Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language

Acoustic Measurements Through the Life Span: Jitter, Shimmer, and Standard Deviation of Fundamental Frequency

OBJECTIVE

To verify changes in acoustic parameters, namely jitter, shimmer, and standard deviation of the fundamental frequency (dp fo), through the life span of vocally healthy Brazilian Portuguese speakers.

METHOD

In total, 526 voice recordings of subjects without complaints and without vocal disorders, aged between 5 and 93 years old, were included. The recordings were divided into 12 age groups (5 to 7, 8 to 9, 10 to 11, 12, 13 to 15, 16 to 18, 19 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 93 years old). Acoustic analysis was carried out, based on the sustained emission of the vowel /a/, extracting the parameters jitter, shimmer, and dp fo, using the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program software. The two-way ANOVAtest was used to investigate possible differences between age groups, followed by the Sidak Post-Hoc test.

RESULTS

Related to jitter, children present higher values compared with the elderly. In adults and the elderly, the jitter measurement does not reflect the changes resulting from aging in both sexes. Women have a higher jitter value compared with men. As for the shimmer, this measurement is high in the child population with stability during adulthood and, in the elderly, it was observed that the shimmer was sensitive to indicate vocal changes in the male population. In general, there are no sex differences on this measurement. Finally, for dp fo, the study found higher values in the child population, with a reduction with aging until stabilizing in adults and the elderly. Higher values were observed for females compared with males.

CONCLUSION

Jitter, shimmer, and dp fo changed through the life span, being elevated for the child population, remaining stable in the adult population, and with smaller changes during aging.

The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology

The field of voice analysis has experienced significant transformations, evolving from basic perceptual assessments to the incorporation of advanced digital signal processing and computational tools. This progression has facilitated a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics of vocal function, particularly through the use of acoustic voice analysis within a multidimensional evaluation framework. Traditionally, voice analysis relied on parameters such as fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio, which, despite their utility, have faced criticism for variability and lack of robustness. Recent developments have led to a shift toward more reliable metrics such as cepstral measures, which offer improved accuracy in voice quality assessments. Furthermore, the integration of multiparametric constructs underscores a comprehensive approach to evaluating vocal quality, blending sustained vowels, and continuous speech analyses. Current trends in clinical practice increasingly favor these advanced measures over traditional parameters due to their greater reliability and clinical utility. Additionally, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, holds promise for revolutionizing voice analysis by enhancing diagnostic precision and enabling efficient, non-invasive screening methods. This shift toward AI-driven approaches signifies a potential paradigm change in voice health, suggesting a future where AI not only aids in diagnosis but also the early detection and treatment of voice-related pathologies.

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 in Turkish

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) version 3.01 in the Turkish-speaking population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Concatenated voice samples of the sustained vowel [a:] and continuous speech were collected from 127 dysphonic and 128 normophonic participants. The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by five experienced raters using the Grade parameter of the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain scale. Rater reliability, concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and differences between normophonic and dysphonic groups were analyzed for the AVQI version 3.01.

RESULTS

The number of syllables for the standardized reading text with the concatenation of the voiced parts lasting around 3 seconds (mean = 3.84 seconds) was 36. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of intra-rater reliability of G scores of five raters were excellent (mean ICC = 0.934), and of inter-rater reliability, they varied between moderate and excellent (mean ICC = 0.786). AVQIv3 demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy with area under receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.906 in identifying disrupted versus normal voice quality. With sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 94%, AVQIv3 = 2.345 was the cutoff point that differentiated most accurately between normophonic and dysphonic voices in Turkish.

CONCLUSION

AVQIv3 is an ecologically valid tool for objective differentiation between dysphonic and normal voices in the Turkish language.

Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population

BACKGROUND

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has emerged in the recent past as a robust multiparametric voice quality evaluation tool. Two versions of AVQI derived using the program PRAAT have found extensive clinical and research applications. These versions have been validated in several languages around the world. However, no research reports are available on validation of AVQI in the South Indian population. Further, studies comparing the performance of the two versions of AVQI are limited in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to validate and compare the two versions of AVQI (AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01) in South Indian languages (Malayalam and Kannada).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of previously recorded voice samples was carried out on a total of 160 (91 normophonic and 69 dysphonic) voice samples. These samples were perceptually rated on a GRBAS scale by five experienced speech-language pathologists. Standardized Syllable Number (SSN) necessary to derive AVQIv03.01 was computed. Following this, these samples were analyzed to obtain the AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01. The concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures were then examined and compared.

RESULTS

A moderate agreement was obtained across the judges on perceptual evaluation of voice quality. SSN in Malayalam and Kannada languages were identified to be 29 and 25 syllables respectively. Language differences were not observed on both versions of AVQI. The concurrent validity of AVQIv03.01 (r = 0.788) was superior to that of AVQIv02.02 (r = 0.655). Further, the threshold of differentiating normophonic and dysphonic samples were determined to be >3.45 for AVQIv02.02 and >2.45 for AVQIv03.01.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQIv03.01 is superior to AVQIv02.02 in terms of its diagnostic accuracy and concurrent validity. Current findings also extend the application of AVQI as a robust tool for the evaluation of voice characteristics to the South Indian population.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in the Measurement of Voice Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multiparametric construct of voice quality recognized for its clinical and research applications around the globe. This study aimed to review the validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQI (v02&03) and determine the effects of age and gender.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered with the PROSPERO registry. The authors searched two databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library database) for relevant studies. Studies selected for the systematic review were grouped based on study objectives. To determine the quality of the selected studies, the authors utilized the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven studies on AVQIv02 revealed a diagnostic threshold ranging from 2.72 to 3.33 for AVQIv02. In comparison, eight studies investigating AVQIv03 suggested a diagnostic threshold ranging from 1.33 to 3.15 for AVQIv03. Altogether, these studies demonstrated a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.92 for AVQIv02 and 0.82 and 0.92 for AVQIv03. The Area under the Curve was slightly better for AVQIv03 (0.94) than AVQIv02 (0.92). Three studies investigating the effect of age and gender on AVQI had a consensus that AVQI is independent of gender. However, findings were contradictory about the impact of age on AVQI.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQI is found to be a valid tool for the assessment of voice quality. AVQIv03 is slightly better than AVQIv02 in its diagnostic accuracy. AVQI is independent of gender. Because of the contradictory evidence, additional research on the effects of age on AVQI is necessary.

Diagnostic Accuracy of DSI and AVQI v.02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Levels of Dysphonia in Kannada Speaking Population

The present study investigated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in Indian adults in the age range of 18-40years across different levels of dysphonia severity. Normophonic individuals (n=163) and individuals with dysphonia (n=134) were selected using purposive sampling in the age range of 18-40years. For DSI, Computerized Speech Lab 4500 and for AVQI, Praat 6.1.03 was used for recording. The results of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for DSI have revealed that DSI can discriminate the normophonic versus mild, mild versus moderate, and moderate versus severe dysphonic with cut-off values of 1.36, -1.83, and -4.07, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity reported for mild versus moderate and moderate versus severe are slightly lower for obtained threshold points. For AVQI v.02.03, ROC analysis revealed that high sensitivity and specificity cut-off points for normophonic versus mild, mild versus moderate, and moderate versus severe dysphonic are 2.50, 3.86, and 6.21, respectively. AVQI is a more effective technique than DSI for distinguishing between dysphonia severities levels, particularly when it comes to mild versus moderate and moderate versus severe, according to comparisons of AROC curves made using the DeLang method.

Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed - CPPS and Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI in healthy and altered children's voices: comparation, relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment and cut-off points

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) of children with normal and altered voices, to relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment (APJ) and to establish cut-off points.

METHODS

Vocal recordings of the sustained vowel and number counting tasks of 185 children were selected from a database and submitted to acoustic analysis with extraction of CPPS and AVQI measurements, and to APJ. The APJ was performed individually for each task, classified as normal or altered, and for the tasks together defining whether the child would pass or fail in a situation of vocal screening.

