Challenges in recruitment and adherence to a randomized clinical trial in Brazil on the effects of transcutaneous nervous electrical stimulation on individuals with peripheral arterial disease: A feasibility study

Literature review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower limbs

The therapeutic challenge in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) is often to increase walking distance, improve pain or heal a wound when PAD is symptomatic. Walking rehabilitation or surgical revascularization techniques are limited. Others strategies as alternatives and/or complementary treatments are needed. Among alternative options, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulations (TENS) could be of interest, both for improved walking distance or pain reduction. The Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a non-pharmacological, mini-invasive technique involving transcutaneous electrical stimulation. However, there are other transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation techniques based on the principle of vagus nerve stimulation with different mechanistics. Trans-auricular Vagus nerve stimulation (Ta-VNS) is another TENS technique (electrode on the external ear) which relies on the anti-inflammatory pathways of efferent and afferent vagal fibers. We propose here to review the literature of mini-invasive electrical stimulations, whatever the anatomical zone concerned, in PAD.

METHOD

The aim was to evaluate the use of non-invasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapies (regardless of location) in PAD of the lower limbs, whatever the disease grade. A review of the literature was carried out via a search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database from 1975 to 2023. The articles were selected via abstracts by checking (1) medical indications: PAD patients with claudication were retained, excluding neurological or venous claudication, PAD whatever the disease grade (intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia [CLI]) and (2) non invasive electrical stimulations were considered (neuromuscular electrical stimulation and spinal cord stimulation were excluded) whatever the anatomical site. Non-electrical stimuli such as acupuncture and reflexotherapy were excluded.

RESULTS

Only 9 items were selected, including 7 studies with TENS treatment on the calf, one with trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation and one with electro-acupuncture points of stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Even if the mechanisms involved are different, TENS on the calves or in the external ears show an improvement of walking distance in PAD patients with intermittent claudication. The results of the studies show few positive effects in arteriopathy but we should keep vigilant in the technics used since mechanisms are different and not fully understood. Electro-stimulation of the calf and external ear appears to be an easy-to-use and accessible therapeutic option, especially since some PAD patients are still failing to be released from pain, despite the rise of endovascular interventional techniques.

Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center

Objective:

Clinical trials, which are mainly conducted in urban medical centers, may be less accessible to rural residents. Our aims were to assess participation and the factors associated with participation of rural residents in clinical trials.

Methods:

Using geocoding, the residential address of participants enrolled into clinical trials at Mayo Clinic locations in Arizona, Florida, and the Midwest between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, was categorized as urban or rural. The distance travelled by participants and trial characteristics was compared between urban and rural participants. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether study location and risks were associated with rural participation in trials.

Results:

Among 292 trials, including 136 (47%) cancer trials, there were 2313 participants. Of these, 731 (32%) were rural participants, which is greater than the rural population in these 9 states (19%, P < 0.001). Compared to urban participants, rural participants were older (65 ± 12 years vs 64 ± 12 years, P = 0.004) and travelled further to the medical center (103 ± 104 vs 68 ± 88 miles, P < 0.001). The proportion of urban and rural participants who were remunerated was comparable. In the multivariable analysis, the proportion of rural participants was lower (P < 0.001) in Arizona (10%) and Florida (18%) than the Midwest (38%) but not significantly associated with the study-related risks.

Conclusions:

Approximately one in three clinical trial participants were rural residents versus one in five in the population. Rural residents travelled further to access clinical trials. The study-associated risks were not associated with the distribution of rural and urban participants in trials.