Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: A potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques

Complication rate with the 1940-nm versus 1470-nm wavelength laser

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized, that endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with the highly water specific 1940-nm wavelength laser would reduce ablation-related thrombus extension (ARTE) incidence compared to the less specific 1470-nm laser.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2017 to March 2023 we identified a consecutive series of patients undergoing EVLA from the prospectively ongoing VEINOVA registry. Patients were treated with the 1940-nm or 1470-nm laser. Demographic data and outcome data were used for this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 3055 EVLA, 2006 procedures were performed with the1470-nm and 1049 with the 1940-nm laser. At 2-6 days follow- up visit (follow up visit 1), all ARTE occurred in 18 (0.9%) of all procedures with the 1470-nm and in 1 (0.1%) with the 1940-nm laser (p = 0.023). DVT was similar in both groups (0.3% vs 0.2%, p = 0.784). Phlebitis occurred in 67 (3.3%) of all procedures with the 1470-nm and in 2 (0.2%; p = 0.003) with the 1940-nm laser and paresthesia in 99 (4.9%) versus 5 (0.5%; p < 0.001), respectively. At 5-6 weeks follow-up (follow up visit 2), all ARTE occurred in 27 (1.4%) of all procedures with the 1470-nm and in 4 (0.4%; p = 0.010) with the 1940-nm laser. DVT was similar in both groups (0.7% vs 0.4%; p = 0.846). Phlebitis occurred in 97 (4.8%) of all procedures with the 1470-nm and in 9 (0.9%; p < 0.001) with the 1940-nm laser and paresthesia in 194 (9.7%) versus 35 (3.3%; p < 0.001), respectively. Occlusion rate was in both groups similar (99.8% vs 99.6%).

CONCLUSION

EVLA using the 1940-nm laser appears to be safe with lower ARTE incidence than using the 1470-nm laser. Phlebitis and paresthesia occurred less frequent with the 1940-nm than with the 1470-nm laser, thus favoring the use of the 1940-nm laser.

Deep vein thrombosis after sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins - an observational study

Background: The risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after endovenous ablation of varicose veins varies in the literature. Little is known about the characteristics of this complication and associated factors. This study aimed: 1) to study the occurrence of DVT after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) alone or combined with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for lower-limb varicose veins; 2) to identify factors associated with DVT. Patients and methods: The study included all outpatients aged 18 years or older who underwent UGFS and EVLA or UGFS alone at the University Hospital of Zurich between 2011 and 2015. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical record. Patients were surveyed about their level of pain after the procedure and their level of satisfaction with the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was used to assess the deep venous system 7-10 days and 6-8 months after the procedure. Regression analysis was used to examine the association of patient and procedure characteristics with the development of DVT. Results: A total of 334 patients (561 procedures performed in 393 different sessions) were included: 73% of the patients underwent combined UGFS and EVLA and 27% underwent UGFS alone. DVT occurred in 24 (7.2%) patients, of whom 88% underwent combined procedures and 17% underwent interventions involving both the great and small saphenous veins on the same session. DVT occurred in 8.2% of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis and in 9.5% of patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis. DVT occurred in 5.2% of women and 11.9% of men. No factors associated with a diagnosis of DVT after intervention were identified. Pain and satisfaction levels did not differ between patients with and without DVT. Conclusions: This study adds to the knowledge of the risk of DVT following UGFS alone or combined with EVLA. Further studies are needed to revise thromboprophylaxis.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures

OBJECTIVE

Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score.

RESULTS

A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

Outcomes of a Single-center Experience In Eliminating Routine Postoperative Duplex Ultrasound Following Endovenous Ablation

OBJECTIVES

The current guidelines recommend routine postoperative screening duplex ultrasound (DUS) after endovenous ablation (EVA). This is a grade 2C recommendation and several contemporary reports have called for revision of this recommendation as there is insufficient evidence to support universal screening DUS after EVA. There are currently no studies that evaluate outcomes among EVA patients who did not have screening DUS. The aim of our study is to present outcomes from our single-center experience among patients who did not have DUS routinely performed after EVA.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients undergoing EVA of the great saphenous vein at our institution between September 30, 2021 and March 15, 2022. At 30 days post procedure, electronic medical records were queried to identify patients who may have presented for evaluation of VTE symptoms.

RESULTS

Over the study period, a total of 80 lower extremity EVA procedures (71 EVLT, 9 RFA) were performed among 76 patients. Postoperative DUS was performed on 24 patients of which none were identified as having EHIT. Of the 54 patients who did not have DUS, a 30-day post procedure chart review revealed that none of these patients were seen for symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We estimate total cost savings of $14,289 by eliminating routine DUS without impact to clinical outcomes following EVA.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative DUS assessment after EVA comes with associated healthcare cost and has low yield given the incidence of clinically significant EHIT (3 and 4) is rare. In our experience, eliminating routine DUS had no impact on clinical outcomes, improved vascular lab access, and had a positive financial impact in our organization. Limiting DUS screening to EVA patients who exhibit symptoms of VTE can be a cost-effective approach that limits unnecessary imaging, time, and resources with no potential change in clinical outcomes based on our data. Further research is required and a randomized controlled trial would be ideal to answer this question.

Radiofrequency Ablation and Concomitant Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Varicose Veins (VV): Perspectives from a Developing Country

Objectives/Background: With decreased patient downtime and reduction in health expenditures, endovascular treatments have become popular for the treatment of venous insufficiency. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and sclerotherapy for refluxing veins and incompetent perforators in a developing country.

