Severe bilateral renal artery stenosis after transluminal radiofrequency ablation of renal sympathetic nerve plexus

Revisiting resistant hypertension: a comprehensive review

Resistant hypertension (RHT) is typically defined as blood pressure that remains above guideline-directed targets despite the use of three anti-hypertensives, usually including a diuretic, at optimal or maximally tolerated doses. It is generally estimated to affect 10-30% of those diagnosed with hypertension, though the true incidence might be lower after one factor in the prevalence of non-adherence. Risk factors for its development include diabetes, obesity and other adverse lifestyle factors, and a diagnosis of RHT confers a greater risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as stroke, heart failure and mortality. It is essential to exclude pseudoresistance and secondary hypertension and to ensure non-pharmacologic management is optimised prior to consideration of fourth-line anti-hypertensive agents or advanced interventions, such as device therapies. In this review, we will cover the different definitions of RHT, along with the importance of careful diagnosis and management strategies, and discuss newer agents and research needs.

Clinical Effect of Renal Arterial Sympathetic Radiofrequency Ablation on Secondary Hypertension

Sympathetic hyperactivity is one of the main mechanisms of secondary hypertension. Reducing renal sympathetic activity through surgery can effectively reduce blood pressure. Many cases have shown that renal denervation (RDN) can selectively block renal artery sympathetic nerve activity to control refractory hypertension. This surgery is a minimally invasive surgery, and the risk of surgery-related adverse events is significantly reduced compared with surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of renal artery sympathetic nerve in the treatment of secondary hypertension. Eight patients with secondary hypertension diagnosed by the cardiovascular department of our hospital and treated with RDN were followed up for 3-18 months, of which 5 cases were followed up for more than 12 months and 8 cases were followed up for more than 3 months. Eight patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation of renal artery catheter. The parameters such as preoperative blood pressure, antihypertensive drugs, organ function, intraoperative ablation resistance, power, time, and temperature were determined. The related changes of blood pressure, antihypertensive drugs, and visceral function and the occurrence of side effects at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were related to the operation. In conclusion, RDN has a significant clinical effect in the treatment of refractory hypertension, with stable postoperative blood pressure drop, reduced drug dosage, and less side effects.

Catheter-based renal sympathetic nerve denervation on hypertension management outcomes

BACKGROUND

Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) provides a minimally invasive interventional treatment modality for patients with resistant hypertension. However, the post-operative outcomes remain a key area of investigation since its earliest clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate patient outcomes after RSD intervention among peer-reviewed patient cases.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature on MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for RSD case studies to assess post-operative hypertension readings and medical management.

RESULTS

Among 51 RSD cases, the post-operative RSD patients report an apparent reduction with a mean number of 3.1 antihypertensive medications. The mean systolic arterial blood pressure 1 year following RSD was 136.0 mmHg (95%CI: 118.7-153.3).

CONCLUSION

The apparent improvements in office systolic blood pressure after 12 month post-operative RSD can support the therapeutic potential of this intervention for blood pressure reduction. Additional studies which utilized a uniform methodology for blood pressure measurement can further support the findings of this systematic review.

Renal denervation after Symplicity HTN-3: an update

After three years of excessive confidence, overoptimistic expectations and performance of 15 to 20,000 renal denervation procedures in Europe, the failure of a single well-designed US trial—Symplicity HTN-3—to meet its primary efficacy endpoint has cast doubt on renal denervation as a whole. The use of a sound methodology, including randomisation and blinded endpoint assessment was enough to see the typical 25–30 mmHg systolic blood pressure decrease observed after renal denervation melt down to less than 3 mmHg, the rest being likely explained by Hawthorne and placebo effects, attenuation of white coat effect, regression to the mean and other physician and patient-related biases. The modest blood pressure benefit directly assignable to renal denervation should be balanced with unresolved safety issues, such as potentially increased risk of renal artery stenosis after the procedure (more than ten cases reported up to now, most of them in 2014), unclear long-term impact on renal function and lack of morbidity–mortality data. Accordingly, there is no doubt that renal denervation is not ready for clinical use. Still, renal denervation is supported by a strong rationale and is occasionally followed by major blood pressure responses in at-risk patients who may otherwise have remained uncontrolled. Upcoming research programmes should focus on identification of those few patients with truly resistant hypertension who may derive a substantial benefit from the technique, within the context of well-designed randomised trials and independent registries. While electrical stimulation of baroreceptors and other interventional treatments of hypertension are already “knocking at the door”, the premature and uncontrolled dissemination of renal denervation should remain an example of what should not be done, and trigger radical changes in evaluation processes of new devices by national and European health authorities.