Patient radiation exposure during percutaneous endovascular revascularization of the lower extremity

Efficacy and utilization of intravascular ultrasound in office-based lower extremity endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease

OBJECTIVES

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a uniquely objective but underutilized imaging modality in the interventional treatment of peripheral arterial disease treatment. IVUS has been shown to improve device size selection and diagnose occult pathology difficult to see with routine angiography. We hypothesize that the use of IVUS in lower extremity endovascular intervention improves accuracy in stent and balloon size selection and minimizes contrast use.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series performed at a single-institution outpatient center by two vascular surgeons from July 2016 through July 2017. We identified 94 total IVUS-assisted procedures. We collected data regarding demographics, balloon and stent size, IVUS-determined vessel diameter, pre-procedure and post-procedure ABI values, and contrast used during the procedure. An independent core laboratory was further utilized to characterize all IVUS and angiographic size vessel measurements.

RESULTS

For the 94 lower extremity IVUS-assisted interventions, the average patient age was 70±9 years old, with an average contrast use of 37.1 mL of Omnipaque 300. There was substantial improvement in pre- and post-procedure ABI (0.7±0.23 to 0.94±0.21). On analysis of average intraluminal IVUS vessel diameter to balloon angioplasty used, we had a correlation in size of 0.96±0.16 in our series. Additionally, in eight instances IVUS allowed for identification of a flow-limiting dissection with subsequent stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of IVUS offers a powerful diagnostic paradigm that has the potential to significantly decrease contrast use and to improve objectivity in choosing appropriate vascular tools to maximize intra-procedural efficacy. The discovery of adverse findings not initially noticed on angiography further reinforces the value of IVUS utilization.

Feasibility of Percutaneous Ultrasound Guided Intervention with Direct Access in Failing Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Grafts

BACKGROUND

Patients with infrainguinal venous bypass grafts are at risk of graft stenosis leading to thrombosis and failure of the graft conduit. When primary assisted reintervention is needed, a common first choice of treatment is percutaneous angioplasty using fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We investigated whether percutaneous ultrasound-guided intervention (PUSGI) is feasible for such endovascular reinterventions.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study (feasibility study), we included patients with ultrasound evidence of significant stenosis in below-the-knee vein grafts in the lower extremities. Inclusion period was 18 months. Reinterventions were disrupted by performing PUSGI in between traditional DSA. Perioperative success was defined as no sign of residual stenosis, stenosis at the access point in the vein, or need for further fluoroscopy guided intervention. Patient follow-up was conducted 6 weeks after the intervention. Patency of the procedure was defined as no disease recurrence or signs of ultrasonographic restenosis at follow-up.

RESULTS

PUSGI was performed in 17 patients referred for reintervention with imminent failing grafts (12 men, 5 women, age range 52-82 years). PUSGI alone was performed successfully in 10 out of 17 patients (59%). The remaining 7 patients underwent successful revascularization with PUSGI in combination with DSA-guided angioplasty. Periprocedural complications occurred in 4 patients. Two of 17 patients had occluded grafts at 6 weeks of follow-up. No PUSGI access site stenoses in grafts were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided reintervention in peripheral vein bypass disease is feasible for selected patients. The study provides insight to qualitative criteria of eligibility for PUSGI in such reinterventions with direct conduit access.

Added Value of Cone-Beam CT to Identify Arterial Supply during Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the addition of cone-beam computed tomography (CT) to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) improves the identification of the genicular arteries during genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 222 patients who underwent GAE for painful knee OA between May 2018 and April 2022. Intraprocedural cone-beam CT and DSA images were reviewed independently by 2 sets of interventional radiologists. DSA was performed for all patients. Technically adequate cone-beam CT was available for 205 patients (92.3%). The presence of the genicular arteries identified by cone-beam CT and DSA was compared using Φ coefficients. Embolization targets identified by both cone-beam CT and DSA were evaluated against those identified by DSA alone.

