The incidence of pulmonary neoplasms discovered by serial computed tomography scanning after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Potential added value of an AI software with prediction of malignancy for the management of incidental lung nodules

Purpose

To determine the impact of an artificial intelligence software predicting malignancy in the management of incidentally discovered lung nodules.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, all lung nodules ≥ 6 mm and ≤ 30 mm incidentally discovered on emergency CT scans performed between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were assessed. Artificial intelligence software using deep learning algorithms was applied to determine their likelihood of malignancy: most likely benign (AI score < 50%), undetermined (AI score 50-75%) or probably malignant (AI score > 75%). Predictions were compared to two-year follow-up and Brock's model.

Results

Ninety incidental pulmonary nodules in 83 patients were retrospectively included. 36 nodules were benign, 13 were malignant and 41 remained indeterminate at 2 years follow-up.AI analysis was possible for 81/90 nodules. The 34 benign nodules had an AI score between 0.02% and 96.73% (mean = 48.05 ± 37.32), while the 11 malignant nodules had an AI score between 82.89% and 100% (mean = 93.9 ± 2.3). The diagnostic performance of the AI software for positive diagnosis of malignant nodules using a 75% malignancy threshold was: sensitivity = 100% [95% CI 72%-100%]; specificity = 55.8% [38-73]; PPV = 42.3% [23-63]; NPV = 100% [82-100]. With its apparent high NPV, the addition of an AI score to the initial CT could have avoided a guidelines-recommended follow-up in 50% of the benign pulmonary nodules (6/12 nodules).

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence software using deep learning algorithms presents a strong NPV (100%, with a 95% CI 82-100), suggesting potential use for reducing the need for follow-up of nodules categorized as benign.

Risk of various cancers in adults with abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The cause of death for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be related to the AAA itself. However, cancer-related mortality could also be a contributing factor. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that an association exists between AAAs and certain cancers.

METHODS

Information from 2009 to 2015 was extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We included 14,920 participants with a new diagnosis of an AAA. Propensity score matching by age and sex with disease-free patients was used to select the control group of 44,760 participants. The primary end point of the present study was a new diagnosis of various cancers.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio (HR) for cancer incidence was higher in the AAA group than in the control group for hepatoma, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer (HR, 1.376, 1.429, and 1.394, respectively). In the case of leukemia, the HR for cancer occurrence was not significantly higher in the AAA group than in the control group. However, when stratified by surgery, the HR was significantly higher for the surgical group (HR, 3.355), especially for endovascular aneurysm repair (HR, 3.864).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that AAAs are associated with an increased risk of cancer, in particular, hepatoma, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer, even after adjusting for several comorbidities. Thus, continued follow-up is necessary for patients with an AAA to permit the early detection of the signs and symptoms of cancer.

Epidemiological Study to Assess the Prevalence of Lung Cancer in patients with smoking-associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: PREVALUNG study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Eligibility criteria definition for a lung cancer screening (LCS) is an unmet need. We hypothesised that patients with a history of atheromatous cardiovascular disease (ACVD) associated with tobacco consumption are at risk of lung cancer (LC). The main objective is to assess LC prevalence among patients with ACVD and history of tobacco consumption by using low-dose chest CT scan. Secondary objectives include the evaluation LCS in this population and the constitution of a biological biobank to stratify risk of LC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We are performing a monocentric 'single-centre' prospective study among patients followed up in adult cardiovascular programmes of vascular surgery, cardiology and cardiac surgery recruited from 18 November 2019 to 18 May 2021. The inclusion criteria are (1) age 45-75 years old, (2) history of ACVD and (3) history of daily tobacco consumption for 10 years prior to onset of ACVD. Exclusion criteria are symptoms of LC, existing follow-up for pulmonary nodule, fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, resting dyspnoea and active pulmonary infectious disease. We targeted the inclusion of 500 patients. After inclusion (V0), patients are scheduled for a low-dose chest CT and blood and faeces harvesting within 7 months (V1). Each patient is scheduled for a follow-up by telephonic visits at month 3 (V2), month 6 (V3) and month 12 (V4) after V1. Each patient is followed up until 1 year after V1 (14 February 2023). We measure LC prevalence and quantify the National Lung Screening Trial and Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NELSON) trial eligibility criteria, radiation, positive screening, false positivity, rate of localised LC diagnosis, quality of life with the Short Form 12 (SF-12) and anxiety with the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory A and B (STAI-YA and STAI-YB, respectively), smoking cessation and onset of cardiovascular and oncological events within 1 year of follow-up. A case-control study nested in the cohort is performed to identify clinical or biological candidate biomarkers of LC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved according the French Jardé law; the study is referenced at the French 'Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé' (reference ID RCB: 2019-A00262-55) and registered on clinicaltrial.gov. The results of the study will be presented after the closure of the follow-up scheduled on 14 February 2023 and disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03976804.

