An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: Natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach

Computed Tomography Angiography After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Interventions

This comprehensive article reviews the complex realm of aortic surgical and endovascular interventions, focusing on the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta. It outlines the nuances of various procedures, emphasizing the importance of computed tomography angiography acquisition for an accurate assessment. Detailed discussions encompass expected postsurgical/endovascular findings and complications, covering various scenarios, from hematoma and infection to pseudoaneurysms and graft-related issues. This article serves as a crucial resource for radiologists, offering invaluable insights into the complexities of aortic interventions and their subsequent imaging, fostering a comprehensive understanding of diagnostic and management strategies.

A Single Centre Long Term Follow Up of the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing System

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical performance at long term follow up of endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS, Endologix Inc. Nellix, Irvine, CA, USA) in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Observational, prospective, single centre study of primary AAA interventions with EVAS (n = 117) from November 2013 to November 2016. Endpoints were primary technical success, Nellix device failure, freedom from open surgical conversion (OSC), freedom from secondary intervention, sac rupture, total mortality, and aneurysm related mortality at long term follow up.

RESULTS

The median age was 75 years (interquartile range [IQR] 70, 81 years) and 83% were male. The median AAA diameter was 58 mm (IQR 54, 60 mm). The median length of follow up was 6.2 years (IQR 5.6, 6.8 years). Primary technical success was 100%. Median time to Nellix failure was 5.6 years (IQR 3.3, 7.4 years). Freedom from Nellix failure at five and seven years was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.2 - 63.8%) and 36% (95% CI 22.3 - 49.7%), respectively. Freedom from OSC at five and seven years was 63% (95% CI 53.2 - 72.8%) and 59% (95% CI 47 - 71%), respectively. The secondary intervention rate was 11.4/100 person years. Freedom from secondary intervention at five and seven years was 52% (95% CI 42.2 - 61.8%) and 51% (95% CI 41.2 - 60.8%), respectively. The cumulative mortality rate at five and seven years was 36% and 54%, respectively. Secondary sac rupture occurred in 9.4% (11/117) with a rate of 2/100 person years. Aneurysm related mortality was 12% (14/117) with a rate of 2.5/100 person years. The median survival was four years (IQR 3, 5.6 years). Thirty day mortality for acute OSC was 67% (n = 3) and 17.1% (6/35) for elective OSC.

CONCLUSION

Long term follow up showed an increased failure rate. Diligent surveillance after endovascular AAA treatment is mandatory, especially when promising new devices are put into clinical use.

Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background/Objectives: this systematic review aims to explore the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) as an emerging trend for addressing a type II endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases including Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The search focused on articles reporting on the laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for the treatment of a type II endoleak post-EVAR. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, technical success rates, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up results. Results: Our analysis included ten case studies and two retrospective cohort studies, comprising a total of 26 patients who underwent a laparoscopic ligation of the IMA between 2000 and 2023. The mean age of the cohort was 72.3 years, with a male predominance (92.3%). The mean AAA diameter at the time of intervention was 69.7 mm. The technique demonstrated a high technical success rate of 92.3%, with a mean procedure time of 118.4 min and minimal blood loss. The average follow-up duration was 19.9 months, with 73% of patients experiencing regression of the aneurysmal sac, and no reports of an IMA-related type II endoleak during the follow-up period. Conclusions: The laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for a type II endoleak following EVAR presents a promising, minimally invasive alternative with high technical success rates and favorable postoperative outcomes. Despite its potential advantages, including reduced contrast agent use and radiation exposure, its application remains limited to specialized centers. The findings suggest the need for further research in larger prospective studies to validate the effectiveness of this procedure and potentially broaden its clinical adoption.

[Late Open Semi-conversion with Endograft Preservation for (Type II) Endoleaks with Late Aneurysm Sac Enlargement after EVAR - Indications, Method and Results in Our Own Patient Collective]

EVAR (endovascular aortic repair) is the most common method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, but according to the latest findings it carries the risk of subsequent complications. These can be caused by (late) aneurysm sac growth. If conservative and surgical therapies fail to treat the aneurysm sac growth, open conversion is necessary to prevent aneurysm rupture. There are several options for open conversion, in which the EVAR prosthesis can be completely preserved or is (partially) removed. Late open semi-conversion with complete in-situ preservation of the EVAR-prosthesis and gathering of the aneurysm sac are a less invasive method than complete conversion and may be performed instead for selected patients. The aim of the present work is to present the surgical method, including indications and technical information, as well as the presentation of the results in our recent patient collective.All patients semi-converted in our department of vascular surgery and phlebology due to (type II) endoleak were included. All data are presented as n (%) or median (range).Between 6/2019 and 3/2023, 13 patients underwent semi-conversion 6 (2-12) years (median, range) after the initial EVAR. The aneurysm sac diameter at the time of semi-conversion was 69 mm (58-95 mm), the operating time was 114 min (97-147 min), the blood loss was 100 ml (100-1500 ml). Five (38%) patients received blood transfusion intraoperatively and 2 (15%) postoperatively. The stay in the intensive care unit lasted 1 (1-5) days, the hospitalisation time was 8 (6-11) days. Postoperative complications were intestinal atony (3 [23%], 1 [8%] with nausea/emesis and gastric tube insertion), anaemia (2 [15%]), hyponatraemia (2 [15%]), delirium (1 [8%]), COVID-19 infection (1 [8%]) and 1 [8%] intra-abdominal postoperative bleeding with the indication for surgical revision and the transfusion of 8 erythrocyte concentrates.Semi-conversion is a safe and practicable surgical method with few severe complications for a selected group of patients, which should be considered as an alternative to more invasive methods with (partial) removal of the EVAR-prosthesis. Further long-term studies comparing semi-conversion to full conversion are needed to demonstrate its benefits.

Pre-Operative Four Dimensional Flow Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Aortic Side Branches as a Method to Predict Risk of Type II Endoleak Resulting in Sac Enlargement After EVAR

OBJECTIVE

To predict sac enlargement with type II endoleak (ELII) before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using four dimensional flow sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI).

METHODS

A single centre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent EVAR between 2013 and 2019 were included. Aortic branches occluded pre-EVAR, and patients with endoleaks other than ELII were excluded. The aortic branch diameter, peak flow velocity (PFVe), and amplitude of the dynamics of flow volume (AFV) were measured in each aortic branch pre-EVAR. Total flow volume per minute (TFV/min), defined as the sum of AFV/min, was calculated in each case. According to computed tomography findings one year post-EVAR, the aortic branches and patients were divided into patent vessel and occluded vessel groups and sac expanding and non-expanding groups. PFVe, AFV/min, and TFV/min were analysed via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The patent aortic branches pre-EVAR (69 inferior mesenteric arteries [IMAs]; 249 lumbar arteries [LAs]) of 100 patients were included. Patent IMAs (n = 14) and occluded IMAs (n = 55), patent LAs (n = 23) and occluded LAs (n = 226), and expanding (n = 9) and non-expanding (n = 91) groups were compared, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in branch diameters (IMA; patent, 2.5 ± 0.8 mm, occluded, 2.5 ± 0.8 mm, p < .78 and LA; patent, 1.5 ± 0.3 mm, occluded, 1.5 ± 0.4 mm, p < .35). PFVe (IMA; patent, 262.6 mm2/sec, occluded, 183.4 mm2/sec and LA; patent, 142.6 mm2/sec, occluded, 47.7 mm2/sec) and AFV/min (IMA; patent, 8.4 mL, occluded, 5.2 mL and LA; patent, 4.2 mL, occluded, 1.4 mL) were higher in the patent vessel group (p < .050). TFV/min was statistically significantly higher in the expanding group (24.1 mL/min) than in the non-expanding group (7.0 mL/min) (p < .010).

