1
|
Crosetti E, Fantini M, Bertotto I, Bertolin A, Arrigoni G, Lorenzi A, Succo G. Current Status of Partial Laryngeal Surgery for Advanced Laryngeal Cancer: When and Why? Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:614-624. [PMID: 38647994 PMCID: PMC11168980 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01516-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper aims to evaluate the evolution and current status of partial laryngeal surgery in the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer (LC). Specifically, recent progress in the selection of both patients and tumors, together with surgical and rehabilitation innovations, have contributed to balancing oncological control with the maintenance of quality of life in naïve and radiorecurrent patients. The main aspect is represented by the recognized role of open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) in this new era of laryngeal cancer treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advancements highlight OPHLs' efficacy for conservative management of intermediate to advanced stages of LC. Innovations such as supratracheal partial laryngectomy have expanded surgical options, offering a modular approach to complex cases. Improved understanding of tumor biology, enhanced imaging techniques, and more precise preoperative planning have led to better patient outcomes, emphasizing the importance of a conservative function-preserving surgical treatment. These advancements reflect a broader trend towards individualized treatment plans that prioritize both survival and quality of life. OPHLs play an important role in current management of intermediate/advanced LC, effectively balancing oncological control with the preservation of laryngeal functions. Critical factors include meticulous patient and tumor selection, the impact of surgical and technological refinements on functional outcomes, and the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment planning. Current evidence justifies the use of these interventions in many intermediate T-stage laryngeal tumors, even at risk of upstaging on pathological examination. The oncological results, the preservation of laryngeal function and the laryngectomy-free survival achieved with OPHLs appear to be highly competitive with those of non surgical organ-preservation protocols, aiming to introduce a new standard in the LC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Crosetti
- ENT Clinic - Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Fantini
- ENT Clinic - Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bertotto
- Radiology Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Andy Bertolin
- ENT Department, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Giulia Arrigoni
- ENT Clinic - Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Lorenzi
- ENT Clinic - Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Succo
- ENT Clinic - Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M, Constantini AC, Eckley C, Englert M, Gama ACC, Gielow I, Guimarães B, Lima LR, Lopes L, Madazio G, Moreti F, Mouffron V, Nemr K, Oliveira P, Padovani M, Ribeiro VV, Silverio K, Vaiano T, Yamasaki R. Reducing the gap between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part B: traditional vocal therapy techniques and modern electrostimulation and photobiomodulation techniques applied to vocal rehabilitation. Codas 2022; 34:e20210241. [PMID: 36000681 PMCID: PMC9886189 DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241pt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This text is the continuation of the XVIII SBFa Congress publication. In part "A" we presented the analyses on clinical vocal evaluation. Part "B" focuses on vocal rehabilitation: 4. Traditional techniques of vocal therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation applied to vocal rehabilitation. The numerous studies on the various programs, methods, and techniques of traditional rehabilitation techniques, and many with high quality of evidence, allow us to consider such procedures relatively well described, safe, and with known effects, accounting for the treatment of various vocal disorders. The scientific evidence with traditional techniques is recognized worldwide. New fronts of evolution, with electrostimulation or photobiomodulation used to handle voice problems, seem to be promising as coadjutant approaches. There are more studies on electrostimulation in vocal rehabilitation than with photobiomodulation; however, scientific evidence for these two modern techniques is still limited. Knowledge and caution are required for the application of either technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Behlau
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Anna Alice Almeida
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Universidade Federal da Paraíba – UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.
| | - Geová Amorim
- Universidade Federal de Alagoas – UFAL - Maceió (AL), Brasil.
| | - Patrícia Balata
- Apta Comunicação, Recife (PE), Brasil.,Universidade Federal de Pernambuco – UFPE - Recife (PE), Brasil.
| | - Sávio Bastos
- Centro de Fotobiomodulação e Saúde – CFOTOBIOS - Belém (PA), Brasil.
| | - Mauriceia Cassol
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre – UFCSPA - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
| | | | - Claudia Eckley
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo – FCMSCSP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Marina Englert
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | | | - Ingrid Gielow
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Bruno Guimarães
- Clínica Bruno Guimarães Serviços de Fonoaudiologia e Fisioterapia, Fortaleza (CE), Brasil.