The prevalence of pancreatic incidentalomas in patients undergoing surveillance for abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Serial imaging in patients with aortic aneurysms may identify non-vascular disease. However, the prevalence and clinical history of pancreatic incidentalomas in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of adults who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) surveillance imaging for abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used for patients with pancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

Of 249 patients, 18 (7.2 %) had a pancreatic incidentaloma. Compared to patients without a lesion, those with a lesion were more likely female (50.0 % vs 24.2 %, p = 0.02) and less likely a smoker (72.2 % vs 90.0 %, p = 0.02). 3 patients with pancreatic lesions underwent intervention, and 1 patient received additional imaging. 2 patients had a surgical oncology referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic incidentalomas are common in patients with aortic aneurysm, but lesion characteristics and management vary. Results suggest that a multi-disciplinary approach, thorough documentation, and referral to pancreatic specialists may be warranted.

Association Between Obesity and Cancer Mortality: An Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic Perspective

Background

Obesity is one of the leading preventable causes of cancer that has a causal relationship with cancers of esophagus, breast and colon. Paradoxically, there are studies demonstrating that obesity is associated with improved survival in cancer patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the association of obesity and cancer mortality in adult patients.

Methods

Retrospective medical record review of 784 adult patients was performed who had a diagnosis of cancer and who were seen in our outpatient Internal Medicine Clinic between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.

Results

Forty-three (5.2%) patients were cancer non-survivors and 741 (94.8%) were cancer survivors. The mean age of the cancer non-survivors group was significantly higher than that of the cancer survivors (78.7 vs. 68.0 years, respectively; P < 0.001). For every unit increase in age, there was 7.6% increased odds of cancer death (95% confidence interval (CI): 3-12%) (P = 0.001). Average body mass index (BMI) of the patients in the cancer non-survivors group was significantly lower than that of the cancer survivors group (25.0 vs. 28.1 kg/m²; P = 0.008). Non-obese patients had 4.9 times greater odds of cancer death (95% CI: 1.51 - 15.81) (P = 0.008). The mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was significantly higher in the cancer non-survivors group compared to the cancer survivors group (7.1% vs. 6.0%; P < 0.001), and for every unit increase in HbA1c there was 1.6 times greater odds of cancer death (95% CI: 1.14 - 2.23) (P = 0.006). Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) had 3.5 times greater odds of cancer death compared to those without PAD (95% CI: 1.18 - 10.19) (P = 0.023).

Conclusions

Non-obese patients with cancer had higher odds of cancer death. Rising HbA1c, increasing age, and presence of PAD were associated with increased cancer mortality.

Patients with atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease have a high risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of literature

PURPOSE

Lung cancer and atherosclerosis share common risk factors. Literature data suggest that the prevalence of lung malignancy in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is higher than in the general population. Our goal was to determine, through a systematic literature review, the prevalence of lung cancer in patients with PAD.