CONCLUSION

Pre-EVAR haemodynamic analyses using 4D flow MRI were useful to detect aortic branches responsible for ELII and to predict AAA cases with sac enlargement. This analysis suggests a new strategy for pre-EVAR aortic branch embolisation.

The Challenge of Endoleaks in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Review of Their Types and Management

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilatation of the abdominal aorta above 3 cm or 50% greater than the segment above. It is a dangerous condition accounting for a substantial number of deaths per year and increasing at an alarming rate. Various factors come into play in the development of AAAs, which this study has elaborated on, including smoking and old age, demographics, and comorbid conditions. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a newer treatment modality used for AAAs in which an endograft device is placed into the aorta, thereby creating a bypass tract from the aneurysm and generating flow mimicking that of the natural aorta. It is minimally invasive and associated with less postoperative mortality and reduced hospital stay. However, EVAR is also associated with significant postoperative complications, including endoleaks, which were reviewed in depth. Endoleaks are postprocedural leaks into the aneurysm sac that are usually identified immediately after graft placement and indicate treatment failure. They are of five subtypes, categorized according to their mechanism of development. The most common type is type II endoleaks, and the most dangerous is type I endoleaks. Each subtype has multiple management options with varying rates of success. Prompt identification along with appropriate treatment of endoleaks can lead to better postoperative outcomes and improved quality of life for patients.

Persisting Type 2 Endoleaks Following EVAR for AAA Are Associated With AAA Expansion

PURPOSE

To determine the evolution of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter in the presence of persisting type 2 endoleaks (pEL2) following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center, case-control study. All patients with pEL2 (pEL2 group, persisting for > 12 months) between 2004 and 2018 were identified and compared with a 1:1 age- and gender-matched control with no endoleak (control group). Primary outcome measures were freedom from AAA expansion and freedom from AAA shrinkage over time. AAA diameter measurements were performed on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Secondary outcome measures were survival, AAA-related mortality, reinterventions for pEL2, incidence of secondary type 1 endoleaks (EL1), and infrarenal aortic branch vessel anatomy.

RESULTS

A total of 773 patients were treated with EVAR for AAA between 2004 and 2018. Of them, 286 patients demonstrated type 2 endoleaks (EL2) in postoperative CTA or intraoperative angiography (37%). Forty-five of 286 EL2 (15.7%) were pEL2 (pEL2 group). Freedom from AAA expansion in the pEL2 group was 100%, 96.7%, 85.2%, and 54.3% after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively, compared with 100% after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years in the control group (p<0.01). Freedom from AAA shrinkage in the pEL2 group after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 95.5%, 90.4%, 90.4%, and 79.1%, respectively, compared with 86.7%, 34.8%, 19.3%, and 19.3% in the control group (p<0.01). Overall survival at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 100%, 97.6%, 95.0% and 95.0% in the pEL2 group and 100% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years in the control group (p=0.17). There were no AAA-related deaths in either group. Patients with pEL2 had a significantly increased number of infrarenal aortic branches (p<0.05, respectively). Eighteen patients (40.0%) in the pEL2 group underwent 34 reinterventions for pEL2, with a median follow-up (FU) of 925 days (0-4173). Clinical success was achieved in 9 patients (50.0%). Four patients (8.9%) with pEL2 developed secondary EL1 after a median FU of 1278 days (662-2121).

CONCLUSION

pEL2 are associated with AAA expansion during midterm FU. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association of AAA expansion due to pEL2 with clinical outcomes to allow recommendations with regard to treatment indications.

A stable aneurysm sac after endovascular aneurysm repair as a predictor for mortality, an in-depth analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term survival in patients with a stable aneurysmal sac and those with aneurysmal sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to identify independent risk factors for aneurysmal sac regression and mortality after EVAR.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent EVAR between 2005 and 2018 with a computed tomography angiography available at 1-year follow-up. Aneurysm sac regression was defined as a diameter decrease of more than 10%. We used a multivariable regression to identify independent risk factors for sac regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were done to test differences in 5-year mortality between a stable sac and sac regression.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 325 patients, 185 in the sac regression group and 140 in the stable sac group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that treatment for a ruptured aneurysm was an independent risk factor for aneurysmal sac regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.96). Age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.31), neck thrombus (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07-6.95), and a type II endoleak (HR, 19.21; 95% CI, 7.32-50.40) were independent risk factors for a stable aneurysm sac diameter. Multivariable Cox regression showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for patients with a stable aneurysm sac after EVAR (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.36-3.72). There was no significant difference in cause of death between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A stable aneurysm sac after EVAR is associated with increased mortality. Age, ischemic heart disease, neck thrombus, and a type II endoleak are independent risk factors for a stable sac. However, a well-founded explanation for this finding is still lacking. Future research should be focussed on aggressive treatment of type II endoleaks and inflammatory processes as potential pathophysiological mechanisms.

Prophylactic Sac Outflow Vessel Embolization is Associated with Improved Sac Regression in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

Type II endoleaks (T2E), commonly identified after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), have been associated with late endograft failure and secondary rupture. Number and size of patent aortic aneurysm sac outflow vessels, namely the inferior mesenteric, lumbar, and accessory renal arteries, have been implicated as known risk factors for persistent T2E. Given technical challenges associated with post-EVAR embolization, prophylactic embolization of aortic aneurysm sac outflow vessels has been advocated to prevent T2E; however, current evidence is limited. We sought to examine the effect of concomitant prophylactic aortic aneurysm sac outflow vessels embolization in patients undergoing EVAR.

METHODS

Patients 18 and older in the SVS Vascular Quality Initiative database who underwent elective EVAR for intact aneurysms between January 2009 and November 2020 were included. Patients with history of prior aortic repair and those without available follow-up data were excluded. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed by group: EVAR with or without prophylactic sac outflow vessel embolization (emboEVAR). Outcomes of interest were rates of in-hospital postoperative complications, incidence of aneurysmal sac regression (≥5mm) and T2E, and rates of re-intervention in follow-up.

RESULTS

15060 patients were included: 272 had emboEVAR and 14788 had EVAR alone. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of age, comorbidities, or anatomic characteristics including mean maximum preoperative aortic diameter (5.5 vs. 5.6 cm, p=0.48). emboEVAR was associated with significantly longer procedural times (148 vs. 124 minutes, p<0.0001), prolonged fluoroscopy (32 vs. 23 minutes, p<0.0001), increased contrast use (105 vs. 91 mL, p<0.0001), without significant reduction in T2E at case completion (17.7% vs. 16.3%, p=0.54). Incidence of postoperative complications (3.7% vs. 4.6%, p=0.56), index hospitalization reintervention rates (0.7% vs. 1.3%, p=0.59), length of stay (1.8 vs. 2 days, p=0.75), and thirty-day mortality (0% vs. 0%, p=1) were similar between groups. In mid-term follow-up (14.6±6.2 months), the emboEVAR group had a significantly greater mean reduction in maximum aortic diameter (0.69 vs. 0.54 cm, p=0.006) with a higher proportion experiencing sac regression ≥5 mm (53.5% vs. 48.7%). Re-intervention rates were similar between groups. On multivariable analysis, prophylactic aortic aneurysm sac outflow vessel embolization (OR 1.34, CI 1.04-1.74, p=0.024) was a significant independent predictor of sac regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic sac outflow vessel embolization can be performed safely for patients with intact aortic aneurysms undergoing elective EVAR without significant associated perioperative morbidity or mortality. emboEVAR is associated with significant sac regression compared to EVAR alone in mid-term follow-up. Although there was not a decrease in the incidence of T2E, this technique shows promise and future efforts should focus on identifying a subset of aneurysm and outflow branch characteristics that will benefit from concomitant selective versus complete prophylactic sac outflow vessel embolization.

