Endovascular treatment of atherosclerosis at the aortoiliac bifurcation with kissing stents or distal aortic stents: a temporary solution or durable improvement?

Stent Protrusion >20 mm Into the Aorta: A New Predictor for Restenosis After Kissing Stent Reconstruction of the Aortoiliac Bifurcation

Purpose: To determine the long-term patency of aortoiliac kissing stents and to identify predisposing factors for the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 105 patients (median age 60.9 years; 64 women) with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease who had kissing stents implanted between 2001 and 2015. The indication for kissing stents was severe claudication in 91 (86.7%) patients and critical limb ischemia in 14 (13.3%). Lesions were TASC A in 52 (49.5%), B in 29 (27.6%), C in 4 (3.8%), and D in 20 (19%) patients. Twenty-five (23.8%) patients had heavily calcified lesions. In all, 210 stents were deployed [180 (85.7%) self-expanding and 30 (14.3%) balloon-expandable]. Follow-up included clinical evaluation, ankle-brachial index measurement, and duplex ultrasonography. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. The primary patency rates were 93%, 86%, and 77% at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Significant ISR developed in 23 (21.9%) patients (12 unilateral and 11 bilateral). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed older age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.81, p=0.004] and larger aortic diameter (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p<0.001) to be variables favoring long-term patency, while a longer aortic stent segment (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.09, p=0.003) and a larger discrepancy between the summed stent diameters and the aortic diameter (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.65, p=0.043) were associated with ISR development. Multivariate analysis showed a longer aortic stent segment to be the only significant determinant of ISR (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.01, p=0.035). Conclusion: The kissing stent technique can be performed with good long-term patency. Patients whose iliac stents protrude too far into the aorta need closer follow-up.

The Results of Self-Expandable Kissing Stents in Aortic Bifurcation

Purpose:

Kissing stent reconstruction is a widely used technique for the management of aortoiliac occlusive disease involving the aortic bifurcation or proximal common iliac arteries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of self-expandable kissing stents in the aortic bifurcation.

Materials and Methods:

We reviewed medical records of the patients treated with a kissing stent retrospectively from January 2007 to December 2012. The primary and secondary patencies were determined with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression was used to determine the factors associated with patency.

Results:

A total of 21 patients were included, and all were male (median age 53±15 years, range 48–78 years). Major symptoms were claudication (n=16, 61.9%), rest pain (n=5, 23.8%) and gangrene (n=5, 23.8%). Tans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II classification was A 2 (9.5%), B 5 (23.8%), C 7 (33.3%) and D 8 (38%). The mean follow-up was 40.7 months. Major complication occurred in only one case which consisted of distal limb ischemia by emboli. Six patients developed symptomatic restenosis or occlusion. There was no major amputation, but minor amputation occurred in 3 patients. There were 2 mortalities not associated with the procedure (lung cancer and intracranial hemorrhage). Primary patency was 89.6% at 1 year, 74.7% at 3 years and 64.0% at 5 years. Secondary patency was 94.1% at 1 year, 88.2% at 3 years and 68.6% at 5 years. No risk factors for restenosis or occlusion were identified.

Conclusion:

Self-expandable kissing stents can be used successfully with comparable patency for endovascular treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusive lesions in the aortic bifurcation area.

T-stenting with small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting) for stenosed aortoiliac bifurcations with small abdominal aortas: an alternative to the classic kissing stents technique

PURPOSE

To report the feasibility and midterm results of aortic bifurcation reconstruction in patients with small abdominal aortas using commercially available stents applied in a modified T-stenting technique adapted from coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (16 men; mean age 52.4 years) with lower limb ischemia (Fontaine stage IIb or III) and distal abdominal aortas <14 mm in diameter were treated for 39 common iliac artery and 16 aortic stenotic lesions involving the aortic bifurcation. A large, self-expanding stent was implanted from the lower aorta to one iliac branch, followed by deployment of a balloon-expandable stent in the contralateral iliac artery such that its proximal edge protruded a few millimeters through the struts of the self-expanding stent into the aorta [TAP (T And Protrude)-stenting technique]. Follow-up clinical, Doppler ultrasound, and computed tomography examinations were scheduled for each patient.

RESULTS

Angiographic success was obtained in all 23 patients, who received 23 self-expanding aortomonoiliac stents (mean diameter 13.5 mm) and 22 balloon-expandable stents (mean diameter 8.14 mm) in the contralateral iliac branch. No complications were reported. At a mean 16.3-month follow-up (range 2-60), clinical and ankle-brachial index (0.6±0.2 at baseline versus 1.04±0.1, p<0.01) improvement was observed in all patients. All stents were patent (patency rate 100%). Two late technical failures of the contralateral stent were observed (incomplete dilation requiring angioplasty and incomplete protrusion without any hemodynamic impact).

CONCLUSION

The TAP-stenting technique adapted to the aortoiliac bifurcation appears to be feasible, with satisfactory early and midterm patency rates in patients with small abdominal aortas. Larger series with longer follow-up times are necessary.

Outcomes of covered kissing stent placement compared with bare metal stent placement in the treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the aortic bifurcation

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes with the use of balloon-expandable covered iliac kissing stents as compared with bare metal stents in the treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the aortic bifurcation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of consecutive patients from a single institution with atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the aortic bifurcation treated with balloon-expandable kissing stents was performed between January 1, 2002, and September 1, 2007. Fifty-four patients were identified and divided into two groups: those with bare metal stents and those with covered stents. Technical and clinical success (Fontaine classification), complications, and patency at follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (17 men, nine women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 39-79 years) received covered stents and 28 patients (15 men, 13 women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 38-82 years) received bare metal stents. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. Major complications occurred in three of the 26 (11%) with covered stents (P = .66) and two of the 28 patients (7%) with bare metal stents. The median follow-up was 21 months (20 months for covered stents vs 25 months for bare metal stents; range, 1-62 months). Twenty-two of the 26 patients (85%) with covered stents had sustained improvement in clinical symptoms during the follow-up period compared with 15 of the 28 patients (54%) with bare metal stents (P = .02). Primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years were 92% and 92%, respectively, for covered stents and 78% and 62% for bare metal stents (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of covered balloon-expandable kissing stents for atherosclerotic aortic bifurcation occlusive disease provides superior patency at 2 years as compared with bare metal balloon-expandable stents.