Materials and Methods: Subjects were selected from an ongoing registry from October 15, 2015 to April 5, 2018. Patients were followed up until 6 months. Pre- and post-procedural Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic (CEAP) scores were compared, and complications were documented and treated accordingly.

Results: In total, 102 limbs (n=97) with 76 great saphenous veins (GSVs) and 26 small saphenous veins (SSVs) underwent RFA, with 79% undergoing concomitant sclerotherapy. Mean follow-up time was 188 days (±33.16). Moreover, 59% were males and 41% females. At the end of follow-up, 99% of the legs had complete occlusion. Pre- and post-procedural CEAP scores were 4.21±1.5 and 3.36±1.7, respectively (p-value <0.001). Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) types 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found in 8.8%, 3.9%, 1.9%, and 0% of the legs, respectively. Most common complications were pain and tenderness (51%), bruising (18%), and paresthesia (7%).

Conclusion: RFA and sclerotherapy have proved to be safe and efficacious. Computed tomography (CT) venous mapping aids in delineating complex venous anatomy and in ruling out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in cases with discrepancy on Doppler ultrasound. Strict compliance of procedural and post-procedural protocol can assure promising results and futuristic value.

Endothermal Heat Induced Thrombosis

Endothermal heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) is a post-procedural entity following endothermal superficial venous ablation that refers to the propagation of thrombus into the adjacent deep vein lumen. It is identified most commonly during the post-procedural surveillance venous duplex ultrasound. EHIT is recognized as a unique post-procedural entity, distinct in clinical behavior from a deep vein thrombosis. The definition, classification systems, pathophysiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention are all discussed. The understanding of EHIT has advanced considerably, but additional data are required to understand its impact on quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of surveillance.

Current status of endothermal heat induced thrombosis

BACKGROUND

There remain many questions regarding the pathophysiology and risk factors for endothermal heat induced thrombosis formation. Moreover, there are a paucity of data on the timing of its occurrence, and there has been no consensus regarding for its treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment strategies for endothermal heat induced thrombosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched from 2001 to present for endothermal heat induced thrombosis, EHIT, deep vein thrombosis, chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation (treatment). All relevant articles identified by the authors mentioning endothermal heat induced thrombosis were included in this review.

RESULTS

A multitude of risk factors, several pathophysiological hypotheses and different treatment strategies are described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothermal heat induced thrombosis is marginally understood. There remains a theoretical risk for significant venous thromboembolic complications. With the new uniform classification of EHIT (American Venous Forum), healthcare providers should continue to investigate the nature of this event.

Thrombotic complications of superficial endovenous ablation: a contemporary review of thermal and non-thermal techniques

Endovenous ablation has become the preferred means to treat superficial venous insufficiency. Ablative technologies have evolved to include a variety of both thermal and nonthermal techniques. The reported thrombotic complications of endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) associated with thermal techniques are low (<2% overall). However, the limited data on newer non-thermal technologies suggest these modalities may have thrombotic complication rates upwards of 6%. Additionally, the pathophysiology of thrombotic events related to mechanochemical ablative techniques may differ from EHIT, and thus, may have different implications for management. Described is a case report of a stroke after cyanoacrylate ablation of the great saphenous vein, and a review of the current literature reporting the thrombotic complications associated with current thermal and non-thermal techniques. There exists a need for high volume studies on newer ablative techniques to fully understand their associated thrombotic complications. This review highlights the need for a comprehensive classification system and standard treatment algorithm encompassing of thrombotic complications associated with both thermal and non-thermal ablative techniques.

Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations

Thermal ablation of saphenous vein varicosis has developed into a standard procedure for treatment of varicose veins. The clinical success of the endovenous thermal procedure is comparable to high ligation and stripping operations and a significant difference between these groups could not be detected in long-term analyses. The only difference is in the genesis of saphenofemoral recurrence detected by duplex ultrasound: neoangiogenesis occurs after high ligation and stripping operation and after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein a recurrence occurs predominantly via a residual anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV). Reduction of costs by an increase in endovenous procedures carried out in an outpatient setting in comparison to stripping operations, which are still frequently carried out in Germany (in comparison to other countries) as an inpatient procedure, have meanwhile been confirmed. An endovenous crossectomy (i.e., high ligation) should be strived for. Nonthermal endoluminal catheter procedures are predominantly reserved for treatment of the short saphenous vein.

Classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis: Recommendations from the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery

The American Venous Forum (AVF) and the Society for Vascular Surgery set forth these guidelines for the management of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). The guidelines serve to compile the body of literature on EHIT and to put forth evidence-based recommendations. The guidelines are divided into the following categories: classification of EHIT, risk factors and prevention, and treatment of EHIT. One major feature is to standardize the reporting under one classification system. The Kabnick and Lawrence classification systems are now combined into the AVF EHIT classification system. The novel classification system affords standardization in reporting but also allows continued combined evaluation with the current body of literature. Recommendations codify the use of duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of EHIT. Risk factor assessments and methods of prevention including mechanical prophylaxis, chemical prophylaxis, and ablation distance are discussed. Treatment guidelines are tailored to the AVF EHIT class (ie, I, II, III, IV). Reference is made to the use of surveillance, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulants as deemed indicated, and the recommendations incorporate the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants. Last, EHIT management as it relates to the great and small saphenous veins is discussed.

Classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis: Recommendations from the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery This Practice Guidelines document has been co-published in Phlebology [DOI: 10.1177/0268355520953759] and Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.008]. The publications are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. The contribution has been published under a Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

The American Venous Forum (AVF) and the Society for Vascular Surgery set forth these guidelines for the management of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). The guidelines serve to compile the body of literature on EHIT and to put forth evidence-based recommendations. The guidelines are divided into the following categories: classification of EHIT, risk factors and prevention, and treatment of EHIT.