Management of Postoperative Complications Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to manage abdominal aortic pathologies (eg, aneurysm and dissection). EVAR was first introduced in 1991. In 1994, endovascular technique was also applied for thoracic aorta, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In recent decades, EVAR has become an acceptable first-line treatment with 50% utilization rate across most practices, especially in high-risk patients. The safety profile of EVAR is comparable to the open approach, with superiority in terms of perioperative mortality and morbidity. This article summarizes the most common complications following EVAR/TEVAR and the most current treatment modalities across practices.

Short-Term Re-intervention of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background and aim

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has revolutionized the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The re-intervention rate following EVAR has been a subject of debate in many studies. The study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes in terms of the early (four-year) re-intervention rate following EVAR at our centre and compare it to the average re-intervention rate of the main studies assessed by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

Methods

The EVAR procedures performed over two years (2015 and 2016) were retrieved using the operation codes. The clinical portal and PACS systems were used to review the discharge summaries, clinic and multidisciplinary team (MDT) letters, as well as the scans and interventional radiology procedures to assess the patients’ adherence to follow-up and identify any re-intervention procedure done to correct underlying problems related to the EVAR performed. Patients who switched their follow-up to another hospital were contacted and interviewed about any re-intervention undergone. 

Results

A total of 108 patients underwent EVAR during the two-year study period. Twenty EVAR-related re-interventions (18.5%) were recorded, irrespective of the cause or the type of intervention. This is slightly higher than the average rate by NICE (16.89%). Type 1 endoleak represented the leading cause for re-intervention (30%). Most of the cases of re-intervention were done endovascularly (60%). Forty-five percent of the patients had a re-intervention during the first year and 35% in the third year.

Conclusion

This study shows that although our re-intervention rate following EVAR was slightly higher than the international average, EVAR is still a safe method for the repair of AAA with relatively low peri-operative morbidity and mortality. However, long-term follow-up of these patients is mandatory as re-interventions are frequently required. Nonetheless, the majority of re-interventions can be done with minimal morbidity to the patient.

Predictive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Angiography for the Technical Success of Transarterial Embolization of Type II Endoleaks Arising from the Lumbar Arteries

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CTA) to predict the technical success of embolization of type II endoleak arising from a lumbar artery after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients at a single academic institution who underwent angiography with possible embolization for a post-EVAR lumbar-supplied type II endoleak from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo CTA before the procedure were excluded. CTAs were reviewed for the ability to trace the entire course of a feeding vessel from the internal iliac artery (IIA) to the lumbar artery at the site of the endoleak. Procedural imaging was reviewed for technical success, defined as the catheterization and embolization of the aneurysm sac through a lumbar artery.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven angiograms with a type II endoleak and suspected feeding lumbar artery were identified. On CTA acquired before the procedure, the arterial path supplying this lumbar artery could be traced from the IIA to the aneurysm sac in 18 (32%) patients. Embolization was technically successful in 16 of these 18 (89%) procedures compared with 10 of 39 (26%) procedures in which the supplying artery could not be traced using CTA (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A potential catheter path from the IIA through the iliolumbar and lumbar arteries to the aneurysm sac can be traced on preprocedural CTA in the minority of lumbar-supplied type II endoleaks. The ability to trace these inflow vessels may predict technical success during embolization. The low rate of technical success when the feeding vessel could not be traced using CTA suggests that these patients should be considered for percutaneous or transcaval sac puncture.

Computed Tomography Angiography Prediction of Successful Trasnscatheter Embolization for Type II Endoleak of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) angiography before transarterial embolization (TAE) in predicting TAE's technical success for type II endoleaks (T2ELs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients (mean age, 74.4 years; range, 46-89 years) who underwent attempted TAE for T2EL from July 2014 to August 2019 and underwent CT angiography before the procedure were included. Each CT angiography result was assessed for a feeding artery that was traceable over its entire course from either the superior mesenteric artery or the internal iliac artery to the endoleak cavity. TAE was performed using coils and was considered technically successful if embolization of the endoleak cavity and feeding artery was performed. The technical success rates were compared between patients with and without traceable feeding arteries.

RESULTS

A fully traceable feeding artery supplying 75% (44/59) of endoleaks in the cohort was identified. TAE was technically successful in 95% (42/44) of these cases but only in 13% (2/15) of the cases without a fully traceable feeding artery (P < .001). When the inferior mesenteric artery was the feeding artery, it was always fully traceable, and TAE was technically successful in 100% (33/33) of the cases. When a lumbar artery was the feeding artery, it was fully traceable in only 42% (11/26) of the cases. When the lumbar artery was not fully traceable, TAE was technically successful in only 13% (2/15) of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The traceability of a feeding artery over its entire course to an endoleak cavity using CT angiography was associated with TAE's technical success. Lumbar feeding arteries were less likely to be fully traceable. TAE's high failure rate when the feeding artery was not fully traceable suggests that translumbar embolization can be considered as an initial approach for theses patients.

Midterm single-center results after endovascular aneurysm sealing reveal a high rate of stent graft migration, secondary aneurysm ruptures, and device-related reinterventions

OBJECTIVE

To report procedural results and mid-term follow-up outcomes of patients treated with endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) for abdominal aortic disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, all patients treated with EVAS between March 2013 and January 2018 for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer were included. The datasets included demographics, aneurysm morphology, and procedural and clinical surveillance outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated within the original instructions for use (IFU-group) were compared with patients treated outside the IFU (non-IFU-group) with regard to survival, reintervention-free survival, freedom from type I endoleak, and freedom from stent graft migration.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included (67 male; median age, 72.5 years). Sixty-five patients were treated for AAA and 5 patients for abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer. Sixty-nine cases were treated electively (98.6%). Technical success was achieved in 68 cases (97.1%). The median clinical follow-up was 50.5 months (interquartile range, 29.3-62.7 months) with a median computed tomography angiographic follow-up of 38.5 months (interquartile range, 17.1-60.2 months). There were five deaths during the study period (7.1%), four of which were aneurysm related (5.7%). Five secondary AAA ruptures were detected (7.1%). Overall, 25 of 70 patients (35.7%) underwent 35 reinterventions, mostly owing to thrombotic complications (18.6%), stent graft migration (17.1%), and type I endoleak (12.9%). Fifteen patients were treated outside of the IFU (non-IFU-group) (21.4%). The estimated reintervention-free survival for the entire cohort at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years was 94.3%, 88.5%, 72%, and 56.9%, respectively. Freedom from stent graft migration at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98.6%, 82.0%, and 47.3%, respectively. The estimated freedom from type I endoleak at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years in the IFU-group was 100%, 100%, 94.9% and, 91.1% and significantly different when compared with the non-IFU-group with 79.5%, 72.2%, 72.2%, and 72.2% (P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the technical and initial results were satisfying, the mid-term results were disappointing. The enforcement of a close follow-up protocol for all patients treated with EVAS, especially vigilant for stent graft migration to prevent secondary type I endoleak and rupture, is strongly recommended.

