1
|
Curfman KR, Blair GE, Kosnik CL, Pille SA, Parsons ME, Shah CA, Neighorn CC, Rashidi L. Same day discharge colon surgery: is it financially worth it? Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:669-674. [PMID: 38372024 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
AIM Same day discharge (SDD) for colorectal surgery shows increasing promise in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive surgery. It has become increasingly relevant due to the constraints posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to compare SDD and postoperative day 1 (POD1) discharge to understand the clinical outcomes and financial impact on factors such as cost, charge, revenue, contribution margin and readmission. METHOD A retrospective review of colectomies was performed at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 143). Two populations were identified: SDD (n = 51) and POD1 (n = 92). Patients were selected by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) and Diagnosis Related Grouper (DRG) codes. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference favouring SDD in total hospital cost (p < 0.0001), average direct costs (p < 0.0001) and average charges (p < 0.0016). SDD average hospital costs were $8699 (values in USD throughout) compared with $11 652 for POD 1 (p < 0.0001), and average SDD hospital charges were $85 506 compared with $97 008 for POD1 (p < 0.0016). The net revenue for SDD was $22 319 while for POD1 it was $26 173 (p = 0.14). Upon comparison of contribution margins (SDD $13 620 vs. POD1 $14 522), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). There were no identified statistically significant differences in operating room time, robotic console time, readmission rates or surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS Amidst the pandemic-related constraints, we found that SDD was associated with lower hospital costs and comparable contribution margins compared with POD1. Additionally, the study was unable to identify any significant difference between operating time, readmissions, and surgical complications when performing SDD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Siragusa L, Pellino G, Sensi B, Panis Y, Bellato V, Khan J, Sica GS. Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomies: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2023. [PMID: 36790358 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy (ALC), meaning discharge within 24 h of surgical colonic resection, has recently been proposed in a few, selected patients. This systematic review was performed with the aim of reviewing protocols for ALC and assessing feasibility, safety and outcomes after ALC. METHOD A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and pooled analysis was performed searching all English studies published until October 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (PROSPERO, CRD42022334463). Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients undergoing ALC, specifying at least one outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were articles reporting a robotic-assisted procedure; unable to retrieve patient data from articles; the same patient series included in different studies. Primary outcomes were success, overall complications and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included mortality and specific complications such us surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, bleeding, rate of ALC acceptance, and unscheduled consultation and reoperation rate. RESULTS Among 1087 studies imported for screening, 11 were included (1296 patients). The success rate was 47% with an overall morbidity of 14%. Readmission and reoperation rates were 5% and 1%, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Protocols of ALC differ significantly among published studies. CONCLUSIONS Overall, ALC appears to be safe and feasible in selected cases with an acceptable success rate and a low risk of readmission after hospital discharge. Future studies should evaluate patients' benefits and discharge criteria, as well as uniformity and standardization of eligibility criteria. This systematic review may help inform on ALC adoption in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.,Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Yves Panis
- Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly sur Seine, France
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Jim Khan
- Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Giuseppe S Sica
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Curfman KR, Blair GE, Pille SA, Kosnik CL, Rashidi L. The patient perspective of same day discharge colectomy: one hundred patients surveyed on their experience following colon surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:134-139. [PMID: 35854124 PMCID: PMC9296012 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09446-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guided by enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and coerced by constraints of the Coronavirus Disease 2019, the concept of same day discharge (SDD) after colon surgery is becoming a topic of great interest. Although only a few literature sources are published on the topic and protocols, the number of centers interested in SDD is increasing. With the small number of sources on protocol, safety, implementation, and criteria, there has yet to be a review of the patient experience and satisfaction. METHODS Our institution has one of the largest American databases of SDD colon surgery. We performed a retrospective patient survey assessing perception of their surgical experience and satisfaction, which analyzed patients from February 2019 to January 2022. Fifty SDD patients were selected for participation, as well as fifty patients who were discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1). An eleven-question survey was offered to patients and responses recorded. RESULTS One hundred patients were contacted, 50 SDD and 50 POD1. Of the SDD patients, 41/50 (82%) patients participated in the survey, while 23/50 (46%) of POD1 patients participated. The highest average response in both populations was an understanding of patient postoperative mobility instructions (9.27/10, 9.68/10). The lowest average response in the SDD population was family comfort with discharge (8.17/10), while patient comfort with discharge was lowest in the POD1 group, (8.56/10). Importantly, we observed that 85.37% of patients who underwent SDD would do so again if given the opportunity. The only statistically significant variable was a difference in comfort with postoperative pain control, favoring the POD1 group, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS SDD colon surgery is a feasible and reproducible option. Only comfort with postoperative pain control found a statistical difference, which we intend to improve upon with postanesthesia care unit education. Of patients reviewed who underwent SDD, most patients enjoyed their experience and would undergo SDD again.