One major feature is to standardize the reporting under one classification system. The Kabnick and Lawrence classification systems are now combined into the AVF EHIT classification system. The novel classification system affords standardization in reporting but also allows continued combined evaluation with the current body of literature. Recommendations codify the use of duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of EHIT. Risk factor assessments and methods of prevention including mechanical prophylaxis, chemical prophylaxis, and ablation distance are discussed.

Treatment guidelines are tailored to the AVF EHIT class (ie, I, II, III, IV). Reference is made to the use of surveillance, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulants as deemed indicated, and the recommendations incorporate the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants. Last, EHIT management as it relates to the great and small saphenous veins is discussed.

Endovenous laser ablation: A comprehensive review

OBJECTIVE

To provide an evidence-based overview of endovenous laser ablation and describe its role as an effective and durable technique for the management of superficial venous insufficiency.

METHODS

The published literature on the treatment of varicose veins using endovenous laser ablation was reviewed. The literature search focused on the history of endovenous laser ablation, its safety and durability, known complications, and differences in outcomes based on the iterations of fiber type and laser wavelength.

RESULTS

Treatment safety and efficacy of endovenous laser ablation appear to be based on the amount of energy administered over a defined distance, or the linear endovenous energy density. The ideal linear endovenous energy density varies with the laser wavelength and fiber-type. Post-operative pain and bruising may be reduced by the use of higher wavelength fibers or the use of radial or jacket-tip fibers as compared to bare-tip fibers. The incidence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis remains low and has declined with increasing experience. Reports have demonstrated a greater than 90% technical success rate with saphenous endovenous laser ablation, long-term durability of ablation, and commensurate improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovenous laser ablation is a safe and durable treatment option for the management of incompetent superficial and perforator veins of the lower extremities. As an endothermal technology, it remains a key component of the standard of care for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.

Update of the SFMV (French society of vascular medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues

Venous insufficiency is a very common disease affecting about 25% of the French population (if we combine all stages of its progression). It is a complex disease and its aetiology has not yet been fully elucidated. Some of its causes are well known, such as valvular dysfunction, vein wall defect, and the suctioning effect common to all varicose veins. These factors are generally associated and together lead to dysfunction of one or more of the saphenous veins. Saphenous vein dysfunction is revealed by ultrasound scan, a reflux lasting more than 0.5 seconds indicating venous incompetence. The potential consequences of saphenous vein dysfunction over time include: symptoms (heaviness, swellings, restlessness, cramps, itching of the lower limbs), acute complications (superficial venous thrombosis, varicose bleeding), chronic complications (changes in skin texture and colour, stasis dermatitis, eczema, vein atresia, leg ulcer), and appearance of unaesthetic varicose veins. It is not possible to repair an incompetent saphenous vein. The only therapeutic options at present are ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, physical removal of the vein (saphenous stripping), or its thermal ablation (by laser or radiofrequency treatment), the latter strategy having now become the gold standard as recommended by international guidelines. Recommendations concerning thermal ablation of saphenous veins were published in 2014 by the Société française de médecine vasculaire. Our society has now decided to update these recommendations, taking this opportunity to discuss unresolved issues and issues not addressed in the original guidelines. Thermal ablation of an incompetent saphenous vein consists in destroying this by means of a heating element introduced via ultrasound-guided venous puncture. The heating element comprises either a laser fibre or a radiofrequency catheter. The practitioner must provide the patient with full information about the procedure and obtain his/her consent prior to its implementation. The checklist concerning the interventional procedure issued by the HAS should be validated for each patient (see the appended document).

Acute Thrombotic Complication Post-Endovenous Ablation With Mobile Thrombus: A Case Study

Endovenous ablation is a common procedure performed on the superficial veins of the lower extremities to treat symptoms of venous insufficiency and varicose veins. While endovenous ablation is a minimally invasive procedure, patients may develop thrombotic complications including endovenous heat-induced thrombosis. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis is a rare complication of thrombus extension from the superficial vein into or near the deep system postprocedure. In this case report, a female with a history of recent endovenous ablation presented to the emergency department with symptoms of a pulmonary embolism. Sonographic evaluation of the right lower extremity revealed extension of thrombus from the ablated superficial vein into the common femoral vein. Thrombus was also noted in the left lower extremity extending from the ablated superficial vein to approximately the saphenofemoral junction. While the left lower extremity was being interrogated, the thrombus was documented, via a cine clip, liberating from the occluded great saphenous vein. Further assessment utilizing computed tomography revealed bilateral pulmonary emboli. This unique case emphasizes the importance of sonographic evaluation post-endovenous ablation.

[Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations]

Thermal ablation of saphenous vein varicosis has developed into a standard procedure for treatment of varicose veins. The clinical success of the endovenous thermal procedure is comparable to high ligation and stripping operations and a significant difference between these groups could not be detected in long-term analyses. The only difference is in the genesis of saphenofemoral recurrence detected by duplex ultrasound: neoangiogenesis occurs after high ligation and stripping operation and after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein a recurrence occurs predominantly via a residual anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV). Reduction of costs by an increase in endovenous procedures carried out in an outpatient setting in comparison to stripping operations, which are still frequently carried out in Germany (in comparison to other countries) as an inpatient procedure, have meanwhile been confirmed. An endovenous crossectomy (i.e. high ligation) should be strived for. Nonthermal endoluminal catheter procedures are predominantly reserved for treatment of the short saphenous vein.

