The impact of renal insufficiency on the outcome of carotid surgery is influenced by the definition used

The effect of chronic renal insufficiency by use of glomerular filtration rate versus serum creatinine level on late clinical outcome of carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported mixed results after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI), and we previously reported the perioperative outcome in patients with CRI by use of serum creatinine (Cr) level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, only a few of these studies used GFR by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in their analysis of long-term outcome.

METHODS

During the study period, 1000 CEAs (926 patients) were analyzed; 940 of these CEAs had Cr levels and 925 had GFR data. Patients were classified into normal (GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or Cr <1.5 mg/dL), moderate CRI (GFR ≥30-59 or Cr ≥1.5-2.9), and severe CRI (GFR <30 or Cr ≥3).

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 34.5 months and a median of 34 months (range, 1-53 months), combined stroke and death rates for Cr levels (867 patients) were 9%, 18%, and 44% for Cr <1.5, ≥1.5 to 2.9, and ≥3 (P = .0001) in contrast to 8%, 14%, and 26% for GFR (854 patients) of >60, ≥30 to 59, and <30, respectively (P = .0003). Combined stroke and death rates for asymptomatic patients were 8%, 17%, and 44% (P = .0001) for patients with Cr levels of <1.5, ≥1.5 to 2.9, and ≥3, respectively, vs 7%, 13%, and 24% for a GFR of ≥60, ≥30 to 59, and <30 (P = .0063). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, stroke-free survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 97%, 94%, and 92% for Cr <1.5; 92%, 85%, and 81% for Cr ≥1.5 to 2.9; and 56%, 56%, and 56% for Cr ≥3 (P < .0001); vs 98%, 95%, and 93% for a GFR ≥60; 93%, 90%, and 86% for a GFR of ≥30 to 59; and 86%, 77%, and 73% for a GFR <30 (P < .0001). These rates for asymptomatic patients at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 97%, 95%, and 93% for Cr <1.5; 94%, 87%, and 82% for Cr ≥1.5 to 2.9; and 56%, 56%, and 56% for Cr ≥3 (P < .0001); vs 98%, 95%, and 94% for a GFR ≥60; 95%, 91%, and 86% for a GFR of ≥30 to 59; and 84%, 80%, and 75% for a GFR <30 (P = .0026). A univariate regression analysis for asymptomatic patients showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of stroke and death was 6.5 (P = .0003) for a Cr ≥3 and 3.1 for a GFR <30 (P = .0089). A multivariate analysis showed that Cr ≥3 had an HR of stroke and death of 4.7 (P = .008), and GFR <30 had an HR of 2.2 (P = .097).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe CRI had higher rates of combined stroke/death. Therefore, CEA for these patients (particularly in asymptomatic patients) must be considered with caution.

Delay between symptoms and surgery for carotid artery stenosis: modification of our practice

BACKGROUND

Recent data from the literature concerning symptomatic carotid stenosis show that the long-term benefits of surgery are greater when the surgery is performed soon after the neurologic event, ideally within 2 weeks. Since 2009, following recommendations, we decided to perform surgery as quick as possible. The aim of the study was to determine whether this approach increased postoperative morbimortality and the way it could change our practice.

METHODS

Using a prospective database containing a consecutive and continuous series of 1,500 carotid endarterectomies performed between 2003 and 2012, we extracted the records concerning the 417 symptomatic carotid stenoses (27.8%). We compared the 30-day and long-term outcome in 3 groups of patients: those operated within 2 weeks of the neurologic event (early surgery group [ESG], n = 158, 37.9%), those operated between 16 days and 6 weeks after the event (deferred surgery group [DSG], n = 79, 18.9%), and those operated more than 6 weeks after the event (late surgery group [LSG], n = 180, 43.2%). In the second part, to assess the new management beginning 2009, patients were divided in 2 periods 2003-2008 (period A) and 2009-2012 (period B) and we compared the 2 period's descriptive data and outcome. The primary outcome was the 30-day combined stroke and death rate. Secondary end points were follow-up freedoms from mortality and stroke.