RESULTS

Children with altered APJ and who failed the screening had lower CPPS values and higher AVQI values, than those with normal APJ and who passed the screening. The APJ of the sustained vowel task was related to CPPS and AVQI, and APJ of the number counting task was related only to AVQI and CPPS numbers. The cut-off points that differentiate children with and without vocal deviation are 14.07 for the vowel CPPS, 7.62 for the CPPS numbers and 2.01 for the AVQI.

CONCLUSION

Children with altered voices, have higher AVQI values and lower CPPS values, when detected in children with voices within the normal range. The acoustic measurements were related to the auditory perceptual judgment of vocal quality in the sustained vowel task, however, the number counting task was related only to the AVQI and CPPS. The cut-off points that differentiate children with and without vocal deviation are 14.07 for the CPPS vowel, 7.62 for the CPPS numbers and 2.01 for the AVQI. The three measures were similar in identifying voices without deviation and dysphonic voices.

Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints

PURPOSE

To evaluate the immediate effect of the inspiratory exercise with a booster and a respiratory exerciser on the voice of women without vocal complaints.

METHODS

25 women with no vocal complaints, between 18 and 34 years old, with a score of 1 on the Vocal Disorder Screening Index (ITDV) participated. Data collection was performed before and after performing the inspiratory exercise and consisted of recording the sustained vowel /a/, connected speech and maximum phonatory times (MPT) of vowels, fricative phonemes and counting numbers. In the auditory-perceptual judgment, the Vocal Deviation Scale (VSD) was used to verify the general degree of vocal deviation. Acoustic evaluation was performed using the PRAAT software and the parameters fundamental frequency (f0), jitter, shimmer, harmonium-to-noise ratio (HNR), Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS), Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI). To measure the aerodynamic measurements, the time of each emission was extracted in the Audacity program. Data were statistically analyzed using the Statistica for Windows software and normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare the results, Student's and Wilcoxon's t tests were applied, adopting a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the results of the JPA and the acoustic measures, in the pre and post inspiratory exercise moments. As for the aerodynamic measures, it was possible to observe a significant increase in the value of the TMF /s/ (p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

There was no change in vocal quality after the inspiratory exercise with stimulator and respiratory exerciser, but an increase in the MPT of the phoneme /s/ was observed after the exercise.

Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments

OBJECTIVE

There are different parts of a battery of voice assessments to assess voice functions and voice quality. The objective assessment of voice quality using acoustics is recommended and two measurements such as the Acoustic Voice Quality index, 03.01 (AVQI) and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) are leading in this domain. The purpose of this study was to verify the validity between these two acoustic measurements and other dimensions of the voice assessments (the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the laryngeal imaging evaluation of the larynx and vocal folds).

METHODS

We used a retrospective database of 150 participants (37 vocally healthy participants and 113 dysphonic patients). To test the validity between the acoustic measurements and the other voice assessments the concurrent validity and diagnostic precision were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics with likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

The VHI-10 score presented moderate-significant correlations with the AVQI and the ABI, r= 0.477, P < 0.001 (r2= 0.228) and r= 0.426, P < 0.001 (r2=0.181), respectively. The larynx alteration presented low-significant correlations with the AVQI (r= 0.362, P < 0.001, r2= 0.131), and ABI (r= 0.371, P < 0.001, r2= 0.138), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was almost reasonable ranging from 0.701 to 0.737; except between ABI and VHI-10 (AUC= 0.689). The highest AUC was between the AVQI and VHI-10 at a threshold of 2.10; the highest specificity was between the ABI and VHI-10 at a threshold of 3.77. However, the lowest sensitivity was between ABI and VHI-10 while the lowest specificity was between the laryngeal diagnosis and the ABI.

CONCLUSION

AVQI and ABI presented significantly lower concurrent validity and diagnostic precision when the reference is not the auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality. However, AVQI seems to be for some validity aspects a more reasonable classifier of vocal handicap and laryngeal alteration than ABI. Both AVQI and ABI values can broaden their range of assessment for the clinical user, thus showing more relationships between the individual voice examination methods.

