A prospective study of the fate of venous leg perforators after varicose vein surgery

[Impact of the Reflux Origin on the Clinical Stage and Surgical Decision in Primary Varicose Veins]

Reflux and recirculation in primary varicose veins are not yet completely understood, and the contribution of perforator veins is dual.Reflux origin was assessed as junctional (JP, reflux of the greater saphenous junction or groin recurrences) with/without suspect perforator veins (SPV), or perforator phenotype (PP, reflux from SPV only or for statistical purposes from the small saphenous vein). Flow direction and intensity were recorded under Valsalva (JP) or as spontaneous/under distal compression/decompression (SPV) and weighted with one/two points as reflux/reentry, respectively, in the case of SPV. We compared the origin and extent of axial reflux and diameter/flow direction of SPV with the clinical stage by multivariate analysis.Of 107 limbs, 68 presented with JP, 49 combined with SPV, and 39 with PP. CEAP C3-C6 was associated with the presence of SPV (JP and PP) in 45/65 (11/22) limbs with primaries (recurrences) or in 3/16 (0/4), p < 0.01 (p = 0.01), without SPV. C4-C6 at first manifestation, however, was more frequent in JP and axial reflux below the knee in 14/39 limbs (p = 0.01) or above the knee in 3/11 (p = 0.12) compared with PP (5/31). SPV flow at first manifestation was reentry in the case of JP and axial reflux below the knee (estimate -1.62, p = 0.02) or above the knee (0.29, p = 0.81) compared with PP, but diameter of the most dilated perforator vein was higher in the case of JP and axial reflux above the knee (estimate 0.20, p < 0.01) or below the knee (0.04, p = 0.30) compared with PP. Predominant SPV flow was reentry/reflux during peripheral compression/decompression, respectively (p = 0.009).The data suggest that the reflux origin and extent of axial reflux are associated with diameter/flow direction of SPV and clinical stage in primary varicose veins.

Erste Erfahrungen mit einem neuen Radiofrequenzsystem zur endovenösen Perforanstherapie

Einführung Die Behandlung der Perforantenvarikose (PV) gehört zu den großen Herausforderungen in der Phlebologie – nicht nur aufgrund der Vergesellschaftung mit chronischen Ulzera crurium und der Rezidivrate. Endovenöse Verfahren der Perforantenablation (EPA) unterliegen technischen Schwierigkeiten. Wir berichten von einer ersten Serie der EPA mit einem neuartigen Radiowellensystem.

Material, Patienten und Methoden Ausschließlich isolierte PV wurden in die Studie aufgenommen. Zur Diagnosestellung wurden dopplersonografische Untersuchungen (DU) durchgeführt. Die ultraschallgeführte EPA erfolgt unter sterilen Kautelen in der ambulanten Operationsabteilung. Postinterventionelle DU wurden nach einem Tag und 14 Tagen, 5 Wochen sowie 3, 6 und 12 Monaten terminiert. Im Falle einer Rekanalisierung wurde eine Schaumsklerosierung angestrebt.

Ergebnisse Neun PV wurden behandelt. Der durchschnittliche Energieeintrag betrug 969J. Nach einem medianen Nachuntersuchungszeitraum von 257 Tagen betrug die primäre Verschlussrate 75%, die sekundäre nach Schaumsklerosierung 89%. Die minimale Komplikationsrate trug zu einer hohen Patientenakzeptanz bei.

Schlussfolgerung Die EPA zur Behandlung der PV mit dem neuen Radiowellensystem hat sich als wirksam und verträglich bewährt. Weiteren Untersuchungen wird es vorbehalten sein, die endgültige Rolle der EPA in der Behandlung von PV zu definieren.

The need for perforator treatment after VenaSeal and ClosureFast endovenous saphenous vein closure in CEAP 6 patients

OBJECTIVE

The authors have previously demonstrated that VenaSeal (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) adhesive, compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA, ClosureFast; Medtronic, Inc), in treatment of refluxing saphenous veins in CEAP 6 limbs, results in shorter healing times of venous ulcers. The authors hypothesize that the longer treated length possible with VenaSeal's nonthermal modality may affect the number of critical refluxing perforators contributing to the nonhealing wound. This follow-up study compares the need for follow-up treatment of perforator veins after saphenous vein treatment with either radiofrequency ablation (ClosureFast RFA) or adhesive closure (VenaSeal).

