Open surgical revision provides a more durable repair than endovascular treatment for unfavorable vein graft lesions

Descriptive Analysis of Amputation-Free Survival After First Time Infra-Inguinal Bypass Occlusion

INTRODUCTION

Occlusion after infra-inguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease is a major complication with potentially devastating consequences. In this descriptive analysis, we sought to describe the natural history and explore factors associated with long-term major amputation-free survival following occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass.

METHODS

Using a prospective database from a tertiary care vascular center, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent a first-time infra-inguinal bypass and subsequently suffered a graft occlusion (1997-2021). The primary outcome was longitudinal rate of major amputation-free survival after bypass occlusion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 1318 first-time infra-inguinal bypass surgeries performed over the study period, 255 bypasses occluded and were included in our analysis. Mean age was 66.7 (12.6) years, 40.4% were female, and indication for index bypass was chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 89.8% (n = 229). 48.2% (n = 123) of index bypass conduits used great saphenous vein, 29.0% (n = 74) prosthetic graft, and 22.8% (n = 58) an alternative conduit. Median (interquartile range) time to bypass occlusion was 6.8 (2.3-19.0) months, and patients were followed for median of 4.3 (1.7-8.1) years after bypass occlusion. Following occlusion, 38.04% underwent no revascularization, 32.94% graft salvage procedure, 25.1% new bypass, and 3.92% native artery recanalization. Major amputation-free survival following occlusion was 56.9% (50.6%-62.8%) at 1 y, 37.1% (31%-43.3%) at 5 y, and 17.2% (11.9%-23.2%) at 10 y. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower amputation-free survival were older age, female sex, advanced cardiorenal comorbidities, CLTI at index procedure, CLTI at time of occlusion, and distal index bypass outflow. Initial treatment after occlusion with both a new surgical bypass (HR 0.44, CI: 0.29-0.67) or a graft salvage procedure (HR 0.56, CI: 0.38-0.82) showed improved amputation-free survival. One-year rate of major amputation or death were 59.8% (50.0%-69.6%) for those who underwent no revascularization, 37.9% (28.7%-49.0%) for graft salvage, and 26.7% (17.6%-39.5%) for new bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term major amputation-free survival is low after occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. While several nonmodifiable risk factors were associated with lower amputation-free survival, treatment after graft occlusion with either a new bypass or a graft salvage procedure may improve longitudinal outcomes.

Mills valvulotome reduces distal vein injuries and improves follow-up freedom from restenosis in patients undergoing infrainguinal in-situ saphenous vein bypass

BACKGROUND

In this study, the early and mid-term outcomes of the use of the Mills valvulotome in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing infrainguinal in-situ saphenous vein bypass were investigated.

METHODS

From January 2018 until December 2019, 153 consecutive CLTI patients from 7 centers have been treated with infrainguinal in-situ saphenous vein bypass. In all patients the devalvulation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) was obtained with the use of the HYDRO LeMaitre^® valvulotome (LeMaitre Vascular, Burlington, MA, USA). Eighty-six patients (56.2%) received the additional treatment of the LeMills valvulotome (LeMaitre Vascular) to disrupt the distal valves of the GSV (Group MV), whilst in the remaining 67 patients (43.8%) this adjunctive device was not used (Group no-MV). Initial outcome measures including intraoperative vein injuries were assessed and compared. At 2-year follow-up, estimated outcomes of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, freedom from distal vein restenosis, and limb salvage were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared between groups using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, the overall rate of vein injuries related to the devalvulation was 5.2% (8 cases) with four cases in both groups (4/86, 4.6%, Group MV vs. 4/67, 6%, Group no-MV; P=0.49). Overall, 4 lesions occurred in the distal portion of the GSV and were all reported in Group no-MV (0/86, 0%, Group MV vs. 4/67, 6%, Group no-MV; P=0.03). Median duration of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6-24). At 2-year follow-up there were no differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency (69.9% Group MV vs. 79.8% Group no-MV, P=0.08), primary assisted patency (85.4% Group MV vs. 90.5% Group no-MV, P=0.37), secondary patency (94.2% Group MV vs. 92.1% Group no-MV, P=0.61), and limb salvage (97.4% Group MV vs. 98.2% Group no-MV, P=0.74). Patients in Group MV had a higher rate of freedom from distal vein restenosis (92.2% Group MV vs. 76% Group no-MV, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive use of the Mills valvulotome (LeMaitre Vascular) reduces intraoperative distal vein injuries and improves the 2-year freedom from distal vein restenosis in patients undergoing infrainguinal in-situ saphenous vein bypass.