Resonant Voice: Perceptual and Acoustic Analysis After an Intensive Lessac Kinesensic Training Workshop

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether actors' and actresses' voices post an Intensive Lessac Kinesensic Training Workshop - ILKTW can be perceptually identified as more resonant, and to assess if the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), the Acoustic Breathing Index (ABI), and their acoustic measures are able to indicate the classified voices as more resonant.

METHODS

Eight vocally healthy English first-language actors and actresses, participants of the same ILKTW, were asked to sustain the vowel /a/ and to read a piece of the Rainbow Passage, pre and postworkshop, at a self-selected habitual frequency and intensity. The readings were divided into initial and final parts, both with 34 syllables, and combined with the vowel /a/ (3s). The pre and postworkshop recordings (pairs of the initial and final parts followed by the /a/ vowel) of each participant were randomly presented to a voice expert who rated the samples as more resonant or similar. The same samples were analyzed using the AVQI and ABI scripts.

RESULTS

87,5% of the initial parts and 100% of the final in postworkshop were rated by the voice expert as more resonant. Tilt was higher for the postworkshop initial parts (P = 0.036), but a correlation with the perceptual rating wasn't found. HNR was higher (P = 0.018) and jitter was lower (P = 0.017) for the postworkshop final parts. The statistical analysis comparing the perceptive and acoustic data for the final samples couldn't be applied.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the ILKTW has a positive impact on the development of a resonant voice and that the perceptual auditory rating was more effective to describe resonant voices than the AVQI, ABI, and its acoustic measures.

The Efficacy of the NHS Waterpipe in Superficial Hydration for People With Healthy Voices: Effects on Acoustic Voice Quality, Phonation Threshold Pressure and Subjective Sensations

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the efficacy of the NHS waterpipe as a superficial hydration treatment in voice production in healthy young women.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, single-blind, within- and between-subject experimental design.

METHODS

Thirty six female university students (mean age 24.6 years, range 19-45 years) were recruited to the study. Participants were randomized to two experimental groups (E1 and E2) and a control group. E1 underwent hydration treatment with the NHS waterpipe filled with 0.9% saline that was immersed in a cup of heated water. E2 underwent a similar treatment but without heated immersion. The control group received no treatment. Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI v03.01) and its subparameters, phonation threshold pressure, self-perceived phonatory effort and sensation of throat dryness was measured at three time points (before the intervention and immediately and 15 minutes after it).

RESULTS

The Tilt of the AVQI's subparameters increased significantly in the E1 (P = 0.027) and E2 groups (P = 0.027) after the intervention. Furthermore, the E1 group had significantly lower harmonics-to-noise-ratio values at the third measurement point compared to the E2 group (P = 0.023). These findings may result from fluid transported to the vocal fold level. The sensations of throat dryness decreased in the E1 (P = 0.001) and E2 groups (P < 0.0005) after the intervention. Perceived phonatory effort decreased statistically significantly at the final measurement point in the E1 (P = 0.002) and E2 (P = 0.031) groups. No variables changed in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The waterpipe seems to be efficient in hydrating vocal folds on single use. It seems to be more efficient when employed with a hot water bath, albeit slightly impairing some acoustic values in the short term. Without the heated fluid, it still seems to decrease sensations of throat dryness and affect acoustic voice quality. The waterpipe does not seem to have an effect on phonation threshold pressure, and it seems to lower self-perceived effort just as efficiently whether the waterpipe is employed using a hot water bath or not. Further research is needed to prove the efficacy of long-term usage and usage with voice patients.

What is the Effect of CPAP Treatment With Humidifier on Vocal Quality?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate vocal quality in patients with OSA before and after continuous use of CPAP with a humidifier using subjective patient perception and clinical assessment. The hypothesis was that CPAP treatment with a humidifier would benefit voice quality.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, sham-controlled, blinded clinical trial.

