Popliteal vein external banding at the valve-free segment to treat severe chronic venous insufficiency

Chronic Edema Management of the Lower Extremities

Peripheral edema is a prevalent condition affecting patients dealing with an assortment of health conditions, such as congestive heart failure (CHF), liver disease, venous insufficiency, and postoperative surgical complications. Edema can present in a variety of ways, ranging from mild localized symptoms to severely debilitating forms that impact patients' daily lives. Despite the vast number of publications addressing the underlying causes of peripheral edema, there seems to be an absence of literature that presents the effectiveness and compliance of current management techniques. This paper aims to condense the current literature on the effectiveness and compliance of current edema management approaches across various common etiologies, with the intention of identifying alternative therapies that could enhance the quality of care for patients with chronic lower extremity edema. Several promising new therapies such as exogenous calf muscle stimulation, leg raise exercises, high-dose albumin injections, and device-based negative pressure lymph drainage (NPLD), deviate from the current established standard of care. This scoping review revealed diverse treatment methods tailored to the specific underlying etiology of edema. The use of diuretics and vasodilators has shown benefits in treating CHF-induced edema but failed to alleviate and prevent the recurrence of edema in hospitalized and recently discharged patients. Albumin injections have emerged as a potential alternative treatment for edema due to liver disease, addressing hypoalbuminemia symptoms caused by liver failure. Patients with vascular causes of edema are efficaciously treated conservatively with compression stockings, although patient adherence remains a hurdle. For postoperative edema, device-based NPLD appears promising, with potential benefits over elastic bandage wraps and kinesiology taping.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep venous reflux correction in chronic venous insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility, operative techniques, safety, and efficacy outcomes of procedures aimed at correcting deep venous reflux, in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.

METHODS

We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from databases' inception to February 2022. We included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies describing surgical procedures to treat patients with deep reflux due to primary and secondary incompetence, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Proportion meta-analyses were performed for all the efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 57 studies in the quantitative synthesis: three randomized controlled trials including 252 patients and 54 case series including 4004 patients. Studies included a median of 38 patients, with a mean age of 51 years; 52% of them were males. Forty percent of studies included 2291 patients with primary incompetence, 29% of studies included 595 patients with PTS, and 31% of studies included 1118 patients with both diseases. As for primary incompetence, pooled estimates for all procedures showed an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-94%) of ulcer healing, 10% (95% CI, 4%-18%) ulcer recurrence, 98% (95% CI, 93%-100%) valve patency, 84% (95% CI, 78%-90%) valve competence, 0.05% (1/1904 patients) pulmonary embolism, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) wound infections, 5% (95% CI, 1%-9%) hematoma, 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%) lymphocele, 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) thrombosis, 85% (95% CI, 74%-94%) pain improvement, 89% (95% CI, 65%-100%) edema improvement, and 85% (95% CI, 73%-93%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement. Patients with PTS showed less favorable outcomes: 82% (95% CI, 71%-91%) of ulcer healing, 18% (95% CI, 5%-36%) ulcer recurrence, 88% (95% CI, 78%-96%) valve patency, 78% (95% CI, 66%-88%) valve competence, no pulmonary embolism, 6% (95% CI, 0%-22%) wound infections, 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%) hematoma, 5% (95% CI, 1%-12%) lymphocele, 7% (95% CI, 1%-16%) thrombosis, 79% (95% CI, 59%-94%) pain improvement, 75% (95% CI, 61%-88%) edema improvement, and 64% (95% CI, 9%-100%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of studies included in each meta-analysis are limited, and knowing how this element can affect the statistical power, as well as the absence of comparative control groups, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux may increase the probability of clinical improvement in patients affected by chronic venous insufficiency. Outcomes appear to be satisfactory even if possible adjunctive procedures may be required over the course of the patient's lifetime. Consequently, a strict follow-up protocol is required to maintain outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux particularly as to how it compares with the more recently introduced endovenous approaches.

Two-Year Results of a First-In-Human Study in Patients Surgically Implanted With a Bioprosthetic Venous Valve, the VenoValve in Patients With Severe Chronic Venous Insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Two-year follow-up results from a first-in-human study of patients implanted with the VenoValve are evaluated for supporting the long-term clinical safety and performance of the device.

BACKGROUND

Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) involves improper functioning of lower limb vein valves and inability of these valves to move blood back towards the heart. CVI symptoms include swelling, varicose veins, pain, and leg ulcers. Currently, there is no cure for this condition and treatment options are limited. This study provides 2-year outcomes for 8 patients who were implanted with the bioprosthetic VenoValve for treating severe CVI with deep venous reflux measured at the mid-popliteal vein. The 6-month and 1-year results were previously published.

METHODS

Eleven patients with C5 & C6 CVI were implanted with VenoValve into the midthigh femoral vein and followed for 2 years. Assessed clinical outcomes include device-related adverse events, reflux time, disease severity, and pain scores.

RESULTS

All 11 implant procedures were successful. Two-year follow-up data was obtained for 8 subjects: 1 patient died of non-device related causes, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 refused to follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No device-related adverse events occurred between the first and second years of follow-up. Reported 2-year clinical performance outcomes included significant decreases in mean reflux times of the mid-popliteal vein (61%), and significant improvements in mean scores for disease severity rVCSS (56%) and VAS pain (87%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study support long-term safety and effectiveness of the VenoValve for improving CVI severity by reducing reflux and thereby venous pressures in the lower extremities. With limited treatments for valvular incompetence involved in severe, deep venous CVI, the device may be considered as a novel therapy. A pivotal trial in the United States is currently being conducted to assess the device in a larger number of patients.

Early Results of Popliteal Vein External Banding for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) encompasses a myriad of clinical manifestations including lower extremity swelling and pain, ulcerations and chronic skin changes such as stasis dermatitis, and lipodermatosclerosis. CVI effects greater than 25 million Americans and has a significant socioeconomic and psychosocial impact. Treatment of CVI varies depending on the etiology. For those patients with deep venous reflux, restoration of the deep venous valvular system is critical. Popliteal vein external banding is a novel technique to treat deep venous reflux. Our study aims to retrospectively review the early outcomes for the largest U.S. series of patients undergoing popliteal vein external banding.

METHODS

Patients with C4, C5, and C6 disease with underlying deep venous reflux were treated with external banding of the popliteal vein. Basic demographic, ultrasound, and procedural data were collected. Patients were seen in clinic and underwent post procedure duplex. Procedure-specific complications were also assessed. The primary outcome was improvement of symptoms or wound healing.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were identified. Seventy-five percent of patients had a history of DVT on the ipsilateral extremity and 66.7% (n = 6) of those patients had previous common or external iliac vein stenting for post-phlebitic syndrome. 58.3% of patients had active ulcerations (C6) at the time of popliteal vein banding and the mean VCSS score was 12.7, consistent with advanced venous disease. Patients were followed for a mean 8.62 months. Of the 8 patients that had active ulcers (C6), 75% completely healed with a mean time to healing of 3.3 months. 91.6% of patients reported clinical improvement in their symptoms (i.e., reduction in edema/swelling, pain or improvement in size of ulcer). Three patients had post-operative wound complications and 1 required oral antibiotic for associated cellulitis.

CONCLUSION

Popliteal vein external banding represents a viable treatment modality for patients with venous insufficiency secondary to deep venous reflux. It is technically easier than most deep venous reconstructive options and may have an important role in the multimodal treatment of patients with advanced CVI.