Real chimney technique for total debranching of supra-aortic trunks

Clampless 2 Device: Experimental Study of a Lateral Aorto-Prosthetic Anastomosic Device Without Clamping or Suturing

BACKGROUND

To offer an alternative to conventional techniques of lateral prosthetic anastomosis on arteries which require a long training, and impose an extensive open surgery, we are proposing the clampless 2 device (C2D) implanted by a simple arterial puncture and allows a lateral implantation of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vascular graft in an artery, without arterial clamping or suture.

METHODS

C2D is a "T" shaped 25-mm long and 8-mm diameter Nitinol stent with a 6-mm PTFE graft prosthesis mounted laterally on the stent, and implanted in an artery, via a 21-French sheath, and a compliant balloon inflation. In vitro testing of the C2D was first performed on a bench including a segment of a 7-mm internal diameter pig abdominal aorta. A series of 5 consecutive C2D implantation was analyzed with evaluation of the implantation time and the fluid losses at a fluid pressure of 80 and 150 mm Hg. The C2D implantation was finally controlled by angioscopy. An aorto-iliac bypass was then secondly performed on 8 living sows, with a side-to-end C2D implantation in the infrarenal abdominal aorta, followed by a conventional end-to-end prosthetic left iliac trunk anastomosis. The C2D and distal conventional anastomotic times were evaluated, as well as the total operative time and blood loss. A postoperative angiogram was systematically performed.

RESULTS

The C2D was successfully implanted in all 5 in vitro tests, with an average implantation time of 2'58 (range: 2'25-3'22). The mean value of fluid losses was 84 ml (range: 67-94 ml), with no fluid leakage occurring at 80- and 150-mm Hg pressure. All anastomoses were patent after macroscopic study by angioscopy with a perfect application of the stent in the aortic wall. In 8 living sows (mean weight: 42 kg, 37-50 kg), an aorto-left iliac bypass was successfully implanted in all cases, with a total mean procedure time of 101 min (range: 90-130 min), and an average fluid loss of 77 ml (range:20-120 ml). The mean implantation time was 4'39 (range 3'29-5'52) for C2D and 16 min (range 12-17 min) to perform the conventional distal prosthetic-iliac anastomosis. Systematic arteriographic and angioscopy control showed perfect patency of the C2D implantations.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary in vitro and acute in vivo testing of C2D implantation show good early results, allowing further long-lasting pig experiments on the way to human homologation.

Differences of mid-term outcomes in debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair between zone 0 and zone 1-2 landing

OBJECTIVE

Debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair (d-TEVAR) for zone 0 landing (Z0-TEVAR) remained challenging in aortic arch aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between Z0-TEVAR and Z1/2-TEVAR to assess the appropriateness of Z0-TEVAR as the first-line therapy for aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Medical records of 200 patients who underwent d-TEVAR from 2007 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 40 patients who underwent Z0-TEVAR (70% males; the median age of 82 years) and 160 Z1/2-TEVAR (78% males; the median age of 77 years) were compared. In each group, 39 patients were matched using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for differences in patient backgrounds.

RESULTS

Freedom from all-cause mortality (p < 0.001), aorta-related mortality (p < 0.001), and stroke (p = 0.001) were significantly lower in Z0-TEVAR than in Z1/2-TEVAR. Freedom from reintervention was similar between the two groups (p = 0.326). Type A dissection post-TEVAR was observed in 3 (7.5%) of Z0-TEVAR, but none in Z1/2-TEVAR (p = 0.006). Pneumonia was also more frequent in Z0-TEVAR (n = 8, 30%) than Z1/2-TEVAR (n = 4, 2.5%) (p < 0.001). PS matching also yielded worse outcomes (all-cause mortality, p = 0.017; aorta-related mortality, p = 0.046; and stroke, p = 0.027) in Z0-TEVAR than Z1/2-TEVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher mid-term mortality and stroke rates after Z0-TEVAR were confirmed by PS matching. Z0-TEVAR would be an alternative for high-risk patients with arch aneurysms requiring zone 0 landing but not a reliable method.

Clampless In-Situ Immobilized Branching (CLIMB) to Reconstruct the Internal Iliac Artery

BACKGROUND

Surgical reconstruction of the internal iliac artery (IIA) or its branches is sometimes demanding because of difficulty in distal clamping and suturing in the narrow pelvic space. Here we present a hybrid technique of ClampLess In-situ imMobilized Branching (CLIMB) to reconstruct IIA.

METHODS

in the CLIMB technique, an 8 mm artificial graft is sutured onto the surface of the common iliac artery (CIA) without clamping. Following puncture of the CIA wall, stent grafts are bridged from IIA to the graft. Finally, the graft is sutured to the ipsilateral external iliac artery (EIA). Concomitant endovascular aneurysm repair or IIA branch embolization can also be performed. We applied this technique to the patients unsuited for other IIA reconstruction.

