Endoscopically directed external support of femoral vein valves

Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep venous reflux correction in chronic venous insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility, operative techniques, safety, and efficacy outcomes of procedures aimed at correcting deep venous reflux, in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.

METHODS

We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from databases' inception to February 2022. We included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies describing surgical procedures to treat patients with deep reflux due to primary and secondary incompetence, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Proportion meta-analyses were performed for all the efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 57 studies in the quantitative synthesis: three randomized controlled trials including 252 patients and 54 case series including 4004 patients. Studies included a median of 38 patients, with a mean age of 51 years; 52% of them were males. Forty percent of studies included 2291 patients with primary incompetence, 29% of studies included 595 patients with PTS, and 31% of studies included 1118 patients with both diseases. As for primary incompetence, pooled estimates for all procedures showed an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-94%) of ulcer healing, 10% (95% CI, 4%-18%) ulcer recurrence, 98% (95% CI, 93%-100%) valve patency, 84% (95% CI, 78%-90%) valve competence, 0.05% (1/1904 patients) pulmonary embolism, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) wound infections, 5% (95% CI, 1%-9%) hematoma, 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%) lymphocele, 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) thrombosis, 85% (95% CI, 74%-94%) pain improvement, 89% (95% CI, 65%-100%) edema improvement, and 85% (95% CI, 73%-93%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement. Patients with PTS showed less favorable outcomes: 82% (95% CI, 71%-91%) of ulcer healing, 18% (95% CI, 5%-36%) ulcer recurrence, 88% (95% CI, 78%-96%) valve patency, 78% (95% CI, 66%-88%) valve competence, no pulmonary embolism, 6% (95% CI, 0%-22%) wound infections, 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%) hematoma, 5% (95% CI, 1%-12%) lymphocele, 7% (95% CI, 1%-16%) thrombosis, 79% (95% CI, 59%-94%) pain improvement, 75% (95% CI, 61%-88%) edema improvement, and 64% (95% CI, 9%-100%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of studies included in each meta-analysis are limited, and knowing how this element can affect the statistical power, as well as the absence of comparative control groups, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux may increase the probability of clinical improvement in patients affected by chronic venous insufficiency. Outcomes appear to be satisfactory even if possible adjunctive procedures may be required over the course of the patient's lifetime. Consequently, a strict follow-up protocol is required to maintain outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux particularly as to how it compares with the more recently introduced endovenous approaches.

Internal compression therapy, a novel method in the treatment of deep venous insufficiency: 18-month clinical results

OBJECTIVE

To present 18-month clinical results for internal compression therapy (ICT) applied percutaneously and as a novel method in the treatment of primary deep venous insufficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Thirty patients diagnosed with isolated primary femoral vein (FV) insufficiency between October 2017 and February 2018 were included in the study. Pre-procedural femoral vein diameters and reflux durations were measured. CEAP classification and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were recorded. Pre-procedural CEAP classifications were CEAP 4 in nine patients and CEAP 3 in 21. Quality of life assessments were carried out using a Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-2). FV diameters were then reduced, and valve coaptation was established with the percutaneous application of hyaluronic acid and cyanoacrylate injected adjacent to a valve with non coapting leaflets. Venous diameters and reflux duration were again measured immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed-up at months 1, 6, and 18, at which times all parameters were re-evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighteen of the 30 patients were women, and 12 were men. The mean duration of the procedure was 22.7 ± 2.9 (20-30) min. Patients' FV diameters were 12.8 (11-14.7) mm before the procedure, 9.9 (9-11.5) mm immediately after, and also 9.9 (9-11.2) mm after 1.5 years (p < 0.001). Pre-procedural reflux duration ranged between 2 and 6 (median: 3) sec, and no reflux was observed in any patient immediately or one month after the procedure (p < 0.001). At 18-month follow-up, reflux lasting only 1 sec was determined in two patients. VCSS scores were 11 (10-12) pre-procedurally and 6 (4-9) at 18 months (p < 0.001). Venous Quality of Life scores were 32 (30-36) before the procedure and 18 (14-24) at 18 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary investigation of the injection of cyanoacrylate and hyaluronic acid around one valve in an incompetent FV can result in improved hemodynamics, CEAP, VCSS and patient QOL at 18 months, without complications.

The May-Husni Procedure: A Reappraisal

OBJECTIVES

The May-Husni procedure is a rarely used saphenofemoral venous bypass because of the small number of patients with post-thrombotic segmental femoral vein obstruction alone and the lack of validated selection criteria. There are only a few institutional series reporting the use of this technique. The purpose of this report is to present the author's experience and critically review the literature.

METHODS

Within a 13 year period 12 patients with venous claudication, skin pigmentation, and severe pain and swelling of their legs underwent the May-Husni procedure. Their median age was 57 years (41-69 years). Imaging showed segmental venous obstruction of the femoral vein in all patients and poor or no inflow from the deep femoral vein. Two patients were lost to follow up and the remaining 10 patients were reviewed with a median follow up of 60 months (26-72 months).

RESULTS

The saphenopopliteal bypass remained patent in all patients at follow up. The development of reflux of the saphenous conduit in four patients did not affect the clinical improvement. Venous claudication resolved, hyper-pigmentation improved, and pain was relieved in all patients. Recanalization of the femoral vein 3 years following thrombosis was followed by recurrence of the post-thrombotic symptoms in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that a highly selected subgroup of patients with severe symptomatic post-thrombotic syndrome secondary to chronic segmental obstruction of the femoral vein do well after the May-Husni procedure. In order to refine the criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from this operation, there is a need for more studies that use a combination of hemodynamic and validated scales that diagnose and grade the severity of post-thrombotic syndrome.