Clinical outcome and morphologic analysis after endovascular aneurysm repair using the Excluder endograft

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Prevalence of type II endoleak after elective endovascular aneurysm repair with polytetrafluoroethylene- or polyester-based endografts

OBJECTIVE

Type II endoleak is the most frequent complication after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester (PE) are the two most commonly used graft materials in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices. Biological properties of the material might influence the appearance and persistence of type II endoleak (T2EL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate potential differences in the prevalence of T2EL after EVAR between polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and PE endografts in patients electively treated for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between January 2011 and January 2022. Preoperative, procedural, and follow-up data were derived from electronic health records. Imaging included computed tomography scans, and/or duplex ultrasound examination. The primary end point was the prevalence of T2EL diagnosed within 1 year after EVAR. Secondary end points included the prevalence of T2EL throughout follow-up, early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) T2EL, the rate of T2EL disappearance during the follow-up period, the prevalence of type I and III endoleak, and T2EL-related reinterventions.

RESULTS

Follow-up was available for 394 patients, 245 in the PE and 149 in the PTFE group. The prevalence of T2EL diagnosed within 1 year after endovascular repair was 11.8% in the PE group and 21.5% in the PTFE group (P = .010). There was no significant difference in early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) T2EL between groups (P = .270 and P = .311). There was no difference in the freedom from endoleak type II reinterventions between groups (P = .877).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of T2EL after elective EVAR is significantly higher with the use of PTFE-based endografts compared with PE-based endografts. This difference is mostly based on T2EL diagnosed after 30 days of follow-up.

Patient longevity and survival with custom-made endovascular solutions: The Fenestrated AnacondaTM approach

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and is associated with excellent clinical outcomes. However, there remains a risk of complications requiring reintervention. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Terumo Aortic Fenestrated Anaconda™ has demonstrated outstanding results. The main scope of this study is to evaluate survival/longevity, target vessel patency (TVP), endograft migration and reintervention following Fenestrated Anaconda™ implantation and discuss relevant literature.

METHODS

The current study represents a 9-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda™ device. For the statistical analysis, SPSS 28 for Windows and R was utilised. Pearson Chi-Square analysis was used to assess differences in cumulative distribution frequencies between variables. Statistical significance for all two-tailed tests was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 5058 patients received the Fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft. The Fenestrated Anaconda™ was indicated either due to complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3891, 76.9%) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1167, 23.1%). Both survival and TVP were 100% during the first 6 postoperative years but dropped to 77.1% and 81% thereafter. In the complex anatomy indication group, cumulative survival and TVP were both 100% until year 7 post-EVAR when they decreased to 82.8% and 75.7%. In the other indication group, survival and TVP were also 100% during the first 6 years but plateaued at 58.1% and 98.8% in years 7-9 of follow-up. No cases of endograft migration and reintervention were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The Fenestrated Anaconda™ has been proven across the literature to be a highly effective EVAR endograft, as it has demonstrated excellent survival/longevity and TVP as well as minimal endograft migration and reintervention.

Impact of patient demographics and intraoperative characteristics on abdominal aortic aneurysm sac following endovascular repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Its main aim is to seal the perfusion of the aneurysmal sac and, thus, induce sac regression and subsequent aortic remodelling. Aneurysmal sac regression has been linked to the short- and long-term clinical outcomes post-EVAR. It has also been shown to be influenced by endograft device choice, with several of these available commercially. This review summarises and discusses current evidence on the influence of pre- and intraoperative factors on sac regression. Additionally, this review aims to highlight the device-specific variations in sac regression to provide an overall holistic approach to treating AAAs with EVAR.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases to identify and extract relevant data.

RESULTS

Female sex, >70 mm original sac diameters, higher pre-procedural fibrinogen levels, smoking and low intra-aneurysmal pressure were found to positively impact sac regression. Whereas renal impairment, ischemic heart disease, high intra-aneurysmal pressure and aneurysm neck thrombus negatively influenced sac regression. Patent lumbar arteries, age, statins and hypercholesterolaemia displayed conflicting evidence regarding sac regression. Regarding the EVAR endografts compared, newer generation devices such as the Anaconda mainly showed the most optimal results.