RESULTS

Genicular arteries with the highest concordance between cone-beam CT and DSA were the inferior lateral (196 vs 198; Φ = 0.3530; P < .0001), superior lateral (197 vs 200; Φ = 0.3060; P < .0001), and superior medial genicular (186 vs 161; Φ = 0.2836; P < .0001) arteries. Cone-beam CT demonstrated higher rates of detection of the inferior medial (195 vs 178; Φ = 0.04573; P = .5150) and median genicular arteries (200 vs 192; Φ = 0.04573; P = .5150). Meanwhile, genicular arteries less frequently identified by cone-beam CT were the descending genicular (197 vs 200; Φ = -0.03186; P = .6502), superior patellar (175 vs 184; Φ = 0.1332; P = .0569), and recurrent anterior tibial (156 vs 186; Φ = 0.01809; P = .7969) arteries. Cone-beam CT in combination with DSA identified 13.4% (372 vs 328) more targets compared to DSA alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the current study, cone-beam CT serves as a valuable adjunct for visualizing the genicular arteries during GAE, and together with DSA, it identifies more potential embolization targets.

Superficial Femoral Artery Recanalization Using Fiber Optic RealShape Technology

Purpose: Report of a successful case of endovascular recanalization of an occluded superficial femoral artery (SFA) using Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) technology. Case Report: A 79-year-old male was referred for evaluation of multiple ischemic pretibial ulcers of the right lower extremity. Computed tomography–angiography (CTA) imaging confirmed significant stenosis of the right common femoral artery (CFA) and an occlusion of the SFA from its origin to the Hunter’s canal. The patient was treated with a hybrid surgical procedure: an endarterectomy of the CFA and SFA origin was performed combined with an endovascular recanalization of the occluded SFA using FORS technology. During recanalization, the FORS guidewire slowly twisted subintimally around the occluded lumen of the SFA, maintaining the created corkscrew shape after pre-dilation with the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon and subsequent stenting. Conclusions: FORS technology can be successfully used during recanalization of an occluded SFA without the use of fluoroscopy. The corkscrew shape formed during recanalization in this case was retained during PTA balloon pre-dilation and stenting; this potentially improves hemodynamics and thereby reduces the risk of in-stent restenosis. However, expanding patient series and longer follow-up data are needed to increase the understanding of the feasibility and effectiveness of using FORS in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Patient doses in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment

OBJECTIVES

Constantly increasing number of procedures performed - endovascular or hybrid in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease during the last decades finds its explanation in the lower morbidity and mortality rates, compared to bypass surgery. The purpose of the current survey was to estimate patients' radiation exposure in aortoiliac segment after endovascular or hybrid revascularization and to study the main factors which have direct contribution.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 285 procedures conducted with the help of a mobile C-arm system in 223 patients was performed. Procedures were grouped according to criteria such as: type of intervention, vascular access, level of complexity and operating team. Different analyses were performed within the groups and dose values.

RESULTS

The median values of kerma-air product (KAP), the number of series and the peak skin dose (PSD) significantly increase with the increasing number of vascular accesses: for one access (16.68 Gy.cm², 6 and 336 mGy), for two (56.93 Gy.cm², 11 and 545 mGy), and for three (102.28 Gy.cm², 15 and 781 mGy). Significant dependence was observed in the case of single access site between the type of access and the dose values: hybrid and retrograde common femoral artery/superficial femoral artery (CFA/SFA) endovascular accesses, 10.06 Gy.cm²/301 mGy and 13.23 Gy.cm²/318 mGy respectively, in contrast with the contralateral CFA and left brachial access, 33 Gy.cm²/421 mGy and 38.33 Gy.cm²/448 mGy respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the most important factors increasing the dose values are number and type of vascular accesses, followed by the combination and number of implanted stents with the complexity of the procedure. The PSD values for a single procedure were between 2 and 12 times lower than those IAEA proposed as trigger levels for radiation-induced erythema. This study shows that trigger levels were not reached even for patients with repeated procedures in the same segment in 1-year period.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The study gives important understanding and clarity on the growing awareness for dose-modifying factors during endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment.

Fusion imaging guidance for endovascular recanalization of peripheral occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular procedures are now the first line option for treatment of lower extremity arterial disease. Fusion imaging guidance has been reported to reduce radiation exposure and reintervention rates during fenestrated and branched endovascular repairs, but limited literature exists on its benefits during lower extremity arterial disease endovascular procedures, and more specifically peripheral occlusive disease (POD). This study aims to evaluate the radiation exposure and technical success benefits of fusion imaging guidance in a large cohort of patients treated endovascularly for complex POD.

