The impact of intraoperative shunting on early neurologic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy using regional anesthesia: technique and considerations

Background

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is one of the most effective operations in minimizing stroke risk in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis in the United States. Awake CEA with regional anesthesia may decrease both perioperative complications and length of hospital stay. Techniques of performing awake CEA is not often described in published literature.

Objective

To describe our experience with CEA using regional anesthesia with a focus on patient selection, anatomic variations, and surgical technique including cervical regional block. We particularly focus on nuances of the awake approach.

Methods

CEA using regional anesthesia is described in detail.

Results

Successful use of regional anesthesia during CEA without complication.

Conclusion

Regional anesthesia for CEA is an advantageous approach for cervical plaque removal in appropriate patients. Thoughtful patient selection, as well as understanding of anatomy and its variants, is required. Potential advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

Short-term outcomes after selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy might lead to intraoperative neurologic deficits, increasing stroke/death risk. If deficits are detected, carotid shunting has been recommended to reduce the risk of stroke. However, shunting may sustain a specific chance of embolic events and subsequently incurring harm. Current evidence is still questionable regarding its clear benefit. The aim is to determine whether a policy of selective shunt impacts the complication rate following an endarterectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2013 to May 2021, all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia with intraoperative neurologic alteration were retrieved. Patients submitted to selective shunt were compared to a non-shunt group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Differences between the groups and clinical outcomes were calculated, resorting to univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were selected, from which 23 were operated on using a shunt. After PSM, 22 non-shunt patients were compared to 22 matched shunted patients. Concerning demographics and comorbidities, both groups were comparable to pre and post-PSM, except for chronic heart failure, which was more prevalent in shunted patients (26.1%, P=0.036) in pre-PSM analysis. Regarding 30-day stroke and score Clavien-Dindo ≥2, no significant association was found (P=0.730, P=0.635 and P=0.942, P=0.472, correspondingly, for pre and post-PSM).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, resorting to shunting did not demonstrate an advantage regarding 30-day stroke or a Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2 rates. Nevertheless, additional more extensive studies are mandatory to achieve precise results concerning the accurate utility of carotid shunting in this subset of patients under regional anesthesia.

Unplanned Shunting Is Associated with Higher Stroke Risk after Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Shunting during eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) may be technically challenging. Whether shunting practice patterns modify perioperative stroke risk after eCEA is unclear. We aimed to compare eCEA outcomes based on shunting practice.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2019) was queried for eCEAs performed for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared outcomes based on whether shunting was routine practice, preoperatively-indicated, intraoperatively-indicated, or not performed.

RESULTS

There were 13,207 eCEAs identified. Average age was 71.4 years and 59.4% of patients were male sex. Ipsilateral carotid stenosis was >80% in 45.6% and there was severe contralateral carotid stenosis in 8.6%. Early ipsilateral symptoms within 14 days of eCEA were transient ischemic attack in 5.6% and stroke in 7%. The majority of cases were performed under general anesthesia (82.7%). Electroencephalogram monitoring and stump pressures were utilized in 30.9% and 14.7%, respectively. Shunting was routine (25.4%), preoperatively-indicated (1.9%), intraoperatively-indicated (4.7%), or not implemented (68%). Preoperatively-indicated shunting was more often performed in patients with early symptomatic carotid stenosis or severe contralateral carotid stenosis. After routine shunting, preoperatively-indicated shunting, intraoperatively-indicated shunting, and no shunting, median operative duration was 110, 101, 112, and 97 min, respectively (P < 0.001), and ipsilateral perioperative stroke prevalence was 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.9%, and 0.7%, respectively (P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, longer operative time was associated with routine shunting (MR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.19, P < 0.001), preoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001), and intraoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16, P < 0.001) compared with no shunting. Compared with no shunting, routine shunting (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54-1.54, P = 0.74) and preoperatively-indicated shunting (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.47-4.99, P = 0.48) were not associated with stroke; however, intraoperatively-indicated shunting was associated with increased stroke (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.41-5.3, P = 0.003). Shunting type was not associated with perioperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperatively-indicated shunting during eCEA was associated with longest operative duration and increased perioperative stroke risk. Surgeon familiarity with shunting and planning to shunt in advance may permit more expeditious shunting and prevent stroke.

Comprehensive comparison of carotid endarterectomy primary closure and patch angioplasty: A single-institution experience

Background:

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective intervention for the treatment of high-grade carotid stenosis. Technical preferences exist in the operative steps including the use patch for arteriotomy closure. The goals of this study are to compare the rate of postoperative complications and the rate of recurrent stenosis between patients undergoing primary versus patch closure during CEA.