Radiofrequency Ablation Increases the Incidence of Endothermal Heat-Induced Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Endovenous thermal ablation has become the procedure of choice in the treatment of superficial venous reflux disease. The current armamentarium of devices and techniques aimed at the elimination of saphenous reflux offers surgeons and interventionalists a variety of treatment options; however, there is a lack of data comparing the safety of these products. The most concerning complication after endovenous thermal ablation is endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) due to the risk of progression to deep venous thrombosis. This study aimed to compare the incidence rate of EHIT between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT).

METHODS

This was a single-center, office-based, retrospective study over the course of 5 years, in which 3,218 consecutive patients underwent 10,029 endovenous saphenous ablations. The patient cohort was 66.2% female, with an average age of 61.9 years. At the time of each individual intervention, 24, 212, 3,620, 4,806, 200, and 1,167 patients had Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology disease 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively.

RESULTS

There was a total of 3,983 EVLT and 6,091 RFA procedures. The most common vessel treated was the great saphenous vein, 63.6% of the time, followed by the small saphenous vein (25.6%), accessory saphenous vein (6.1%), and perforator vein (4.6%). There were 186 cases of EHIT, with 137 (73.6%) identified as type 1 as per the Kabnick classification. Endovenous ablation performed via RFA resulted in significantly more cases of EHIT than of EVLT (109 vs. 77; P = 0.034; odds ratio = 1.52), which was confirmed by a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest single-center study of endovenous saphenous ablations to date, RFA was shown to pose a significantly higher risk of EHIT than of EVLT.

The Perioperative Role of Duplex Venous Scanning in Endovenous Laser Therapy

Varicose veins that emerge as a result of the venous valvular incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV) are a common chronic condition affecting millions of people. When invasive treatment is necessary, surgical removal of the GSV and varicosities has been the standard procedure to relieve symptoms. Recent advances in laser technology have resulted in endovenous laser therapy as an alternative to open surgery by ablating the GSV. Duplex venous ultrasound is a critical part of preoperative planning, intraoperative safe execution of the procedure and postoperative care. It is necessary that the vascular surgeon and the sonographer work in tandem and have experience in intraoperative duplex venous scanning to achieve an optimal outcome.

Impact of Postoperative Duplex Surveillance after Radiofrequency Ablation of the Greater Saphenous Vein

Purpose

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of greater saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency; however, recent reports have begun to document an associated incidence of postprocedural deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of up to 16%. We evaluated our incidence of DVT after RFA and the role of venous duplex ultrasonography (VUS) in the assessment and treatment of GSV reflux.

Methods

During a 17-month period, 62 lower extremities with symptomatic GSV reflux were evaluated by VUS in 51 patients (74% women; mean age 51 years, range 25–83 yrs). Clinical history and examination focusing on risk factors for venous insufficiency and DVT were obtained along with a complete preoperative bilateral lower-extremity VUS in all patients. All procedures were completed by performing an intraoperative VUS to confirm patency of the GSV and common femoral veins before and after RFA. All patients received outpatient complete lower-extremity VUS within 5 days of the procedure to assess technical success of the procedure and superficial and deep venous patency.

Results

Fifty (98%) of patients completed RFA, with one patient undergoing high ligation of the GSV because of our inability to pass a guidewire and catheter into the proximal GSV. Duplex ultrasound confirmed successful RFA of the GSV in all limbs treated. Stab phlebectomy was performed in 33 (53%) limbs for associated clusters of large varicose veins. Two postoperative DVTs occurred (2/62,3.2%), both of which were identified as a floating thrombus in the common femoral vein and which subsequently were treated with percutaneous catheter-directed suction thrombectomy without the need for extended anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusion

Duplex venous scanning is an important component in the diagnosis and treatment of GSV insufficiency. VUS not only is necessary to direct the success of these catheter-based ablative procedures but is mandatory to confirm the absence of extended DVT after the procedure is completed. Our series has recorded a relatively low incidence of DVT and demonstrates that early recognition and aggressive treatment of nonocclusive common femoral DVT after RFA can obviate the need for long-term anticoagulation and potentially the sequelae of deep venous thrombosis.

Die chronische venöse Insuffizienz - Eine Zusammenfassung der Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie

Die chronische Venenerkrankung ist eine weit verbreitete Krankheit, die in späteren Stadien mit einer Vielzahl an Symptomen, aber auch Komplikationen wie dem Ulcus cruris, einhergeht. Dies wiederum hat weitreichende Auswirkungen auf die Lebensqualität der Patienten wie auch auf das Gesundheitssystem. Für die Diagnostik der chronischen Venenerkrankungen steht eine Auswahl an Verfahren zur Verfügung, wobei sich die farbkodierte Duplexsonographie als Goldstandard etabliert hat. Im Bereich der Therapie kam es in den letzten Jahrzehnten zu großen Fortschritten, sodass heute auch Alternativen zum klassischen Stripping durch die endoluminalen Verfahren zur Verfügung stehen. Die Wahl der Therapieoption ist jedoch weiterhin stark abhängig von mehreren Faktoren, unter anderem von den anatomischen Gegebenheiten und dem Krankheitsstadium. Im folgenden Artikel werden die Anatomie und Pathophysiologie, sowie die aktuellen Standards der Diagnostik und Therapie zusammengefasst.

Chronic venous insufficiency - a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Chronic venous disease is a common disorder associated with a variety of symptoms in later disease stages but also with complications such as venous leg ulcer. This, in turn, has substantial socioeconomic effects and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. While there are a number of diagnostic procedures available, color-flow duplex ultrasound has become the gold standard. As regards therapeutic options, major advances have been made in recent decades. Today, there are alternatives to saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein, including endovenous thermal ablation techniques. However, treatment selection continues to depend on many factors such as individual anatomical circumstances and disease stage. The following article provides an overview of the anatomy and pathophysiology as well as current diagnostic and therapeutic standards.