RESULTS

The mean time between symptom onset and surgery was 7.7 ± 3.8 days for the ESG, 28.3 ± 8.6 days for the DSG, and 89.4 ± 36.7 days for the LSG. In the 3 groups, the types of symptoms leading to the indication for carotid surgery were comparable, with a stroke in 221 cases (53.0%), a transient ischemic attack in 146 cases (35.40%), and amaurosis fugax in 50 cases (12.0%). The groups were comparable in terms of comorbidities. The overall 30-day stroke rate was 1.4% (6 cases), the 30-day death rate was 1.7% (7 cases), and the combined stroke and death rate was 3.4% (3.2% in the ESG, 5.1% in the DSG, and 2.8% in the LSG [P = 0.808]). Survival rates at 24, 48, and 60 months were, respectively, 95%, 78%, and 78% in ESG, 86%, 81%, and 81% in DSG, and 91%, 83%, and 74% in LSG (P = 0.78). Freedom from stroke at 60 months showed to be, respectively, 97% in ESG, 96% in DSG, and 91% in LSG (P = 0.32). During the period A (2003-2008), we had taken care of 217 symptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients (22.3% of stenosis) and during the period B (2009-2012), 200 symptomatic stenosis (37.9% of stenosis). During the period A, an early surgery (<15 days) had place in 31 cases (14.3%), and during the period B, in 127 cases (63.5%). The 30-day stroke and death rate was of 3.7% during the period A and of 3.0% during the period B (P = 0.455). The 24-month survival and stroke-free survival rates were comparable between the 2 periods.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, surgery for symptomatic carotid stenosis can be performed early without increasing the rate of postoperative and long-term outcome. We have modified our practice, performing more and more early surgery for symptomatic stenosis without any impact on the outcome.

In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Most studies based on state and nationwide registries evaluating perioperative outcome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) rely on hospital discharge data only. Therefore, the true 30-day complication risk after carotid revascularization may be underestimated.

METHODS

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2005-2010 to assess the in-hospital and postdischarge rate of any stroke, death, cardiac event (new Q-wave myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest), and combined stroke/death and combined adverse outcome (S/D/CE) at 30 days following CEA. Multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors for in-hospital and postdischarge events separately, and in particular, those that predict postdischarge events distinctly.

RESULTS

A total of 35,916 patients who underwent CEA during 2005-2010 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database; 59% were male, median age was 72 years, and 44% had a previous neurologic event. Thirty-day stroke rate was 1.6% (n = 591), death rate was 0.8% (n = 272), cardiac event rate was 1.0% (n = 350), stroke or death rate was 2.2% (n = 794), and combined S/D/CE rate was 2.9% (n = 1043); 33% of strokes, 53% of deaths, 32% of cardiac events, 40% of combined stroke/death, and 38% of combined S/D/CE took place after hospital discharge. Patients with a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack had similar proportions of postdischarge events compared with patients without prior symptoms. Independent predictors for postdischarge events, but not for in-hospital events were female sex (stroke [odds ratio (OR), 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-2.1] and stroke/death [OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7]), renal failure (stroke [OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.2]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (death [OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.7], stroke/death [OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4], and S/D/CE [OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

With 38% of perioperative adverse events after CEA happening posthospitalization, regardless of symptoms status, we need to be alert to the ongoing risks after discharge particularly in women, patients with renal failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This emphasizes the need for reporting and comparing 30-day adverse event rates when evaluating outcomes for CEA, or comparing carotid stenting to CEA.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes of surgical resection for primary colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort review

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease, a disease entity increasing in number, may be an obstacle in various aspects of treatment for malignant neoplasm, such as perisurgical management and implementation of chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate both short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer who have chronic kidney disease.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective cohort study of patients.

SETTINGS

This study as conducted at an academic tertiary hospital in Japan.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

We investigated 1127 consecutive patients with stages 0 to III primary colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection in our department from January 2001 to December 2010. Based on estimated glomerular filtration rate, patients were classified into stages 0 to 2 (including normal renal function, 882 patients, 78.2%), stages 3 to 4 (226 patients, 20.1%), or stage 5 chronic kidney disease (19 patients, 1.7%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinicopathological data, perioperative course, frequencies of postoperative complications, adjuvant chemotherapy, and recurrence-free and overall survivals after surgery for colorectal cancer were compared among the 3 different chronic kidney disease stage groups.

RESULTS

Patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 frequently experienced diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular comorbidities. They were also hypoalbuminemic and anemic and more likely to receive blood transfusions, although estimated blood loss was smaller during surgery than in the other patients. Perioperative cardiovascular complications were more frequent in the chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 4 and 5 groups (5.3%) than those in the stages 0 to 2 group (0.8%, p < 0.0001). However, the frequencies of other complications were similar. There were no differences in the frequency of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival among different chronic kidney disease stages; in contrast, the chronic kidney disease stage 5 group showed a poorer overall survival.

LIMITATIONS

: The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

From these data, we conclude that surgical resection for colorectal cancer in patients with chronic kidney disease can be performed with acceptable outcomes.