Type 2 Endoleak With or Without Intervention and Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to examine the impact of type 2 endoleaks (T2EL) on overall survival and to determine the need for secondary intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands was conducted among patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2012. The primary endpoint was overall survival for patients with (T2EL+) or without (T2EL-) a T2EL. Secondary endpoints were sac growth, AAA rupture, and secondary intervention. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

A total of 2 018 patients were included. The median follow up was 62.1 (range 0.1 - 146.2) months. No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ (n = 388) and T2EL- patients (n = 1630) (p = .54). The overall survival estimates at five and 10 years were 73.3%/69.4% and 45.9%/44.1% for T2EL+/T2EL- patients, respectively. Eighty-five of 388 (21.9%) T2EL+ patients underwent a secondary intervention. There was no difference in overall survival between T2EL+ patients who underwent a secondary intervention and those who were treated conservatively (p = .081). Sac growth was observed in 89 T2EL+ patients and 44/89 patients (49.4%) underwent a secondary intervention. In 41/44 cases (93.1%), sac growth was still observed after the intervention, but was left untreated. Aneurysm rupture occurred in 4/388 T2EL patients. In Cox regression analysis, higher age, ASA classification, and maximum iliac diameter were significantly associated with worse overall survival.

CONCLUSION

No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ and T2EL- patients. Also, patients who underwent a secondary intervention did not have better survival compared with those who did not undergo a secondary intervention. This study reinforces the need for conservative treatment of an isolated T2EL and the importance of a prospective study to determine possible advantages of the intervention.

A Systematic Review and Pooled Meta-Analysis on the Incidence and Temporal Occurrence of Type II Endoleak Following an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

The aim in this study was to systematically review the literature to identify the time of occurrence of a newly diagnosed Type II endoleak (T2E) following an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and its potential impact on aneurysmal sac diameter changes.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane until January 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three observational studies were deemed eligible and provided data for 2643 T2E detected following EVAR. A total of 1432 (54.2%) T2E were diagnosed before 30 days follow-up, while 1035 (39.1%) T2E were diagnosed beyond 30 days following EVAR. A total of 222 (8.4%) T2E were diagnosed after 12 months of follow-up. A pooled meta-analysis of 6 studies, showed that early diagnosed T2E had a statistically significant higher odds of resolving as compared to those detected late (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.14-5.09; P = 0.021; I² = 68.9%). Sac expansion was documented in 313 (29%) T2E. The ruptured endoleaks were 14 (1.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of a T2E is a dynamic process detected throughout the lifetime of a patient with 8% detected beyond 12 months following EVAR. Long-term follow up is required with future prospective studies with consist reporting on changes in sac diameter, the thrombus characteristics. Long-term outcomes are needed to optimize management of patients with a newly diagnosed T2E.

Type II Endoleak Nidus Volume on Arterial and Delayed Phases of Initial CT Angiography after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Predicts Persistent Endoleak and Aneurysm Sac Enlargement

Purpose

To evaluate type II endoleak nidus volume (ENV) in the arterial phase (ENV_AP) and delayed phase (ENV_DP) of the first postoperative CT angiography (CTA) as a predictor of persistent endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement at follow-up CTA in patients with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Materials and Methods

Ninety-three patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 72 years ± 8; range, 56-88 years) with EVAR and type II endoleak were included in a single-institution retrospective study conducted between March 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. ENV_AP, ENV_DP, change of volume (ENV_DP-AP), and percentage of ENV_AP and ENV_DP in aneurysm sac volume (ASV) (ENV_AP/ASV%, ENV_DP/ASV%, respectively) were measured on first postoperative CTA images. The mean follow-up was 31.6 months ± 26.6 (range, 6-163.8 months). Patients were divided into two groups (group A, spontaneous resolution of endoleak without intervention [n = 29] and group B, persistent endoleak at follow-up CTA [n = 64]) and compared by using the Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, and Pearson χ² tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare accuracies of parameters at first postoperative CTA.

Results

The accuracy of ENV_DP (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.78) was superior to the accuracy of ENV_DP/ASV% (AUC, 0.76), ENV_DP-AP (AUC, 0.74), ENV_AP (AUC, 0.71), and ENV_AP/ASV% (AUC, 0.69) in indicating persistent endoleak. In group B, 46 patients (72%) showed ASV enlargement and 44 patients (69%) underwent endoleak embolization. ENV_AP (1.7 cm³ ± 2.9 vs 3.4 cm³ ± 4.2; P = .001), ENV_DP (2.9 cm³ ± 3.8 vs 8.0 cm³ ± 9.6; P < .001), ENV_DP-AP (1.1 cm³ ± 1.8 vs 4.5 cm³ ± 7.8; P < .001), ENV_AP/ASV% (0.9% ± 1.5 vs 1.7% ± 2.2; P = .003), and ENV_DP/ASV% (1.6% ± 2.2 vs 3.7% ± 3.6; P < .001) were smaller in group A than in group B.

Conclusion

ENV_DP of the first postoperative CTA is an accurate predictor of persistent endoleak compared with ENV_AP, and persistent endoleak is associated with aneurysm sac enlargement, in which earlier intervention is recommended.© RSNA, 2021.

Factors Influencing Clinical Success Following Endovascular Treatment of Type II Endoleaks

PURPOSE

To compare long-term outcomes of transarterial (TA) and translumbar (TL) embolization of type II endoleaks (T2E) following EVAR, as well as factors that predict clinical success.

METHODS

129 (mean age, 71.4y; range, 53-95) with T2E referred for embolization from August-2003 to December-2017 were retrospectively reviewed. One-hundred-eighty procedures were performed via TA (n = 139) and TL (n = 41) approaches, with 37 patients undergoing 51 reinterventions. Clinical success was defined as absence of endoleak and/or absence of aneurysm sac enlargement on follow-up imaging. Medical comorbidities, procedural data, embolic agents used, presence of successful sac embolization, and 30-day morbidity and mortality data were collected.

RESULTS

TL approaches had higher technical success (41/41 vs.122/139, p = .014). Clinical success rates were 52% (N = 58/111) and 62% (N = 23/37) for TA and TL procedures respectively (p = .34). Looking at all procedures, sac embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue had higher clinical success compared to other embolic agents (p = .017-.037). Successful sac access was a strong predictor of success for TA procedures (46/78 vs.12/33, p = .0379). 30-day complication rates were similar between TA (5.8%) and TL (4.9%) approaches. There was 1 death secondary to graft infection following TA embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall clinical success of TA and TL embolization when considering re-interventions is high. n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue had significantly higher success than other embolic agents (p = .017-.037). Successful sac access was associated with success for TA procedures.

Postimplantation syndrome in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair - a systematic review

Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a poorly understood phenomenon occurring in the early post-operative course. The underlying aetiology, risk factors, clinical sequalae, and treatment options, are largely unknown. The lack of any standardised diagnostic criteria limits current research in this field. The MEDLINE database was interrogated using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) search strategy. Five search terms were used; "postimplantation syndrome" AND "aneurysm", AND "infection", AND "complications", AND "biomarkers", AND "outcomes". 19 studies were included in the review process, reporting a 17.4%-39.0% incidence of PIS. IL-6 was the most commonly elevated biomarker in PIS vs. non-PIS patients. There was a higher incidence of PIS in patients who received polyester rather than expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts. There was a lower rate of type 2 endoleaks observed in patients who developed PIS. Early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were higher in PIS patients, however there were no studies reporting long-term MACE. Length of stay was higher in PIS patients. Current data support the role of IL-6 as being key to the development of PIS following EVAR. Further work describing the effect that PIS has on long-term clinical outcomes is needed. Lack of standardised diagnostic criteria limit the reporting of PIS between centres, the criteria proposed by this review may resolve this.

Type II Endoleaks After EVAR: A Literature Review of Current Concepts

Endoleak is the most frequent complication following endovascular aneurysm repair, which is not present in the surgical counterpart. The most frequent type of endoleak corresponds to type II, and its natural history remains poorly understood. Therefore, their treatment continues to be a topic of debate. The vast majority of the studies found in the literature are of a retrospective nature, and there are no prospective studies comparing intervention versus a conservative approach. Future studies should aim to compare not only different approaches to resolve type II endoleak but also when should be the right time to treat them, with the primary purpose of avoiding sac rupture. The objective of this review is to provide the reader with a literature overview about type II endoleaks to help in the decision-making process on this topic.