Methods:

Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent CEA at single institution. Vascular surgeons mainly performed patch closure technique while neurosurgeons used primary closure. Patients’ baseline characteristics as well as intraprocedural data, periprocedural complications, and postprocedural follow-up outcomes were captured.

Results:

Seven hundred and thirteen charts were included for review with mean age of 70.5 years (SD = 10.4) and males representing 64.2% of the cohort. About 49% of patients underwent primary closure while 364 (51%) patients underwent patch closure. Severe stenosis was more prevalent in patients receiving patch closure (94.5% vs. 89.4%; P = 0.013). The incidence of overall complications did not differ between the two procedures (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence intervals = 0.82–1.85; P = 0.353) with the most common complications being neck hematoma, strokes, and TIA. Doppler ultrasound imaging at 6 months postoperative follow-up showed evidence of recurrent stenosis in 15.7% of the primary closure patients compared to 16% in patch closure cohort.

Conclusion:

Both primary closure and patch closure techniques seem to have similar risk profiles and are equally robust techniques to utilize for CEA procedures.

Benefit of selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia

Objectives

Carotid cross-clamping during endarterectomy exposes the patient to intraoperative neurological deficits due to embolism or cerebral hypoperfusion. To prevent further cerebrovascular incidents, resorting to shunt is frequently recommended. However, since this method is also considered a stroke risk factor, the use is still controversial. This study aims to shed some light on the best approach regarding the use of shunt in symptomatic cerebral malperfusion after carotid artery cross-clamping.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a tertiary referral hospital who underwent carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia for carotid artery stenosis and manifested post-clamping neurologic deficits were prospectively gathered. Shunt use was left to the decision of the surgeon and performed in 31.6% (25) of the patients. Demographics, comorbidities, imaging tests, and clinical/intraoperative features were evaluated. For data assessment, univariate analysis was performed.

Results

Regarding 30-day stroke, 30-day postoperative complications (stroke, surgical hematoma, hyperperfusion syndrome), and cranial nerve injury, no significant differences were found ( P = 0.301, P = 0.460, and P = 0.301, respectively) between resource to shunt and non-shunt. Clamping and surgery times were significantly higher in the shunt group ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions

Selective-shunting did not demonstrate superiority for patients who developed focal deficits regarding stroke or other postoperative complications. However, due to the limitations of this study, the benefit of shunting cannot be excluded. Further randomized trials are recommended for precise results on this matter with current sparse clinical evidence.

The Role of Carotid Stump Pressure in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review evaluates the carotid stump pressure (CSP)’s role as a single parameter at any given pressure as an indicator for selective shunting, or vice versa, in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A systematic review of literature in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1969 to 2019 was conducted. The primary end point was set at 0 to 30-day mortality, ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and a secondary point at recognition of an optimal CSP pressure. The data was subjected to meta-analytics. The odds ratio (OR) was reported at 95% confidence interval (CI). This study has been registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019119851. The pooled analysis on the primary endpoint of IS demonstrated higher incidence of stroke in shunted CEAs solely based on CSP measurement alone (OR, 0.14, 95%CI: 0.08–0.24, I²=48%, p<0.001). Sub group analysis demonstrated similar patterns at 25 mmHg (OR, 0.06, 95%CI: 0.01–0.5, p<0.01), 30 mmHg (OR, 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01–0.63, p=0.02) and 40 mmHg (OR, 0.23, 95%CI: 0.09–0.57, p<0.01). This effect on end points of mortality and TIA demonstrated no benefit in either direction. CSP, as a single criterion, is not a reliable parameter in reduction of TIA, mortality, and IS at any given pressure range.

Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk

OBJECTIVE

Whether recent stroke mandates planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. Our goal was to determine associations of various shunting practices with postoperative outcomes of CEAs performed after acute stroke.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2018) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days of an ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons who prospectively planned to shunt either shunted routinely per their usual practice or shunted selectively for preoperative indications. Surgeons who prospectively planned not to shunt either shunted selectively for intraoperative indications or did not shunt. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared shunting approaches.