METHODS

We consulted available publications in the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included all articles, written in English or French, published between 1990 and 2020 reporting the prevalence of lung cancer in patients with PAD (atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm or peripheral occlusive diseases). Patients with coronary artery disease, cardiac valvulopathy or carotid stenosis were not included. We did not include case reports. We performed a critical analysis of each article. Data were collected from two independent readers. A fixed effect model meta-analysis allowed to estimate a summary prevalence rate.

RESULTS

We identified 303 articles, and selected 19 articles according to selection criteria. A total of 16849 patients were included (mean age 68.3 years, 75.1% of males). Aortic aneurysms were found in 29% of patients and atherosclerotic occlusive disease in 66% of patients. Lung cancer was identified in 538 patients, representing a prevalence of 3%.

DISCUSSION

Lung cancer is found in 3% of patients with atherosclerotic PAD. This prevalence is higher than that found in lung cancer screening programs performed in the general population of smokers and former smokers. These patients should be screened for lung cancer. Their selection may dramatically increase the benefit of lung cancer screening.

Creating an Incidental Pulmonary Nodule Safety-Net Program

Pulmonary nodules are a frequent, incidental finding on CT scans, ranging from up to 8.4% on abdominal scans and up to 48% on CT angiograms. Incidental findings are sometimes disregarded or overshadowed by critical situations and may not be disclosed or documented on discharge. The costs and risks associated with incidental findings are not insignificant, including the risk of a delayed diagnosis of lung cancer. A medical center commitment to prevent overlooked incidental pulmonary nodules led to the development of an incidental pulmonary nodule program. The program, led by an advanced practice nurse, established processes to identify patients with incidental lung nodules on CT scans and developed criteria for further follow-up with the primary care provider and the patient. Improvements with consistent use of Fleischner guidelines in scan reports by radiologists and increased ownership in informing patients of incidental nodules by ED and trauma providers have occurred. As the frequency of chest CT imaging is increasing, the number of incidental nodules identified will also increase. A lung nodule surveillance process would greatly benefit every lung nodule clinic or hospital system for management of pulmonary nodules.

Peripheral arterial disease and systematic detection of circulating tumor cells: rationale and design of the DETECTOR prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a strong risk factor for cancer and atherosclerosis. Cancer mortality, especially from lung cancer, overtakes cardiovascular (CV) death rate in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Only a few patients with lung cancer after PAD management may benefit from surgical excision. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) associated with low-dose chest CT (LDCT) may improve early cancer detection. This study focuses on a screening strategy that can address not only lung cancer but all tobacco-related cancers in this high-risk population.

METHODS

DETECTOR Project is a prospective cohort study in two French University hospitals. Participants are smokers or former smokers (≥30 pack-years, quitted ≤15 years), aged ≥55 to 80 years, with atherosclerotic PAD or abdominal aortic aneurysm. After the first screening round combining LDCT and CTC search on a blood sample, two other screening rounds will be performed at one-year interval. Incidental lung nodule volume, volume doubling time and presence of CTC will be taken into consideration for adapted diagnostic management. In case of negative LDCT and presence of CTC, a contrast enhanced whole-body PET/CT will be performed for extra-pulmonary malignancy screening. Psychological impact of this screening strategy will be evaluated in population study using a qualitative methodology. Assuming 10% prevalence of smoking-associated cancer in the studied population, a total of at least 300 participants will be enrolled.

DISCUSSION

Epidemiological data underline an increase incidence in cancer and related death in the follow-up of patients with PAD, compared with the general population, particularly for tobacco-related cancers. The clinical benefit of a special workup for neoplasms in patients with PAD and a history of cigarette smoking has never been investigated. By considering CTCs detection in this very high-risk selected PAD population for tobacco-induced cancer, we expect to detect earlier pulmonary and extra-pulmonary malignancies, at a potentially curable stage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (No N° EUDRACT_ID RCB: 2016-A00657-44) and was approved by the ethics Committee for Persons Protection (IRB number 1072 and n° initial agreement 2016-08-02; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02849041).

