Comparison of posterior and medial approaches for popliteal artery aneurysms

Elective Surgical Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms with Posterior Approach vs. Endovascular Exclusion: Early and Long Term Outcomes of Multicentre PARADE Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was compare elective surgical repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) via a posterior approach vs. endovascular exclusion, analysing early and five year outcomes in a multicentre retrospective study.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2023, a retrospectively maintained dataset of all consecutive asymptomatic PAAs that underwent open repair with posterior approach or endovascular repair in 37 centres was investigated. An aneurysm length of ≤ 60 mm was considered the only inclusion criterion. A total of 605 patients were included; 440 PAAs (72.7%) were treated via a posterior approach (open group) and the remaining 165 PAAs (27.3%) were treated using covered stents (endo group). Continuous data were expressed as median with interquartile range. Thirty day outcomes were assessed and compared. At follow up, primary outcomes were freedom from re-intervention, secondary patency, and amputation free survival. Secondary outcomes were survival and primary patency. Estimated five year outcomes were compared using log rank test.

RESULTS

At 30 days, no differences were found in major morbidity, mortality, graft occlusion, or re-interventions. Three patients (0.7%) in the open group experienced nerve injury. The overall median duration of follow up was 32.1 months. At five year follow up, freedom from re-intervention was higher in the open group (82.2% vs. 68.4%; p = .021). No differences were observed in secondary patency (open group 90.7% vs. endo group 85.2%; p = .25) or amputation free survival (open group 99.0% vs. endo group 98.4%; p = .73). A posterior approach was associated with better survival outcomes (84.4% vs. 79.4%; p = .050), and primary patency (79.8% vs. 63.8%; p = .012).

CONCLUSION

Early and long term outcomes following elective repair of PAAs measuring ≤ 60 mm via a posterior approach or endovascular exclusion seem comparable. Nerve injury might be a rare but potential complication for those undergoing open surgery. Endovascular repair is associated with more re-interventions.

Staged bilateral release of the popliteus muscle using a posterior surgical approach to the popliteal fossa to treat type 4 popliteal artery entrapment

Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is a rare cause of intermittent claudication in the young. Aberrant embryological development results in entrapment of the popliteal artery by myofascial structures of the popliteal fossa. Type 4 PAES is due to aberrant development of the popliteus muscle superficial to the popliteal artery. We present a case of bilateral type 4 PAES, along with intraoperative photography highlighting the anatomical cause for this pathology. Both limbs in this patient were treated successfully with surgical release of the entrapping popliteus muscle via a posterior surgical approach to the popliteal fossa. This report emphasises the importance of determining popliteal artery integrity and entrapment subtype to guide the management of this condition.

Early and long-term results of surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms using a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethilene graft

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess early and long-term results of open surgical interventions for popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) with the use of heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (HePTFE) in a single center, retrospective, non-comparative cohort study.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained dataset, including 207 open interventions for PAAs between 2002 and 2022, was performed and 170 procedures carried on with the use of a HePTFE graft were found. Perioperative results were analyzed in terms of mortality, graft thrombosis and amputation rates. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of survival, primary and secondary patency, freedom from amputation, freedom from reintervention with life-table analysis and Kaplan Meier curves. Follow-up results were considered as primary outcomes, whereas perioperative results were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In 82 interventions (48%) the PAA was asymptomatic. In 140 cases a medial approach was used, while in 30 cases a posterior approach was preferred. The level of the distal anastomosis was the p3 tract of the popliteal artery in 89% of the cases. One perioperative death occurred; early thromboses occurred in eight cases and the overall perioperative amputation rate was 2.8%. The median duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 1-251). Estimated survival rate at 10 years was 55% (standard error, SE, 0.065). The 10-year rates of primary and secondary patency and freedom from amputation were 40.8% (SE 0.06), 47.6% (SE 0.065) and 93.4% (SE 0.04), respectively. The estimated freedom from reintervention rate at 10 years was 57% (SE 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large monocentric experience showed that open surgical repair of PAAs with HePTFE is a safe procedure, with low rates of perioperative complications, and excellent results in the long-term setting.