Open Surgical Secondary Interventions are More Durable than Endovascular Interventions for Lower Extremity Bypass Stenosis or Occlusion

Objectives: Lower extremity bypasses often require secondary interventions to maintain patency. Our objectives were to characterize effectiveness of secondary interventions to maintain or restore bypass graft patency, and to compare outcomes of open and endovascular interventions. Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent lower extremity bypass at our institution from 2007 to 2010. We recorded the index bypass and subsequent ipsilateral interventions performed through 2018 or until loss of secondary patency. Patient, procedure, and anatomic data were collected. Endovascular intervention was compared with open/hybrid intervention. For outcome analysis, patency measures were defined relative to the time of the secondary intervention rather than the time of the index bypass. Results: 174 secondary interventions (56 open/hybrid, 118 endovascular; 42 for graft occlusion, and 132 for stenosis) treating 228 lesions in 97 bypasses were available for study. The index bypass was most commonly performed for tissue loss (71.1%), utilized a tibial artery target (57.7%), and used single-segment great saphenous vein (59.8%) rather than alternative vein (32.0%) or prosthetic (8.2%). A higher portion of open/hybrid interventions (51.8%) were done for graft occlusion than endovascular interventions (11.0%, P < .001). Mean follow-up for secondary interventions was 3.5 years. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified female gender, prior MI, anticoagulation, occlusion, and endovascular intervention as predictors of loss of primary patency. Intervention for occlusion predicted poorer primary and secondary patency. Endovascular intervention was associated with poorer primary patency as compared to open intervention and a trend toward poorer secondary patency. Conclusions: Both open and endovascular secondary interventions on lower extremity bypasses are low-risk procedures that offer acceptable patency. Although more commonly performed in the setting of graft occlusion, open surgical interventions show improved durability compared to endovascular interventions. Some patients, including those with occluded grafts, may benefit from more liberal use of open surgical intervention to restore bypass patency.

Endoluminal interventions versus surgical interventions for stenosis in vein grafts following infrainguinal bypass

BACKGROUND

Bypass surgery using a large saphenous vein graft, or another autologous venous graft, is a well-recognised treatment option for managing peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb, including chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) and intermittent claudication, peripheral limb aneurysms, and major limb arterial trauma. Bypass surgery has good results in terms of limb preservation rates and long-term graft patency but is limited by the possibility of vein graft failure due to stenoses of the graft. Detection of stenoses through clinical and ultrasonographic surveillance, followed by treatment, is used to avoid graft occlusion. The conventional approach to treatment of patients with graft stenosis following infrainguinal bypass consists of open surgical repair, which usually is performed under general anaesthesia. Endoluminal treatment with angioplasty is less invasive and uses local anaesthesia. Both methods aim to improve blood flow to the limb.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of endoluminal interventions versus surgical intervention for people with vein graft stenosis following infrainguinal bypass.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 25 August 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We aimed to include all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared endoluminal interventions versus surgical intervention for people with vein graft stenosis following infrainguinal bypass.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed all identified studies for potential inclusion in the review. We aimed to use standard methodological procedures in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The main outcomes of interest were primary patency, primary assisted patency, and all-cause mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no RCTs that met the inclusion criteria for this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no RCTs that compared endoluminal interventions versus surgical intervention for stenosis in vein grafts following infrainguinal bypass. Currently, there is no high-certainty evidence to support the use of one type of intervention over another. High-quality studies are needed to provide evidence on managing vein graft stenosis following infrainguinal bypass.

Long Term Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Failing Distal Bypass Vein Grafts

OBJECTIVE

Although distal bypass using vein has been established with acceptable outcomes for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), the major issue affecting long term outcomes is vein graft disease. This study aimed to analyse the peri-procedural results and long term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for failing vein grafts after distal bypass.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 113 failing vein grafts (94 patients, 113 limbs) after distal bypass between 2009 and 2019 at the study hospital.

RESULTS

The mean age was 74 ± 9 years and 72% of the patients were men. Of the 113 grafts, 54 grafts (48%) were detected in asymptomatic patients, 41 grafts (36%) in patients with recurrent ulcer or gangrene, and 18 grafts (16%) in patients with rest pain. The failing grafts were treated by low pressure long inflation balloon angioplasty with a mean balloon size of 3.0 ± 0.8 mm. The mean procedural time was 60 ± 29 min and procedural success was 98% (111 grafts). During the mean follow up period of 34 months, EVT was performed a median frequency of two times (range 1-11 times). The primary and assisted primary patency of the EVT revised grafts were 41% and 80% at one year, 34% and 68% at three years, 31% and 58% at five years, respectively. Of 41 limbs with recurrent ulcer or gangrene, the wound healed in 34 limbs (85%). The complete healing rate was 71% at three months and 84% at 12 months. Eight patients required major amputation, and the freedom from major amputation rate was 96% at one year and 80% at five years.