METHODS

From January 2017 to September 2019, in a single center, all consecutive patients presenting symptomatic occlusions (Rutherford Baker categories 3 to 6) in the setting of POD and treated endovascularly were retrospectively assessed for inclusion. All procedures were performed under augmented fluoroscopy guidance (Vessel ASSIST, GE Healthcare), overlaying on live imaging the 3D path for transluminal recanalization based on the preoperative computed tomography angiography. Technical success, dose area product (DAP), total cumulated air kerma (CAK), and fluoroscopy time were collected. DAP results were compared with the literature.

RESULTS

During the study period, 179 patients were treated for iliac (n = 56) or femoropopliteal (n = 123) symptomatic arterial occlusions. Technical success was reported in 171 of 179 procedures (95.5%). The use of a re-entry catheter was required to achieve technical success in 11 patients (6.1%). Mean DAP and CAK were 15.44 Gy·cm² and 135 mGy, respectively, with a mean fluoroscopy time of 15.04 minutes. DAP and CAK were significantly higher in the iliac group when compared with the femoropopliteal group, although fluoroscopy time was not significantly different. DAP was lower than levels reported in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of fusion imaging guidance during POD endovascular treatment is associated with low radiation exposure, high technical success, and reduced need for re-entry systems.

Preclinical study testing feasibility and technical requirements for successful telerobotic long distance peripheral vascular intervention

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted endovascular surgery enables us to perform interventions from long distances. This study evaluates the workflow and telecommunication requirements of telerobotic peripheral vascular interventions.

METHODS

Ten superficial femoral artery cases were performed by the operator being 44 miles away from the interventional suite, with an endovascular robotic system, on a high-fidelity endovascular simulator. Procedural success, technical success, fluoroscopy time, residual stenosis, contrast dose and network delay were registered. Communication success was assessed after each procedure on a scale from 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal).

RESULTS

Procedural success and technical success were 100% and 80%, respectively. The mean residual stenosis, fluoroscopy time and contrast dose were 1.7 ± 5.25%, 6.5 ± 1.8 min and 58.8 ± 14.8 ml. The mean network latency was 38.9 ± 3.5 ms. Median communication success scores were 4.5 (min: 4, max: 5) reported by both the operator and the bedside technician on a scale of 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal).

CONCLUSION

With a stable network connection and good communication protocol, a high success rate was achieved for remote robotic-assisted peripheral vascular intervention in an ex vivo model.

Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Is Safe and Effective in the Outpatient Setting

BACKGROUND

Antegrade superficial femoral artery (SFA) access for peripheral artery disease reduces the time, radiation, and contrast required with contralateral common femoral access (CFA). Yet, this technique remains underutilized in the treatment of SFA, popliteal and tibial disease, and there remains limited data on the safety and effectiveness of antegrade SFA access in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review of lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in our office-based endovascular suite was conducted from 2013 to 2018. Interventions necessitating CFA access such as iliac, common femoral, or deep femoral artery revascularization were excluded (n = 206). In addition, interventions potentially requiring large sheaths not amenable to SFA access (e.g., popliteal aneurysm) were excluded. Relevant demographic and treatment variables including postoperative complications were abstracted.

RESULTS

We identified 718 patients, who underwent revascularization of the SFA, popliteal and tibial arteries. Antegrade SFA access was chosen in 448 patients (62.4%) with the remaining 270 patients having retrograde CFA access. Antegrade SFA access was achieved primarily with a 4-French sheath, while a majority of retrograde CFA interventions utilized a 6-French sheath for access (87.7% vs 69.5%, P < 0.001). Significantly less fluoroscopy (9.5 vs 16.4 min, P < 0.001) and contrast (25.4 vs 38.5 mL, P < 0.001) were used during SFA access compared with retrograde access. Technical success was achieved in 93.2% with antegrade SFA vs 94.8% retrograde CFA access (P = 0.42). The overall rate of complications was low for both cohorts (2.7% vs 3.7%, P = 0.78) and there were no statistical differences in access site complications (1.1% vs 1.5%, P = 0.94), hematoma (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = 0.84), and pseudoaneurysm (0.4% vs 0%, P = 0.98) between techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous antegrade SFA access can be performed safely in the outpatient setting and remains an effective alternative to retrograde CFA access with significantly less utilization of fluoroscopy and contrast.