RESULTS

eleven patients underwent the current technique. All but one patient underwent contralateral IIA interruption. Seven patients had a history of aorto-iliac repair before the index surgery. Iliac extender, internal iliac component, Viabahn VBX or Fluency covered stent were used for bridging the graft. Simultaneous IIA branch embolization was performed in 2 patients. Distal landing zones were IIA in 7 grafts, superior gluteal artery in 4 grafts and inferior gluteal artery (IGA) in 1 graft. Technical success was achieved in all cases. No patient complained of buttock claudication or other ischemic symptoms on the treatment side. During a mean follow-up period of 38 months, 11 out of 12 grafts were patent without any related endoleak. One IGA graft occluded at 56 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

the CLIMB technique is a viable alternative to preserve IIA with an acceptable mid-term durability.

Total Debranching Plus Antegrade Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair without Side Clamping in a Patient with Arch Aneurysm and Ascending Aorta Calcification

A high-risk patient with aortic arch aneurysm, associated with severe calcification of the ascending aorta and iliac arteries, was treated with total debranching and antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via the ascending aorta. Proximal anastomosis for a triple-branched graft to the ascending aorta was performed without side clamping using the "real chimney technique." After bypassing the supra-aortic branches, a TEVAR was performed in an antegrade fashion through the ascending aorta. This case suggests that the approaches mentioned above should be considered in patients with arch aneurysms and severe calcified degeneration.

Dual aortic aneurysms with coronary artery and multiple cerebrovascular stenoses

Total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair is useful for avoiding neurological complications in cases where cardiopulmonary bypass is difficult and for devising an intraoperative cervical branch reconstruction method.

[Removal of ascending aortic dissection and residual blood flow after transcatheter isolation of descending aortic dissection]

Presented herein is a clinical case report concerning successful simultaneous surgical treatment of a female patient with a complication after transcatheter treatment for chronic dissection of the descending portion of the thoracic aorta. The woman was subjected to elective transcatheter isolation of chronic dissection of the descending thoracic aorta using a stent graft with complete coverage of the zone of the origin of the left subclavian artery. Repeat control imaging studies several months after the intervention revealed residual blood flow through the false channel, directed retrogradely from the distal edge of the stent graft to the left subclavian artery. Besides, the patient was also found to have local dissection of the distal part of the ascending aorta (zone 0). An operative intervention was performed: sternotomy, prosthetic repair of the ascending portion of the aorta and part of the aortic arch, as well as transposition of the left subclavian artery to the left common carotid artery. The control imaging studies confirmed radical removal of the false aneurysm of the ascending aorta and the presence of total thrombosis of the false channel at the level of the stent graft.

Preoperative renal function affects outcomes of surgery for aortic arch aneurysm in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the optimal surgical procedure for arch aneurysm in the elderly based on preoperative comorbidities, especially focusing on renal function.

METHODS

The medical records of 374 patients who experienced arch surgery between 2008 and 2019 were reviewed. Among the 374 patients, 92 who underwent total arch replacement (TAR) were assigned to the TAR group and the remaining 152 who underwent debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair (DTEVAR) were assigned to the DTEVAR group.

RESULTS

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was an independent risk factor of mortality (hazard ratio, 2.85; p = 0.029) in the TAR group but not in the DTEVAR. In the Grade I/II category CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 mL/min), freedom from all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the TAR group than in the DTEVAR group (p = 0.0155, log-rank). Freedom from all-cause mortality was comparable between the two groups in the Grade IIIa CKD (eGFR, 45-60) (p = 0.584, log-lank), Grade IIIb (eGFR, 30-45) (p = 0.822), and Grade IV/V (eGFR < 30) (p = 0.548).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients who underwent TAR, CKD was the independent risk factor of the mortality, but not in the patients who underwent debranching TEVAR. Conversion of surgical strategy from TAR to debranching TEVAR in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms in the elderly with CKD below Grade IIIa is acceptable considering that less-invasiveness. While, in the elderly with Grade I/II CKD, TAR still remains as a primary choice for the arch repair for better mid-term survival.

A hybrid clampless technique for aortic anastomoses

Background and Purpose

In various circumstances of aortic repairs (heavy circumferential calcifications or shaggy aorta with extensive thrombus), open and endovascular techniques are at high risk. In addition to a likelihood of emboli, aortic clamping can be complicated by rupture and endovascular techniques may not be successful. We here describe a simple and reproducible hybrid technique that allows performing an aortic anastomosis without clamping in these situations.

Methods

After a limited exposure of the anterior aortic wall in a healthy segment, a prosthetic graft is sutured without any arteriotomy or clamping (adventitial suture), mimicking the final aspect of an end-to-side anastomosis. The graft and the anastomosis site are punctured using a long needle, allowing a guidewire to be positioned in the aorta under fluoroscopic guidance. Protected covered stenting of the anastomosis site opens the anastomosis without aortic clamping. After tunneling the graft to the target artery, the distal anastomosis is performed in a usual fashion.

Results

This technique was successfully used in 10 challenging consecutive cases with a sustained patency.

Conclusions

This hybrid clampless technique for aortic anastomosis represents a useful alternative for challenging lesions unsuitable for a simple open or endovascular treatment.