| | | | - Leonardo Lopes
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Universidade Federal da Paraíba – UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.
| | | | - Felipe Moreti
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Centro Universitário da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC – FMABC - Santo André (SP), Brasil.,Complexo Hospitalar Municipal de São Bernardo do Campo – CHMSBC - São Bernardo do Campo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Vanessa Mouffron
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
| | - Katia Nemr
- Universidade de São Paulo – USP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | | | - Marina Padovani
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo – FCMSCSP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Vanessa Veis Ribeiro
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Universidade Federal da Paraíba – UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.
| | - Kelly Silverio
- Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo – USP - Bauru (SP), Brasil.
| | - Thays Vaiano
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Rosiane Yamasaki
- Centro de Estudos da Voz – CEV - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M, Constantini AC, Eckley C, Englert M, Gama ACC, Gielow I, Guimarães B, Lima LR, Lopes L, Madazio G, Moreti F, Mouffron V, Nemr K, Oliveira P, Padovani M, Ribeiro VV, Silverio K, Vaiano T, Yamasaki R. Reducing the gap between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part B: traditional vocal therapy techniques and modern electrostimulation and photobiomodulation techniques applied to vocal rehabilitation. Codas 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT This text is the continuation of the XVIII SBFa Congress publication. In part “A” we presented the analyses on clinical vocal evaluation. Part “B” focuses on vocal rehabilitation: 4. Traditional techniques of vocal therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation applied to vocal rehabilitation. The numerous studies on the various programs, methods, and techniques of traditional rehabilitation techniques, and many with high quality of evidence, allow us to consider such procedures relatively well described, safe, and with known effects, accounting for the treatment of various vocal disorders. The scientific evidence with traditional techniques is recognized worldwide. New fronts of evolution, with electrostimulation or photobiomodulation used to handle voice problems, seem to be promising as coadjutant approaches. There are more studies on electrostimulation in vocal rehabilitation than with photobiomodulation; however, scientific evidence for these two modern techniques is still limited. Knowledge and caution are required for the application of either technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Behlau
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Anna Alice Almeida
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brasil
| | | | - Patrícia Balata
- Apta Comunicação, Brasil; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brasil
| | | | - Mauriceia Cassol
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brasil
| | | | - Claudia Eckley
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Bruno Guimarães
- Clínica Bruno Guimarães Serviços de Fonoaudiologia e Fisioterapia, Brasil
| | | | - Leonardo Lopes
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brasil
| | | | - Felipe Moreti
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Centro Universitário da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Brasil; Complexo Hospitalar Municipal de São Bernardo do Campo, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Marina Padovani
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Rosiane Yamasaki
- Centro de Estudos da Voz, Brasil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fantini M, Crosetti E, Affaniti R, Sprio AE, Bertotto I, Succo G. Preoperative prognostic factors for functional and clinical outcomes after open partial horizontal laryngectomies. Head Neck 2021; 43:3459-3467. [PMID: 34405480 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In minority of cases, the clinical recovery of the neolarynx after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) can be challenging, possibly affecting the final functional outcome. METHODS One hundred and twenty-three patients who underwent OPHLs were selected. A series of clinical preoperative independent variables were considered. All patients were monitored for the following dependent outcome variables: sequelae; need for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy positioning; days before tracheal cannula removal and nasogastric tube removal; and length of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant associations between preoperative clinical variables and outcomes variables. RESULTS Multivariate analysis confirmed age, cT classification, body mass index, and smoking habits as significant prognostic factors for worse functional and clinical recovery outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Knowing what variables are significantly associated with worse clinical and functional outcomes can guide clinicians in defining the best surgical choice not only from an oncological perspective, but also for a better postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Fantini
- Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Erika Crosetti
- Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Riccardo Affaniti
- Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Andrea Elio Sprio
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Department of Research, ASOMI College of Sciences, Marsa, Malta
| | - Ilaria Bertotto
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Succo
- Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy.,Oncology Department, University of Turin, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| |
Collapse
|