CONCLUSION

Sac regression following EVAR in AAA is an important prognostic factor for morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, several pre- and intraoperative factors can have an influence on sac regression. Therefore, it is necessary to take them into account when assessing AAA patients for EVAR to optimise outcomes. The choice of EVAR stent-graft can also affect sac regression, with evidence suggesting that the Fenestrated Anaconda is associated with the most favourable results.

Identifying Patients at High Risk for Post-EVAR Aneurysm Sac Growth

PURPOSE

Post-EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) aneurysm sac growth can be seen as therapy failure as it is a risk factor for post-EVAR aneurysm rupture. This study sought to identify preoperative patient predictors for developing post-EVAR aneurysm sac growth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to select potential predictive preoperative factors for post-EVAR sac growth (including a total of 34.886 patients), which were evaluated by a retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing EVAR between 2009 and 2019 (N=247) with pre-EVAR computed tomography scans and at least 1 year follow-up. The primary study outcome was post-EVAR abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac enlargement (≥5 mm diameter increase). Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed.

RESULTS

Potential correlative factors for post-EVAR sac growth included in the cohort analysis were age, sex, anticoagulants, antiplatelets, renal insufficiency, anemia, low thrombocyte count, pulmonary comorbidities, aneurysm diameter, neck diameter, neck angle, neck length, configuration of intraluminal thrombus, common iliac artery diameter, the number of patent lumbar arteries, and a patent inferior mesenteric artery. Multivariate analysis showed that infrarenal neck angulation (hazard ratio, 1.014; confidence interval (CI), 1.001-1.026; p=0.034) and the number of patent lumbar arteries (hazard ratio, 1.340; CI, 1.131-1.588; p<0.001) were associated with post-EVAR growth. Difference in estimated freedom from post-EVAR sac growth for patients with ≥4 patent lumbar arteries versus <4 patent lumbar arteries became clear after 2 years: 88.5% versus 100%, respectively (p<0.001). Of note, 31% of the patients (n=51) with ≥4 patent lumbar arteries (n=167) developed post-EVAR sac growth. In our cohort, the median maximum AAA diameter was 57 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 54-62) and the median postoperative follow-up time was 54 months (IQR = 34-79). In all, 23% (n=57) of the patients suffered from post-EVAR growth. The median time for post-EVAR growth was 37 months (IQR = 24-63). In 46 of the 57 post-EVAR growth cases (81%), an endoleak was observed; 2.4% (n=6) of the patients suffered from post-EVAR rupture. The total mortality in the cohort was 24% (n=60); 4% (n=10) was AAA related.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that having 4 or more patent lumbar arteries is an important predictive factor for postoperative sac growth in patients undergoing EVAR.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study strongly suggests that having 4 or more patent lumbar arteries should be included in preoperative counseling for EVAR, in conjunction to the instructions for use (IFU).

Major Adverse Cardiac Events after Elective Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

There is a significant cardiac morbidity and mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, information about long-term risk of cardiac events after EVAR and potential predictors is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at one- and five-years after elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Baseline, perioperative and postoperative information of 320 patients was evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of MACE after EVAR, which was defined as acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina pectoris, de novo atrial fibrillation, hospitalization for heart failure, mitral valve insufficiency, revascularization (including PCI and CABG), as well as cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to determine incidences of MACE, MACE excluding non-cardiovascular death and cardiac events by excluding non-cardiovascular and vascular death from MACE. Predictors of MACE were identified using univariate and multivariate binary regression analysis.