CONCLUSION

Long term outcomes including patency, wound healing rate, and amputation free survival after EVT for failing vein grafts were acceptable. EVT could be a viable alternative to surgical revascularisation in patients with a failing distal bypass graft for CLTI.

Efficacy of Balloon Angioplasty for Infrainguinal Vein Graft Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Vein graft stenosis is a critical complication of lower-limb bypass surgery. For vein graft stenosis, balloon angioplasty has been performed instead of surgical revision in recent years. We therefore investigated the effectiveness of the balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULT

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 115 vein graft stenoses performed via balloon angioplasty from August 2011 to January 2018. The rate of freedom from reintervention after balloon angioplasty was 54.3%, 44.4%, and 38.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The rate of freedom from graft occlusion after balloon angioplasty was 79.9%, 71.9%, and 61.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Predictors of freedom from graft occlusion after balloon angioplasty by a multivariate analysis were a single treated lesion (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.85; P = 0.0189), balloon angioplasty within 90 days after bypass surgery (HR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.56-8.07; P = 0.0033), and using a cutting balloon (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.17-0.97; P = 0.0426).

CONCLUSIONS

The freedom from graft occlusion rate after balloon angioplasty remained relatively high. Furthermore, better results can be expected in single treated lesions and cases of balloon angioplasty occurring 90 days after bypass surgery or in which a cutting balloon was used. Balloon angioplasty for lower-limb bypass graft stenosis was shown to be a useful treatment.

Drug-Coated Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty In Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Randomized, Controlled Study With 1-Year Follow-Up (The Drecorest Ii-Study)

Background and Aims:

Stenosis due to intimal hyperplasia and restenosis after initially successful percutaneous angioplasty are common reasons for failing arteriovenous fistulas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drug-coated balloons in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenosis.

Design:

Single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. Block randomized by sealed envelope 1:1.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 39 patients with primary or recurrent stenosis in a failing native arteriovenous fistulas were randomized to drug-coated balloon (n = 19) or standard balloon angioplasty (n = 20). Follow-up was 1 year. Primary outcome measure was target lesion revascularization.

Results:

In all, 36 stenoses were analyzed; three patients were excluded due to technical failure after randomization. A total of 88.9% (16/18) in the drug-coated balloon group was revascularized or occluded within 1 year, compared to 22.2% (4/18) of the stenoses in the balloon angioplasty group (relative risk for drug-coated balloon 7.09). Mean time-to- target lesion revascularization was 110 and 193 days after the drug-coated balloon and balloon angioplasty, respectively (p = 0.06).

Conclusions:

With 1-year follow-up, the target lesion revascularization-free survival after drug-coated balloon-treatment was clearly worse. The reason for this remains unknown, but it may be due to differences in the biological response to paclitaxel in the venous arteriovenous fistula-wall compared to its antiproliferative effect in the arterial wall after drug-coated balloon treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive lesions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03036241

Infrainguinal Vein Graft Stenoses: Long-Term Outcomes of Graft Angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Graft angioplasty combines the durability and ability of surgical bypasses to treat long arterial occlusions with the minimally invasive nature of endovascular procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of single and repeated graft angioplasty in revising failing infrainguinal vein bypass grafts and to determine predictors of medium- and long-term freedom from revision after graft angioplasty.

METHOD

This was a retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database. Consecutive endovascular revisions of graft-threatening lesions identified by duplex ultrasound surveillance were reviewed from 2003 to 2010. Patients were followed up until death, major amputation, or the end of follow-up, with the data last updated on January 1, 2013.

RESULTS

178 graft angioplasty procedures performed in 114 bypass grafts in 103 limbs from 98 patients were studied. At 5 years, freedom from revision was 22.6%, graft survival was 45.8%, amputation-free survival was 57.9%, and patient survival was 64.9%. Analysis of repeated angioplasties found no evidence that effectiveness diminishes significantly with the number of previous angioplasties performed (p=.892). Higher Rutherford Grade of ischemia and longer time interval from index surgery to first angioplasty were significant positive predictors of medium- and long-term patency.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of infrainguinal vein grafts is safe and effective in the treatment of failing grafts identified by duplex surveillance. Graft angioplasties do not lose effectiveness when repeated and have shown cumulative benefit in prolonging graft survival. Treatment of claudicants and time interval from graft implantation of more than 6 months at the time of first angioplasty are positive predictors of at least medium-term patency after graft angioplasty.