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of CEAP 6 patients who had closure of their saphenous veins from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Patients who underwent follow-up treatment of perforator veins were grouped according to their method of initial management of their saphenous veins. The primary end point was incidence of a perforator procedure after ClosureFast or VenaSeal ablation. Secondary end points included sclerotherapy to facilitate wound healing. Bivariate analysis used the χ² test, Fisher exact test, t-test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. A P value of <.05 defined statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were 119 CEAP 6 patients with saphenous closure: 51 limbs treated with VenaSeal and 68 with RFA. Median follow-up was 105 days (interquartile range: 44, 208). All limbs achieved wound healing during the study period. Mean time to wound healing post index procedure was shorter for VenaSeal than RFA (72 vs 293.8 days, P > .0009), as was median time (43 vs 104 days, P = .001). More limbs treated with RFA had previous known deep vein thrombosis (29% vs 10%, P = .009), deep venous insufficiency (82% vs 51%, P = .0003), and perforator reflux (57% vs 29%, P = .002). Limbs with identified follow-up perforator reflux treated with RFA had a higher prevalence of initially treated saphenous veins with RFA compared with those treated with VenaSeal (49% vs 27%, P = .003). There was no difference between the methods of vein closure and use of concurrent sclerotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ClosureFast and VenaSeal are both effective and safe modalities of saphenous ablation, but VenaSeal treatment was associated with less perforator RFA intervention.

Anatomy of Perforating veins of the lower limb

Die Perforansvenen (PV) der unteren Extremitäten sind nicht nur gerade und direkte Verbindungen zwischen den tiefen und oberflächlichen Venennetzen, sondern bilden gemeinsam ein weit verzweigtes Netz. Trotz ihrer starken anatomischen Variabilität ist ihre Position bemerkenswert konstant und prognostizierbar. Dies ist durch ihre enge Beziehung zu den Muskelvenen bedingt und durch die hämodynamischen Ebenen entlang der Extremität zu erklären. Sie sind bei der Beurteilung durch Ultraschalluntersucher in der täglichen Praxis eine Hilfe.

Der anatomische Inhalt dieses Artikels stammt aus folgenden Quellen: Anatomische Präparationen von C. Gillot nach Latex-Injektion und anschließender farblicher Unterteilung von über 400 Extremitäten. Dreidimensionale Rekonstruktionen von CT-Venografien von 1200 Extremitäten und präoperativen Hautvenenvermessungen von 25 000 Extremitäten.

Es wird Folgendes beschrieben: Referenzpunkte der Extremität, Perforansvenen des Fußes, Beins und Sprunggelenks, der Wade, Anastomosen zwischen den Perforansvenen, Begleitarterien der Bein-PVs und Oberschenkel-PVs.

Great uncertainty regarding treatment of varicose vein recurrence

Introduction: Although varicose vein recurrence is common and 10–30 % of all varicose vein surgery is done for recurrence of some sort, there are very few studies that can guide us to the best re-treatment option. With the introduction of minimal invasive endovenous treatments there is a variety of possible options besides traditional open surgical techniques.

Method: The Scandinavian Venous Forum held a symposium at the GSP meeting in Lü-beck 2012 and this review article is based on data from the presentations at that symposium. Further data has been added regarding new knowledge that was not available a year ago, from PubMed search and article references.

Results: The most common reasons for recurrence are discussed and also the discrepancy between neovascularization (NV) and recurrence due to technical failures. It is likely that NV is the most commonly duplex detected type of recurrence following open groin surgery, less common early after endovascular techniques. However, technical or tactical failures are the most common reasons for redo surgery because of symptomatic recurrence. NV seldom leads to symptomatic recurrences and thus a need for re- treatment. There is a risk that the stumps left following endovenous treatments will become a source for symptomatic recurrence after 5–10 years and indications of that have been reported in the few available 5 year RCT-reports following laser treatments. Treatment of recurrence due to stumps in the groin can be done safely within a reasonable operating time through a medial approach and the stump itself can generally not be treated with any of the endovenous alternative methods. Foam treatment can be used for most other recurrent veins but the durability is unknown. Endovascular thermal ablation can only be used for reopened or remaining saphenous veins and accessory saphenous veins while tributaries have to be treated by stab excisions or foam.

Conclusion: Long term reports of results of redo surgery are limited but suggest reasonably good results from open surgical intervention and are non-existent for the endovenous techniques. So far groin recurrence seems best treated surgically by an indirect approach, preferably medial. More studies are needed to find the best treatment regime for varicose vein recurrence in general and hybrid procedures might be the way forward by combinations of different techniques.