Fusion Imaging with a Mobile C-Arm for Peripheral Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Fusion imaging makes it possible to improve endovascular procedures and is mainly used in hybrid rooms for aortic procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fusion imaging for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures with a mobile flat plane sensor and dedicated software to assist endovascular navigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May and December 2017, 41 patients requiring femoropopliteal endovascular revascularization were included. Interventions were carried out in a conventional surgical room equipped with a mobile plane sensor (Cios Alpha, Siemens). The numerical video stream was transmitted to an angionavigation station (EndoNaut (EN), Therenva). The software created an osseous and arterial panorama of the treated limb from the angiographies carried out at the beginning of procedure. After each displacement of the table, the software relocated the current image on the osseous panorama, with 2D-2D resetting, and amalgamated the mask of the arterial panorama. The success rates of creation of osseous and arterial panorama and the success of relocation were evaluated. The data concerning irradiation, the volume of contrast (VC) injected, and operative times were recorded.

RESULTS

Osseous panoramas could be automatically generated for the 41 procedures, without manual adjustment in 33 cases (80.5%). About 35 relocations based on a 2D-2D resetting could be obtained in the 41 procedures, with a success rate of 85%. The causes of failure were a change in table height or arch angulation. The average duration of intervention was 74.5 min. The irradiation parameters were duration of fluoroscopy 17.8 ± 13.1 min, air kerma 80.5 ± 68.4 mGy, and dose area product 2140 ± 1599 μGy m². The average VC was 24.5 ± 14 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study showed that fusion imaging is possible in a nonhybrid room for peripheral procedures. Imagery of mobile C-arms can be improved for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures without heavy equipment. These imagery tools bring an operative comfort and could probably reduce irradiation and the injected VC. The clinical benefit must be evaluated in more patients in a randomized comparative study with a rigorous methodology.

Current utilization and future directions of robotic-assisted endovascular surgery

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular surgery has become the standard of care to treat most vascular diseases using a minimally invasive approach. The CorPath system further enhances the potential and enables surgeons to perform robotic-assisted endovascular procedures in interventional cardiology, peripheral vascular surgery, and neurovascular surgery. With the introduction of this technique, the operator can perform multiple steps of endovascular interventions outside of the radiation field with high precision movements even from long-geographical distances.

AREAS COVERED

The first and second-generation CorPath systems are currently the only commercially available robotic devices for endovascular surgery. This review article discusses the clinical experiences and outcomes with the robot, the advanced navigational features, and the results with recent hardware and software modifications, which enables the use of the system for neurovascular interventions, and long-distance interventional procedures.

EXPERT OPINION

A high procedural success was achieved with the CorPath robotic systems in coronary and peripheral interventions, and the device seems promising in neurovascular procedures. More experience is needed with robotic neurovascular interventions and with complex peripheral arterial cases. In the future, long-distance endovascular surgery can potentially transform the management and treatment of acute myocardial infarction and stroke, with making endovascular care more accessible for patients in remote areas.

Standardisation of Technique and Volume of Iodinated Contrast Administration During Infrainguinal Angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Acute Kidney injury is recognised to occur after administration of iodinated contrast during endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease. There are no standardised protocols for contrast delivery during infrainguinal angiography.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to review published practice regarding the technique of conventional infrainguinal angiography and intervention, and describe a standard set of subtraction views, injection rates and contrast volumes for infrainguinal angioplasty.

METHODS

Database searches and review of papers containing (Angioplasty or Angiography) and ("lower limb" or peripheral or infrainguinal) and (method or technique or guidelines or protocol) was performed and defined procedures assessed.

RESULTS

A small number of papers provided specific technical details relating to contrast volumes and angiography views. There was considerable variation from authors who have described the contrast volumes used for lower limb angiography. We describe our simple and consistent method. The precise pathophysiology of contrast related nephropathy is under scrutiny. There is interest in new technology to minimise contrast induced kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

Few publications specify iodinated contrast doses, injection volumes or imaging views for infrainguinal arteriography. Standard infrainguinal angioplasty can be performed with conventional equipment using relatively small volumes of contrast by following a systematic technique.

