The Efficacy of the NHS Waterpipe in Superficial Hydration for People With Healthy Voices: Effects on Acoustic Voice Quality, Phonation Threshold Pressure and Subjective Sensations

A Multiparametric Acoustic and Self-Perceptual Measure of Laryngeal Hydrations in Speech-Language Pathologists: A Preliminary Longitudinal Investigation

PURPOSE

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) work with individuals with communication disorders. Their work can strain their voice, resulting in dysphonia, adversely affecting their career and quality of life. Laryngeal hydration can prevent vocal damage and improve vocal performance in SLPs. However, there is limited research on the effects of laryngeal hydration in SLPs using longitudinal studies. Hence, the present study aims to assess the longitudinal impact of laryngeal hydration in SLPs using multiparametric acoustic and self-perceptual measures.

METHOD

The research method lasted for 6 consecutive days, with each day lasting 2-3 hours for each participant. Ten SLPs, aged 18-30 years, were recruited. On alternate days, laryngeal hydration treatment (systemic, surface, and combined hydration) was given while participants performed vocal loading tasks. Prerecording and postrecording of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and its consistent parameters (smoothed cepstral peak prominence [CPPs], harmonics-to-noise ratio [HNR], shimmer%, shimmer local, long-term average spectrum [LTAS] slope, and LTAS tilt) and self-perceptual measures (perceived phonatory effort [PPE], perceived vocal tiredness [PVT]) were taken. Kruskal-Wallis test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to assess vocal changes in SLPs with laryngeal hydration.

RESULTS

No significant differences in overall AVQI scores were found between pretests and posttests for all types of laryngeal hydration treatment. However, there was a significant increase in CPPs and the LTAS slope for combined hydration and a decrease in HNR with an increase in shimmer local for systemic hydration in the posttest compared with the pretest. Only systemic hydration in the posttest showed a rise in PPE and PVT compared with the pretest, compared with surface and combined hydration.

CONCLUSION

Voice outcome measures of the present study demonstrated the immediate beneficial effects of surface hydration and combined hydration in SLPs by preserving voice quality during vocal loading. Systemic hydration had less of an immediate impact on voice quality. This study suggests empirical evidence for laryngeal hydration, which can enhance vocal performance and preserve voice quality in SLPs.

The Effects of Hard Voice Onset on Objective Voice Function in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) causes laryngopharyngeal hypersensitivity and laryngeal muscle hyperfunction, which may result in hard voice onset in patients with LPR. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of hard voice onset in patients with LPR and the effects of hard voice onset on objective voice function in patients with LPR.

METHODS

Forty patients with confirmed LPR were enrolled in the LPR group, and 40 healthy subjects were enrolled in the non-LPR group. Subjects underwent laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy, and the presence or absence of hard voice onset in each subject was determined by two experienced laryngologists based on whether glottal closure was complete or incomplete before vocal fold vibration. Based on the results, the subjects with LPR were divided into a hard voice onset group and a non-hard voice onset group. The voice onset time (VOT) was measured and compared between the hard and non-hard voice onset groups within the LPR group. Laryngeal aerodynamic assessment was also carried out on the LPR group, and subglottal pressure, phonation threshold pressure (PTP), glottal resistance, and mean flow rate were measured. The voice acoustic signals of subjects were additionally analyzed in the LPR group, and the fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and noise-harmony ratio were determined. The kappa statistic, chi-square test and independent-samples t test in SPSS were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The two laryngologists had substantial inter-rater consistency on the evaluation of hard voice onset and non-hard voice onset, with a kappa statistic of 0.71. In the LPR group, 42.5% of patients had hard voice onset (17/40), significantly more than in the non-LPR group (8/40, 20%) (P < 0.05). The VOT in the LPR group was significantly longer than in the non-LPR group (P < 0.05). Within the LPR group, the VOT, PTP and shimmer were significantly greater in the hard voice onset group than in the non-hard voice onset group (all P < 0.05). The other laryngeal aerodynamic parameters and acoustic parameters were not significantly different between the hard voice onset group and the non-hard voice onset group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Changes in vocal production may occur in LPR patients, causing them to be more susceptible to hard voice onset. The patients with hard voice onset require longer VOT and greater PTP to initiate phonation.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in the Measurement of Voice Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multiparametric construct of voice quality recognized for its clinical and research applications around the globe. This study aimed to review the validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQI (v02&03) and determine the effects of age and gender.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered with the PROSPERO registry. The authors searched two databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library database) for relevant studies. Studies selected for the systematic review were grouped based on study objectives. To determine the quality of the selected studies, the authors utilized the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven studies on AVQIv02 revealed a diagnostic threshold ranging from 2.72 to 3.33 for AVQIv02. In comparison, eight studies investigating AVQIv03 suggested a diagnostic threshold ranging from 1.33 to 3.15 for AVQIv03. Altogether, these studies demonstrated a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.92 for AVQIv02 and 0.82 and 0.92 for AVQIv03. The Area under the Curve was slightly better for AVQIv03 (0.94) than AVQIv02 (0.92). Three studies investigating the effect of age and gender on AVQI had a consensus that AVQI is independent of gender. However, findings were contradictory about the impact of age on AVQI.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQI is found to be a valid tool for the assessment of voice quality. AVQIv03 is slightly better than AVQIv02 in its diagnostic accuracy. AVQI is independent of gender. Because of the contradictory evidence, additional research on the effects of age on AVQI is necessary.

Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Voice Outcome Indices in the Treatment of Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index

INTRODUCTION

The Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) are the two widely used multiparameter acoustic instrumented indices that estimate dysphonia severity and track treatment outcomes. This study compared the performance of these two indices in identifying voice quality changes with eclectic voice therapy in individuals with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HFVD).

METHOD

Twenty individuals with HFVD including eight males and 13 females in the age range of 20-55 years received an eclectic voice therapy program named the Comprehensive Voice Habilitation Program. All the participants attended 15 sessions of voice therapy. DSI and AVQI measures were obtained at the baseline, immediate post therapy, 15 days post therapy (follow-up 1), and 60 days post therapy (follow-up 2). Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to verify whether there were any differences between the time points for dependent variables DSI and AVQI. The effect sizes obtained for the DSI and AVQI measures were also noted.

RESULTS

A significant difference was obtained between the baseline and post therapy, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2 for AVQI measure with a very large effect size, ηp2 = 0.451. In contrast, DSI showed a significant difference only between the baseline and follow-up 1 with effect size, ηp2 = 0.187.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirmed that both DSI and AVQI were effective in tracking the changes in the severity of dysphonia. However, when compared, AVQI appeared to be more sensitive than DSI in potentially reflecting the effect of eclectic voice therapy in HFVD.

Eclectic Voice Therapy Program in Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Evidence from Multidimensional Vocal Profiling

PURPOSE

Hyperfunctional voice disorder (HFVD) is a disorder of multifactorial origin. It can be speculated that an eclectic voice therapy program that uses combinatory approaches could bring about better efficiency of voice in these individuals. Nevertheless, very less attempts have been made to examine the efficacy of eclectic voice therapy using multidimensional voice outcome measures in the treatment of HFVD.

METHOD

Ten individuals with HFVD in the age range of 20-55years attended Comprehensive Voice Habilitation Program (CVHP), an eclectic voice therapy approach for 15 sessions spread across 3weeks. A stroboscopy examination was performed at the baseline and post-therapy to track the changes in laryngeal functions. Further, perceptual voice analysis, Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), and Voice Handicap Index in Kannada (VHI-K) were obtained at the baseline, post-therapy, and two follow-ups to report the therapy outcomes. Related samples Friedman's Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test were used to note the pre-post and follow-up changes in voice outcomes.

RESULTS

Stroboscopy findings revealed significant improvement in movement patterns of the vocal folds and a reduction in ventricular hyperadduction. Perceptual ratings and AVQI scores decreased in post-therapy and follow-up evaluations indicating a decrease in dysphonia severity over time. In addition, a significant decrease in VHI-K scores indicated the alleviation of self-perceived disability/handicap.

CONCLUSION

The current study provided preliminary evidence to support the efficacy of eclectic voice therapy in HFVD by documenting significant changes in the voice-related outcome measures.