A Clampless Aortoprosthetic End to Side Anastomotic Device with Large Diameter Aortic Puncher

Introduction

To facilitate safe anastomosis of a vascular prosthesis onto the proximal ascending aorta without side clamping, a clampless anastomotic device with large diameter aortic puncher was developed.

Report

First, a vascular prosthesis is anastomosed onto the aorta without making a hole, then the aortic wall within the prosthesis is punched out using the device.

Discussion

After further refinement of the present device, endovascular surgery with debranching could be performed more safely and quickly.

Is debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair acceptable as the first choice for arch aneurysm in the elderly?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess differences in midterm outcomes between total arch replacement (TAR) and debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair (d-TEVAR) and to evaluate the validity of d-TEVAR as the preferred treatment choice for aortic arch aneurysm in the elderly.

METHODS

We reviewed the case histories of 86 patients who had undergone TAR (64 men; mean age 78 ± 2.9 years) and 121 patients who had undergone d-TEVAR (90 men; mean age 82 ± 4.5 years) between 2007 and 2017; of these patients, 50 from each group were matched based on propensity scores to adjust for differences in patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Rates of freedom from all-cause mortality at 2 and 4 years were similar between the 2 groups (88% and 77% in the TAR group vs 82% and 64% in the d-TEVAR group, P = 0.11), but rates of freedom from reintervention at 2 and 4 years were significantly higher in the TAR group (100% and 96%) than in the d-TEVAR group (97% and 88%) (P = 0.004). Propensity score matching yielded similar survival rates of 88% and 85% for TAR vs 86% and 71% for d-TEVAR (P = 0.53) and comparable freedom from reintervention rates (100% and 97% in TAR, 98% and 90% in d-TEVAR, P = 0.16) at 2 and 4 years. Cox regression analysis identified previous cerebral infarction [hazard ratio (HR) 3.9; P = 0.005 in TAR/HR 3.1; P = 0.002 in d-TEVAR] as an independent positive predictor of overall mortality in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Midterm outcomes after TAR and d-TEVAR were satisfactory and propensity score matching-based evaluation revealed no significant differences in outcomes, implying that d-TEVAR is an acceptable first-choice procedure for aortic arch aneurysm in patients older than 75 years.

Balloon protection of the left subclavian artery in debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

Since 2012, we have routinely applied balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery to prevent embolic events through the left vertebral artery during debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair. This study aimed to study the effectiveness of balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who underwent debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2007 and 2017. Of these, 71 patients for whom balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery was used were assigned to the balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery group (58 men; age: 78 ± 6.7 years), and 86 patients were assigned to the control group (66 men; age: 78 ± 8.9 years). A total of 51 patients from each group were matched by their propensity scores to adjust for differences in the patients' characteristics.

RESULTS

Perioperative stroke was significantly lower in the balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery group than in the control group (0%: 0/71 vs 7.9%: 7/86, P = .014). Freedom from all causes of mortality at 2 and 4 years was significantly higher in the balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery group compared with the control group (93%/76% vs 77%/59%, P = .015). Freedom from aortic death at 2 and 4 years was similar in both groups (97%/97% vs 91%/86%, P = .094). Propensity score matching yielded similar results of better freedom from all causes of mortality in the balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery group (93%/93% vs 81%/63%, P = .017) and equivalent aortic death in both groups (95%/95% vs 92%/88%, P = .30).

CONCLUSIONS

Debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair using balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery demonstrated more appropriate early and late outcomes. Evaluation using propensity score matching enhanced the efficacy of balloon protection of the proximal left subclavian artery.

Comparison of Two Different Techniques for Isolated Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Zone 2

Purpose: To analyze the results of isolated left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using carotid-subclavian bypass (CSbp) or chimney grafts (CGs). Methods: A retrospective multicenter, observational study identified 73 patients (mean age 68±13 years, range 22–87; 56 men) with acute or chronic thoracic aortic lesions who underwent TEVAR with isolated LSA revascularization using either CSbp (n=42) or CGs (n=31) from January 2010 and February 2017. Primary endpoints were TEVAR-related mortality, postoperative stroke, freedom from type Ia endoleak, and LSA patency. Results: Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. Early TEVAR-related mortality was 4.2% (CSbp 2% vs CG 6%, p=0.571). Two (3%) patients had major ischemic strokes (one in each group). Mean follow-up was 24±21 months (range 1–72; median 15). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related mortality was 93%±3% (95% CI 84.3% to 97.0%) at 12 and 36 months, with no significant difference between CSbp and CG (p=0.258). Aortic reintervention did not differ between the groups (CSbp 5% vs CG 6%, p=0.356); nor did freedom from type Ia endoleak (CSbp 98% vs CG 87%, p=0.134). Gutter-related endoleaks occurred in 4 (13%) CG patients, but none of the patients experienced sac enlargement or the need for reintervention and none died. Primary patency of the LSA was 100% for the entire group during the observation period. Conclusion: In our experience, LSA revascularization proved most satisfactory and equally effective with both the CSbp and CG techniques, without discernible differences at midterm follow-up.