RESULTS

Through one- and five-years follow-up after EVAR, freedom from MACE was 89.4% (standard error (SE) 0.018) and 59.8% (SE 0.033), freedom from MACE excluding non-cardiovascular death was 94.7% (SE 0.013) and 77.5% (SE 0.030) and freedom from cardiac events was 96.0% (SE 0.011) and 79.1% (SE 0.030), respectively. Predictors for MACE within one-year were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 3 or 4 (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.52-6.59) and larger abdominal aortic diameter (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08). History of atrial fibrillation (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) was a negative predictor factor. Predictors for MACE through five-years were history of heart failure (OR, 4.10; 95% CI 1.36-12.32) and valvular heart disease (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.97-5.51), ASA score 3 or 4 (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.96-2.88) and older age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08).

CONCLUSION

MACE is a common complication during the first five-years after elective EVAR. Cardiac diseases at baseline are strong predictors for long-term MACE and potentially helpful in optimizing future post-operative long-term follow-up.

Aortic graft explants - A single institution analysis of incidence and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Explantation of both endovascular endovascular aneurysm repair and open aortic grafts is a procedure associated with high peri-operative risk, and the current study sought to determine the outcomes and trends over time in these patients.

METHODS

This study examined data from all patients undergoing explant of an aortic graft (both open and endovascular) between January 2004 and December 2020 at a single centre. Variables analysed included comorbidities, duration to and indication for explantation, type of revascularization, in-hospital complications and mortality, duration of hospital and ICU stay, and out-patient mortality.

RESULTS

Of 688 open and 1352 EVARs performed, 46 patients underwent 48 explants. Five were open grafts and 43 were endografts, equating to an explant rate of 0.73% of open and 3.18% EVARs. Average time to explant was 70 months, with patients presenting electively having a significantly longer duration to representation than those presenting emergently (51 vs 44 months, p=0.003). Indication for explant was endoleak in 70%, infection in 23%, and occlusion in 6%. Of the endoleaks, 61% of were Type 1, 22% Type II, 11% Type IV, and 6% Type V. On representation, 17 patients (35%) were symptomatic. Overall mortality rate was 8.3%, with a trend for higher mortality in emergent than elective presentations (11.8 vs 6.5%, p=0.55). There was no change in explant rate over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective aortic graft explantation is associated with low mortality, despite its complexity and patient comorbidities. Patients presenting with symptoms suffered higher mortality and a longer post-operative course, suggesting that aortic graft explantation should be considered sooner rather than later, rather than persisting with repeated endovascular management.

A systematic review on anatomical predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm remodeling after endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE

Long-term outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are inferior to open surgical repair with regard to reinterventions and late mortality. AAA sac remodeling after EVAR has been associated with endoleaks, reinterventions, and mortality. Therefore, predictors of AAA sac remodeling could indirectly give insight into long-term EVAR outcomes. This review aims to provide an overview of the evidence on anatomical predictors of positive and negative AAA sac remodeling after EVAR.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched using terms of AAA sac growth, shrinkage, and remodeling. Eligible articles were identified and only papers that included currently used endografts were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies that reported on a total of 27 anatomical parameters of the aortoiliac anatomy were included. Only 4 parameters were investigated by >5 studies, 7 parameters were investigated by 3-5 studies, 6 parameters were investigated by 2 studies, and 10 parameters were investigated by 1 study. For the presence of neck thrombus, 3 out of 4 studies reported similar results indicating that it may predict less AAA sac shrinkage. AAA thrombus, total AAA volume, flow-lumen volume, and the number of hostile neck parameters were only investigated by 2-3 studies, but they seem promising in predicting sac remodeling. For hostile neck anatomy, neck length, infrarenal neck angulation, and patency of the inferior mesenteric artery, no significant association with any category of AAA sac remodeling was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents neck thrombus, AAA thrombus, number of hostile neck parameters, total AAA volume, and AAA flow-lumen volume as important anatomical features that are likely to play a role in AAA remodeling after endovascular repair that should be further explored using advanced imaging techniques. This review also showed that strong consistent evidence on anatomical predictors of AAA sac remodeling after EVAR is lacking. Therefore, further research with large patient groups on a broad range of predictors of AAA sac change after EVAR is needed to complement the current gap in the evidence.

Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Current evidence suggests short-term survival benefit from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures, but this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ruptured aneurysm treated by OSR and EVAR; and to assess the rate of complications and reinterventions, as well as to evaluate their impact on survival.

METHODS

The medical records of the non-ruptured AAA patients undergoing OSR or EVAR between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 at Tartu University Hospital, Estonia, were retrospectively reviewed. We gathered survival data from the national registry (mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 2.3 years).

RESULTS

A total of 225 non-ruptured AAA patients were treated operatively out of whom 95 (42.2%) were EVAR and 130 (57.8%) were OSR procedures. The difference in estimated all-cause mortality between the OSR and EVAR groups at day 30 was statistically irrelevant (2.3% vs 0%; p = 0.140), but OSR patients showed statistically significantly higher 5 year survival compared with EVAR patients (75.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.002). Complication and reintervention rates for the EVAR and OSR groups did not differ statistically (26.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.122; 10.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.981, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater aneurysm diameter (p = 0.012), EVAR procedure (p = 0.016), male gender (p = 0.023), and cerebrovascular diseases (p = 0.028) were independently positively associated with 5-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-day mortality, and complication and reintervention rates for EVAR and OSR after elective AAA repair were similar. Although the EVAR procedure is an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality, higher age and greater proportion of comorbidities among EVAR patients may influence not only the choice of treatment modality, but also prognosis.

Long-term outcome results after endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair with the bifurcated EXCLUDER Endoprosthesis

OBJECTIVE

To report the long-term outcome of patients presenting with an aortic, aortoiliac, or isolated common iliac aneurysm treated with the bifurcated EXCLUDER Endoprosthesis. Furthermore, potential differences in late outcome results between the original- and low-permeability endoprosthesis were analyzed.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 182 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with the EXCLUDER Endoprosthesis between June 1998 and October 2015 in an academic, tertiary care center for aortic disease was performed. Patient follow-up was from 3 to 20 years (mean follow-up of 6.9 years). Primary end points were overall survival and reintervention-free survival. Secondary end points were device-related complications, endoleaks, and reinterventions.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 72.8%, 42.1%, and 12.2%, respectively, with no aneurysm-related mortality and no difference in overall survival between the original- vs low-permeability endoprosthesis group (P = .617). Freedom from type I endoleak at 5 years was 94.8%. No new type I endoleak was detected beyond the 5-year follow-up mark. No type III endoleak was identified. Reintervention-free survival was 83.6%, 66.7%, and 66.7% at 5-, 10-, and 15-year follow-up, respectively. There was a significant difference in intervention-free survival between the original- vs low-permeability endoprosthesis group (P = .029) and after the 5-year follow-up mark. In addition, patients with the low-permeability endoprosthesis showed significantly fewer device-related complications (P = .002) and endoleaks (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular aneurysm repair using the EXCLUDER Endoprosthesis is effective and durable on long-term follow-up, with acceptably low device-related complications and reinterventions. The low-permeability endoprosthesis was associated with significantly fewer new device-related complications and endoleaks after 5 years of follow-up.

One Year Outcomes of an International Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study on the Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis for Aorto-Iliac Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) was developed to preserve perfusion in the hypogastric artery after endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms. This study reports the 12 month technical and clinical outcomes of treatment with this device.