Recent Progress of Varicose Vein Treatment Especially about Endovascular Heat Ablation, SEPS and Foam Sclerotherapy

There were three epoch making events in therapy of varicose veins. The first one is that the endovascular heat ablation (EVHA) using diode laser was authorized by the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare in January 2011. The second one is that Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery (SEPS) was also authorized in April 2014. All of the therapies which were covered by the national insurance system had been the procedures for superficial veins but the SEPS is procedure for the perforating veins. The third one is that the foam usage of Polidocasklerol was listed formally at the medical package insert in September 2016. Moreover stub avulsion was introduced as figure-related improvement method with a smaller operation wound instead of conventional varicectomy and the other existing therapies are progressing every day. Therefore, by this education seminar, I lecture mainly on the EVHA, SEPS and foam sclerotherapy in varicose vein treatment. Finally I show one case which you should remember. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2017; 26: 225–230.)

Risk of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Isolated Great Saphenous Vein Thrombus

Risks associated with isolated great saphenous vein (GSV) thrombosis remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with isolated GSV thrombosis, particularly those with thrombus within 3 cm of the sapheno-femoral junction. A retrospective chart review of color flow Doppler lower extremity venous ultrasound examinations from an academic hospital from 2011 to 2016 was conducted. Seventy-eight patients were identified as having acute thrombus in their GSV and were then further stratified based on the presence or absence of concomitant deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A control group of 49 patients who presented with leg swelling and were found to have a normal color flow Doppler examination was also identified. Patients without thrombus (n = 49), patients with isolated GSV thrombus (n = 29), and patients with GSV thrombus with concomitant DVT (n = 49) underwent full chart review to determine whether any patients developed PE. This was diagnosed specifically by computed tomography angiogram or ventilation/perfusion scan, within 60 days of initial diagnosis of lower extremity thrombus. In our analysis, there was no significant difference in the risk of PE in patients with isolated GSV thrombus compared with a control group of normal patients (3.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.38). However, patients with GSV thrombus and concomitant DVT had a significantly increased risk of PE compared with patients with isolated GSV thrombus (26.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.01). We found that the risk of PE in patients with isolated GSV thrombus is not significantly increased compared with a normal cohort.

[Endovenous ablation versus open surgery for varicose veins : An attempt at an evaluation]

Open and endovenous surgery of varicose veins provides an excellent way to treat varicose veins. However, there are great differences in the how the techniques are performed. No matter which procedure is carried out, there are standards that should be observed. The state of the art of open venous surgery with radical crossectomy is well-known, but unfortunately is still not always performed correctly nowadays. The state of the art of endovenous surgery has unfortunately not yet been sufficiently documented, but should be based on open-surgical techniques. How the standard of both methods today is (or should be) is described in detail in this work. A recurrence definition which applies to both techniques, is set up.

More Successful Results with Less Energy in Endovenous Laser Ablation Treatment: Long-term Comparison of Bare-tip Fiber 980 nm Laser and Radial-tip Fiber 1470 nm Laser Application

BACKGROUND

Varices and venous insufficiency are common and serious health problems in the general population which affect the quality of life. Endothermal treatment of the great saphenous vein has become the first line of treatment for superficial venous reflux, and the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) method has been widely accepted all over the world. In this method, ablation is provided by a laser fiber inserted into the lumen of the vein. Initially, the fibers were 810 nm, but today the fibers are usually 940, 980, or 1470 nm.

METHODS

The study included 400 patients (419 procedures) who were diagnosed with venous insufficiency and underwent 980 and 1470 nm EVLA. Patients were followed up for 48 months. A 980-nm bare-tip laser catheter in Group A and a 1470-nm radial-tip laser catheter in Group B were inserted until they were 2 cm below the saphenofemoral junction. An EVLA catheter was drawn slowly at the rate of 1-3 cm/sec (2.08 ± 0.6). The energy applied to the saphenous vein was 60-120 J/cm (84.65 ± 13.03) and 45-120 J/cm (76.95 ± 15.06) in Group A and Group B, respectively (P < 0.001), with 15 W in the continuous mode. Follow-up visits included a physical examination and Doppler ultrasonography performed at the following time points: day 1, week 1, and months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Saphenous vein occlusion rates and postprocedure saphenous vein diameters were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Pain levels were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES^® pain scale (0-10). Postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Group A (980 nm laser) consisted of 200 patients with a mean age of 37.84 ± 12.2 years. Group B (1470 nm laser) consisted of 200 patients with a mean age of 38.38 ± 12.1 years. The mean duration of the procedure was 32.2 ± 9.7 min in Group A and 31.7 ± 8.8 min in Group B, respectively (P = 0.47). Induration, ecchymosis, and paresthesia rates were significantly higher in the bare-tip laser group. The most important complication, deep vein thrombosis, was observed in 4 patients in Group A. Recanalization rates were found to be increased by prolonged follow-up periods. At the 48-month follow-up, this rate was 15.9% in Group A and 8.3% in Group B (P = 0.017). This rate showed that the 1470-nm wavelength laser treatment was more successful in Group B than in Group A over the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the 980 and 1470 nm wavelength laser-assisted EVLA procedures appear to be effective in treating saphenous vein insufficiency. The 1470-nm radial-tip fiber is preferred due to lower energy levels, lower complication rates, early return to daily life, and the successful long-term occlusion rate.

