Acoustic and Perceived Measurements Certifying Tango as Voice Treatment Method

The Hellenic Voice Handicap Index of Different Laryngeal Mass Lesions: A Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Voice disorders influence the quality of people's life. When the type of disorder is determined then the clinicians are capable of finding their patients' needs and address their complaints concerning their vocal problems. One of the most used tools, for assessing the patients' quality of life (in accordance with their vocal status), is the Voice Handicap Index. In this study, we determined the cut-off scores of Voice Handicap Index for population with laryngeal mass lesions such as vocal polyps and nodules. The calculated cut-off points further guide clinicians toward applying a needed interventional method/therapy even in the cases where the condition of a person could not be easily estimated.

METHODS

The study involved 130 participants (aged 19-74). Specifically, 90 nondysphonic people served as the control group, while 40 participants had already been diagnosed with voice disorders due to laryngeal mass lesions. Participants who were diagnosed with a laryngeal inflammation or had undergone a surgery were excluded from the study. The cut-off scores were determined through a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The calculated cut-off points were 19.50 for the total score of VHI, 7.50 for the functional domain, and 8.50 for the physical and the emotional domain.

CONCLUSIONS

The aforementioned cut-off points could be used in empowering the everyday clinical practice. Moreover, their knowledge could help the construction of an individualized therapy plan, as well as monitoring-biofeedback tool for the populations with vocal fold lesions.

Checking for voice disorders without clinical intervention: The Greek and global VHI thresholds for voice disordered patients

Voice disorders often remain undiagnosed. Many self-perceived questionnaires exist for various medical conditions. Here, we used the Greek Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to address the aforementioned problem. Everyone can fill in the VHI questionnaire and rate their symptoms easily. The innovative feature of this research is the global cut-off score calculated for the VHI. Therefore, the VHI is now capable of helping clinicians establish a more customizable treatment plan with the cut-off point identifying patients without normal phonation. For the purpose of finding the global cut-off point, a group of 180 participants was recruited in Greece (90 non-dysphonic participants and 90 with different types of dysphonia). The voice disordered group had higher VHI scores than those of the control group. In contrast to previous studies, we provided and validated for the first time the cut-off points for all VHI domains and, finally, a global cut-off point through ROC and precision-recall analysis in a voice disordered population. In practice, a score higher than the well-estimated global score indicates (without intervention) a possible voice disorder. Nevertheless, if the score is near the threshold, then the patient should definitely follow preventive measures.

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Greek Voice Handicap Index-10 (GVHI-10) With Additional Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

OBJECTIVE(S)

The use of subjective evaluation tools are proven useful and of high clinical value in the case of voice disordered population. For that type of evaluation, self-assessment questionnaires about the severity of the voice like Voice Handicap Index-30 (VHI-30) have been developed. The VHI-30 is the most studied tool which includes psychometrically robustness while guiding physician's therapeutic decision making. Additionally, a valid abbreviated version of VHI-30 was developed for the first time in the Greek Language which is named as Greek Voice Handicap Index-10 (GVHI-10). Consequently, the aim of our study was to validate the proposed version of the VHI-10.

METHODS

Ninety nondysphonic individuals and 90 dysphonic patients were classified by Otolaryngologists and Speech Language Pathologists. The study's subjects were evaluated with endoscopy and stroboscopy. Also, they were administrated the GVHI-30 and the translated version of the Voice Evaluation Template (VEF). The GVHI-10 was extracted by the Greek version of VHI-30.

RESULTS

The group with voice disorders exhibited higher statistical significance in all GVHI-10 scores compared to those of the control group. The GVHI-10 showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's a = 0.915 and split-half reliability coefficient equal to 0.86), good sensitivity compared to Greek VHI-30 (r = 0.764, P = 0.000) and intraclass correlation. A total cut-off point equal to 6.50 (AUC: 0.964; P < 0.001) was also calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed version of GVHI-10 distinguished the perceived levels of voice between dysphonic and nondysphonic groups and between different voice disordered populations. The GVHI-10 is shown to be clinically valid and sensitive exhibiting high reliability.