METHODS

This study was a physician initiated international multicentre, prospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was primary patency of the hypogastric branch at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical and clinical outcomes. Patients with an indication for elective treatment with the Gore Excluder IBE were enrolled between March 2015 and August 2018. Baseline and procedural characteristics, imaging data, physical examinations and questionnaire data (Walking Impairment Questionnaire [WIQ], EuroQol-5-Dimensions [EQ5D], International Index of Erectile Function 5 [IIEF-5]) were collected through 12 month follow up.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were enrolled of which 97% were male, with a median age of 70.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64.5 - 75.5 years). An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) above threshold for treatment was found in 42.7% and in the remaining patients the iliac artery diameter was the indication for treatment. The maximum common iliac artery (CIA) diameter on the Gore Excluder IBE treated side was 35.5 mm (IQR 30.8 - 42.0) mm. Twenty-two patients received a bilateral and seven patients had an isolated IBE. Median procedural time was 151 minutes (IQR 117 - 193 minutes) with a median hospital stay of four days (IQR 3 - 5 days). Primary patency of the IBE at 12 month follow up was 91.3%. Primary patency for patients treated inside and outside the instructions for use were 91.8% and 85.7%, respectively (p = .059). Freedom from secondary interventions was 98% and 97% at 30 days and 12 months, respectively. CIA and AAA diameters decreased significantly through 12 months. IIEF-5 and EQ5D scores remained stable through follow up. Patency of the contralateral internal iliac artery led to better IIEF-5 outcomes. WIQ scores decreased at 30 days and returned to baseline values through 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Use of the Gore Excluder IBE for the treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms shows a satisfactory primary patency through 12 months, with significant decrease of diameters, a low re-intervention rate, and favourable clinical outcomes.

Clinical and anatomical variables associated in the literature to limb graft occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair compared to the experience of a tertiary referral center

INTRODUCTION

Limb graft occlusion (LGO) is the third reason for hospital readmission after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. We reviewed the clinical features, incidence, anatomical and devices related predictive factors for LGO after EVAR, and compared them with our experience.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

EVAR between 2010-2017 were included. Patients with LGO (LGO group) were matched for age and type of endograft with the rest of the entire cohort without LGO (control group). Clinical, anatomical, operative, outcome, and follow-up data were collected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Two hundred seventy-six EVAR, (30 aorto-uniliac), 276 patients. The incidence of LGO was 2.5% (seven limbs, seven patients) at 27±24.6 days. Symptomatic patients were successfully treated. No mortality, limb loss, critical limb ischemia or residual claudication due to LGO was observed. Fifty patients resulted from the matching. Among the predictive factors of LGO between the two groups, significant differences were observed in graft limb oversizing ≥15% (57.1% vs. 8%, P=0.005), or kinking (42.9% vs. 2%, P=0.01), and diameter of the aortic bifurcation <20 mm (71.4% vs. 20%, P=0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that these three variables increased the risk of LGO (P=0.003, P=0.006, and P=0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The strongest predictive factors of LGO issued from our review were: extension in the external iliac artery, or small diameter; tortuous, angled, and calcific iliac axis; excessive oversizing of the limb graft, or kinking; use of old generation devices; EVAR performed outside the instructions for use. Limb graft oversizing >15%, or kinking, and aortic bifurcation <20 mm appear to be independent predictive factors of LGO.

Long-term results after standard endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts

OBJECTIVE

Many endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison of long-term outcomes between devices might aid in this decision process, but comparative data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of two commercially available endoprosthesis, the Endurant (Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts.

METHODS

Patients undergoing standard endovascular repair from July 2004 to December 2011 in a single institution with the Endurant or the Low-Porosity Excluder endografts were eligible. Only patients treated for intact degenerative abdominal infrarenal aneurysms were included. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. The primary end point was primary clinical success, defined as clinical success without the need for an additional or secondary surgical or endovascular procedure. Neck-related events (a composite of type IA endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, or migration of >5 mm), neck morphology changes, renal function, and overall survival were secondary end points.