Association between antithrombotic therapy and risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical results and postoperative complications, especially recanalization or bleeding complications, in patients with saphenous varicose veins undergoing endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) while receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1136 Japanese patients undergoing EVLA with a 980-nm diode laser between January 2012 and November 2015 at our institution. The patients were divided into two groups: ATT users (ATT group) and nonusers (control group). The ATT group was further divided into two subgroups according to whether the patients received antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Clinical outcomes and postoperative complications among these patients were assessed.

RESULTS

Approximately 20% of the patients undergoing surgery for saphenous varicose veins at our institution received ATT. Of these, 141 (12.4%) received antiplatelet therapy and 95 (8.4%) received anticoagulant therapy. Successful occlusion of the full length of the treated vein was achieved in 99.9% of the patients; there were no severe perioperative complications. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis occurred in 2.4% of patients, whereas postoperative complications developed in 1.2% of patients. One patient experienced recanalization (0.08%). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of recanalization and postoperative complications on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes and postoperative complications of EVLA in the ATT group were equivalent to those in the control group, indicating that EVLA can be safely performed in patients receiving ATT.

Utility of the Ginza forceps for superficial phlebectomy during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency of using the Ginza forceps (DVx, Tokyo, Japan), which have a long shaft and strong grip, for superficial phlebectomy with the stab avulsion technique, during simultaneous endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

METHODS

The subjects were patients treated with EVLA performed by a single operator at one institution. All patients had a GSV diameter of 4-10 mm and an EVLA length of the GSV of >20 cm. We compared 59 limbs treated only with the Varady hook (Group A) with 46 limbs treated with the Ginza forceps (Group G).

RESULTS

The mean operative times for Groups A and G were 55.4 ± 17.1 vs. 48.5 ± 13.5 min, respectively (P = 0.002), and the number of stab incisions was 5.9 ± 2.9 (1-13) vs. 3.5 ± 2.3 (1-11), respectively (P < 0.001). The rates of nerve injury and thrombophlebitis were 1.7 vs. 0 and 3.4 vs. 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing superficial phlebectomy with the Ginza forceps reduced the operation time and the number of stab wounds. These initial results suggest that using the Ginza forceps for the procedure is safe and efficient.

Mid-Term Report on the Safety and Effectiveness of Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins

Objective: Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a relatively new technique for treating great saphenous varicose veins, is less invasive compared with stripping surgery. This study examined the mid-term safety and effectiveness of RFA for varicose veins.

Materials and Methods: We enrolled 104 patients (147 limbs) who underwent RFA for varicose veins of the lower extremities (females, 67; 64.4%). The mean age was 68.9±9.2 years (39–85 years). In 121 limbs (82.3%), there were great saphenous veins. All patients were observed as outpatients for 12 months after the procedure. RFA was performed using ClosureFast™ catheters with tumescent local anesthesia.

Results: There was 99.4% occlusion of the treated veins, and partial recanalization was observed in one limb. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) was identified in five limbs (3.4%). All EHITs were class 1 according to the Kabnick classification, and they disappeared within 1 month of the intervention without antithrombotic therapy. No other major complications were observed. Mean venous clinical severity scores improved from 5.31 at the baseline to 1.10, 0.39, 0.14, and 0.06 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusion: RFA is a safe and effective strategy for varicose veins of the lower extremities.

Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation of the Saphenous Vein

Objective: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are safe and effective treatments for varicose veins caused by saphenous reflux. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) are known complications of these procedures. The purpose of this article is to investigate the incidence of postoperative DVT and EHIT in patients undergoing EVLA and RFA. Methods: The patients were assessed by clinical examination and venous duplex ultrasonography before operation and at 24-72 hours, 1 month, and 1 year follow-up after operation. Endovenous ablation (EVA) had been treated for 1026 limbs (835 patients) using an RFA; 1174 limbs (954 patients) using a 1470-nm wavelength diode laser with radial two-ring fiber (1470R); and 6118 limbs (5513 patients) using a 980-nm wavelength diode laser with bare-tip fiber (980B). Results: DVT was detected in 3 legs (0.3%) of RFA, 5 legs (0.4%) of 1470R, and 27 legs (0.4%) of 980B. One patient in three symptomatic DVT treated with 980B developed asymptomatic pulmonary embolus. In all, 31 of the 35 DVTs were confined to the calf veins. The incidence of EHIT classes 2 and 3 was 2.7% following RFA procedure, 6.7% after 1470R, and 7.5% after 980B. Conclusion: The incidence of EHIT following EVA was low, especially the RFA procedure. EHIT resolves within 2-4 weeks in most patients. DVT rates after EVA were compared with those published for saphenous vein stripping. (This is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2015; 55: 153-161.).

Positioning for Endovenous Laser Ablation: Comparative Study with Thigh Stripping

We performed a comparative study of surgical outcomes and venous functions between endovenous laser ablation with a 980-nm diode laser (EV group) and thigh stripping (ST group). There were no severe complications and initial success rates were 100% in both groups. In the EV group, preoperative symptoms improved in 94.3% of cases, the venous occlusion rate was 98%, and endovenous heat induced thrombosis had occurred in 11.9% (Class 3: 0.7%) at 12 months after the operation. Although comparative study of postoperative venous function by air plethysmography showed significant improvement in both groups, there was less recovery of postoperative venous function in the EV than in the ST group. (This article is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2015; 55: 13-20.).