Three cases of fusion imaging in endovascular treatment of occlusive peripheral artery disease

Endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease has dramatically improved in the past decades; however, occlusive or stenotic lesions of the femoral-popliteal artery segment remain a significant challenge for vascular specialists. Real-time guidance based on vessel visualization might be helpful for successful recanalization. Herein, we present three successful cases of fusion imaging during endovascular treatment of the femoral-popliteal artery segments.

Patients’ radiation doses during percutaneous endovascular procedures in arteries of the lower limbs

Abstract. Background: Percutaneous endovascular revascularisation interventions are increasingly used in treatment of lower extremity artery disease and may expose patients to substantial radiation. Patients and methods: Dose-area product (DAP) was retrospectively analysed in 1063 consecutive interventions performed in adult patients with lower extremity artery disease in a single tertiary medical centre. Differences between procedure types, stratified according to anatomical region and arterial lesion complexity were evaluated. Results: Median DAP for diagnostic interventions was 35.6 (15.0–52.4) Gy cm2 in aorto-below-knee arteriography and 3.2 (2.0–4.5) Gy cm2 in ipsilateral femoral arteriography (p < 0.001). For angioplasty without stenting, median DAP was 53.4 (28.6–87.4) Gy cm2 for pelvic interventions vs. 5.9 (4.3–8.6) Gy cm2 for antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (p < 0.001). For stenting, median DAP was 54.9 (32.5–91.2) Gy cm2 for pelvic interventions vs. 8.3 (6.0–12.3) Gy cm2 for antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (p < 0.001). Inside the same anatomical region, diagnostic interventions were associated with significantly lower DAP than therapeutic interventions. Stenting vs no stenting increased DAP values only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (8.3 (6.0–12.3) vs 5.9 (4.3–8.6) Gy cm2 (p < 0.001). Arterial lesion complexity affected DAP values only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal therapeutic interventions. Conclusions: The most important factor influencing patients’ radiation doses was the anatomical region. Pelvic interventions were associated with 6–11-times higher DAP values than femoropopliteal interventions with antegrade ipsilateral approach. Stenting and complexity of lesions increased DAP only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions.

Patient doses in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE:

Hybrid surgical methods such as remote endarterectomy and endovascular revascularization are fluoroscopy-guided procedures successfully replacing conventional open surgery for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to: (1) evaluate the dose parameters describing exposure of patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid revascularization of the lower limb (below the inguinal ligament); (2) compare the data available in the literature with the evaluations of patients' dose values and related factors for patients undergoing such procedures; (3) examine the correlation of doses with certain parameters; (4) estimate the peak skin dose and assess the potential for radiation-induced skin injuries during the procedures.

METHODS:

Data for 259 patients were extracted retrospectively and analyzed. The procedures were grouped by type of intervention, vascular approach, and level of complexity. The analyses included the correlation of dose values with the operating team.

RESULTS:

The air kerma-area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) values greatly varied depending on the procedure type but also among patients undergoing the same procedure. The type of vascular access has the largest impact on patients' doses. The KAP and FT values for brachial artery were: 347 Gy.cm² and FT: NA; for contralateral common femoral artery (CFA) approach: 207 Gy.cm² and 153 s; e.g. significantly higher than for ipsilateral CFA: 96 Gy.cm² and 78 s; for hybrid surgery: 77 Gy.cm² and 41 s; and for ipsilateral retrograde popliteal approach: 61 Gy.cm² and 53 s. The same tendency is observed for the peak skin dose (PSD) values: the highest are for brachial artery (2053 mGy) and contralateral CFA (1325 mGy) approach, followed by the ipsilateral CFA (748 mGy), hybrid surgery (649 mGy), and ipsilateral retrograde popliteal approach (566 mGy).

CONCLUSION:

Registered dose values and FT for the different procedures do not exceed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) proposed trigger values for patients' follow-up for radiation-induced skin injuries. The type of vascular access has the highest negative impact on radiation dose levels and resultant KAP, PSD, and FT values. There is a significant increase of the dose values with increase of the number of inserted stents and the level of complexity. This should be considered in planning, especially for patients who undergo multiple diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

This study gives a systematic understanding for patient radiation exposure in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities, thus far absent in the literature.

Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures

OPINION STATEMENT

Endovascular procedures expose both patients and physicians to fluoroscopic ionizing radiation that carries a dose-dependent risk of acute toxicity and a small, but demonstrable, long-term risk of malignancy due to resultant genetic mutations. Exposure doses vary widely based upon patient-related factors including body size and anatomic complexity, operator technique, procedure type (diagnostic vs. therapeutic), vascular bed imaged, and imaging equipment employed. Effective dosage may vary as much as 200-fold for physicians and 20-fold for patients depending upon the procedure: for example, complex aortic interventions with branched graft devices may convey mean effective doses of more than 0.4 mSv for physicians and 100 mSv for patients, whereas distal, small-vessel angiography may entail mean effective doses of less than 0.002 mSv for physicians and 5 mSv for patients. Particular attention is given to physicians' ocular exposure, which may cause cataract development, and to hand exposure, which is significantly higher than total body exposure when operators work near the x-ray beam. Given the risks of radiation exposure, numerous strategies have been developed to reduce both physician and patient doses. These measures include physician education about dose-reducing imaging techniques, development of low-dose imaging equipment, introduction of new radiation shielding drapes and caps, and real-time dose monitoring. Here, we review physician and patient effective doses of radiation by procedure type as reported in the literature and present recent data regarding dose-reduction strategies.

A Multicenter Survey of Endovascular Theatre Equipment and Radiation Exposure in France during Iliac Procedures

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure, endovascular theatre equipment, and practices in France during iliac angioplasty.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed among vascular surgeons who attended a half day of radiation safety training in 2012 and 2015 and had to collect data on 3 patients undergoing iliac procedure. In 2012, 330 surgeons performed 899 procedures, compared with 114 surgeons and 338 procedures in 2015. Due to exclusions, 653 and 306 procedures were analyzed in 2012 and 2015, respectively. Endovascular environment, practices, anatomical characteristics, and radiation parameters were collected, analyzed, and compared generally and between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Endovascular theatre equipment significantly improved over the 3 years: mobile flat-panel detector (1.1% vs. 5.9%), hybrid rooms (1.5% vs. 14.7%), and dedicated radiology tables (37.2% vs. 51.2%). Lesion's classification (Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus) was similar between groups but procedure complexity increased overtime: more than one stent implanted (32.3% vs. 41%, P < 0.01), cross over (11.5% vs. 16%, P < 0.05), and kissing procedures (19.3% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.05). The mean dose area product (DAP) was 14.2 ± 18.9 Gy cm² in 2012 and 21.5 ± 37.6 Gy cm² in 2015 (P < 0.01), and the mean fluoroscopy time was 4.8 ± 5.5 min and 5.2 ± 5.9 min, respectively (nonsignificant). Overall, hybrid rooms, body mass index over 25 kg/m², more than one stent implanted, and crossover technique were associated with a significantly higher DAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 3 years, a large population of vascular surgeons improved radiation safety knowledge, operative environment, and technical complexity. However, these changes have led to an increased DAP in 2015, which underline the outmost importance of low dose settings and application of ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principles in every day practice.

Using 7.5 frames per second reduces radiation exposure in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions

BACKGROUND

Peripheral vascular interventions can be associated with significant radiation exposure to the patient and the operator.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we sought to compare the radiation dose between peripheral vascular interventions using fluoroscopy frame rate of 7.5 frames per second (fps) and those performed at the standard 15 fps and procedural outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from consecutive 87 peripheral vascular interventions performed during 2011 and 2012 from two medical centers. The patients were divided into two groups based on fluoroscopy frame rate; 7.5 fps (group A, n = 44) and 15 fps (group B, n = 43). We compared the demographic, clinical, procedural characteristics/outcomes, and radiation dose between the two groups. Radiation dose was measured as dose area product in micro Gray per meter square.

RESULTS

Median dose area product was significantly lower in group A (3358, interquartile range (IQR) 2052-7394) when compared to group B (8812, IQR 4944-17,370), p < 0.001 with no change in median fluoroscopy time in minutes (18.7, IQR 11.1-31.5 vs. 15.7, IQR 10.1-24.1), p = 0.156 or success rate (93.2% vs. 95.3%), p > 0.999.

CONCLUSION

Using fluoroscopy at the rate of 7.5 fps during peripheral vascular interventions is associated with lower radiation dose compared to the standard 15 fps with comparable success rate without associated increase in the fluoroscopy time or the amount of the contrast used. Therefore, using fluoroscopy at the rate of 7.5 fps should be considered in peripheral vascular interventions.