RESULTS

The study included 277 patients (156 Endurants; 121 Excluders). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years) and did not differ between groups (P = .18). Patients treated with the Endurant stent graft had wider (neck diameter of >28 mm, 27.3% vs 1.7% [P < .001]; neck diameter of 27 mm, [interquartile range (IQR), 24-29 mm] for Endurant and 24 mm [IQR, 22-25 mm] for Excluder; P < .001) and more angulated necks (β-angle of >60°, 26.7% vs 12.5%; P = .004). Oversizing was greater in the Endurant group (16% [IQR, 12%-22%] vs 13% [IQR, 8%-17%], respectively; P < .001). Patients were treated outside device instructions for use regarding proximal neck: 16.7% in the Endurant and 17.3% in the Excluder group (P = .720). The 7-year primary clinical success was 54.7% for the Endurant and 58.1% for the Excluder groups (P = .53). Freedom from neck-related events at 7 years was 76.7% for the Endurant and 78.8% for Excluder group (P = .94). The Endurant stent graft (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.8; P = .009) was an independent predictor of significant renal function decline. Neck dilatation was greater in Endurant-implanted patients (13% [95% CI, 2%-22%] vs 4% [95% CI, 0%-10%]; P < .001). Overall survival at 7 years was 61.4% in the Endurant and 50.3% (n = 50; standard error, 0.047) in the Excluder group (P = .39).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that durable and sustainable results can be obtained with either of these late generation devices. This finding suggests that careful planning and a tailored device selection taking into account the patient's anatomy are more relevant determinants than the graft model itself to obtain clinical success. The Endurant endoprosthesis seems to be associated with a higher rate of neck dilatation and faster decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, but further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.

Sex-dependent outcomes following elective endovascular aortic repair

BACKGROUND

Evidence has shown that women derive less benefit from endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in large part due to more challenging aortoiliac anatomy. This study sought to examine whether sex-dependent outcomes exist following elective EVAR cases.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent elective EVAR procedures between 2008 and 2014. Outcome data collected included procedural and hospital morbidity, mortality, and overall EVAR durability based on the incidence of unplanned graft-related secondary interventions (SIs) (e.g., open conversion, proximal or distal extensions, and coil embolizations).

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one patients (150 men, 31 women) met the study inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 40.3 mo. Women had more challenging anatomy compared to men including smaller overall iliac diameters (6.8 mm versus 8.0 mm, P < 0.001) and more severe iliac angulation (77% moderate to severe versus 44%, P < 0.001). Women had increased risk of postoperative complications compared to men (41.9% versus 11.3%, P = 0.003). There was no perioperative mortality in our series of elective EVAR cases. Median 5-y survival following EVAR was 64.4% for men and 76.3% for women (P = 0.599). Late SI rates following EVAR was 10.5% with 16 (10.7%) men and 3 (9.7%) women needing interventions (P = 0.870). Overall durability of EVAR extrapolated as time to SIs was 91% at 2 y and 85% at 5 y. Factors predisposing SIs were iliac tortuosity (P = 0.046), aortic neck angle (P = 0.022), and endoleak at the follow-up (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, immediate outcomes following EVAR were different between men and women, with women having increased rates of postoperative complications. Mortality and overall long-term durability of EVAR, however, were the same between sexes despite anatomical differences. EVAR durability was significantly dependent on the severity of iliac tortuosity, aortic neck angulation, and presence of endoleak at the follow-up.