Management of abdominal aortic aneurysm and concomitant malignant disease

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant malignant disease and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) represent a challenging issue in terms of treatment priority, timing and perspectives. This systematic review provides an overview of the available literature about AAA and concomitant malignant disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a literature search of all the English-language medical literature in Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Clinical Trial databases and the Cochrane Library up to December 31st, 2018.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The literature about AAA and concomitant malignant disease is mostly based on retrospective small case series. Two recently published meta-analyses focusing on the management of AAA and concomitant abdominal neoplasms came to the same conclusion "treat what is most threatening or symptomatic first." The threshold to treat asymptomatic AAA should not be altered in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer including cases under chemotherapy. An asymptomatic AAA of at least 55 mm anatomically suitable for EVAR, should only be treated first in patients with at least a life expectancy of two years followed by staged cancer surgery two weeks later.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions about management of AAA and concomitant malignant disease should be based on clinical judgment applied individually in a multidisciplinary setting ("treat first what kills first"). The indication for treatment is not different than in patients with AAA without cancer. A staged approach is preferable and ideally the AAA should be excluded by endovascular means if anatomically suitable. An international registry should be initiated to gather more evidence about the management and outcomes of patients with AAA and concomitant carcinoma.

Late-Onset Malignant Neoplasms and Their Prognostic Factors after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Little is known about late-onset primary malignant neoplasms after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) despite malignancy being one of the primary causes of late death. We investigated the incidence and prognostic factors related to the occurrence of malignancy after AAA repair.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 589 patients who underwent AAA repair, including 264 endovascular AAA repairs and 325 open surgical repairs; 482 patients had no history of previous malignancy or concomitant malignancy, 72 had previous malignancy, and 35 had concomitant malignancy in remission at the time of AAA repair. The cumulative incidence rates of late-onset malignancy occurrence and cancer death were estimated using the cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks, that is, noncancer death, and prognostic factors were investigated using the Fine-Gray hazard model.

RESULTS

After hospital discharge, 128 malignancies occurred in 116 patients. Overall cumulative incidence rates of late-onset malignancy occurrence at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 4.0%, 11.7%, 18.2%, and 38.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that significant prognostic factors for late-onset malignancy included history of previous malignancy, current smoker, higher intraoperative blood loss, absence of allogeneic blood transfusion, lower C-reactive protein levels, and lower serum high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. The type of surgical procedures for AAA repair did not affect the occurrence of malignancy. In addition, current smoker and higher intraoperative blood loss significantly increased the risk of cancer death.

CONCLUSIONS

Current smoker and higher intraoperative blood loss were independent risk factors for late-onset malignancy after AAA repair. Late-onset malignancy after AAA repair should be monitored among patients at high risk and requires aggressive management to improve long-term survival.

Increased risk of malignancy in patients with an aortic aneurysm: a nationwide population-based retrospective study

Background

Cardiovascular disease and malignancy have numerous similarities and possible interactions, as these diseases share several risk factors, epidemiological features and biological signaling pathways. Data regarding the risk of malignancy in patients with aortic aneurysm (AA) are scarce. We aimed to determine whether patients with AA have an increased risk of malignancy.

Materials and Methods

The data for the nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study described herein were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We selected adult patients who had been newly diagnosed with AA and were followed up between 2000 and 2010. We excluded patients who had been diagnosed with AA and malignancy prior to the date of the AA diagnosis. The control cohort was selected from individuals who had no history of AA and was selected with 1:4 matching according to co-morbidities and medication history. The outcome was a diagnosis of malignancy and the cumulative incidence of AA.

Results

A total of 10,933 patients diagnosed with AA were identified. The patients with an AA had a significantly higher cumulative risk of developing malignancies in subsequent years than the patients without an AA (log rank test < 0.001). Similarly, patients with malignancies had a significantly higher cumulative risk of developing an AA in subsequent years than patients without malignancies (log rank test < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with an AA were shown to have a substantially increased risk of developing a variety of malignancies compared with patients without AAs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of this increased risk when treating patients with AAs.