Collapse
|
4
|
McLemore EC, Lee L, Hedrick TL, Rashidi L, Askenasy EP, Popowich D, Sylla P. Same day discharge following elective, minimally invasive, colorectal surgery : A review of enhanced recovery protocols and early outcomes by the SAGES Colorectal Surgical Committee with recommendations regarding patient selection, remote monitoring, and successful implementation. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7898-7914. [PMID: 36131162 PMCID: PMC9491699 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09606-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have continued to evolve, the length of hospitalization (LOS) following elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery has continued to decline. Further refinements in multimodal perioperative pain management strategies have resulted in reduced opioid consumption. The interest in ambulatory colectomy has dramatically accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Severe restrictions in hospital capacity and fear of COVID transmission forced surgical teams to rethink strategies to further reduce length of inpatient stay. METHODS Members of the SAGES Colorectal Surgery Committee began reviewing the emergence of SDD protocols and early publications for SDD in 2019. The authors met at regular intervals during 2020-2022 period reviewing SDD protocols, safe patient selection criteria, surrogates for postoperative monitoring, and early outcomes. RESULTS Early experience with SDD protocols for elective, minimally invasive colorectal surgery suggests that SDD is feasible and safe in well-selected patients and procedures. SDD protocols are associated with reduced opioid use and prescribing. Patient perception and experience with SDD is favourable. For early adopters, SDD has been the natural evolution of well-developed ERPs. Like all ERPs, SDD begins in the office setting, identifying the correct patient and procedure, aligning goals and objectives, and the perioperative education of the patient and their supporting significant others. A thorough discussion with the patient regarding expected activity levels, oral intake, and pain control post operatively lays the foundation for a successful application of SDD programs. These observations may not apply to all patient populations, institutions, practice types, or within the scope of an existing ERP. However, if the underlying principles of SDD can be incorporated into an existing institutional ERP, it may further reduce the incidence of post operative ileus, prolonged LOS, and improve the effectiveness of oral analgesia for postoperative pain management and reduced opioid use and prescribing. CONCLUSIONS The SAGES Colorectal Surgery Committee has performed a comprehensive review of the early experience with SDD. This manuscript summarizes SDD early results and considerations for safe and stepwise implementation of SDD with a specific focus on ERP evolution, patient selection, remote monitoring, and other relevant considerations based on hospital settings and surgical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth C McLemore
- Bernard J. Tyson Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
- Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Colon and Rectal Surgery, Los Angeles Medical Center, 4760 Sunset Blvd, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Erik P Askenasy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Popowich
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ambulatory surgery is increasingly performed in medically complex patients. This dynamic environment requires new approaches to ensure cost-effective, efficient, and ultimately safe preoperative evaluation of the patient. This review investigates recent advances in the assessment of ambulatory patients, with a special focus on patient screening, digital communication, and multidisciplinary team evaluation. RECENT FINDINGS Identifying suitable candidates for ambulatory surgery relies on a variety of medical, surgical, and institutional factors. Identification of high-risk patients and optimization of their treatment can be achieved through multidisciplinary protocols specific to the local institution and in line with current guidelines. Virtual assessment may be sufficient for most patients and provide an efficient evaluation strategy and high patient satisfaction. Prescreening can be supported by preoperative nursing teams. SUMMARY The increasing complexity of treatment provided in day surgery offers a unique opportunity to highlight the importance of anesthesiology staff as perioperative caregivers. Preoperative evaluation serves as a central junction to integrate a variety of surgical, medical, and institutional factors to provide safe, satisfactory, and efficient care for patients. Implementing technological innovation to streamline and facilitate this process is paramount.
Collapse
|
6
|
Popeskou SG, Christou N, Panteleimonitis S, Langford E, Qureshi T, Parvaiz A. Safety and Feasibility of a Discharge within 23 Hours after Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175068. [PMID: 36078996 PMCID: PMC9456718 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Enhanced or accelerating recovery programs have significantly reduced hospital length stay after elective colorectal interventions. Our work aims at reporting an initial experience with ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy (ALC) to assess the criteria of discharge and outcomes. Methods: Between 2006 and 2016, data regarding patients having benefited from elective laparoscopic colorectal resections in two main centres in the United Kingdom have been analysed. Both benign and malignant pathologies were included. A standardised enhanced recovery program was performed for each patient, except epidural analgesia was replaced with single shot spinal infiltration. Patients were followed up through a telephone call system by a nurse. Short-term clinical outcomes were analysed. Results: A total of 833 patients were included and 51 (6.1%) were discharged within 24 h following surgery. Of these, 4 out of 51 (7.8%) patients came back hospital within 30 days of discharge; 2 (3.9%) required reoperation (Small bowel obstruction and wound abscess drainage). Conclusions: This study highlights that a 24-h discharge following elective laparoscopic colorectal interventions seems safe and feasible in selected patients. Although challenging to achieve, a standardised approach to laparoscopic surgery in combination with strict adherence to an enhanced recovery protocol are the fundamental elements of this path.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niki Christou
- Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Sofoklis Panteleimonitis
- Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole BH15 2JB, UK
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, James Watson West, 2 King Richard 1st Road, Portsmouth PO1 2FR, UK
| | - Ed Langford
- Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole BH15 2JB, UK
| | - Tahseen Qureshi
- Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole BH15 2JB, UK
| | - Amjad Parvaiz
- Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole BH15 2JB, UK
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, James Watson West, 2 King Richard 1st Road, Portsmouth PO1 2FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Colectomy in outpatient care or in an enhanced recovery setting: Is there truly any difference? J Visc Surg 2022; 159:2-4. [PMID: 34992009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|