Thrombosis of the Saphenous Vein Stump after Varicose Vein Surgery

We evaluated thrombus extension in the proximal stump of the saphenous vein at 6 days, 4 weeks, and 16 weeks after saphenous vein surgery performed between July 2013 and March 2014 (18 patients, 29 limbs, and 31 stumps) using duplex ultrasonography. All thrombotic events were classified as endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Thrombus was observed in 27 stumps (87.1%), with only four (12.9%) stumps remaining without thrombus on postoperative day 6. Thrombus as EHIT class 2 was observed in one stump and as EHIT class 3 in another; in the remaining 25 stumps, it was observed as EHIT class 1 postoperatively. No further extension of thrombus was found at 4 and 16 weeks after surgery. The rate of thrombus formation in the proximal stump of the saphenous vein after conventional surgery is comparatively higher than that after thermoablation techniques. Further studies are required to determine adequate evaluation methods and appropriate therapies for stump thrombosis after varicose vein surgery. (This article is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2015; 55: 105-110).

Delayed Presentation of Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis Treated by Thrombolysis and Subsequent Open Thrombectomy

Although endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) is frequently reported after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), the incidence and timing of occurrence of EHIT are not fully understood. We present a case of EHIT successfully treated with a combination of surgical and endovascular treatments. A 57-year-old woman, two months post bilateral EVLA, presented with a swollen leg. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed by Doppler ultrasonography and computerized tomographic venography. We treated the patient with catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase after insertion of an inferior vena cava filter. After thrombolytic treatment, we performed surgical venous thrombectomy, due to the presence of a large thrombus in the femoral vein. During the operation, we found organized old thrombus at the great saphenous vein which connected to the deep femoral vein. From these findings, we confirmed the presence of EHIT despite a long time having passed after EVLA. The patient was placed on anticoagulation therapy with oral rivaroxaban for three months.

Prevention and Treatment of Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Results of a Prospective active controlled Study

We conducted a prospective, single-center, active controlled study from July 2013 to January 2015, in Chinese patients with rapid ventricular arrhythmia who had received radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) treatment to determine formation of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LDVT) post RFCA procedure, and evaluated the effect of rivaroxaban on LDVT. Patients with asymptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism who had not received any other anticoagulant and had received no more than 36 hours of treatment with unfractionated heparin were included. Post RFCA procedure, patients received either rivaroxaban (10 mg/d for 14 days beginning 2–3 hours post-operation; n = 86) or aspirin (100 mg/d for 3 months beginning 2–3 hours post-operation; n = 90). The primary outcome was a composite of LDVT occurrence, change in diameter of femoral veins, and safety outcomes that were analyzed based on major or minor bleeding events. In addition, blood flow velocity was determined. No complete occlusive thrombus or bleeding events were reported with either of the group. The lower incidence rate of non-occluded thrombus in rivaroxaban (5.8%) compared to the aspirin group (16.7%) indicates rivaroxaban may be administered post-RFCA to prevent and treat femoral venous thrombosis in a secure and effective way with a faster inset of action than standard aspirin therapy.

Comparative Study of Outcome of Duplex Ultrasound-Guided, Catheter-Directed Foam Sclerotherapy and Radio-frequency Ablation in the Management of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Chronic venous insufficiency of lower limbs is a common problem in adults. We compared the two modalities, namely duplex ultrasound-guided, catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and radio-frequency ablation (RFA), in the management of great saphenous varicose veins using clinical assessment (Venous Clinical Severity Score, Venous Disability Score) and duplex imaging. Patients presenting with great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosity due to incompetent saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) were selected and randomly assigned in each arm, i.e., duplex UGFS group and RFA group. Patients were assessed on days 7, 30, and 90 both clinically and sonologically. Clinical assessment was based on the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Disability Score (VDS). Obliteration of the treated GSV segment was noted in all the limbs of the RFA group (31/31) on duplex sonography on days 7, 30, and 90, while in the UGFS group, out of 30 limbs, obliteration was successful in 28 (28/30) and 2 had treatment failure. However, outcome of both the groups were statistically comparable (P value > 0.05). After the procedure, improvement in the VCSS was noted in both the study arms in every follow-up and both the modalities were found to be equally effective. Improvement in the Venous Disability Score was there on every follow-up, but maximum improvement was seen on the second visit, i.e., post-treatment day 30. Improvement was statistically significant and equal in both arms after the initial 1 week. Foam sclerotherapy, especially catheter-directed, is as effective as radio-frequency ablation in achieving anatomical obliteration and yielding relief in clinical signs and symptoms in patients with GSV varicosity with SFJ incompetence.

The effect of wavelength on endothermal heat-induced thrombosis incidence after endovenous laser ablation

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the incidence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) depends on the laser wavelength used in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the saphenous veins.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing EVLA in our office from 2005 to 2014 with an 810-nm (hemoglobin-specific) or 1470-nm (water-specific) laser. We reviewed the records for age, sex, body mass index, Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic (CEAP) class, vein diameter, vein(s) treated, adjunctive phlebectomy, energy delivered, laser pullback times, and EHIT (closure level ≥3) development. The Fisher exact test and Pearson χ(2) test were used to evaluate the association between EHIT and the categoric variables. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between EHIT and the continuous variables.