Early and mid-term outcomes of open popliteal artery aneurysm repair with prosthetic grafts

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the early and mid-term outcomes of open surgical repair (OR) for popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) with prosthetic grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pre-, intra-, and postoperative data of all patients who underwent PAA OR with prosthetic grafts at our Institution between January 2009 and July 2019 were included in a prospectively maintained database which was retrospectively analysed. Primary patency was defined as uninterrupted flow (<50% stenosis) in the graft with no additional procedures performed. Secondary patency was defined as the restoration of graft patency.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients underwent OR for 104 PAA (age: 71, 67-78; 82 males) with prosthetic grafts. Seventy-two aneurysms (68%) were asymptomatic. The median diameter was 30mm (24-37). A medial approach was used in 35 aneurysms (34%) while a posterior approach (PA) in 69 (65%). Repairs either consisted of aneurysmectomy or aneurysm ligation without removal with an interposition graft with end-to-end anastomoses. Median operative time was 120 (103-142) minutes. The estimated blood loss (EBL) was 281 (150-281) ml. Only one patient treated by PA sustained a permanent peroneal nerve lesion, and a second patient treated via the same approach needed a surgical revision due to bleeding on postoperative day two. No temporary lesions were recorded. There were no early amputations. No perioperative deaths occurred. The median length of stay (LOS) was 3 (3-4) days. An expanded poly-tetra-flour-ethylene graft was used in 102 cases (98%) and a Dacron graft in the remain two cases (2%). As for the caliber, the 8mm graft was used in 64 cases (62%). Median follow-up was 34.6 (8.5-62.7) months. There was no related mortality. Nineteen PAA underwent reintervention with primary and secondary rate patency of 78% and 88% at three years. The median time to reintervention was 28.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Popliteal artery aneurysms open repair with prosthetic grafts are safe and feasible, with good mid-term results and satisfactory primary and secondary patency at three years.

Results of Surgical Treatment for Popliteal Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Evaluate the results of open surgery treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs), performed in our department for over 25 years, comparing those treated with a medial approach with those treated with a posterior approach.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective analysis of a total of 88 PAAs, performed between January 1994 and December 2018, with an average of 65 months follow-up, comparing the results of 59 patients operated by a medial approach (group 1) in which aneurysm exclusion and femoro-popliteal bypass below the knee was carried out, with 29 cases treated by a direct posterior approach (group 2) - aneurismectomy and graft interposition-. The postoperative complications, immediate and long term patency, limb salvage and mortality rate were studied.

RESULTS

In group 1 the chosen material for the bypass was reversed greater saphenous vein (GSV) in 45 cases (76.3%), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts in 12 (20.3%) and Dacron grafts on 2 (3.4%), while in group 2, a 6 mm diameter ringed ePTFE graft was used in 27 cases (93.1%) and reversed GSV in 2 (6.9%). There were eight (13.6%) postoperative graft thrombosis in group 1, 5 (8.9%) of them needing amputation, and 1 (3.4%) graft thrombosis in group 2 (P = 0.077). During the follow up, major amputation was necessary in 2 cases (3.7%) in group 1, while there were no cases of major amputation in group 2. Mortality was 61% (36 patients) in group 1 and 27% (8 patients) in group 2 (p = 0.003), at the end of surveillance.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, in the open surgical treatment of PAAs, the posterior approach could be considered as the first choice in selected cases.

Outcomes of popliteal artery aneurysms treated by ligation and in situ saphenous vein bypass

BACKGROUND

Modality of elective repair (open or endovascular) of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) is still debated. About open repair no strict evidence exists about the best surgical technique. The aim of this study was to report a 20-year experience with ligation and in situ saphenous vein bypass for the elective treatment of PAAs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent elective open surgical PAA repair in our center between January 2001 and April 2020 was performed. Ninety-two limbs in 84 patients underwent a PAA ligation and in situ saphenous bypass. Early (30 day) outcomes were assessed. Estimated 5-year outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier curves in terms of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were evaluated. Associations of patient and procedure variables with patency and limb salvage outcomes were sought with multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly male (80/84, 95.2%) with a mean age of 73.1 years (range 50-89). In all cases technical success was obtained. The mean hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 2-27). Thirty-day overall mortality (n=1) and major amputation (n=1) rates were both 1.2%. Mean duration of follow-up was 31.3 months (range 1-168). At 5 years estimated rates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were 76.3%, 81.5%, 89.9%, and 96.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis the associations were: primary patency with PAA diameter >30 mm (P=.007), and poor run-off status (P<.001); primary assisted patency with poor run-off status (P<.001); secondary patency with poor run-off status (P=.04). Major amputation had no independent predictors of poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgical treatment of PAAs with ligation and in situ saphenous vein bypass is safe, effective and urable with good 5-year outcomes in terms of overall patency and limb salvage. Poor run-off status seemed to be an independent predictor of worse patency rates. This surgical technique should be cautiously applied in patients with PAAs with a diameter >30 mm.