METHODS

Forty-three natal males with obstructive sleep apnea for whom CPAP treatment was recommended following polysomnography were randomized into two therapy groups: CPAP and Sham-CPAP. Participants completed questionnaires on voice use, a voice self-assessment with the ten-item vocal handicap index (VHI-10), and complementary questionnaires: the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), reflux symptoms index (LPRSI) and oral dryness visual analog scale (DRY). Their voices were recorded at three different times: before CPAP therapy, and after 3 and 6 months of continuous CPAP use. The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI), and an auditory-perceptual judgment (APJ) were also applied before and after the CPAP and Sham treatments.

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment, the CPAP group presented improvements in their sleep patterns; however, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in respect of the results of the voice-related questionnaires, the AVQI values, and the APJ of the voice quality. All of the participants had some degree of vocal deviation at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP therapy with a humidifier did not improve vocal quality as evaluated by the clinician or patient self-assessment. However, it did not have any significant negative effects on voice quality, so can be considered safe to use in male OSA patients.

Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) at pre- and post-voice therapy times.

METHODS

This is a before and after intervention study, with retrospective data collection. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 49.9 years participated in the study. The vocal therapy occurred between the years 2016 to 2019 in a teaching clinic, and the subjects had vocal samples collected before and after the therapeutic processes. CPPS and AVQI data extractions were performed during pre- and post-therapy. In order to characterize the sample, auditory-perceptual evaluation (APE) regarding the overall degree of vocal deviation at pre- and post-therapy moments was performed. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The APE data indicated a decrease in the median values of overall vocal deviation degree at the post-therapy stage for both the vowel (p=0.00) and number (p=0.00) samples. The average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pre-therapy and 16.37 post-therapy (p=0.01); for the number emission, it was 8.22 pre-therapy and 9.06 post-therapy (p=0.02), there was a difference in the CPPS of the vowel and numbers indicating vocal improvement at post-therapy. The average AVQI was 2.27 pre-therapy and 1.54 post-therapy (p=0.05). There was an improvement in the AVQI results, with borderline p-value.

CONCLUSION

Vocal therapy produced changes in the general degree of vocal deviation, as well as in CPPS and AVQI measurements, and the results at the post-therapy moment are similar to those of vocally healthy individuals.

Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) at pre- and post-voice therapy times.

METHODS

This is a before and after intervention study, with retrospective data collection. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 49.9 years participated in the study. The vocal therapy occurred between the years 2016 to 2019 in a teaching clinic, and the subjects had vocal samples collected before and after the therapeutic processes. CPPS and AVQI data extractions were performed during pre- and post-therapy. In order to characterize the sample, auditory-perceptual evaluation (APE) regarding the overall degree of vocal deviation at pre- and post-therapy moments was performed. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The APE data indicated a decrease in the median values of overall vocal deviation degree at the post-therapy stage for both the vowel (p=0.00) and number (p=0.00) samples. The average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pre-therapy and 16.37 post-therapy (p=0.01); for the number emission, it was 8.22 pre-therapy and 9.06 post-therapy (p=0.02), there was a difference in the CPPS of the vowel and numbers indicating vocal improvement at post-therapy. The average AVQI was 2.27 pre-therapy and 1.54 post-therapy (p=0.05). There was an improvement in the AVQI results, with borderline p-value.

CONCLUSION

Vocal therapy produced changes in the general degree of vocal deviation, as well as in CPPS and AVQI measurements, and the results at the post-therapy moment are similar to those of vocally healthy individuals.

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Persian Language

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to validate the acoustic voice quality index version 03.01 (AVQIv3) and the acoustic breathiness index (ABI) in the Persian language.

METHODS

Six judges assessed the severity degree of the abnormal overall voice quality (hoarseness) and breathiness from continuous speech (cs) and sustained vowel (sv) in 136 voices samples of dysphonic and 45 vocally healthy participants. Firstly, the time length of cs and sv was balanced out for a higher level of ecological validity. Secondly, the concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically analyzed with the Spearman rank-order correlation, and the receiver operating characteristics, likelihood ratio, and Youden index.

RESULTS

There was substantial inter-rater reliability between judges regarding hoarseness and breathiness. Twenty syllables were identified as the standardized number of syllables for the cs part. Sufficient correlations were found between AVQI and hoarseness (rs = 0.74), and between ABI and breathiness (rs = 0.74), respectively. The thresholds of 1.63 (sensitivity of 73.2% and specificity of 91%) and 2.97 (sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 87%) yielded the highest level of diagnostic findings for AVQI and ABI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AVQIv3 and ABI are reliable indices to quantify the abnormal overall voice quality and breathiness in the Persian language.

Videokymographic index of glottic function: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy

ABSTRACT Purpose To develop the Videokymographic Index of Glottic Function (VIGF), a composite indicator from digital videokymography parameters, captured by high-speed videolaryngoscopy exams of women with and without laryngeal alterations of behavioral etiology. Methods The sample consisted of 92 women aged between 18 and 45 years. Fifty-five (55) women with behavioral dysphonia, presenting with laryngeal and voice alterations, and thirty-seven (37) women without any laryngeal and voice alterations. Voice evaluation was performed by consensus via an auditory-perceptual analysis of the sustained vowel /a/ at a habitual pitch and loudness. Voice classification was obtained by means of a general degree of dysphonia, where G0 indicated neutral voice quality and G1 to G3 indicated altered voice quality. Laryngeal images were captured via digital videokymography analysis of a sustained vowel /i/ at a habitual pitch and loudness. The VIGF was based on the midpoint of the glottal region for analysis. Logistic regression was performed using the MINITAB 19 program. Results Logistic regression was composed of two stages: Stage 1 consisted of the analysis of all variables, where the maximum opening and closed quotient variables showed statistical significance (p-value <0.05) and the model was well adjusted according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p-value=0.794). Stage 2 consisted of the re-analysis of the selected variables, also showing a well-adjusted model (p-value=0.198). The VIGF was defined as follows: VIGF=e^(8.1318-0.2941AbMax-0.0703FechGlo)/1+e^(8.1318-0.2941AbMax-0.0703FechGlo). Conclusion The VIGF demonstrated a cut-off value equal to 0.71. The probability of success was 81.5%, sensitivity 76.4%, and specificity 89.2%.

Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment

During the XXVIII Brazilian Congress of SBFa, 24 specialists met and, from a leading position on scientific research as a tool for connecting laboratory and clinic, five fronts of knowledge of the voice specialty were discussed as following: Perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality; 2. Acoustic analysis of the vocal signal; 3. Voice self-assessment; 4. Traditional techniques of therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation (PBMT) in voice. Part "a" of this publication was associated with the consolidation of the analyses of the first three aspects. The trend in the perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality was related to the use of standard protocols. The acoustic evaluation of the vocal signal is accessible and can be done descriptively or by extraction of parameters, thus preferring multiparametric measures. Finally, the analysis of the individual himself closes this triad of voice documentation, which will be the basis for the conclusion of the evaluation, reference for monitoring progress, and evaluation of treatment results.

Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment

ABSTRACT During the XXVIII Brazilian Congress of SBFa, 24 specialists met and, from a leading position on scientific research as a tool for connecting laboratory and clinic, five fronts of knowledge of the voice specialty were discussed as following: Perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality; 2. Acoustic analysis of the vocal signal; 3. Voice self-assessment; 4. Traditional techniques of therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation (PBMT) in voice. Part “a” of this publication was associated with the consolidation of the analyses of the first three aspects. The trend in the perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality was related to the use of standard protocols. The acoustic evaluation of the vocal signal is accessible and can be done descriptively or by extraction of parameters, thus preferring multiparametric measures. Finally, the analysis of the individual himself closes this triad of voice documentation, which will be the basis for the conclusion of the evaluation, reference for monitoring progress, and evaluation of treatment results.

[Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language]

THE AIM

Of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in Russian language and determine threshold values to differentiate normal and dysphonic voices in russophone population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

41 recordings of patients with laryngeal hemiplegia and hemiparesis appeared after thyroid carcinomas' surgical treatment and laryngeal cancer from the Tomsk Cancer Research Institute were used, as well as 10 new recordings of normophonic people, composing a control group. Voice samples included the first quatrain of the poem «Sail» written by M.Yu. Lermontov, and sustained vowel «a». Four specialists who work with voice disorders (three speech-language pathologists and one phoniatrist) rated degree of dysphonia for all voice sample. Moreover, the AVQI was calculated for each sample.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant correlation between auditory-perceptual assessment and the AVQI (r=0.74), this confirms that AVQI is effective in evaluating voice disorders. The group of people with normal voice had relatively low values of AVQI, whereas the group of patients with laryngeal diseases had relatively high values. Analysis of ROC-curve showed that AVQI has excellent diagnostic accuracy to differentiate normal and dysphonic voices (AUC=0.966).

CONCLUSIONS

The AVQI is the excellent tool for objective assessment of voice disorders in the Russian population/.

Videokymographic index of glottic function: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy

PURPOSE

To develop the Videokymographic Index of Glottic Function (VIGF), a composite indicator from digital videokymography parameters, captured by high-speed videolaryngoscopy exams of women with and without laryngeal alterations of behavioral etiology.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 92 women aged between 18 and 45 years. Fifty-five (55) women with behavioral dysphonia, presenting with laryngeal and voice alterations, and thirty-seven (37) women without any laryngeal and voice alterations. Voice evaluation was performed by consensus via an auditory-perceptual analysis of the sustained vowel /a/ at a habitual pitch and loudness. Voice classification was obtained by means of a general degree of dysphonia, where G0 indicated neutral voice quality and G1 to G3 indicated altered voice quality. Laryngeal images were captured via digital videokymography analysis of a sustained vowel /i/ at a habitual pitch and loudness. The VIGF was based on the midpoint of the glottal region for analysis. Logistic regression was performed using the MINITAB 19 program.

RESULTS

Logistic regression was composed of two stages: Stage 1 consisted of the analysis of all variables, where the maximum opening and closed quotient variables showed statistical significance (p-value <0.05) and the model was well adjusted according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p-value=0.794). Stage 2 consisted of the re-analysis of the selected variables, also showing a well-adjusted model (p-value=0.198). The VIGF was defined as follows: VIGF=e^(8.1318-0.2941AbMax-0.0703FechGlo)/1+e^(8.1318-0.2941AbMax-0.0703FechGlo).

CONCLUSION

The VIGF demonstrated a cut-off value equal to 0.71. The probability of success was 81.5%, sensitivity 76.4%, and specificity 89.2%.

The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to verify the influence of different cultural backgrounds and languages on the perception of voice quality. Another aim was to evaluate the correlation between clinical auditory-perceptual judgments with acoustic measurements, such as the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) and the acoustic breathiness index (ABI), i.e., their effect on the concurrent validity.

METHODS

Brazilian and European participants rated 2 culturally and linguistically different datasets (i.e., 150 Brazilian Portuguese and 218 German voice sample sets), with each dataset containing concatenated voice samples of continuous speech and sustained phonation. The raters evaluated the vocal quality in terms of the overall voice quality and breathiness. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were also tested. The psychometric qualities of the AVQI and the ABI (concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy) were analyzed, considering the perceptual ratings of Brazilian and European participants for each dataset.

RESULTS

Rater reliability decreased for nonnative participants when evaluating the nonnative dataset. Brazilian raters perceived the German voices as more severe, whereas German raters considered the overall voice quality of Brazilian voices as less severe than native raters. The concurrent validity of the AVQI and the ABI, i.e., the agreement with the auditory-perceptual evaluations, was high irrespectively of the group of participants. The diagnostic accuracy, which refers to the ability to identify a deviated voice, was higher, considering the perceptual evaluations of native listeners.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian raters classified voice quality as more deviated, and the Brazilian voice samples were measured to be less severe (a possible language characteristic). Further studies are necessary to verify whether there was a task or sample consequence or if adjustments to the AVQI and ABI equations are required for Brazilian Portuguese.

Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Its Isolated Acoustic Measures to Discriminate the Severity of Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and its isolated acoustic measures accuracy in discriminating voices with different degrees of deviation.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-eight voice samples (160 dysphonic; 98 vocally healthy). Information regarding acoustic analysis and overall degree of deviation (G) were considered. The acoustic analysis consisted of the AVQI total score and its isolated acoustic measures: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs); harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR); shimmer local and dB (Shim, ShdB); the general slope of the spectrum (Slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (Tilt). The auditory-perceptual judgment was the median G score of five voice specialists (Cohen's = 0.605-0.773; Fleiss = 0.370). Quadratic discriminant analysis and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of performance measures were used to investigate the discriminatory power of these measures.

RESULTS

AVQI presented acceptable accuracy to differentiate voices with no vocal deviation and with vocal deviation (73.9%) and among the degrees of deviation (mild vs. moderate = 70.49%; mild vs. moderate = 71.39%; moderate vs. severe = 87.5%). No isolated acoustic measurement was consistent with differentiating voice quality among all degrees of deviation. A combination of five acoustic measures (CPPs, HNR, ShdB, Slope, Tilt) had the highest accuracy to differentiate between healthy and deviated voice (75.55%). Shimmer was more accurate to discriminate between voices with mild, moderate, and severe deviation; almost all isolated acoustic measurements were accurate to discriminate voices with moderate and severe deviation. The combination of acoustic measures presented higher accuracy (mild vs. moderate = 70.21%-74.29%; mild vs. moderate = 71.53%-76.11%; moderate vs. severe = 86%-95.50%).

CONCLUSION

AVQI is an accepted tool to discriminate among different degrees of vocal deviation, and more accurate between voices with moderate and severe deviations. Isolated acoustic measures perform better when discriminating voices with a higher degree of deviation. A combination of acoustic parameters, with the same weight, is more accurate to discriminate different degrees of deviation, however, not consistent.

Influence of the Voice Sample Length in Perceptual and Acoustic Voice Quality Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the variations that different voice sample length (VSL) has on the perceived degree of voice quality deviation and on the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) accuracy.

METHODS

Voices of 71 subjects (53 dysphonic; 18 vocally health) were recorded: numbers 1-20 (42 syllables) + vowel/a/. Three different VSL were edited: VSL_long, 1-20 + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_cust, customized length, were voiced-segments of the continuous speech had the same length of the vowel (mean = 18.73 syllables corresponding to 3 seconds of only-voiced segments) + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_short, 1-10 (15 syllables) + 3 seconds vowel/a/. Three voice specialists perceptually judged the overall voice quality (G); 3 sessions were performed to evaluate each VSL variant. AVQI's precision and Spearman correlation were assessed.

RESULTS

The intra-rater reliability was "almost perfect" (kappa >0.826) for all evaluators in VSL_short; "substantial" (0.684) and "almost perfect" (0.897) in VSL_cust and "fair" (0.447) to "almost perfect" (1.000) in VSL_long. The inter-rater reliability was "moderate" (0.554) for VSL_long, "substantial" (0.622 and 0.618) for VSL_cust and VSL_short. The Gmean and AVQI_mean were perceived as more severe for longer samples and less severe for shorter samples. Considering the AVQI, VSL_short (r = 0.665) presented the higher correlation. VSL_cust presented the best area under the ROC curve (0.821). VSL_long and VSL_cust specificity was 100%, VSL_short specificity was 75%; higher sensitivity was observed for VSL_short (74%).

CONCLUSION

The voice quality outcomes changes for different VSLs. Longer VSLs seem to be perceived as more deviated, shorter VSLs seem to be more reliable and have better correlation with the acoustic analysis. The AVQI best accuracy was found at a customized length. Thus, to increase the voice analysis reliability, standardized procedure must be followed, including a precise speech material control allowing comparison among clinics and voice-centers.