Comparison of Endovascular Stent Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Increased renal complications have been suggested with suprarenal stent grafts, but long-term analyses have been limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of endograft choice on perioperative and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We compared Medicare beneficiaries undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair from 2005 to 2008 with endografts with infrarenal fixation and a single docking limb (AneuRx, Excluder) to those with suprarenal fixation and 2 docking limbs (Zenith), or a unibody configuration (Powerlink). Propensity score weighting accounted for differences in patient characteristics among the different graft formations, and perioperative mortality, complications, and length of stay and 4-year rates of survival, rupture, and reintervention were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-six thousand one hundred seventy-one Medicare beneficiaries were identified including 11,002 (24%) with suprarenal fixation, 32,909 (71%) with infrarenal fixation, and 2,260 (5%) with a unibody graft. After propensity score weighting, there were no significant differences in patients' baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. The suprarenal fixation patients had higher rates of perioperative mortality (1.7% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.01), renal failure (6.0% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), and mesenteric ischemia (0.7% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.01) and longer length of stay (3.4 days vs. 3.0 days, P < 0.001) compared with patients with infrarenal fixation. Unibody grafts had higher rates of renal failure (5.9% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), mesenteric ischemia (1.0% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), and conversion to open repair (0.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001) compared to those with infrarenal fixation and single docking limbs. At 4 years, mortality remained slightly higher with suprarenal compared to infrarenal fixation (30% vs. 29%, P = 0.047), although these patients had fewer conversions to open repair (0.6% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.03) and aneurysm-related reinterventions (10% vs. 12%, P < 0.01). At 4 years, unibody grafts had more aneurysm-related interventions compared to infrarenal fixation grafts (15% vs. 12%, P < 0.01) but fewer conversions to open repair (0.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.02). Late rupture did not differ among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to infrarenal fixation devices, patients who underwent EVAR with suprarenal fixation had higher perioperative mortality and renal complications but fewer reinterventions including conversion, while the unibody graft had more perioperative complications and aneurysm-related reinterventions, but fewer conversions to open repair. Although these differences could be explained by selection bias, these data suggest that further comparative effectiveness analyses should be performed to understand the outcomes following EVAR with suprarenal fixation and unibody grafts.

EVAR and OPEN treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: What is the role of MMP-9 in the follow-up?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study is to verify the role of metalloproteinases in endovascular repair (EVAR) and OPEN surgery treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Postoperatively, these enzymes could represent an important biomarker to adapt diagnostic tests and further investigations during follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From 2004 to 2008, 55 patients were considered with AAA. Of these, 33 patients (mean age: 70.1 years), (mean AAA diameter: 5.4cm) were treated with OPEN surgery (group A) and 22 (mean age: 74.1 years) (mean AAA diameter: 5.1cm) were treated with EVAR. In 17 of them, there were no signs of endoleak (group B1), while in 5 patients, a presence of endoleak (group B2) was detected. Plasma samples were collected in order to determine MMP-9 activity. Enzyme immunoassay was performed preoperatively at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Patients treated conventionally were clinically examined after 1 and 12 months by ultrasound. Patients undergoing EVAR treatment were clinically examined by CT scan after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The analysis was done by assessing the interaction over time of the MMP-9 value in B1 and B2 groups.

RESULTS

The average values observed for MMP-9 were preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively: in group A 150.8ng/mL (SD=30.5), 252.5ng/mL (SD=25.2), 315.4ng/mL (SD=22.7), 295.3ng/mL (SD=26.8), 210.7ng/mL (SD=30.2); in group B1 105ng/mL (SD=10.8), 125.6ng/mL (SD=18), 85.8ng/mL (SD=19.9), 95ng/mL (SD=20.2), 80.4ng/mL (SD=15.6); in group B2 149ng/mL (29.2), 375.4ng/mL (SD=40.2), 215ng/mL (SD=35.9), 180ng/mL (SD=20.2), 175ng/mL (SD=33.4). The MMP-9 level was higher in group B2 compared to group B1 (P=0.01), suggesting a correlation with the presence of the endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study shows that MMP-9 may be a biomarker of the presence of endoleak. Other further investigations and larger series are needed to show that metalloproteases could play a role in the follow-up of EVAR treated patients.