The fate of calf perforator veins after saphenous vein laser ablation

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess hemodynamic changes in calf perforator veins (PVs) after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of saphenous veins.

METHODS

The series comprised 60 limbs of 41 patients (27 female, 14 male; median age, 43 years [range, 22-78 years]) who underwent EVLA for varicose veins. All patients were prospectively evaluated by means of color Doppler ultrasonography before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

EVLA did not change the rate of incompetent PVs (preoperatively, 154/483 [32%] vs. postoperatively, 167/501 [33%]; P = 0.173), but significantly increased the total number of all PVs (n=483 vs. n=501, P = 0.036). Following EVLA, 28% of the limbs had thrombosis of PVs, 34% had new US-detectable PVs, 42% showed new competency, and 52% showed new incompetency. New competent PVs were found more commonly in the medial leg (ablation site) than the lateral leg (nonablation site) (28.3% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.016), while new incompetent PVs were found more commonly in nonablation site than ablation site (31.7% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.086). Additionally, new competent PVs in the posterior leg were found more often in patients who had small saphenous vein ablation than patients who did not (30% vs. 0%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

EVLA induces numerous changes in calf PVs. These changes seem to result from flow offloading in ablation site and onloading in nonablation site in the early postablation period.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for the Treatment of Perforating Vein Incompetence

Recent advances in catheter-based endovenous interventions have broadened our understanding in the pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies of chronic venous insufficiency, a condition that can be caused by abnormality of various lower extremity venous structures, including superficial or deep vein reflux or incompetent perforating veins. This article reviews the history and therapeutic principles of percutaneous ablation of perforators (PAPs). Discussions related to treatment strategies and procedural techniques of PAPs using radiofrequency ablation, laser energy, and sclerosant injection are provided. Current clinical results of PAPs with radiofrequency and laser energy ablation as a treatment modality of chronic venous insufficiency are also discussed.

The Incidence, Clinical Importance and Management of Incompetent Gastrocnemius Vein

PURPOSE

To report the incidence, clinical importance and management of the incompetent gastrocnemius vein.

METHODS

The incompetency was examined by duplex and pulse-Doppler ultrasound at the popliteal fossa in a standing position between July 2006 and August 2014.

RESULTS

Among 1805 legs surveyed, 14 legs showed primary incompetent gastrocnemius vein (0.78%). The incompetency was in medial gastrocnemius vein in 13 legs (93%). Clinical manifestation was varicose vein in the small saphenous territory in nine, varicose vein in great saphenous territory in one, congestive dermatitis in two, calf clamp in one and no symptom in one. The nine cases with varicose vein in the small saphenous territory received surgical management. These included three cases with residual varicose veins after saphenopopliteal disconnection and stripping small saphenous vein. The root of the gastrocnemius vein was divided leaving no complication. In cases without varicose vein in small saphenous territory, an elastic compression socks was useful in some degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Incompetency of gastrocnemius vein was not so rare. When a case is accompanied by small saphenous varicose veins, division of the root of gastrocnemius vein along with small saphenous vein stripping is recommended in order to reduce residual varicose vein.

Debate: whether venous perforator surgery reduces recurrences

Superficial venous surgery and perforator vein surgery, specifically, have a long and varied history in the evolution of vascular surgery, especially because venous disease continues to be extremely common. As with other areas of our specialty, perforator vein procedures have progressed from being purely open operations to becoming less invasive procedures. Despite this, there remains much discussion (as well as overt disagreement) about whether perforator vein surgery is actually appropriate and beneficial in the first place. Surgeons have no level I evidence from randomized controlled studies to determine whether perforator vein surgery does or does not reduce the chances of recurrence of superficial venous varicosities, so we must rely on the evidence as it currently is. Perhaps not surprisingly, our two experts have assembled divergent opinions on the role of perforator venous surgery in contemporary practice.

Diagnosis and follow-up of varicose veins with duplex ultrasound: how and why?

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is very prevalent and causes a significant financial burden in Western societies. Accurate diagnosis is mandatory to define the anatomy and pathophysiology involved in the disease process. Duplex ultrasound (DU) is a well-established non-invasive tool used for varicose veins work-up that, most recently, has also been utilized for follow-up after endovenous procedures such as endovenous laser or radiofrequency ablation and foam sclerotherapy. Insightful information on how DU is performed during varicose veins work-up and the rationale of DU utilization for endovenous procedures are discussed.