RESULTS

There were 5683 CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons planned to shunt in 56.1% of cases. Patients whose surgeons planned to shunt vs planned not to shunt were more likely to have severe contralateral stenosis (8.8% vs 6.9%; P = .008), to receive general anesthesia (97.5% vs 89.1%; P < .001), and to undergo conventional CEA (94% vs 81.8%; P < .001). Unadjusted outcomes were similar between the cohorts for operative duration (124.3 ± 48.1 minutes vs 123.6 ± 47 minutes; P = .572) and 30-day stroke (3.4% vs 3%; P = .457), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 0.8%; P = .16), and mortality (1.6% vs 1.3%; P = .28). On multivariable analysis, planning to shunt vs planning not to shunt was associated with similar risk of 30-day stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.67; P = .402). On subgroup analysis, in 38.4% patients, no shunt was placed, whereas the remainder received routine shunts (44.4%), preoperatively indicated shunts (11.6%), and intraoperatively indicated shunts (5.5%). Compared with no shunting, shunting by surgeons who routinely shunt was associated with a similar stroke risk (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.91-2.13; P = .129), but shunting by surgeons who selectively shunt on the basis of preoperative indications (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63; P = .007) or intraoperative indications (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.86-6.01; P < .001) was associated with increased stroke risk. Prior coronary revascularization independently predicted increased intraoperatively indicated shunting (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.8; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

In CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke, there is no difference in postoperative stroke risk when surgeons prospectively plan to shunt or not to shunt. Shunting is often not necessary; however, when shunting is performed, routine shunters achieve better outcomes.

The Dutch Audit of Carotid Interventions: Transparency in Quality of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions (DACI) registers all patients undergoing interventions for carotid artery stenosis in the Netherlands. This study describes the design of the DACI and results of patients with a symptomatic stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It aimed to evaluate variation between hospitals in process of care and (adjusted) outcomes, as well as predictors of major stroke/death after CEA.

METHODS

All patients with a symptomatic stenosis, who underwent CEA and were registered in the DACI between 2014 and 2016 were included in this cohort. Descriptive analyses of patient characteristics, process of care, and outcomes were performed. Casemix adjusted hospital procedural outcomes as (30 day/in hospital) mortality, stroke/death, and major stroke/death, were compared with the national mean. A multivariable logistic regression model (backward elimination at p > 0.10) was used to identify predictors of major stroke/death.

RESULTS

A total of 6459 patients, registered by 52 hospitals, were included. The majority (4,832, 75%) were treated <2 weeks after their first hospital consultation, varying from 40% to 93% between hospitals. Mortality, stroke/death, and major stroke/death were, respectively, 1.1%, 3.6%, and 1.8%. Adjusted major stroke/death rates for hospital comparison varied between 0 and 6.5%. Nine hospitals performed significantly better, none performed significantly worse. Predictors of major stroke/death were sex, age, pulmonary disease, presenting neurological symptoms, and peri-operative shunt.

CONCLUSION

CEA in The Netherlands is associated with an overall low mortality and (major) stroke/death rate. Whereas the indicator time to intervention varied between hospitals, mortality and (major) stroke/death were not significantly distinctive enough to identify worse practices and therefore were unsuitable for hospital comparison in the Dutch setting. Additionally, predictors of major stroke/death at population level could be identified.

Carotid endarterectomy: neither shunting nor patching technique

Introduction The role of carotid shunting in carotid endarterectomy is controversial. Many studies have concluded that patch angioplasty is preferable to primary closure, while others found that it had no value. The aim of this study was to report the results of our first series of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with a non-shunting technique and primary closure of the arteriotomy. Methods From October 2014 to October 2017, 63 patients with unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis underwent carotid endarterectomy. There were 48 males and 15 females, the mean age was 63.16 years, and all were symptomatic. Conventional endarterectomy was performed without a shunt in all cases. All arteriotomies were closed primarily. We analysed the early and late outcomes of this procedure with at least 18 months of follow-up. Results Diabetes was the most frequent comorbidity. Most of the patients had a history of transient ischemic attack (49.2%) or stroke (44.4%). All patients had significant (moderate to severe) carotid artery stenosis. Postoperatively, 2 (3.2%) patients developed ischemic stroke, one (1.6%) suffered hypoglossal nerve injury, and one had a postoperative cervical hematoma. During follow-up, one patient developed asymptomatic total occlusion of the endartrectomized carotid artery at 18 months. Conclusion Carotid endarterectomy without shunting is a safe procedure. The short- and longer-term outcomes are not significantly inferior to those of the routine or selective shunting technique, and the rate of restenosis is not higher than that of patch angioplasty closure.

Predictive Factors of Silent Brain Infarcts after Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

The optimization of medical treatment regularly challenges the role of carotid surgery for asymptomatic patients. Current research seeks to determine which of these patients will benefit most from surgery. The goal of this study was to identify in a multicenter study, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the risk factors for postoperative silent cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid surgery for asymptomatic stenosis.