Midterm evaluation of perigraft arterial sac embolization in endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Management of clinically significant endoleaks (ELs) remains costly, time-consuming, and morbid. Unresolved ELs can result in rupture and mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Perigraft arterial sac embolization (PASE) has been used to treat ELs diagnosed at the time of EVAR or during surveillance.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases was conducted. The databases were compiled from two institutions between 2006 and 2016. PASE was performed for type I, type II, or type III EL with a thrombin, contrast medium, and Gelfoam (Pfizer, New York, NY) slurry prepared as previously described. PASE was administered either at the time of EVAR (primary) or during surveillance (secondary). Safety end points included nontarget embolization, defined as neurologic or enteric clinical sequelae from lumbar artery or visceral artery embolization, allergic reaction, peripheral embolization, or rupture. Efficacy end points included successful resolution of EL and cessation of aneurysm sac growth on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast enhancement.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients included in the study were treated with PASE. Primary PASE was performed in 38 patients (58%) and secondary in 28 (42%). Within the total cohort, the average clinical and CT scan follow-up was 1.7 years (0.1-11.6 years). Four patients required open repair for residual high-pressure ELs (one type IIIB and three type I; 6%). Of the 95% of patients who did not require open conversion, aneurysm growth did not occur during the follow-up period. In the overall cohort, PASE was successful in 88% of type I EL and 73% of patients with type II EL. There was no evidence of recanalization after thrombosis of culprit vessel for EL. No patients suffered nontarget embolization, spinal ischemia, allergic reaction, post-EVAR rupture, or colonic ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary and secondary PASE proved to be a safe, effective, and durable tool in sac management in conjunction with EVAR. Treating ELs during or after EVAR with PASE has minimized the incidence of EL on CT scan and halted aneurysm growth in our cohort. Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term durability of PASE in reducing secondary interventions after EVAR.

Type 2 Endoleaks: Common and Hard to Eradicate yet Benign?

PURPOSE

The exact significance of type 2 endoleaks (T2ELs) and the indication and efficacy of treatment are widely debated. We report our experience with managing T2ELs in a tertiary Asian centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) between February 2006 and December 2016. Patients with T2ELs were identified, and their data were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients underwent EVAR, of which 67 (42.9%) developed T2ELs. Seven were lost to follow-up. The remaining 60 patients had a mean follow-up period of 50.3 ± 33.9 months-34 (56.7%) experienced T2ELs early and the rest (43.3%) had late T2ELs. Forty-one patients had isolated T2EL, whilst 19 had concomitant T1EL and/or T3EL. Spontaneous resolution occurred in 25 patients (41.7%). All T2ELs with stable sac size were on continued surveillance. Amongst those with persistent T2ELs associated with sac growth (n = 17), 14 underwent intervention, of which 7 (50%) received > 1 embolisation procedure. A total of 16 transarterial embolisation and 8 translumbar embolisation procedures were performed. Technical success rate was 75%. In the intervention group, 5 (35.7%) had complete and sustained resolution, 7 had persistent/recurrent T2ELs but stable sac size, and 2 had progressive sac expansion. Overall mortality due to sac rupture occurred in 2 patients with concomitant T2EL and T1EL/T3EL.

CONCLUSION

T2ELs are common, albeit mostly benign if occurring in isolation and not in association with sac growth. Achieving complete T2EL resolution with embolisation is difficult even with reinterventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2B, retrospective study.

Translumbar Embolization of Type II Endoleaks: 12 Years of Experience at a Regional Vascular Centre

Background and Aims:

The management of persistent type II endoleaks (T2E) is often problematic for the endovascular specialist, with a lack of clear evidence for the best approach for embolization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of translumbar embolization (TLE) for T2E following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods:

This retrospective review included 27 embolizations performed on 23 patients with a median age of 78 (range 67-94 years; male: female 15:9), during the period September 2006 to July 2018. Primary outcome was freedom from aneurysm sac growth defined as <2 mm sac diameter increase on subsequent computed tomography.

Results:

The initial technical success rate was 100%, with complete “on table” embolization of the T2E on fluoroscopy; however, 4 (15%) patients needed repeat TLE due to persistent endoleak identified on follow-up computed tomography or because of further sac expansion. Satisfactory stasis was achieved in these 4 cases following a second embolization. The mean volume of embolic injected was 7.4 mL per case. Feeding vessels were identified on angiography in all cases; the nidus was supplied by lumbar branches in 21 cases, by the inferior mesenteric artery in 1 case and by both in a further 5 cases. Freedom from aneurysm sac growth (defined as < 2 mm) following 1 or 2 separate TLE was achieved in 18 (78%) and 20 (86%) patients, respectively. The major complication rate was <5% with one case of psoas abscess presenting 7 months following embolization; there were 2 minor complications in the form of intraprocedural transient abdominal pain.

Conclusion:

The translumbar approach is a safe and effective technique to treat T2E, as evidenced by the low complication and reintervention rate.

Immediate and 1-year success rate of type 2 endoleak treatment using three-dimensional image fusion guidance

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess immediate and 1-year success rate of type 2 endoleak (T2E) treatment with ethylene-vinyl-alcohol-polymer using three-dimensional (3D) image fusion guidance with cone beam computed tomography via trans-arterial embolization (TAE) or direct percutaneous sac injection (DPSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients with T2E who were treated either using TAE (34/37; 92%) or DPSI (9/37; 8%) were included. There were 34 men and 3 women with a mean age of 86±9 (SD) years (range: 67-104years). Mean aneurysm diameter was 67±14 (SD) mm (range: 42-101mm) at pre-procedure evaluation. Immediate success was complete embolization of the sac and feeding artery. 1-year success was reduction or stability of the aneurysmal sac diameter based on pre-procedure and 12-month follow-up examinations. Safety (treatment-related complications), patient demographics, duration of procedure and contrast volume were reported.

RESULTS

Immediate and 1-year successful outcomes were reported in 94% (n=32) and 88% (n=28) of patients after TAE and 100% (n=9) and 89% (n=8) after DPSI. T2E treatments were immediately successful for 95% of the procedures (41/43) and for 88% (36/41) at 1year. Overall, T2E treatment was effective in 33 patients (89%). No major complications occurred. Mean procedure time and contrast volume were significantly different between the 2 techniques with respectively 87±16 (SD) min (range: 65-120min) and 75±26 (SD) mL (range: 40-130mL) for TAE and 32±10 (SD) min (range: 20-50min) (P<0.01) and 6±6 (SD) mL (range: 2-22mL) (P<0.01) for DPSI. Mean aneurysm diameter at 1-year was 68±17 (SD) mm (range: 43-101mm). No significant differences in the pre-procedure sac diameter were found at long-term follow-up between patients without T2E and those with persistent T2E (P=0.1) in the successful embolization group (n=33).

CONCLUSION

TAE or DPSI treatments of T2E with ethylene-vinyl-alcohol-polymer using 3D-image fusion guidance were immediately successful for 95% of the procedures and remained effective for 88%. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess sac stability in the case of persistent endoleak.

Multicenter experience in translumbar type II endoleak treatment in the hybrid room with needle trajectory planning and fusion guidance

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of treating type II endoleaks (T2Ls) after aortic endovascular repair with image guidance translumbar puncture using intraoperative cone beam computed tomography with preprocedure computed tomography angiography fusion in hybrid operating rooms.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive T2L patients in three different institutions were treated between March 2015 and September 2017 by direct translumbar puncture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac after previous endovascular aortic repair. All patients were treated at a single setting in a cardiovascular hybrid operating room with a workstation featuring needle trajectory planning and guidance software. Aneurysm sac size change from the index treatment, freedom from recurrent endoleak after treatment, demographics, risk factors, and procedure factors were analyzed with univariate analysis.