Estudo comparativo entre os achados do exame físico, do mapeamento com eco-color Doppler e da exploração cirúrgica na recidiva das varizes de membros inferiores a partir da junção safeno-femoral

CONTEXTO: A recidiva de varizes em membros inferiores é complicação frequente da safenectomia e sua incidência atinge até 80% dos casos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a sensibilidade do exame físico e do mapeamento com eco-color Doppler no diagnóstico da insuficiência do coto da veia safena magna, em doentes previamente operados, comparando-os com os achados da exploração operatória da junção safeno-femoral. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados prospectivamente 30 doentes envolvendo 37 membros submetidos previamente à safenectomia magna para tratamento de varizes e que foram reoperados por recidiva de varizes na região inguinal ou em face anterossuperior da coxa. Todos os doentes foram submetidos ao mapeamento com eco-color Doppler. Os dados foram comparados com os achados da exploração da crossa da veia safena magna na reoperação. RESULTADOS: A sensibilidade do mapeamento com eco-color Doppler para a presença de insuficiência do coto da veia safena magna foi de 70,3% (26 concordâncias dentre os 37 membros) e resultados falsos negativos ocorreram em 29,7% (11) membros avaliados (p=0,03). A sensibilidade do achado de varizes na região inguinal e na face anteromedial da coxa com a presença de insuficiência do coto da veia safena magna foi de 100% (37 concordâncias dentre os 37 membros) e não houve resultados falsos negativos. CONCLUSÕES: No doente já submetido à safenectomia magna, a presença no exame físico de varizes recidivadas em região inguinal e na face anteromedial da coxa é sugestivo de insuficiência do coto da veia safena magna, devendo-se realizar o mapeamento com eco color Doppler para o adequado planejamento da reexploração da crossa da veia safena magna.

Early results from a randomized trial of saphenous surgery with or without subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery in patients with a venous ulcer

Background

The aim was to clarify the role of incompetent perforators (IPs) in venous leg ulcers. This short-term report focused on safety, patient satisfaction and the fate of IPs after subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS), or saphenous surgery alone.

Methods

Patients aged 30–78 years with an open or recently healed venous ulcer, and with an incompetent saphenous vein and IPs, were allocated randomly to saphenous surgery alone, or in combination with SEPS. A control duplex scan was performed 6–9 months after surgery, and clinical follow-up was scheduled after 1 week, 3 and 12 months. A standard questionnaire was completed at each clinical visit.

Results

Seventy-five patients were enrolled; 37 had SEPS and 38 had saphenous surgery alone. SEPS prolonged the operation by a median of 15 min (P = 0·003). Duplex imaging revealed significantly more remaining IPs in the no-SEPS group (P &lt; 0·001). Compared with the preoperative scan, significantly more legs were free from IPs in the SEPS group compared with the no-SEPS group (21 of 36 versus 7 of 37 respectively; P &lt; 0·001). There were no other major outcome differences between the groups.

Conclusion

There was no short-term clinical benefit from adding SEPS to saphenous surgery in patients with varicose ulcers and IPs, although SEPS reduced the number of perforators remaining after 1 year.

One-year outcomes of radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins using the radiofrequency stylet device

Objectives

Early success treating incompetent perforator veins (IPVs) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and the trend to move varicose vein surgery into a walk-in walk-out service led to the design of a specific device enabling RFA of IPVs using local anaesthesia (ClosureRFS™ stylet). Our aim was to assess one-year outcomes of a clinical series of patients undergoing treatment with this device. Truncal reflux, where present, was treated initially, and RFA of IPVs was performed as a secondary procedure.

Method

Duplex ultrasound examinations were performed and the presence of IPVs documented. Results were compared with preoperative scans. IPVs were classified as closed, not closed/reopened or de novo.

Results

Of the 75 patients invited for follow-up, 53 attended at a median time of 14 months (range 11–25). Sixty-seven limbs were analysed (M:F 1:2.1, median age 62, range 25–81). Of the 124 treated IPVs, 101 were closed (82%). Clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological clinical score was improved in 49.3% limbs. IPV closure was reduced in patients with recurrent varicose veins compared with primary varicose veins (72.3% versus 87%, P = 0.056).

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the radiofrequency stylet device to be an effective treatment for IPVs.

Five-year results of incompetent perforator vein closure using TRans-Luminal Occlusion of Perforator

Objective

To audit the five-year outcome of the TRLOP technique as indicated by the rate of IPV closure on duplex ultrasound (DUS).