METHODS

The multicenter, retrospective study included patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis suitable for surgical treatment and who did not have a history of cerebral ischemia. A diffusion MRI scan was performed the day before and in the 3 days after the procedure. An analysis by an independent neuroradiologist determined the presence of preoperative silent ischemia and the appearance of new lesions postoperatively. The analysis also took into account the plaque type, lesions of supra-aortic trunks, the circle of Willis, the type of surgery, and anesthesia, shunt use, and clamp time.

RESULTS

Between April 2011 and November 2015, 141 patients were included. The mean degree of carotid stenosis in the patients who underwent surgery was 78.2% ± 6.5, with 9 (6.4%) cases of contralateral stenosis ≥70% and 6 (4.3%) of which were thrombosis. The circle of Willis was incomplete in 23 (16.3%) patients. Twenty-one (14.9%) plaques were of high embolic risk. The preoperative MRI found 34 (24.1%) patients with embolic ischemic lesions. The majority of procedures were eversions performed under general anesthesia, 7 (5%) required a shunt, and the mean clamp time was 39 ± 16 min. The postoperative MRI revealed that 10 (7%) patients had a new ischemic lesion on the operated side. None of these lesions were symptomatic. On multivariate analysis, the risk factors for appearance of a new ischemic lesion on the operated side were significant severe stenosis of the vertebral artery ipsilateral to the lesion (odds ratio [OR] = 9.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.1-39.8], P = 0.003) and insertion of a shunt (OR = 9.1, 95% CI [1.1-73.1], P = 0.039). The 30-day follow-up showed one death at D4 due to hemorrhagic stroke on the operated side and one contralateral stroke. None of the study patients had a myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, the rate of silent ischemic lesions in asymptomatic carotid surgery showed 43.3% of preoperative silent ischemic lesions and 9.2% of new silent lesions after surgery. The use of a shunt and presence of ipsilateral vertebral stenosis are risk factors for perioperative embolism.

Effective Intraluminal Shunt in Carotid Endarterectomy for Carotid Artery Near Occlusion: Technical Report

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery near occlusion is a critical degree of stenosis whereby blood flow is decreased and the distal cervical and intracranial internal carotid arteries (ICAs) are prone to collapse. Considering the diminished perfusion and risk of progression to total occlusion and periocclusive embolism, we performed carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery near occlusion.

METHODS

Accurate evaluation of tandem stenosis or patency of the poststenotic ICA in carotid artery near occlusion is often difficult preoperatively. Thus we performed carotid endarterectomy in a hybrid operating room where intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and endovascular angioplasty or stenting for distal lesions can be performed if necessary. In addition, to evaluate the distal ICA intraoperatively, we used an intraluminal shunt for shunt angiography, with injection of contrast material through the shunt tube, as a replacement for conventional DSA. Furthermore, an intraluminal shunt held the collapsed lumen open and provided a scaffold for suturing, which prevented postoperative stenosis of the distal ICA.

CONCLUSION

The present report is intended to underline the merits of intraluminal shunt as a replacement for conventional DSA and as a scaffold for suturing.

Selective Carotid Shunting Based on Intraoperative Transcranial Doppler Imaging during Carotid Endarterectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Review

Background

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with selective shunting is the surgical method currently used to treat patients with carotid artery disease. We evaluated the incidence of major postoperative complications in patients who underwent CEA with selective shunting under transcranial Doppler (TCD) at our institution.

Methods

The records of 45 patients who underwent CEA with TCD-based selective shunting under general anesthesia from November 2009 to June 2015 were reviewed. The risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Preoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in three patients. Plaque ulceration was detected in 10 patients (22.2%) by preoperative computed tomography imaging. High-level stenosis was observed in 16 patients (35.5%), and 18 patients had contralateral stenosis. Twenty patients (44.4%) required shunt placement due to reduced TCD flow or a poor temporal window. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.2%. No cases of major stroke were observed in the 30 days after surgery, but four cases of minor stroke were noted. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR], 40; p=0.018) and ex-smoker status (OR, 17.5; p=0.021) were statistically significant risk factors for a minor stroke in the 30-day postoperative period. Analogously, multivariate analysis also found that atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) and ex-smoker status (p=0.002) were significant risk factors for a minor stroke in the 30-day postoperative period. No variables were identified as risk factors for 30-day major stroke or death. No wound complications were found, although one (2.2%) of the patients suffered from a hypoglossal nerve injury.

Conclusion

TCD-based CEA is a safe and reliable method to treat patients with carotid artery disease. Preoperative atrial fibrillation and ex-smoker status were found to increase the postoperative risk of a small embolism leading to a minor neurologic deficit.