RESULTS

All patients (N = 26; 19 male, 7 female; age range, 59-95 years; mean body mass index, 27.44 ± 3.06 kg/m²) underwent treatment for AAA sac expansion or symptoms. Four patients had failed to respond to previous catheter-directed T2L treatment. The most common risk factors included hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, tobacco use, and diabetes. Time to initial endoleak diagnosis ranged from 2 to 1914 days (average, 404 days). Aneurysm size after initial repair was 60.3 ± 7.5 mm; sac size had increased 10.1 ± 6.5 mm at the time of treatment. Onyx (Medtronic, Irvine, Calif) or glue (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) and coil embolization was used in 20 cases, and 6 patients were treated with coiling alone. There was no difference between the patients treated with coils alone and those treated with coils or glue (P > .05) in terms of freedom from failure. Total procedure time was 75.9 ± 40.7 minutes; contrast material volume, 19.9 ± 29 mL; fluoroscopy time, 13.74 ± 12.2 minutes; and radiation dose, 121.16 ± 167.7 mGy. After embolization, the mean sac diameter decreased by 2.2 mm to 67.5 ± 9.8 mm. Average follow-up period was 214 days. In 19 patients, the sac reduced in size between 0.2 and 19.1 mm per 100 days; in 2 patients, there was continued AAA expansion (3.4-4.3 mm per 100 days); there was no change in the sac size in 5 patients after the procedure. There were no AAA ruptures during the study period. Once T2L was treated, the recurrence rate was low at 11.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This initial multicenter evaluation of the effectiveness of fusion image-guided translumbar obliteration of T2L demonstrated that the technique was effective at all three study centers and showed excellent efficacy to reduce AAA sac size. This may become a more effective and efficient method of treating T2L compared with transarterial or transcaval embolization because of its high success rate and technical ease.

Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair without Type 2 Endoleak Using Concomitant N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Injection into the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate our new method to occlude target lumber arteries using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for prevention of type 2 endoleak (T2E).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, 176 patients who underwent EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were reviewed. Starting from October 2015, 83 patients (treatment group) underwent NBCA injection into the aneurysmal sac during EVAR. The incidence of T2E at 7 days and AAA sac diameter 12 months after EVAR were compared with those of the control group comprising 93 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR alone before 2015. The incidence of T2E at 7 days was significantly lower in the treatment group (2.4%) than in the control group (22.6%) (P < 0.001). AAA sac diameter at 12 months in the treatment group had a mean decrease of 6.6 mm as compared with the mean 4.4 mm in the control group (P = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, NBCA injection was significantly related to the reduction of incidence of T2E at 7 days (odds ratio = 11.8, P < 0.001) and a decrease in AAA sac diameter at 12 months (P < 0.001). There was no NBCA injection-related complication and reintervention in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

NBCA injection might be safe and useful to reduce the incidence of T2Es and to prevent AAA sac expansion.

Velocities of type II endoleaks on Doppler ultrasonography predict outcome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether flow velocities measured using Doppler ultrasonography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) can predict for resolution of type II endoleaks without intervention. We also assessed the relationship of the flow velocities to sac growth and the need for intervention. We hypothesized that hemodynamic properties suggesting low flow velocity would predict for resolution of type II endoleaks.

METHODS

The data from 23 patients with type II endoleaks identified on Doppler ultrasonography after EVAR from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The 23 patients with type II endoleaks were split into two groups. Group 1 included the 13 patients with resolved endoleaks or shrinking sac size and group 2, the 10 patients with an increasing sac size or those requiring intervention to seal the endoleak because of an increased sac size. We analyzed the velocities of the endoleak nidus.

RESULTS

Doppler ultrasound velocities were significantly lower in patients with resolved type II endoleaks and those with a shrinking aneurysm sac size compared with those demonstrating an increase in aneurysm sac size (42.6 ± 25.2 cm/s vs 219.5 ± 84.1 cm/s; P < .0001). Of the 10 patients in group 2, nine had required intervention with either translumbar embolization or transarterial embolization, with only two experiencing complete resolution of the type II endoleak, despite the intervention. All patients in group 2 had had ≥1 duplex ultrasound scan with endoleak nidus velocities >100 cm/s. In contrast, no patient in group 1 had had any duplex ultrasound scan with endoleak nidus velocities >100 cm/s.

CONCLUSIONS

The Doppler ultrasound velocities of type II endoleaks might be able to predict for spontaneous resolution of type II endoleaks or increased sac growth. Type II endoleaks on Doppler ultrasonography with endoleak nidus velocities >100 cm/s can persistent, even with attempted treatment.

Tight systolic blood pressure control with combination therapy decreases type 2 endoleaks in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has revolutionized the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease. However, the survival advantage is lost in the long term due the occurrence of endoleaks affecting the late rupture of aneurism sac. Few data are available on the role of blood pressure control in affecting the incidence of type 2 endoleaks in patients undergoing EVAR.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to evaluated whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) control to target 130 mmHg reached after preoperative cardiology consultant might decrease the incidence of type II endoleak(T2E), sac expansion and related aortic reintervention after elective endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR).

METHODS

We analyzed 386 patients undergoing EVAR between 2008 and 2016. The primary endpoints were T2E, sac expansion and related aortic re-intervention or sac shrinkage during a median follow-up of 24 months [12-48]. The secondary endpoint was every cause of vascular or cardiac morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The SBP value of 130 mmHg at the time of EVAR resulted, at ROC curve analysis, the most sensitive and specific for all the analyzed endpoints (T2E, n = 74; sac expansion n = 19; re-intervention, n = 10, sac shrinkage, n = 72). The combination antihypertensive therapy showed a significant inverse relationship with T2E occurrence. The incidence of primary endpoints was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with SBP ≥ 130 mmHg. Cardiovascular death was significantly more prevalent (p < 0,001) in patients with SBP ≥130 mmHg. These findings were confirmed at the multivariable Cox regression analysis [primary endpoint HR = 0.09(0.06-0.15), p < 0.001; cardiovascular death HR = 0.33(0.12-0.85), p = 0.023].

CONCLUSIONS

Tight SBP control at the target of 130 mmHg at the time of elective EVAR significantly decreases TE2 occurrence, need of re-intervention and cardiovascular death in a prolonged follow-up of a large sample of patients.

Importance of Follow-up Imaging in the Detection of Delayed Type 2 Endoleaks Despite Complete Aneurysmal Sac Shrinkage

Type 2 endoleaks usually constitute a benign and self-limited phenomenon, which rarely leads to aneurysmal sac expansion. However, in a small subset of patients, a persistent type 2 endoleak might pressurise the aneurysmal sac causing expansion. The authors present two cases with delayed new-onset type 2 endoleak. One occurred after standard endovascular aortic repair and the other after chimney endovascular aortic repair, causing expansion of the aneurysmal sac after a period of complete aneurysmal sac shrinkage. Accordingly, there is a risk of sac re-expansion due to delayed onset endoleaks, independent of the technique, justifying the need for a continuous follow-up despite long-term aneurysmal sac shrinkage.

Surgical Repair of a 13-cm Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Aortocaval Fistula in a 63-Year-Old Tuba Player

Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula, a rare condition, can be fatal without prompt intervention. The clinical symptoms are complex and varied, so diagnosis is typically confirmed by use of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography. We report our surgical repair of a 13-cm-diameter infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortocaval fistula in a 63-year-old orchestral tuba player who had 2 classic symptoms of the condition. The unruptured aneurysm and fistula were complicated by acutely angled vessels, so we performed surgery rather than endovascular repair. The patient recovered fully and was discharged from the hospital. This infrarenal aneurysm with aortocaval fistula is perhaps the largest to have been treated successfully by means of open surgery. In addition to our patient's case, we discuss the history and treatment considerations of this rare combined condition.