Aortic Curvature Is a Predictor of Late Type Ia Endoleak and Migration After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To evaluate the association between aortic curvature and other preoperative anatomical characteristics and late (>1 year) type Ia endoleak and endograft migration in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients. Methods: Eight high-volume EVAR centers contributed 116 EVAR patients (mean age 81±7 years; 103 men) to the study: 36 patients (mean age 82±7 years; 31 men) with endograft migration and/or type Ia endoleak diagnosed >1 year after the initial EVAR and 80 controls without early or late complications. Aortic curvature was calculated from the preoperative computed tomography scan as the maximum and average curvature over 5 predefined aortic segments: the entire infrarenal aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and the suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aorta. Other morphological characteristics included neck length, neck diameter, mural neck calcification and thrombus, suprarenal and infrarenal angulation, and largest aneurysm sac diameter. Independent risk factors were identified using backward stepwise logistic regression. Relevant cutoff values for each of the variables in the final regression model were determined with the receiver operator characteristic curve. Results: Logistic regression identified maximum curvature over the length of the aneurysm sac (>47 m−1; p=0.023), largest aneurysm sac diameter (>56 mm; p=0.028), and mural neck thrombus (>11° circumference; p<0.001) as independent predictors of late migration and type Ia endoleak. Conclusion: Aortic curvature is a predictor for late type Ia endoleak and endograft migration after EVAR. These findings suggest that aortic curvature is a better parameter than angulation to predict post-EVAR failure and should be included as a hostile neck parameter.

Total Occlusion of Abdominal Aortic Endograft Successfully Treated with Axillobifemoral Bypass

We report a case of total occlusion of a Zenith bifurcated stent graft 16 months after implantation. A 72-year-old man was admitted to our hospital complaining of bilateral lower extremity numbness, followed by severe rest pain 4 h after sudden onset of symptoms. Computed tomography showed total occlusion of the endograft at the mid-portion of the main body. He underwent left axillobifemoral bypass using a reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene T-shaped graft, leading to resolution of symptoms 7 h after onset. Axillobifemoral bypass successfully relieved acute lower extremity ischemia caused by total occlusion of the abdominal aortic endograft.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Aim

To identify patients who are under higher threat for migration because of an old generation stent graft application.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies which included older generation endografts and data reporting on graft migration after EVAR. Outcome data were pooled and combined, and were calculated using fixed or random effects models.

Results

From 2000 to 2014, 22 retrospective studies were identified reporting on stent- graft migration after EVAR (8.6%). From those patients, 39% received re-intervention with the mean time of identification ranging from 12 to 36 months. Six of these retrospective nonrandomized studies were eligible for meta-analysis. AAA diameter (AAA diameter: 0.719 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00065–1.4384 mm; p = 0.00497) and neck length (neck length: 4.36 mm; 95% CI: 1.3277–7.394; p = 0.0048) were the only significant factors associated with stent- graft migration. Neck diameter and neck angulation did not have any important influence on stent-graft migration.

Conclusions

Patients with large AAA and short necks who were treated with older generation stent grafts such as AneurX and Talent are in higher risk for endograft migration than others. Stent- graft migration consists of an insidious and underestimated threat.

A technique for endograft relining of a type IV endoleak using a surgeon-modified internal gate

Type IV endoleaks represent a rare etiology of late endograft failure; however, depending on the location, they can be extremely challenging to repair with endovascular solutions. We present a method of endograft relining that preserves antegrade limb perfusion, avoids extra-anatomic reconstructions, and ensures complete endograft exclusion.

[Interventional endovascular therapy of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm]

The catheter-based interventional therapy (endovascular aortic repair EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has gained an established place in the spectrum of therapeutic options. The procedure is characterized by low peri-interventional morbidity and mortality. Multislice computed tomography (CT) has a dominant role in defining the correct indications and in selecting an appropriate stent graft prior to the intervention. The rate of acute conversions could be reduced from 2.9 % to 0 % in our own elective patient population since 2010. In our vascular centre the proportion of patients treated by EVAR was 39.5 % (102 out of 258). The procedure is used routinely in patients who have an increased risk for general anesthesia or open surgery due to concomitant diseases. It is also used in patients with a reduced local operability due to prior surgery, abdominal diseases or radiation therapy. Arterial closure devices allow a completely percutaneous approach in a certain group of patients. However, after EVAR a life-long surveillance is mandatory because delayed therapy failure has been described. In younger patients who do not have a higher risk open surgery is still an option. The paper describes techniques, results und complications of EVAR.