Methods

Patients underwent DUS five years post-TRLOP. Experienced vascular technologists documented the presence of IPVs using a two co-ordinate system, blinded to previous results. Results were then compared with preoperative scans. IPVs were classified as: closed; not closed/reopened; or de novo. Closed IPVs were defined as the absence of any IPV at or within 5 cm of a previous IPV in the vertical and horizontal plane. Any IPVs found outside the delineated area were defined as de novo IPVs.

Results

Of 67 patients invited, 37 attended DUS (55% participation rate; men to women ratio of 14:23, age 40–84; mean 64). Preoperative clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological classification: C2, 36.2%; C3, 27.6%; C4, 34.5%; C6, 1.7%. From 125 IPVs analysed, 101 were closed (81%), 24 were not closed/reopened (19%) and 14 de novo IPVs were found.

Discussion

Despite these results representing our learning curve for the procedure, we found TRLOP to be an effective treatment for IPVs. The closure rates described are comparable with the published clinical series data for subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery.

Venous ulcers: new options in treatment: minimally invasive vein surgery

Venous disease has a spectrum of presentations. The most advanced state of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) managed by wound care specialists being ulceration of the lower extremity. The goal of all treatments for advanced venous disease is to decrease ambulatory venous hypertension. Treatment can be divided into exogenous and endogenous methods. Exogenous methods include those applied externally such as compression, elevation, debridement and wound dressings. Endogenous methods treat the underlying venous pathology either due to venous valvular dysfunction or venous obstruction leading to venous hypertension. Recently, significant advances in endogenous methods have evolved. The development of a new concept, minimally invasive vein surgery (MIVS), has improved upon traditional, open, invasive treatments of venous disease. MIVS techniques are performed percutaneously, with minimal anesthesia, no incisions and rarely require hospital admission. This article summarizes the concept of MIVS, describes each method of MIVS and its complementary role in the management of venous leg ulcers patients.

[Local surgical therapy of venous leg ulcers]

Leg ulcer is a polyaetiologic condition the successful treatment of which is decisively influenced by correct diagnosis of the underlying cause. About 76% of leg ulcer cases are due to chronic venous insufficiency. Nonhealing venous leg ulcers are the domain of local surgical therapy with a variety of symptomatic and causal surgical methods. Shave therapy is the treatment of choice, with relatively low invasiveness and good long-term results. Today subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery and the surgical treatment of fascia cruris (fasciotomy, fasciectomy) are used rarely but increasingly indicated. Long-lasting healing is decisively influenced by thorough follow-up treatment with complex physical compression treatment and exercises following the surgical treatment of nonhealing venous leg ulcers.

Residual varicose veins below the knee after varicose vein surgery are not related to incompetent perforating veins

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate the occurrence of residual varicose veins (visible and ultrasonic) at the below-knee level after short-stripping the great saphenous vein (GSV) and to investigate the possible role of preoperative incompetent perforating veins (IPVs) on the persistence of these varicose veins.

METHODS

In this prospective study in 59 consecutive patients (74 limbs) with untreated primary varicose veins, a preoperative clinical examination and preoperative color flow duplex imaging were performed. Re-evaluation (clinical examination and color flow duplex imaging) was performed 6 months after surgery. Dissection of the saphenofemoral junction and short-stripping of the GSV from the groin to just below the knee level was performed without additional stab avulsions on the lower leg. The association between postoperative reflux in the three GSV branches below the knee level and preoperative IPV and the association between postoperative visible varicose veins in the GSV below knee level and preoperative IPV were determined with odds ratios with the help of a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative varicosities in the GSV below the knee were visible in 62 limbs (70%) and were visible after surgery in 12 limbs (16%). The number of limbs with reflux in the 3 below-knee GSV branches was as follows: anterior branch, 34 (49%) before surgery and 31 (44%) after surgery; main stem, 59 (79%) before surgery and 62 (91%) after surgery; and posterior branch, 49 (67%) before surgery and 46 (63%) after surgery. No statistically significant association between postoperative reflux in the three GSV branches and preoperative IPV nor between postoperative visible varicose veins and preoperative IPV was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that reflux in the GSV below knee level after the short-stripping procedure persists in all below-knee GSV branches. Approximately 20% of patients with visible varicose veins in the GSV area below the knee level will have visible varicose veins in this area 6 months after the short-strip procedure. These clinical and ultrasonic residual varicose veins are not significantly related to the presence of preoperative IPV.