Flow dynamics of type II endoleaks can determine sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair using four-dimensional flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic parameters of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) to predict sac expansion using four-dimensional flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI) analysis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and were diagnosed with a T2EL were included in the study. Using 4D-flow MRI at 7 days, the peak flow velocity and amplitude of dynamics of blood flow per minute were measured in each T2EL vessel. The peak flow velocity was defined as the maximum of the absolute value of the blood flow velocity. The amplitude of dynamics of blood flow in the tributary arteries was defined as the sum of the absolute values of the inflow and outflow volume in each vessel. The amplitude of dynamics of blood flow in the tributary arteries per sac was calculated in each sac. The aneurysm sac diameter was measured by computed tomography (CT) at 1 year. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of sac expansion.

RESULTS

Of 155 patients who underwent EVAR, both CT angiography and 4D-flow MRI were performed in 107 patients at 7 days after EVAR. Among them, 39 (36.4%) were found to have a T2EL, of whom 28 were re-evaluated with CT angiography and 4D-flow at 1 year; 7 patients had expanding sacs (expanding group), whereas 21 had nonexpanding sacs (not-expanding group). At 7 days, 28 patients had 80 T2EL vessels detected by 4D-flow MRI, of which 39 vessels (48.8%) had stopped flowing at 1 year (transient vessels); 41 vessels (51.3%) had sustained flow (persistent vessels). The persistent vessels had significantly larger peak flow velocity and amplitude of dynamics of blood flow. The comprehensive analysis of T2EL vessels per sac identified that the amplitude of dynamics of blood flow in the tributary arteries per sac was significantly higher in the expanding group than in the not-expanding group. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of sac enlargement at a cutoff value of 3750 mm³/min were 85.7% and 76.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The fate of aneurysm sacs with T2ELs after EVAR has remained difficult to predict. A comprehensive analysis of concurrent multiple T2EL vessels using 4D-flow MRI analysis may enable prediction of the sac expansion after EVAR.

Type 2 Endoleak Incidence and Fate After Endovascular Aneurysms Repair in a Multicentric Series: Different Results with Different Devices?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is describing incidence and fate of type 2 endoleaks (T2ELs) in a multicentric cohort of patients treated by endovascular aneurysms repair using the Ovation device (Endologix) and comparing them with a group treated using the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted on 261 patients treated using the Ovation device and 203 using the Excluder. Outcomes were intraprocedural, 30-day, 12-month, and mean time follow-up T2EL incidence and related reinterventions. Patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), ≥3 lumbar arteries (LAs), intrasac thrombus volume, the mean diameter of common and external iliac arteries, external iliac artery stenosis (>70%), diameter ≤5 mm, iliac tortuosity ratio ≤0.5, thrombosis, and calcification were noted and considered as potentially influencing outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients of the Ovation group presented significantly more thrombosed, calcified, and tortuous iliac vessels than those in the Excluder group. No significant differences were noted in sac thrombosis, IMA, and LA patency. At completion angiography, T2EL was evident in 57 Ovation and 46 Excluder patients (P = 0.832). At 1 month, it was evident in 33 Ovation group and 28 Excluder group patients (P = 0.726). At 12-month and mean time (30.14 months) follow-up, no differences were evident between the 2 groups (P = 0.940 and 0.951, respectively). The log-rank test showed that the rate of T2EL-related reintervention was not different between the 2 groups (P = 0.46). Regarding anatomical characteristics, a statistically significant difference was not observed between patients presenting or not with T2EL (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Data showed no significant differences in terms of T2EL incidence between the 2 study groups. None of preoperative anatomical features were found to be significantly associated with the appearance of T2EL.

Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcome of Treatment for Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and need for secondary interventions for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating the clinical outcomes of different type II endoleak treatments in patients with a persistent type II endoleak after EVAR.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Medline via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Outcomes of interest were technical and clinical success, change in sac diameter, complications, need for additional interventions, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, and (AAA related) mortality. Meta-analyses were performed with random effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 59 studies were included, with a cumulative cohort of 1073 patients with persistent type II endoleak. Peri-operative complications following treatment of type II endoleaks occurred in 3.8% of patients (95% CI 2.7-5.2%), and AAA related mortality was 1.8% (95% CI 1.1-2.7%). Overall technical success was 87.9% (95% CI 83.1-92.1%), while clinical success was 68.4% (95% CI 61.2-75.1%). Among studies detailing sac dynamics, decrease or stable sac, with or without resolution, was achieved in 78.4% (95% CI 70.2-85.6%). Changes in sac diameter following type II endoleak treatment were documented in 157 patients to at least 24 months. Within this group an actual decrease in sac diameter was reported in only 27 of 40 patients.

CONCLUSION

There is little evidence supporting the efficacy of secondary intervention for type II endoleaks after EVAR. Although generally safe, the lack of evidence supporting the efficacy of type II endoleak treatment leads to difficulty in assessing its merits.

Type II endoleaks: diagnosis and treatment algorithm

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is recommended for aneurysms greater than 5.5 cm, symptomatic, or rapidly expanding more than 0.5 cm in 6 months. Seventy-five percent of AAAs today are treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) rather than open repair. This is fostered by the lower periprocedural mortality, complications, and length of hospital stay associated with EVAR. However, some studies have demonstrated EVAR to result in higher reintervention rates than with open repair, largely due to endoleaks. Type II is the most common, making up 10-25% of all endoleaks. Type II endoleaks, can potentially enlarge and pressurize the aneurysm sac with a risk of rupture. However, many type II endoleaks spontaneously resolve or never lead to sac enlargement. Imaging surveillance and approaches to management of type II endoleaks are reviewed here.

The natural history of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair justifies conservative management

Objective

Management of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair has been controversial. Some advocate for conservative management, while others believe that intervention is indicated. This study investigated the natural history of type 2 endoleaks in order to derive direction in management.

Methods

Patients who had endovascular aneurysm repair at the Veterans Affairs Long Beach were retrospectively identified and computerized tomographic angiography was independently reviewed by a radiologist and a vascular surgeon. Type 2 endoleaks were analyzed for the following outcomes: rupture, duration of endoleak, spontaneous resolution, changes in the size of the aneurysm sac, and reintervention rates.

Results

Of the 160 patients who had completed required follow-up to date (mean 3 years) after endovascular aneurysm repair, 39 (24.4%) patients were identified as having a type 2 endoleak on computerized tomographic angiography imaging. 6 (15.4%) of these 39 patients required repair due to aneurysm sac growth >1 cm. 2 (5.13%) were repaired with an open procedure and 4 (10.3%) with an endovascular approach. Of these 6 aneurysm leaks requiring repair, 4 (66.7%) had a simultaneous endoleak (types 1 or 3) in addition to the identified type 2 endoleak. Spontaneous resolution of type 2 endoleaks occurred in 16 (41.0%) patients. 4 patients (10.3%) had delayed type 2 endoleaks that presented 4, 9, 12, and 23 months after their 30 day post op computed tomography was normal. None of the 4 patients with delayed type 2 endoleaks required reintervention and none had aneurysm sac growth greater than 5 mm.

Conclusions

Overall, we found that 85% of patients who had type 2 endoleaks did not require intervention after a mean follow-up time of 3 years. The association of a type 1 or 3 endoleak with a type 2 endoleak was more likely to require correction due to aneurysm expansion >1 cm, thus type 2 endoleaks associated with another type of endoleak require more aggressive management.

