lower rate of postoperative ileus, after labeling. (5.3% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.0019). Other medical and surgical complications were not significantly reduced. Adherence to protocol improved after labeling (17 [16-18] vs. 14 [13-16] items, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a labeled enhanced recovery program for liver surgery was associated with a significant shortening of hospital stay and a halving of postoperative morbidity, mainly ileus.

New ERAS in liver transplantation - Past, present, and next steps

There are parallels between the history of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) and liver transplantation. Both have been established and advanced by innovative individuals, often going against perceived wisdom and convention. Liver transplantation has traditionally been considered too complex for ERAS pathways, despite a small number of trials showing them to be both safe and of benefit. To date, there are very few randomized controlled trials and cohort studies publishing outcomes on liver transplant patients enrolled in comprehensive ERAS pathways. To progress our field, the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society's Consensus Conference has created expert panels to analyze the evidence in 32 domains of the liver transplantation pathway using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to generate expert recommendations. These recommendations will be voted on by the international community to gain consensus using the Danish model, and create the ERAS4OLT.org Enhanced Recovery after Liver Transplantation Pathway.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Transplantation: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, evidence-based, program of care developed to minimize the response to surgical stress, associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and hospital stay. This study presents the specific ERAS Society recommendations for liver transplantation (LT) based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus.

METHODS

PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in April 2019 for published and ongoing randomized clinical trials on LT in the last 15 y. Studies were selected by 5 independent reviewers and were eligible if focusing on each validated ERAS item in the area of adult LT. An e-Delphi method was used with an extended interdisciplinary panel of experts to validate the final recommendations.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles were included in the systematic review. A consensus was reached among experts after the second round. Patients should be screened for malnutrition and treated whenever possible. Prophylactic nasogastric intubation and prophylactic abdominal drainage may be omitted, and early extubation should be considered. Early oral intake, mobilization, and multimodal-balanced analgesia are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The current ERAS recommendations were elaborated based on the best available evidence and endorsed by the e-Delphi method. Nevertheless, prospective studies need to confirm the clinical use of the suggested protocol.

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve short-term outcomes after liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review aimed to investigate the available quality of evidence (QOE) of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for liver transplantation (LT) on short-term outcomes, grade recommendations and identify relevant components for ERAS protocols. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on short-term outcomes after LT when applying comprehensive ERAS protocols (>1 ERAS component) versus control groups (CRD42021210374), following the GRADE approach for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality, length of stay and readmission rates after ERAS for LT. Of 858 screened articles, two randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective and 1 retrospective cohort studies were included (2002 - 2020). Frequent ERAS components were early extubation and postoperative antibiotic, fluid and nutrition management. Overall complications were reduced in ERAS versus control cohorts (OR 0.4 (CI 0.2, 0.7), with no significant differences in mortality and hospital readmission rates. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were shorter in ERAS groups (percentage decrease, 55% and 29%, respectively). QOE for individual outcomes was rated moderate to low. ERAS protocols in LT are related to improved short-term outcomes after liver transplantation (Quality of Evidence; Moderate to low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong), but currently lack standardization. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The clinical effect of early enteral nutrition in liver-transplanted patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Appropriate nutritional support is critical for patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Early enteral nutrition (EEN) has been considered effective in critically ill patients. However, the clinical effect of EEN on liver-transplanted patients is unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical effect of early enteral nutrition in patients receiving a liver transplant.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, WanFang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to collect relevant studies up to January, 2020. The results of these studies were pooled to calculate relative risk and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous data and continuous data. All statistical analysis was carried out by Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

9 RCTs and 10 cohort studies with 1300 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with TPN, EEN reduced postoperative infection rates, ICU hours, length of hospitalization, and the duration of bowel ventilation as well as strengthening the nutritional status and liver function of LT patients. There is no difference in mortality rates, blood glucose levels or gastrointestinal complications. Compared to TPN, the combined EN + PN method more effectively prevented infection.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing liver transplantation, early enteral nutrition with or without combination may considered as a better nutritional therapy than total parenteral nutrition.

Patient-reported recovery in upper abdominal cancer surgery care: A prospective study

The study aimed to describe and analyse patient-reported recovery in patients after upper abdominal cancer surgery. This study had a quantitative design and patients were consecutively included in a university hospital in southern Sweden. Twenty-four patients answered the Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP) questionnaire at three measurement points. All five dimensions were affected. In the physical symptoms dimension, the majority of patients reported a lack of energy upon discharge. High levels of anxiety were reported. Over 50% of patients reported some degree of depressed mood at all three measurement points. In the social dimension, the majority of patients reported some degree of being dependent on help from others in everyday life at 4 weeks after discharge. Few patients are fully recovered at 4 weeks after discharge. Individual patient-reported recovery estimates may be valuable in identifying and planning interventions tailored to each patient's needs throughout the care process.

Multidisciplinary care in surgery: Are team-based interventions cost-effective?

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary care has been shown to improve outcomes for patients, and interprofessional collaboration has been demonstrated to be beneficial for providers. In the field of surgery, although a large number of multidisciplinary care teams have been described, no study to date has examined whether or not these team-based interventions are generally cost-effective. This is the first systematic review to examine cost savings attributable to multidisciplinary care across all surgical fields.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of articles published on cost outcomes associated with multidisciplinary surgical teams was performed. Selected articles reported on cost outcomes directly attributable to a collaborative intervention. Cost savings were totaled on a per-patient basis. Each article was also reviewed to determine whether the authors ultimately recommended the team-based intervention described.

RESULTS

A total of 1421 articles were identified in the initial query, of which 43 met inclusion criteria. Thirty-nine studies (91%) reported multidisciplinary care to be cost effective, with an average cost savings among all studies of $5815 per patient. No significant differences in the amount of savings achieved were found between different intervention subtypes. All studies ultimately recommended (40) or gave mixed reviews (3) of multidisciplinary care, regardless of whether cost savings were achieved.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary surgical care is beneficial not only in terms of patient and provider outcomes, but also in reference to its cost-effectiveness. Well-designed multidisciplinary teams tend to optimize perioperative care for all involved parties. Efforts to improve surgical care should employ multidisciplinary teams to promote both quality and cost-effective care.

ERAS in minimally invasive hepatectomy

Open hepatectomy is associated with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality profile. The use of minimally invasive approach for hepatectomy can reduce the post-operative complication profile and total length of hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs involve evidence-based multimodal care pathways designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing major surgery. This review will discuss the published evidence, challenges and future directions for ERAS in minimally invasive hepatectomy.

Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have historically been associated with high morbidity given the physiologic insult of an extensive operation. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes for many procedures but have not been well studied in these cases. We examined the feasibility and effect of ERAS pathway implementation for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC between October 2015 to September 2018 were identified. Patient characteristics, disease pathology, and perioperative outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-d readmissions, renal dysfunction, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients who were included, 11 (35.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC prior to the implementation of the ERAS pathway, and 20 (64.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC according to the ERAS guidelines. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical or pathologic characteristics between groups. There was a significant decrease in LOS with ERAS pathway management from 9 d to 6 d (P = 0.002). No patients from either cohort experienced acute kidney injury. There was no significant difference in 30-d readmission rates or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this feasibility study, ERAS pathway utilization significantly decreased postoperative LOS for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, without evidence of increased complications or readmissions. ERAS programs should be considered for integration into future CRS/HIPEC protocols.