RESULTS

There were 1439 veins ablated in 1109 patients (769 female, 340 male). The great saphenous vein (GSV) was treated in 1332, the small saphenous vein (SSV) in 78, and both in 29 (22 procedures on accessory veins were excluded). The CEAP C class for these patients was 1 in 0, 2 in 616, 3 in 522, 4 in 150, 5 in 51, and 6 in 98, and was not recorded in 2. EHIT occurred in 76 cases (5.28%), in 73 after GSV ablation and in three after SSV ablation. The 810-nm laser was used in 1144 procedures, and EHIT developed in 69 patients (6.0%). The 1470-nm laser was used in 295 procedures, with EHIT developing in seven patients (2.4%; P = .0122 by Fisher exact test). The average energy delivered to the EHIT group (3517 ± 1998.1 J) was higher than for the non-EHIT group (2825.1 ± 1491.2 J; P = .0002). The average vein diameter was larger in the EHIT group (9.3 ± 3.8 mm) than in the non-EHIT group (7.2 ± 3.3 mm; P = .0001). EHIT occurred in 59 of 837 cases (6.6%) undergoing simultaneous stab phlebectomy compared with 17 of 525 cases (3.1%) undergoing only EVLA (P = .0049). Statistical analysis confirmed the association between EHIT and CEAP class was significant (P = .0001). No differences were seen for age, body mass index, sex, combined bilateral, and multiple or simultaneous GSV and SSV ablations between the two groups. A multivariate analysis confirmed that CEAP class, vein diameter, adjunctive phlebectomy, and laser wavelength were indeed risk factors for post-EVLA EHIT and that energy delivered and pullback time were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Water-specific laser fiber wavelength (1470 nm) reduces the risk of EHIT compared with a hemoglobin-specific wavelength (810 nm). CEAP class, simultaneous phlebectomy, and vein diameter >7.5 mm are associated with increased risk of EHIT after EVLA.

A review of the current management and treatment options for superficial venous insufficiency

The recognition of lower extremity venous disease as a significant cause of morbidity and lower quality of life, afflicting up to 25 % of Western populations, has led to rapid and drastic improvements in treatment options as well as an increasing awareness of the disease. Superficial venous disease, a frequent medical problem encountered in clinical practices, is now a common reason for referral to providers offering a spectrum of interventions. Venous guidelines have been set forth by the American Venous Forum and Society for Vascular Surgery covering simple spider veins to chronic venous ulcerations. (Gloviczki et al. J Vas Surg 53:2S-48S, 2011) This review provides an overview of the modern management of varicose veins and venous insufficiency.

Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods

Saphenous reflux interferes with the physiological decrease in pressure and induces ambulatory venous hypertension. Elimination of reflux is achieved by flush ligation at the incompetent saphenofemoral junction and stripping of the great saphenous vein, which is the basis of the conventional surgical therapy. Endovenous ablative methods substitute stripping by thermal of chemical destruction of the saphenous trunk; they usually refrain from saphenofemoral junction ligation. Short-term and medium-term results up to 5 years, achieved after endovenous ablation without high ligation, are comparable with those after conventional surgery, which questioned the necessity to ligate the incompetent saphenofemoral junction. Nevertheless, clinical symptoms caused by recurrent reflux occur as a rule not earlier than 8 to 10 years after efficient abolition of reflux. Consequently, randomized studies with long-term follow-ups exceeding 10 years are necessary for trustworthy assessment whether it is justified to abstain from saphenofemoral junction ligation.

Interventions on the Superficial Venous System for Chronic Venous Insufficiency by Surgeons in the Modern Era

Objective:

To evaluate patient characteristics, practice patterns, and outcomes for patients treated for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).

Background:

Chronic venous insufficiency is a common problem treated using open or endovascular methods by physicians from a number of surgical and nonsurgical specialties.

Methods:

Patients treated for CVI in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set (2005-2011) were identified. Analyses were based on open surgical treatment (open surgery of varicose vein [OSVV]) versus endovenous ablation (EVA), specialty of treating surgeon, and by the presence of venous ulceration (VU). Preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative measures were examined, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the postoperative outcomes of superficial surgical site infection (sSSI) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Results:

A total of 4366 patients were identified. Patients undergoing EVA were older (53.3 vs 51.8 years; P < .001), had higher body mass index (BMI; 29.9 vs 29.0; P < .001), and more commonly presented with VU (20.9% vs 13.3%; P < .001). Vascular surgeons were more likely than general surgeons to treat patients with VU (17.0% vs 13.4%; P = .017). Patients with VU had higher BMI (32.2 vs 28.8; P < .001), were older (57.9 vs 51.4 years; P < .001), and more likely to be diabetic (9.0% vs 4.7%; P < .001). Factors associated with sSSI were OSVV (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-5.50; P = .016), obesity (AOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.10-4.24; P = .025), and VU (AOR 2.56; 95% CI 1.19-5.50; P = .016). Patients undergoing OSVV had significantly lower odds of DVT when compared to EVA (AOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28-0.97; P = .040).

Conclusions:

The OSVV, obesity, and VU increase the odds of sSSI after procedures treating CVI. Patients in these categories should be monitored closely for signs of infection in the perioperative period. Patients undergoing EVA have higher odds of postoperative DVT, suggesting that routine screening after EVA for DVT may be justified.

Properties of polidocanol foam in view of its use in sclerotherapy

Foam sclerotherapy is a widely used method to treat varicose veins disease. It is easy to use and apply, affordable, and has high efficiency that depends on foam stability upon injection. Since sclerotherapy is usually applied in a medical doctor's office, one of the most employed methods to generate foam is based on the Tessari technique which uses pumping cycles of liquid and air in-and-out of a double syringe system. Finally, the produced foam exits through a small orifice (∼2mm) at the output of a three-way valve. The present work shows results regarding the factors that may influence foam stability (liquid to air ratio, type of connector, syringe diameter, number of pumping cycles, etc.) of a commonly used sclerosing agent (polidocanol). Furthermore, an effort is made to evaluate the effect of adding different substances on the stability of polidocanol foams (0.5% w/w) by altering the surface tension or/and the bulk and interfacial rheological properties of the fluids. It is shown that adding small concentrations of nonionic surfactants can increase foam stability with just a very small variation of the mean bubbles size.