An Institution-Wide Algorithm for Treatment of Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)

Objectives:

Multiple endovascular techniques have been described for the treatment of persistent type II endoleaks (pT2ELs) causing aneurysm sac growth following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In the event of a failed endovascular procedure and a pT2EL, a consensus regarding further treatment is lacking, and the literature suggests repeated endovascular attempts are rarely successful. Herein, we propose an algorithm for definitive management of pT2ELs with persistent sac growth following EVAR.

Methods:

A retrospective review of 29 patients who underwent treatment of persistent sac growth in the setting of pT2ELs was performed. Intervention methods were determined at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Aneurysmal sac enlargement was defined as a diameter increase > 5 mm, and persistent endoleak was defined as lasting greater than 6 months.

Results:

From 2000 to 2015, 917 EVAR procedures were performed at our institution. Isolated pT2ELs with sac enlargement were identified in 29 patients. Twenty-five patients underwent direct translumbar sac puncture and coiling and/or Onyx (Onyx, Plymouth, Minnesota) embolization of the culprit vessels. Thirteen (52%) of 25 patients had pT2EL after first endovascular intervention, and 10 (40%) of 25 patients failed 2 endovascular treatments. Of those 10, 7 displayed persistent aneurysmal sac growth and underwent a third embolization procedure. Type II endoleaks persisted in 6 patients; 3 patients were subsequently treated with laparotomy, ligation of lumbar vessels, sac exploration, and sac plication around the endograft. Technical success for this technique was 100%. During a mean follow-up of 38.4 months, no recurrent T2ELs, stent graft migration, and/or disjunction were observed.

Conclusions:

We propose a new algorithm for the management of pT2ELs. If 2 endovascular procedures fail to control of the endoleak, repeat endovascular attempts are not recommended. Endovascular failure should be followed by laparotomy with surgical ligation of culprit feeding vessels followed by sac exploration and plication of the sac, and endoaneurysmorrhaphy.

Risk factors of secondary intervention for type II endoleaks in endovascular aneurysm repair: An 8-year single institution study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The natural history of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) is still not completely understood; however, it is widely accepted that those associated with aneurysmal sac growth are harmful. We aimed to review our experience with T2ELs in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of all patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal-type abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) at a single institution from August 2007 to November 2015. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Preoperative contrast computed tomography scans were reviewed to determine aneurysm morphology (the maximum AAA diameter, number of lumbar arteries that enter the AAA sac, size of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), proximal neck diameter, proximal neck angle, existence of thrombosis, presence of atheroma, and existence of rupture).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients underwent EVAR; the follow-up duration was 35.82 ± 31.89 months. There were statistically significant differences in female sex (P = .040), number of lumbar arteries on preoperative computed tomography scans (P = .010), and non-smoking status (P = .031) between patients with and without T2ELs. There were statistically significant differences in the maximum AAA diameter (P = .034) and size of the IMA (P = .043) between patients with and without secondary intervention in T2EL. There was one mortality after EVAR but no mortality associated with T2ELs.

CONCLUSIONS

A more judicious approach that considers risk factors of T2ELs is needed before EVAR. The risk of secondary intervention in patients developing a T2EL after EVAR could increase with the maximum AAA diameter ≥7 cm or IMA ≥3 mm.

Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is frequently caused by persistent flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and midterm efficacy of laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of endoleak.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane databases and key references were searched with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for studies reporting on laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR.

RESULTS

Eight case studies and one study of a retrospective nature were identified. In total, 20 patients (18 men; mean age, 73.6 ± 2 years; with a mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter of 64.3 ± 10 mm) who underwent post-EVAR laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for type II endoleak were analyzed. The mean time from EVAR until intervention ranged from 6 to 18 months. All but one patient were asymptomatic; in 9, the aneurysm sac was enlarged, and in 11, the endoleak was considered persistent without sac enlargement. The mean procedural duration was 99 ± 24 minutes, with technical success rate of 90% (18/20); in two cases, the patients were successfully reoperated on laparoscopically in 24 hours. The mean hospitalization was 3.6 ± 1.2 days, with 0% (0/20) perioperative and 30-day mortality. No patient underwent open conversion or showed signs of intestinal ischemia. During follow-up of 32.6 ± 12 months, 13 of 20 patients had aneurysm sac regression, whereas the rest had a stable sac diameter without evidence of persistent type II endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR is a feasible and safe technique in specialized centers with high technical success rate and good midterm outcomes.

Postoperative initial 2-day blood pressure management facilitates the shrinkage of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair by reducing the incidence of type II endoleak

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of initial 2-day blood pressure management (BPM) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for the incidence of subsequent type II endoleak (T2E) and shrinkage of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac diameter.

METHODS

We reviewed 136 patients who underwent EVAR for atherosclerotic AAA between July 2008 and July 2014 with one of three stent grafts (Excluder [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz], Powerlink [Endologix Inc, Irvine, Calif], and Endurant [Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, Calif]). Starting from 2013, the mean blood pressure of 76 participating patients (treatment group) was maintained at 75 to 90 mm Hg for the initial 48 hours after EVAR. The incidence of T2E at 7 days and AAA sac diameter 12 months after EVAR were evaluated using computed tomography scanning. The results so obtained were then compared with those of the control group composed of 60 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR before 2013.

RESULTS

The incidence of T2E at 7 days was significantly lower in patients who received treatment (treatment group, 19.7%; control group, 40.0%; P = .013), and AAA sac diameter at 12 months in the treatment group had a mean decrease of 5.1 mm compared with the mean 2.2 mm in the control group (P = .004). In multivariate regression analysis, BPM was significantly related to the reduction of incidence of T2E at 7 days (odds ratio, 0.31; P = .007) and a decrease in AAA sac diameter at 12 months (P = .005). In addition, although the use of Endurant had less effect, the use of Excluder under controlled blood pressure conditions improved the incidence of T2E from 80% to 23% compared with those under normal postoperative management (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The initial 2-day postoperative BPM might have positive effects, such as lower incidence of T2E and facilitation of AAA sac shrinkage.

Embo-EVAR: A Technique to Prevent Type II Endoleak? A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Intraprocedural aneurysm sac embolization (embo-EVAR) during endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) using coils and fibrin glue is a technique for preventing type II endoleak (EII). Our aim is to evaluate feasibility, safety and clinical outcome of this promising approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective clinical case analysis of 72 patients who underwent EVAR during the period 2011-2014. Two groups were compared at 6 and 12 months follow-up with contrast media computed tomography scan and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging: consecutively, 36 patients (group A) treated with classic EVAR and 36 patients (group B) treated with embo-EVAR. Coils were released filling better as possible the aneurysm sac; the embolization was completed by injecting fibrin glue. Device and materials used, differential systemic and sac pressures, presence of any endoleak, and complication were registered.

RESULTS

In our experience, we had 100% technical success without surgical conversion. Embo-EVAR was performed, after endograft deployment, in group B patients, all with ratio of Δ-pressures (obtained from Δ-sac pressure/Δ-differential pressure) > 0.16. No early or late complications occurred and mortality was nil. Follow-up was performed with computed tomography-angiography and CEUS at 6 and 12 months. We observed 9 type II and 1 type Ia endoleak in group A and 2 type II and 1 type Ib endoleaks in group B. Mean radiation exposure time was 30.3 min in group A and 43.3 min in group B. EVAR procedure average cost was 9,000 €. The average cost of sac embolization was 1,500€.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a randomized study is necessary, embo-EVAR may be a valid approach to prevent type II endoleaks and further complications. Mild costs and exposure-dose increase could be accepted to avoid reinterventions, and in our experience, it could be routinely performed with excellent results.