Open Endoaneurysmorrhaphy of 9-cm Ruptured Popliteal Aneurysm 7 Years after Initial Repair

BACKGROUND

A previously repaired right popliteal artery aneurysm via a medial approach with proximal and distal ligation and interval bypass re-presented 7 years after the initial repair with a ruptured 9 × 25.5 cm right popliteal aneurysm.

METHODS

Surgical repair was complex due to the large size of the aneurysm. Technique and management of popliteal aneurysm repair are discussed, along with a review of the current literature.

RESULTS

A 58-year-old male with a 3.5 cm popliteal artery aneurysm was initially treated with end-to-end prosthetic bypass and proximal/distal aneurysm ligation from a medial-approach without complication. Seven years later, he presented with a 9-cm popliteal aneurysm rupture. Posterior approach endoaneurysmorrhaphy repair was far more complicated than expected with massive blood loss. Despite this, he was discharged without complication POD #5, but on POD #19 presented with cellulitis and underwent incision and drainage of retained hematoma with cultures positive for Strep dysgalactiae. With appropriate treatment, he was healed in 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of large popliteal aneurysms can be challenging, but continued aneurysmal degeneration is a potential consequence if the sac continues to be pressurized from patent geniculate arteries. Surgical repair of large popliteal artery aneurysms is complex and requires adjunctive techniques to maximize success. A posterior approach is described and the literature reviewed to support recommendations for primary popliteal artery aneurysm repair and repair of large degenerated popliteal artery aneurysms. We recommend primary popliteal artery aneurysm repair from a posterior approach with endoaneurysmorrhaphy and an interposition bypass. For ruptured large popliteal artery aneurysms, there is a high risk of hemorrhage and wound complications. Therefore, we recommend the use of a tourniquet, surgical drain and to consider the collection of intraoperative cultures to guide potential antibiotic management.

Extended posterior approach for huge popliteal aneurysm extended to superficial femoral artery

Objectives:

Generally, popliteal artery aneurysms have been addressed surgically by a medial, posterior, or lateral approach. We have designed a new posterior approach that exposes the superficial femoral artery and entire popliteal artery without dividing any muscles in a just prone position.

Methods and results:

A 72-year old man with huge popliteal aneurysm extended to superficial femoral artery was admitted to our hospital. Surgery was performed due to a high risk of rupture. An S-shaped skin incision was made in the popliteal fossa. We could not expose the proximal side of the giant aneurysm proximal to the foramen of the adductor magnus. We extended the skin incision to the proximal and exfoliated the medial side of semitendinosus muscle. We could expose the superficial femoral artery in this approach like in a medial approach. We could perform the interposition of great saphenous vein.

Conclusion:

The advantages of this approach allowed for entire exposure of the popliteal aneurysm in the same patient’s position when we perform aneurysmectomy and bypass. It is possible for this approach to provide easy access to the superficial femoral artery proximal to the adductor hiatus and distal below-knee popliteal artery including the tibioperoneal trunk.

Suprageniculate Approach to Release of Popliteal Entrapment without Distal Bypass Despite Preoperative Runoff Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is an uncommon condition in which anatomic or functional popliteal artery compression causes arterial insufficiency. We present a case of popliteal entrapment with runoff thrombosis treated with suprageniculate release of entrapment without distal bypass.

RESULTS

A 15-year old boy with Klinefelter syndrome presented with right leg claudication severely limiting his activity. He had a palpable femoral pulse, but no palpable popliteal or foot pulses on the right. Noninvasive testing showed a partially thrombosed popliteal artery with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.69. Computed tomography scan revealed type III popliteal entrapment with distal thromboses and abnormal insertion of gastrocnemius muscle. Popliteal entrapment release was performed via a medial suprageniculate approach in consideration for distal bypass. The soleus was released first; intraoperative angiography showed continued popliteal compression with forced dorsiflexion. This was followed by release of the gastrocnemius and found caudal and medial to the soleus as a tight band. Repeat angiography showed cessation of popliteal artery compression with dorsiflexion. Bypass was not performed due to improvement of distal flow seen on angiography. Postoperative recovery was unremarkable. On 1-month and 9-month follow-up, he had a normal ABI and arterial duplex, was asymptomatic, and had returned to normal activities.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe suprageniculate approach to popliteal release that may be useful if a distal bypass is planned. In this case, bypass was unnecessary despite the abnormal appearance of distal runoff on preoperative imaging, as the child's perfusion improved with entrapment release alone, and arterial remodeling over time resulted in normal perfusion and arterial appearance on duplex imaging.