The prevalence and significance of thoracic findings in patients undergoing extended coverage computed tomography for assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Many major vascular centres, including ours, incorporate coverage of the thoracic aorta in CT scans evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) (extended coverage contrast-enhanced CT (EC-CECT) scan]. We sought to determine the prevalence of thoracic pathology in a large consecutive series of patients with AAA undergoing EC-CECT.

METHODS

All patients who underwent EC-CECT for AAA between April 2013 and 2014 were identified from our radiology information system. Reports were retrospectively reviewed and for each study, sex, age and reported thoracic aortic and other non-vascular findings were extracted. Findings were initially categorized into "major" or "minor" depending on if they were mentioned in the report impression/conclusion. Any major thoracic pathology was termed "significant" if there was a new diagnosis/patient intervention/investigation and a change in patient management.

RESULTS

Of the 150 scans included in the study, 97 (65%) had at least one thoracic finding. These findings included 24 scans (16%) with major findings and 73 scans (48%) with minor findings. In 13 scans (9%), the findings were significant and resulted in a delay (n = 11) or cancellation (n = 2) of AAA repair.

CONCLUSION

Pre-procedural EC-CECT helps to identify significant intrathoracic findings in patients with AAA, which can have a major impact on AAA repair. This study supports the routine use of pre-procedural EC-CECT in planning AAA repair.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study describes the prevalence of significant thoracic pathology, which can impact on AAA repair. This information could potentially change the pre-procedure imaging protocol for patients with AAA.

Prevalence and significance of extravascular incidental findings on computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography

Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are routinely used to evaluate patients with vascular disease. They have the ability to detect unexpected non-vascular pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and significance of extravascular incidental findings in patients undergoing CTA or MRA. A retrospective review of 737 patients who underwent CTA and 184 patients who underwent MRA during a five-year period was performed. Incidental findings were classified as low, moderate or high significance findings. For patients with high significance extravascular findings, assessment of the rates of appropriate follow-up was conducted. Among the CTA patients, 539 (73.1%) had incidental findings. Low, moderate and high significance findings were discovered in 514 (69.7%), 95 (12.9%) and 41 (5.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (48.8%) patients with high significance findings received appropriate follow-up investigations. Among the MRA patients, 95 (51.6%) had extravascular findings. Low, moderate and high significance findings were present in 80 (43.5%), 27 (14.7%), and 3 (1.6%) patients, respectively. Two (66.7%) patients with high significance findings were properly followed up. In conclusion, incidental findings on CTA and MRA are very common. A small percentage of these findings could be serious and were not all adequately followed-up in our study population. Referring physicians should be aware of the potential for serious incidental findings and manage them appropriately.

What do you mean, a spot?: A qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their physicians about pulmonary nodules

BACKGROUND

More than 150,000 Americans each year are found to have a pulmonary nodule. Even more will be affected following the publication of the National Lung Screening Trial. Patient-doctor communication about pulmonary nodules can be challenging. Although most nodules are benign, it may take 2 to 3 years to rule out cancer. We sought to characterize patients’ perceptions of communication with their providers about pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

We conducted four focus groups at two sites with 22 adults with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. Transcripts were analyzed using principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Patients described conversations with 53 different providers about the pulmonary nodule. Almost all patients immediately assumed that they had cancer when first told about the nodule. Some whose providers did not discuss the actual cancer risk or explain the evaluation plan experienced confusion and distress that sometimes lasted for months. Patients were frustrated when their providers did not address their concerns about cancer or potential adverse effects of surveillance (eg, prolonged uncertainty, radiation exposure), which in some cases led to poor adherence to evaluation plans. Patients found it helpful when physicians used lay terms, showed the CT image, and quantified cancer risk. By contrast, patients resented medical jargon and dismissive language.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients commonly assume that a pulmonary nodule means cancer. What providers tell (or do not tell) patients about their cancer risk and the evaluation plan can strongly influence patients’ perceptions of the nodule and related distress. We describe simple communication strategies that may help patients to come to terms with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule.