Risk factors for stent graft-induced new entry after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection

The Impact of Oversizing in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Long-Term Outcomes in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of oversizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on early and long-term survival and major adverse events in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2018, 226 patients who were diagnosed with uncomplicated TBAD and received TEVAR were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into ≤5% oversizing (n=153) and >5% oversizing (n=73) groups. Primary end points were all-cause and aortic-related mortalities. Secondary end points were procedure-related complications, including retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD), endoleak, distal stent-induced new entry (SINE), and late reintervention. All-cause and aortic-related mortalities were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method, while procedure-related complications were evaluated using a competing risk model with all-cause death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Mean oversizing was 2.1%±1.5% in the ≤5% oversizing group and 9.6%±4.1% in the >5% oversizing group. Differences in the 30-day mortality and adverse events between the 2 groups were statistically insignificant. The freedom from all-cause mortality was comparable between the ≤5% oversizing group and the >5% oversizing group (≤5%: 93.3% at 5 years, >5%: 92.3% at 5 years, p=0.957). No significant difference was observed between both groups in the freedom from aortic-related mortality (≤5%: 95.0% at 5 years, >5%: 96.7% at 5 years, p=0.928). However, the competing risk analyses revealed that the cumulative incidence of RTAD was statistically significantly greater in the >5% oversizing group than in the ≤5% oversizing group (≤5%: 1(0.7%) at 5 years, >5%: 6(6.9%) at 5 years, p=0.007). All RTADs occurred within a year of TEVAR. The differences in the cumulative incidences of type I endoleak, distal SINE, and late reintervention were not significant between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The differences in the 5-year all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality between patients with uncomplicated TBAD who received TEVAR with ≤5% oversizing and those who got TEVAR with >5% oversizing were insignificant. However, oversizing >5% was considerably associated with an increased risk of RTAD within a year of TEVAR, suggesting that oversizing ≤5% may be the appropriate size for TEVAR in patients with uncomplicated TBAD.

CLINICAL IMPACT

For patients with uncomplicated TBAD, choosing oversizing ≤5% in endovascular treatment is beneficial to reduce the risk of postoperative retrograde type A aortic dissection. This finding provides a basis for stent size selection in endovascular repair. In addition, one year after TEVAR is the main time period for postoperative retrograde type A aortic dissection, and attention should be paid to the management and follow-up of this period.

Urgent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type-B0,D Acute Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study is to clarify safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), excluding the primary entry in the descending aorta, for type-B0,D acute aortic dissection (TB0,DAAD) (so-called retrograde type-A acute aortic dissection).

METHODS

Forty-six patients with hyperacute-phase (within 2 days after the onset) type-A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) and TB0,DAAD underwent urgent (on the admission or next day) intervention (TEVAR or conventional surgical aortic repair [CSAR]) for 2 years. Results of TEVAR for TB0,DAAD were compared with those of CSAR for TAAAD. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, aortic reintervention, and major complications (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis). Details of TEVAR were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven patients with TB0,DAAD and 39 patients with TAAAD underwent respectively urgent TEVAR and CSAR. Aortic reintervention was significantly more frequent in the TEVAR than CSAR group (28.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in incidence of death and stroke between the TEVAR and CSAR group. All the 7 patients survived and 5 of the 7 (71.4%) patients were relieved of aortic reintervention for 30 days following TEVAR. One patient, however, underwent aortic arch replacement on postoperative day (POD) 1 owing to the patent and nonshrinking ascending false lumen (FL). The entry existed in the aortic arch. Another patient underwent ascending and transverse aortic replacement with frozen elephant trunk on POD13 due to proximal stent graft-induced new entry irrespective of the thrombosed and shrinking ascending FL. Because of the patent and nonshrinking ascending FL, 1 patient underwent additional TEVAR for the residual entry in the distal descending thoracic aorta on POD33 and subsequently ascending aortic replacement 4 months later. No entry was detected in the ascending or transverse aorta. The ascending FL in the other 4 patients was thrombosed early, shrinking gradually, and disappeared at last following TEVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent TEVAR for TB0,DAAD may be alternative to CSAR in selected cases. Accurate diagnosis of the primary entry location on preinterventional computed tomography scans for exclusion of the entry and cautious selection and delivery of a stent graft to prevent stent graft-induced new entry or endoleak are requisite for success of the procedure, remodeling of the FL, and satisfactory prognosis.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence Related to the Impact of Endovascular Repair Timing on Prognosis of Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine whether thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) timing is more beneficial in the acute phase (first 14 days) than in the subacute phase (14-90 days) for the administration of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases (EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) until December 2023 to identify studies reporting the results of TEVAR used for patients with acute TBAD. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated utilizing either the random-effects model or the fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies involving 4,827 individuals with TBAD (including 1,609 with subacute TBAD) met our selection criteria. Early results revealed a lower incidence of Ia endoleaks (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.33; P = 0.04) and aortic ruptures (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 0.98-8.50; P = 0.05) in subacute TBAD. Apart from these findings, there was little difference in other incidents between the 2 groups. Regarding late outcomes, we observed significantly higher rates of retrograde dissection (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04-4.34; P = 0.04), distal stent-induced new entry (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.61; P = 0.009), and reintervention (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.05-1.99; P = 0.02) in acute TBAD than in subacute TBAD, whereas no significant differences were found for other outcomes between the 2 groups. Also, TEVAR appeared to yield comparable results for false lumen thrombosis and true lumen regression in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Subacute TBAD repair with TEVAR demonstrates a more effective reduction in adverse event rates compared to immediate treatment in the acute phase.

Numerical simulation of the distal stent graft-induced new entry after TEVAR

The study aimed to investigate the mechanical factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in aortic dissection patients and discussed these factors in conjunction with aortic morphology. Two patients (one dSINE and one non-dSINE), with the same age, gender, and type of implanted stent, were selected, then aortic morphological parameters were calculated. In addition, the stent material parameters used by the patients were also fitted. Simulations were performed based on the patient's aortic model and the stent graft used. The true lumen segment at the distal stent graft was designated as the "dSINE risk zone," and mechanical parameters (maximum principal strain, maximum principal stress) were computed. When approaching the area with higher mechanical parameters in the dSINE risk zone, dSINE patient exhibited higher values and growth rates in mechanical parameters compared to non-dSINE patient. Furthermore, dSINE patient also presented larger aortic taper ratio, stent oversizing ratio, and expansion mismatch ratio of the distal true lumen (EMRDTR). The larger mechanical parameters and growth rates in dSINE patient corresponded to a greater aortic taper ratio, stent oversizing ratio, and EMRDTR. The failure of dSINE prediction by the stent tortuosity index indicated that mechanical parameters were the fundamental reasons for dSINE development.

Diameter changes of the thoracic aorta caused by acute type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The impact of type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) on historical pre-TBAAD diameters of the thoracic aorta is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of changes in aortic diameters induced by dissection, measured with a computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before and after TBAAD.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2014, CT angiography of 50 non-Marfan patients with nonbicuspid aortic valves diagnosed with TBAAD were compared to historical CTs on file.

RESULTS

The ascending aorta and proximal arch showed negligible change. The proximal, mid, and distal aorta diameters changed compared with predissected values (107.7 ± 4.8%, 109.3 ± 4.9%, and 105.7 ± 5.8%, respectively). Neither sex, false lumen status, or mural calcification, nor prior thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia, correlated with the diameter change. Age ≥80 years in the proximal descending aorta did correlate with the diameter change (110.7 ± 4.0% vs 106.1 ± 4.6% p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although identifying predicting factors for an aortic diameter increase all along with the thoracic aorta was still challenging, the degree of diameter change by aortic dissection was 105.7% to 109.3% in descending thoracic aorta, most prominent in middle descending aorta.

Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Nonacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Entry closure with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) results in aortic remodeling recently. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between aortic diameter or timing of surgical intervention from onset and remodeling after TEVAR for uncomplicated nonacute TBAD.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and December 2021, 83 consecutive patients underwent TEVAR for TBAD at our center. Forty patients with subacute and chronic uncomplicated TBADs with a patent false lumen, who could be followed up for at least 6 months, were included in this study. Indications for TEVAR included aortic diameter enlargement and preemptive treatment to prevent future aneurysmal changes in patients at risk of aortic diameter enlargement. Aortic remodeling was accessed, and data between the remodeling and nonremodeling groups were compared.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 97.5%, with a type Ia endoleak remaining in 1 patient. No operative or in-hospital mortality occurred. Paraparesis occurred in only 1 patient (2.5%). Follow-up was completed at a median of 53.5 months. Late death occurred in 3 cases, but there were no aortic-related deaths. Late aortic remodeling was achieved in 22 patients (55%). The preoperative maximum aortic diameter (PMAD) in the thoracic aortic region was 51.5 mm in the nonremodeling group, significantly larger than 42.5 mm in the remodeling group (P < 0.0001). The cutoff value of the PMAD for predicting aortic remodeling was 45 mm (area under the curve, 0.917; P = 0.028). The remodeling group had an earlier time from onset to intervention than the nonremodeling group, with a cutoff value of 6.3 months (area under the curve, 0.743; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for nonacute uncomplicated TBAD resulted in a late aortic remodeling rate of 55%. This study suggested that a PMAD of >45 mm or a period >6.3 months between dissection onset and surgery hinders aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Prevention of distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) can occur after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness of restrictive bare stent (RBS), tapered stent graft (TSG), and non-TSG in TEVAR in preventing dSINE after a midterm follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR (June 2010 to December 2018). The occurrence of dSINE during follow-up was examined. Predictors of dSINE were determined using Fine-Gray regression with death as the competing event. Survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Finally, 364 patients were included: 111 with non-TSG TEVAR, 125 with TSG TEVAR, and 128 with TEVAR with RBS. After 54.5 months, incidences of dSINE in the 3 groups were 12.61%, 4.80%, and 1.56%, respectively (P = .002). On Fine-Gray regression adjusted for clinically relevant covariates, the expansion mismatch ratio (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.12; P < .001) and complete false lumen thrombosis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.94; P = .037) were identified as predictors of dSINE. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that dSINE was not only a risk factor for aortic-related mortality (hazard ratio, 17.90; 95% CI, 3.27-98.12; P = .001), but also a predominant risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 4.91; 95% CI, 1.66-14.52; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

dSINE can happen in TBAD patients who undergo TEVAR. Thus, long-term surveillance is crucial. TSG and RBS had lower expansion mismatch ratios, which might help prevent dSINE.

A CT-based predictive model for stent-induced vessel damage: application to type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The distal stent-induced new entry (distal SINE) is a life-threatening device-related complication after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, risk factors for distal SINE are not fully determined, and prediction models are lacking. This study aimed to establish a predictive model for distal SINE based on the preoperative dataset.

METHODS

Two hundred and six patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) that experienced TEVAR were involved in this study. Among them, thirty patients developed distal SINE. Pre-TEVAR morphological parameters were measured based on the CT-reconstructed configurations. Virtual post-TEVAR morphological and mechanical parameters were computed via the virtual stenting algorithm (VSA). Two predictive models (PM-1 and PM-2) were developed and presented as nomograms to help risk evaluation of distal SINE. The performance of the proposed predictive models was evaluated and internal validation was conducted.

RESULTS

Machine-selected variables for PM-1 included key pre-TEVAR parameters, and those for PM-2 included key virtual post-TEVAR parameters. Both models showed good calibration in both development and validation subsamples, while PM-2 outperformed PM-1. The discrimination of PM-2 was better than PM-1 in the development subsample, with an optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 and 0.77, respectively. Application of PM-2 in the validation subsample presented good discrimination with an AUC of 0.9727. The decision curve demonstrated that PM-2 was clinically useful.

CONCLUSION

This study proposed a predictive model for distal SINE incorporating the CT-based VSA. This predictive model could efficiently predict the risk of distal SINE and thus might contribute to personalized intervention planning.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study established a predictive model to evaluate the risk of distal SINE based on the pre-stenting CT dataset and planned device information. With an accurate VSA tool, the predictive model could help to improve the safety of the endovascular repair procedure.

KEY POINTS

• Clinically useful prediction models for distal stent-induced new entry are still lacking, and the safety of the stent implantation is hard to guarantee. • Our proposed predictive tool based on a virtual stenting algorithm supports different stenting planning rehearsals and real-time risk evaluation, guiding clinicians to optimize the presurgical plan when necessary. • The established prediction model provides accurate risk evaluation for vessel damage, improving the safety of the intervention procedure.

Distal Stent Graft-Induced New Entry After Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure for Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors of distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) after frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for aortic dissection (AD) and to consider strategies to prevent this complication.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 52 patients who had undergone aortic arch repair for AD with the FET procedure using J Graft FROZENIX from 2014 to 2020 at a single center. Baseline characteristics, aortic characteristics and mid-term outcomes were compared between patients with and without dSINE. The extent of unfolding of the device and movement of the distal edge of the device were analyzed by multidetector computed tomography. The primary endpoints were survival and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

dSINE was the most prevalent complication after FET procedure, with an incidence of 23%. Eleven of 12 patients with dSINE underwent secondary interventions. dSINE was common in chronic aortic dissection (P = 0.001) and was associated with the residual false lumen area (P < 0.001) and movement distance of the distal edge of the device in the cranial direction (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The distal edge of the FET is more likely to move in the cranial direction, and this movement may cause dSINE.

The role of aorta distal to stent in the occurrence of distal stent graft-induced new entry tear: A computational fluid dynamics and morphological study

Distal stent graft-induced new entry tear (dSINE) is an important complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study aims to explore whether the aorta distal to the stent plays an important role in the occurrence of dSINE. Sixty-nine patient-specific geometrical models of twenty-three enrolled patients were reconstructed from preoperative, postoperative, and predSINE computed tomography scans. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to calculate the von Mises stress in the CFD group. Meanwhile, morphological measurements were performed in all patients, including measurements of the inverted pyramid index at different follow-up time points and the postoperative true lumen volume change rate. In the CFD study, the time-averaged von Mises stress of the true lumen distal to the stent in dSINE patients was significantly higher than that in the CFD controls (20.42 kPa vs. 15.47 kPa). In the morphological study, a special aortic plane (plane A) with an extremely small area distal to the stent was observed in dSINE patients, which resulted in an inverted pyramid structure in the true lumen distal to the stent. This structure in dSINE patients became increasingly obvious during the follow-up period and finally reached the maximum value before dSINE occurred (mean, 3.91 vs. 1.23). At the same time, enlargement of the true lumen distal to the stent occurs before dSINE, manifesting as a continuous increase in the true lumen volume (mean, 0.70 vs. 013). A new theory of what causes dSINE to occur has been proposed: the inverted pyramid structure of the true lumen distal to the stent caused an increase in the von Mises stress in this region and aortic enlargement, which ultimately led to the occurrence of dSINE.

Partial arch replacement of type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection

BACKGROUND

Stent graft-induced new entry (SINE), defined as the stent graft-induced formation of a new entry point for blood to enter an area, is increasingly being observed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection worldwide. We herein describe a case of Stanford type A aortic dissection due to proximal SINE after TEVAR for Stanford type B dissection.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case involved a 58-year-old man with type A aortic dissection due to SINE. Six years previously, he had developed severe back pain and was diagnosed with type B aortic dissection after computed tomography examination. Because the primary entry was positioned at the descending aorta, we conducted TEVAR for exclusion of the entry with a GORE TAG conformable thoracic aortic graft. He was thereafter followed by our hospital. Six years later, he developed jaw pain and was examined at another hospital. He was transferred to our hospital because of the possibility of type A dissection. Computed tomography revealed type A aortic dissection with proximal site SINE. Emergency partial arch replacement was conducted, and he was discharged on postoperative day 27. Because the entry was at the lesser curve of the arch, we excluded the entry and conducted partial arch replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case, proximal SINE occurred 6 years after TEVAR. Because SINE may occur even in the long term after TEVAR, careful follow-up is necessary.

Hemodynamic parameters impact the stability of distal stent graft-induced new entry

Stent graft-induced new entry tear (SINE) is a serious complication in aortic dissection patients caused by the stent-graft itself after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The stability of SINE is a key indicator for the need and timing of reinterventions. This study aimed to understand the role of hemodynamics in SINE stability by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis based on patient-specific anatomical information. Four patients treated with TEVAR who developed a distal SINE (dSINE) were included; two patients had a stable dSINE and two patients experienced expansion of the dSINE upon follow-up examinations. CFD simulations were performed on geometries reconstructed from computed tomography scans acquired upon early detection of dSINE in these patients. Computational results showed that stable dSINEs presented larger regions with low time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and high relative residence time (RRT), and partial thrombosis was observed at subsequent follow-ups. Furthermore, significant systolic antegrade flow was observed in the unstable dSINE which also had a larger retrograde flow fraction (RFF) on the SINE plane. In conclusion, this pilot study suggested that high RRT and low TAWSS may indicate stable dSINE by promoting thrombosis, whereas larger RFF and antegrade flows inside dSINE might be associated with its expansion.

Cardiac Pulsatile Helical Deformation of the Thoracic Aorta Before and After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Type B Dissections

PURPOSE

Type B aortic dissections propagate with either achiral (nonspiraling) or right-handed chiral (spiraling) morphology, have mobile dissection flaps, and are often treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). We aim to quantify cardiac-induced helical deformation of the true lumen of type B aortic dissections before and after TEVAR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cardiac-gated computed tomography (CT) images before and after TEVAR of type B aortic dissections were used to construct systolic and diastolic 3-dimensional (3D) surface models, including true lumen, whole lumen (true+false lumens), and branch vessels. This was followed by extraction of true lumen helicity (helical angle, twist, and radius) and cross-sectional (area, circumference, and minor/major diameter ratio) metrics. Deformations between systole and diastole were quantified, and deformations between pre- and post-TEVAR were compared.

RESULTS

Eleven TEVAR patients (59.9±4.6 years) were included in this study. Pre-TEVAR, there were no significant cardiac-induced deformations of helical metrics; however, post-TEVAR, significant deformation was observed for the true lumen proximal angular position. Pre-TEVAR, cardiac-induced deformations of all cross-sectional metrics were significant; however, only area and circumference deformations remained significant post-TEVAR. There were no significant differences of pulsatile deformation from pre- to post-TEVAR. Variance of proximal angular position and cross-sectional circumference deformation decreased after TEVAR.

CONCLUSION

Pre-TEVAR, type B aortic dissections did not exhibit significant helical cardiac-induced deformation, indicating that the true and false lumens move in unison (do not move with respect to each other). Post-TEVAR, true lumens exhibited significant cardiac-induced deformation of proximal angular position, suggesting that exclusion of the false lumen leads to greater rotational deformations of the true lumen and lack of true lumen major/minor deformation post-TEVAR means that the endograft promotes static circularity. Population variance of deformations is muted after TEVAR, and dissection acuity influences pulsatile deformation while pre-TEVAR chirality does not.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Description of thoracic aortic dissection helical morphology and dynamics, and understanding the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on dissection helicity, are important for improving endovascular treatment. These findings provide nuance to the complex shape and motion of the true and false lumens, enabling clinicians to better stratify dissection disease. The impact of TEVAR on dissection helicity provides a description of how treatment alters morphology and motion, and may provide clues for treatment durability. Finally, the helical component to endograft deformation is important to form comprehensive boundary conditions for testing and developing new endovascular devices.

Reintervention after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce regarding the incidence, reasons, potential risk factors, and long-term outcomes of reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2020, 238 patients with uncomplicated TBAD who received TEVAR were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical baseline data, aorta anatomy, dissection characteristics, and details of the TEVAR procedure were evaluated and compared. A competing-risk regression model was used to estimate the cumulative incidences of reintervention. The multivariate Cox model was used to identify the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 68.6 months. A total of 27 (11.3%) cases of reintervention were observed. The competing-risk analyses showed that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative incidences of reintervention were 5.07%, 7.08%, and 14.0%, respectively. Reasons for reintervention included endoleak (25.9%), aneurysmal dilation (22.2%), retrograde type A aortic dissection (18.5%), distal stent-graft-induced new entry and false lumen expansion (18.5%), and dissection progression and/or malperfusion (14.8%). Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that a larger initial maximal aortic diameter (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.69, p = 0.011) and increased proximal landing zone oversizing (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.47, p = 0.033) were the significant risk factors for reintervention. Long-term survival rates were comparable between patients with or without reintervention (p = 0.915).

CONCLUSIONS

Reintervention after TEVAR in patients with uncomplicated TBAD is not uncommon. A larger initial maximal aortic diameter and excessive proximal landing zone oversizing are associated with the second intervention. Reintervention does not significantly affect long-term survival.

How to select the optimal size of frozen elephant trunk in total arch replacement for type A acute aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Total arch replacement (TAR) with a frozen elephant trunk (FET) is a common technique for acute aortic dissection, but there is no consensus on the optimal size of the FET.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who underwent TAR with FET for acute aortic dissection at our hospital since 2014 were included. The aortic diameter obtained from FET was measured on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and the estimated oversizing ratio was calculated. We investigated the relationship between the estimated oversizing ratio and postoperative outcomes. We also measured the maximum true lumen diameter, circumference of the true lumen, and total aortic diameter at the same level as the FET end on preoperative CT and examined the correlation with the aortic diameter obtained from FET.

RESULTS

The average estimated oversizing ratio was 109%. Early postoperative CT showed complete thrombosis of the false lumen in 41 (93.2%) patients. No distal stent graft-induced new entry occurred during follow-up. The correlation coefficients between the three measurements and aortic diameter obtained from FET were 0.64 (maximum true lumen diameter), 0.76 (true lumen diameter calculated from circumference), and 0.72 (total aortic diameter), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The aortic diameter obtained from FET on postoperative CT was strongly correlated with the true lumen diameter calculated from the circumference and total aortic diameter on preoperative CT. It is reasonable to select a size of approximately 130% of the true lumen diameter calculated from the circumference or 80% to 85% of the total aortic diameter.

Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and reported the outcomes of using a tapered stent graft and dSINE reintervention.

METHODS

A total of 226 patients with uncomplicated TBAD who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair between January 2010 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The global features of the thoracic aorta and the local features of the proximal and distal landing zones were evaluated and compared between the dSINE and non-dSINE groups. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify the independent risk factors for dSINE. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was estimated using competing risk models.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 16 patients (7.1%) had developed dSINE. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a type III aortic arch, decreased angle, increased distal oversizing, and increased distal mismatch ratio were significant risk factors for dSINE. Of the patients with tapered stent grafts, five with a ≤4-mm taper had developed dSINE. However, no dSINE was seen in the >4-mm taper group (P = .024). Reintervention was performed for 7 of the 16 patients with dSINE (43.8%). The mean time from the initial detection of dSINE to reintervention was 6.43 ± 4.62 months. The competing risk analyses showed that the cumulative incidence of reintervention in the dSINE group at 1, 3, and 5 years was 25.0%, 37.5%, and 43.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A type III aortic arch, excessive distal oversizing and mismatch ratio, and severe angulation were associated with dSINE in patients with uncomplicated TBAD. The use of a tapered stent graft with a >4-mm taper could help prevent dSINE in patients with a high taper ratio. Aggressive reintervention was associated with favorable long-term outcomes for patients with progressive dSINE.

Aortic remodeling, reintervention, and survival after zone 0 arch repair with frozen elephant trunks for acute type A aortic dissection: Midterm results

Objectives

To investigate the midterm results after zone 0 arch repair with frozen elephant trunks for acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods

Between October 2014 and April 2021, 196 patients underwent zone 0 arch repair with frozen elephant trunks for acute type A aortic dissection. The true lumen area, aortic lumen area, and false lumen status were assessed at four aortic levels, the proximal and distal descending thoracic aorta (level A and level B, respectively), celiac artery branching (level C), and terminal aorta (level D). Aortic remodeling (postoperative area as a percentage of the preoperative area) was classified into 3 groups, positive (true lumen area ≥120% with aortic lumen <120% or true lumen area ≥80% with aortic lumen <80%), minimal (80% ≤ true lumen area and aortic lumen area <120%), and negative remodeling (all other changes).

Results

In-hospital mortality was 13 (6.6%) patients. The overall survival rate was 85.1% at 5 years. The freedom from distal aortic reintervention was 89.9% at 5 years. The prevalence of completely thrombosed or obliterated false lumen at 2 years was 96.8% at level A, 88.4% at level B, 47.2% at level C, and 27.6% at level D. The prevalence of positive aortic remodeling at 2 years was 84.7% at level A, 75.0% at level B, 29.2% at level C, and 16.7% at level D.

Conclusions

Zone 0 arch repair with frozen elephant trunks for acute type A aortic dissection can avoid invasive aortic arch resection and facilitate aortic remodeling of the descending thoracic aorta. The FET effect on aortic remodeling is limited at the aortic level below the FET stent end.

Endovascular reintervention after frozen elephant trunk: where is the evidence?

The introduction of the single-step hybrid frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for total arch replacement has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery. FET has proven to achieve excellent results in the repair of complex thoracic aorta pathologies. However, there remains a risk of reintervention post-FET for a variety of causes. This secondary intervention can either be performed endovascular, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), or via open surgery. Multiple FET hybrid prosthesis are commercially available, each requiring different rates of endovascular reintervention. The current review will focus on providing an overview of the reintervention rates for main causes in relation to the FET grafts on the market. In addition, strategies to prevent reintervention will be highlighted. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase to highlight the evidence in the literature on endovascular reintervention after FET. The main causes for secondary intervention are distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), endoleak and negative aortic remodeling, and to a much lesser extent, graft kinking and aorto-esophageal fistulae. In addition, it is clear that the Thoraflex Hybrid (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK) is the superior FET device, showing excellent reintervention rates for all the above causes. Interestingly, the choice of FET device as well as its size and length can help prevent the need for reintervention. The FET procedure is indeed associated with excellent clinical outcomes, however, the need for reintervention may still arise. Importantly, the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis has shown excellent results when it comes to endovascular reintervention. Finally, several strategies exist that can prevent reintervention.

Predictive factors of distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk procedure for aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The incidence rate of distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic dissection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and seek the clinical and anatomical predictive factors.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective multicenter evaluation of complications including distal stent graft-induced new entry, aortic events, and re-intervention after the frozen elephant trunk procedure for aortic dissection.

RESULTS

Our cohort included total 177 consecutive patients who underwent the frozen elephant trunk procedure for acute and chronic aortic dissection at five centers in Japan from May 2014 to March 2021. The incidence rate of distal stent graft-induced new entry was 14.1% (25/177 patients). The cumulative incidence of d-SINE was 7.1%, 12.4%, 21.4% after 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Distal stent graft-induced new entry was not associated with mid-term survival rate. After competing risk regression analysis, onset time > 48 hours (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-12.79; P=0.031) was detected as an independent predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness that there is a relatively higher incidence of distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk procedures is important. Non-hyperacute phase was detected as an independent risk factor. Preemptive endovascular repair may be appropriate to protect new entry in high-risk patients.

Risk profile analysis of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Laboratory and radiographic predictors

BACKGROUND

There is emerging evidence to support pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) intervention for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (unTBAD). Pre-emptive intervention would be particularly beneficial in patients that have a higher baseline risk of progressing to complicated TBAD (coTBAD). There remain debate on the optimal clinical, laboratory, morphological, and radiological parameters, which would identify the highest-risk patients that would benefit most from pre-emptive TEVAR.

AIM

This review summarizes evidence on the clinical, laboratory, and morphological parameters that increase the risk profiles of unTBAD patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Scopus to collate all research evidence on the clinical, laboratory, and morphological parameters that increase the risk profiles of unTBAD patients RESULTS: At present, there are no clear clinical guidelines using risk-stratification to inform the selection of unTBAD patients for TEVAR. However, there are noticeable literature trends that can assist with the identification of the most at-risk unTBAD patients. Patients are at particular risk when they have refractory pain and/or hypertension, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), larger aortic diameter, and larger entry tears. These risks should be considered alongside factors that increase the procedural risk of TEVAR to create a well-balanced approach. Advances in biomarkers and imaging are likely to identify more pertinent parameters in the future to optimize the development of balanced, risk-stratified treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

There are a variety of risk profiling parameters that can be used to identify the high-risk unTBAD patient, with novel biomarkers and imaging parameters emerging. Longer-term evidence verifying these parameters would be ideal. Further randomized controlled trials and multicentre registry analyses are also warranted to guide risk-stratified selection protocols.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of highly tapered type B aortic dissection with proximal tapered stent grafts and distal restrictive stent grafts

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated aortic remodeling in highly tapered type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a proximal tapered stent graft plus a distal restrictive stent graft to maximize thoracic coverage while avoiding distal excessive oversizing.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients presenting with highly tapered TABD were randomized to restricted TEVAR (r-TEVAR) and standard TEVAR groups. Highly tapered TBAD was defined as the maximal diameter of the true lumen at proximal and distal thoracic aorta landing zone tapers greater than 8 mm or taper ratio greater than 20%. Patients in the r-TEVAR group underwent proximal tapered stent grafts plus distal restrictive stent grafts to match the taper ratio of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) and extend the length of stent coverage. Patients in the standard TEVAR group underwent proximal tapered stent grafts implantation without distal restrictive stent grafts. Aortic remodeling was estimated by computed tomography angiography (CTA) during the follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients underwent r-TEVAR, and 18 patients underwent standard TEVAR. The taper ratio of the stent graft matched the DTA in the r-TEVAR group (24.7±3.4% vs. 27.3±4.2%, P=0.068) but did not match that in the standard TEVAR group (13.5±3.3% vs. 30.5±9.6%, P<0.001). The length of stent graft coverage in the r-TEVAR group was longer than that in the standard TEVAR group (220.4±21.1 mm vs. 175.3±17.8 mm, P<0.001). Compared with the standard TEVAR group, the r-TEVAR group had better complete remodeling of the DTA at 6 months (40% vs. 5.6%, P=0.03), 12 months (60% vs. 16.7%, P=0.027) and 24 months (78.6% vs. 41.2%, P=0.036) after the operation. There was no difference in the cumulative survival rate between the r-TEVAR and standard TEVAR groups (P=0.166).

CONCLUSIONS

r-TEVAR with overlapping proximal tapered stent grafts and distal restrictive stent grafts can match the taper of highly tapered TABD, extend the length of stent graft coverage, and lead to better remodeling of the DTA than standard TEVAR.

Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair

Background

This study was performed to compare aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients with acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Methods

We retrospectively examined 323 consecutive patients with acute (n = 129), subacute (n = 161), and chronic (n = 33) TBAD who underwent TEVAR from June 2013 to December 2016 in in multicenter institution. Patient demographics, clinical data, and imaging characteristics were recorded and compared among the three groups.

Results

The three groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Perioperative mortality rates were similar among the acute (2.3%), subacute (0.0%), and chronic (0.0%) groups (P = 0.34). Perioperative morbidity rates, including the rates of visceral and lower limb malperfusion and cerebral infraction, were also similar. The rate of perioperative endoleak was significantly higher in the chronic group (18.1%) than in the acute (3.9%) and subacute (3.7%) groups (P = 0.02). The mean follow-up duration was 78 ± 22 months (range, 36–101 months). The mortality rates were comparable among the three groups. The rates of reintervention and lower limb malperfusion were higher in the chronic group than in the acute and subacute groups. FL diameter reduction were more robust in the acute and subacute groups than in the chronic group.

Conclusion

Patients with acute, subacute, and chronic TBAD had different outcomes in this study. Patients with acute and subacute TBAD had fewer complications than those with chronic TBAD. Aortic remodeling after TEVAR was more favorable in patients with acute and subacute TBAD than in patients with chronic TBAD. TEVAR promotes more positive remodeling at the stent graft level than at the distal level of the aorta.

Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk

Background

The introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for total arch replacement (TAR) has revolutionized the field of aortivascular surgery by allowing hybrid repair of complex aortic pathologies in a single step through combining an open surgical approach with an endovascular one. FET has been associated with favorable aortic remodeling, however, its is also associated with development of distal stent graft induced new entry (dSINE) tears postoperatively. The rate of aortic remodeling and the incidence of dSINE have been linked together, in addition, there seems to be a relationship between these two variables and FET insetion length as well as graft size.

Aims

The scope of this review is to highlight the rate of aortic remodeling as well the incidence of dSINE associated with different FET devices available commercially. This review also aimed to investigate the relationship between aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and FET graft size.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase in order to collate all research evidence on the above mentioned variables.

Results

Thoraflex™ Hybrid Plexus seems to yield optimum aortic remodeling by promoting maximum false thrombosis as well true lumen expansion. Thoraflex Hybrid™ is also associated with the lowest incidence of dSINE post-FET relative to the other FET devices on the market. Aortic remodeling and dSINE do influence each other and are both linked with FET graft length and size.

Conclusion

The FET technique for TAR shows excellent aortic remodeling but is associated with a considerable risk of dSINE development. However, Thoraflex™ Hybrid has demonstrated itself to be the superior FET device on the aortic arch prostheses market. Since aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and stent graft size are all interconnect, the choice of FET device length and size must be made with great care for optimum results.

Hybrid Technique on the Total Arch Replacement for Type A Aortic Dissection: 12-year Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes From a Single Center

Objective

Hybrid total arch replacement (HTAR) was an alternative for type A aortic dissection (TAAD). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcomes of HTAR for TAAD and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of performing this procedure under mild hypothermia.

Methods

A total of 209 patients who underwent HTAR for TAAD were retrospectively analyzed and stratified into mild (n = 48) and moderate (n = 161) hypothermia groups to evaluate the effects of mild hypothermia on the clinical outcomes. Long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated by the overall survival and adverse aortic events (AAEs). A total of 176 patients with preoperative and at least one-time postoperative aortic computed tomography angiography in our institute were included for evaluating the late aortic remodeling (aortic diameter and false lumen thrombosis).

Results

The median follow-up period was 48.3 (interquartile range [IQR] = 28.4–73.7) months. The overall survival rate was 88.0, 83.2, and 77.1% at the 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, and in the presence of death as a competing risk, the cumulative incidence of AAEs was 4.8, 9.9, and 12.1% at the 1, 5, and 10 years. The aortic diameters were stable in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta (P > 0.05 in all the measured aortic segments). A total of 100% complete false lumen thrombosis rate in the stent covered and distal thoracic aorta were achieved at 1 year (64/64) and 4 years (18/18), respectively after HTAR. The overall composite adverse events morbidity and mortality were 18.7 and 10.0%. Mild hypothermia (31.2, IQR = 30.2–32.0) achieved similar composite adverse events morbidity (mild: 14.6 vs. moderate: 19.9%, P = 0.41) and early mortality (mild: 10.4 vs. moderate: 9.9%, P = 1.00) compared with moderate hypothermia (median 27.7, IQR = 27–28.1) group, but mild hypothermia group needed shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (mild: 111, IQR = 93–145 min vs. moderate: 136, IQR = 114–173 min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamping (mild: 45, IQR = 37–56 min vs. moderate: 78, IQR = 54–107 min, P < 0.001) time.

Conclusion

Hybrid total arch replacement achieved desirable early and long-term clinical outcomes for TAAD. Performing HTAR under mild hypothermia was as safe as under moderate hypothermia. After HTAR for TAAD, dissected aorta achieved desirable aortic remodeling, presenting as stable aortic diameters and false lumen complete thrombosis. In all, HTAR is a practical treatment for TAAD.

Mid- and long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (un-TBAD) has been managed conservatively with medical therapy to control the heart rate and blood pressure to limit disease progression, in addition to radiological follow-up. However, several trials and observational studies have investigated the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in un-TBAD and suggested that TEVAR provides a survival benefit over medical therapy. Outcomes of TEVAR have also been linked with the timing of intervention.

AIMS

The scope of this review is to collate and summarize all the evidence in the literature on the mid- and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in un-TBAD, confirming its superiority. We also aimed to investigate the relationship between the timing of TEVAR intervention and results.

METHODS

We carried out a comprehensive literature search on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE to collate and summarize all research evidence on the mid- and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in un-TBAD, as well as its relationship with intervention timing.

RESULTS

TEVAR has proven to be a safe and effective tool in un-TBAD, offering superior mid- and long-term outcomes including all-cause and aorta-related mortality, aortic-specific adverse events, aortic remodeling, and need for reintervention. Additionally, performing TEVAR during the subacute phase of dissection seems to yield optimal results.

CONCLUSION

The evidence demonstrating a survival advantage in favor TEVAR over medical therapy in un-TBAD means that with further research, particular trials and observational studies, TEVAR could become the gold-standard treatment option for un-TBAD patients.

Clinical Results and Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Treatment for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection With the “Fabulous” Stent System

Objective

To report the clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after the implantation of a self-developed, biomechanically optimized, two-stage thoracic stent system named Fabulous.

Background

Given the efficacy of the PETTICOAT concept, the benefits of Fabulous and the behavior of remodeling in different segments need further investigation.

Methods

This is a prospective and multicenter study. From 2017 to 2019, 145 patients (mean age, 56.6 years; 88.3% male) from 14 centers were included in this cohort. The clinical results and core laboratory results were from a central electronic data capture system. Computed tomographic angiography was performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months and yearly thereafter and was used for volumetric analysis by 3mensio (Bilthoven, The Netherlands). After the 1-year follow-up, 97.2 and 87.6% of the clinical and imaging results of the eligible patients were available.

Results

Both stent grafts and bare stents were successfully delivered in place in 100% of the patients. The 30-day mortality and 1-year freedom from all-cause mortality were 2.1 and 96.6%, respectively. The incidence of entry flow was 11.7% at 30 days and 6.2% at 365 days. No cases of stent-induced new entry (SINE) or reintervention were observed. After the 1-year follow-up, the true lumen/overall volume ratio reached 88%. The following subdivided segment volume changes were recorded: stent graft segment TL +56%; FL −92%, bare stent segment TL +32%; FL −75%, and there were no significant changes in the visceral segment.

Conclusions

These outcomes indicated that there were favorable clinical benefits of Fabulous stent system. This device achieved a low short-term mortality and a low incidence of reintervention. In addition, patients undergoing Fabulous stent system implantation showed remodeling both on descending aorta and on the distal aorta. The volume changes in the TL and FL varied in the different segments. The long-term follow-up is still ongoing.

Stent Graft-Induced Aortic Wall Injury (SAWI) - Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Stent graft-induced new entry (SINE) has been described in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic dissection. The incidence of stent graft-induced aortic wall injury (SAWI) related to iatrogenic injury in non-dissections is incompletely described. We describe incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of SAWI.

METHODS

All post-TEVAR CT angiograms (1/2005-12/2018) were reviewed for radiographic evidence of SAWI. Endograft-induced aortic dissections were likewise considered SAWI. Patient characteristics, time to SAWI, and need for re-intervention were noted. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify risk factors for SAWI.

RESULTS

Within the study cohort (n=430), 38 (9%) patients developed SAWI during a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR 4.8 years). 42% (n=16) of SAWI were proximal, 53% (n=20) distal and 5% (n=2) both proximal and distal. Nine (23%) were distal intimal flap injuries in dissection cases, thus sub-classifying them as SINE. 29% (n=11) of SAWI required re-intervention. Of these, 45% (n=5) were open and 55% (n=6) endovascular. TEVAR for acute dissection had a higher incidence of SAWI development (HR 4.6, 95% CI: [2.4, 9.0]; p<0.001) as compared to other indications. Use of devices with proximal bare springs or barbs was also associated with increased SAWI incidence (HR 5.3, 95% CI: [2.6, 11.0]; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of SAWI following TEVAR is low (9%), but nearly one-third will require re-intervention. TEVAR in the setting of acute dissection and use of devices with proximal bare springs or barbs were associated with an increased incidence of SAWI.

The PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique prevents distal stent graft-induced new entry in patients with aortic dissection

PURPOSE

Distal stent graft-induced new entry (SINE) is a serious complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique was developed to prevent distal SINE for double-barrel TBAD. Initially, a proximal stent-graft (SG) is deployed, followed by the extension of a bare stent above the celiac artery and deployment of a second SG within the bare stent. This study examined whether the PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique prevents distal SINE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study comparing two groups that underwent conventional standard TEVAR between January 2013 and September 2018 and TEVAR using the PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique after October 2018 for double-barrel TBAD.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (74% male) underwent standard TEVAR (group A), while another 27 (78% male) underwent the PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique (group B). TEVAR was performed in the chronic phase on 15 patients (55.6%) in group A and on 16 (59.2%) in group B. Aorta-related mortality occurred in one patient in group A (3.7%). Oversizing ratios at the distal edge of the SG diameter to the major axis of the true lumen were 25% ± 26% and 25% ± 21% in groups A and B, respectively. During the follow-up period, five patients (18.5%) in group A and none in group B (p = 0.02) developed distal SINE. Three out of the five patients with distal SINE in group A were treated with additional TEVAR, one with thoracoabdominal aortic replacement, and one with conservative observation. The freedom from distal SINE rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The PETTICOAT-snowshoe technique significantly prevented distal SINE during the mid-term period even with the same distal SG oversizing as conventional standard TEVAR.

Early experience with a novel dissection-specific stent-graft to prevent distal stent-graft-induced new entry tears after thoracic endovascular repair of chronic type B aortic dissections

PURPOSE

The aim was to report short and mid-term outcomes of a novel, investigational, dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), specifically designed to address the features of chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) and reduce the risk of distal stent-graft-induced new entry tears (dSINE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single center cohort study of all patients undergoing TEVAR with the DSSG for CTBAD from January 1, 2017 to January 31, 2020. The DSSG, which is a modified stent-graft based on the Cook Zenith Alpha Thoracic platform, has no proximal barbs and a customized longer body length with substantial taper. The second and third distal Z-stents are sited internally to avoid any contact of the metal skeleton with the dissection membrane and have reduced radial force, while the most distal stent was removed creating a distal 30 mm unsupported Dacron graft.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (13 males, 3 females) with a median age of 66 years (range 31-79 years) underwent elective TEVAR of CTBAD using the DSSG. Six patients (38%) had an underlying connective tissue disorder. The median tapering was 10mm (range 4mm-21mm) and median length 270mm (range 210-380 mm). Technical success was achieved in all but one case (96%). One patient died within 30 days, due to retrograde type A dissection with cardiac tamponade. The 30-day rate of stroke, spinal cord ischemia and re-interventions was 0%. After median imaging follow-up time of 17 months (range 1 - 31 months), one patient developed a dSINE four months after the index procedure. After median survival follow-up of 23 months (range 2 - 35 months), one late death occurred due to traumatic brain injury, while no aortic-related death occurred during follow-up. Complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis was achieved in nine patients while the remaining six showed partial FL thrombosis. No instances of diameter increase at the level of treated aortic segment were noted with serial measurements showing either stable (n=7) or decreased (n=8) maximal transverse diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of CTBAD is safe and feasible. This early real-world experience shows promising mid-term effectiveness with low rates of dSINE or unplanned re-interventions and satisfactory aortic remodelling during follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed, however, before any firm conclusions can be drawn.

A new dissection-specific hybrid stent graft for patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

We present our first experience of using a new dissection-specific hybrid stent graft (SG) (the 'Soft Elephant Trunk') in the frozen elephant trunk technique, in patients with non-acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and February 2021, patients with non-acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection underwent the frozen elephant trunk procedure at our centre using 3 SG types: group Z used stiff, distal Z-shaped nitinol SGs (E-Vita, Medtronic); group R used a stiff, ring-shaped nitinol SG (Thoraflex); and group S used a soft, distal dissection-specific SG. Predictors of distal SG-induced new entry were analysed. End points were hospital- and midterm-follow-up results.

RESULTS

The study comprised 109 patients with 46 (42.2%), 22 (20.2%) and 41 (37.6%) patients in groups Z, R and S, respectively. No significant differences were found in early outcomes. Freedom from distal SG-induced new entry was comparable in groups Z, R and S (68.9% vs 92.9% vs 100%, log-rank = 0.14). There was no significant difference in follow-up between the groups. Four-year survival rates were 80.44%, 71.59% and 95.06% in groups Z, R and S, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the presence of connective tissue disorders [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.62, P = 0.11] and SG diameter (HR = 1.37, P = 0.034) were strong predictors of distal SG-induced new entry.

CONCLUSIONS

Dissection-specific hybrid SG with a soft distal end is effective in patients with non-acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Compared to non-soft distal SGs, this can reduce the incidence of distal complications. Long-term outcomes are necessary to determine the potential advantages and disadvantages of the new prosthesis.

Management of Acute, Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

For decades, the mainstay of management for acute, uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has been anti-impulse medical therapy, focusing on close control of blood pressure, and heart rate. However, the natural history of this entity has remained one of aortic degeneration over time and significant morbidity and mortality. More recently, the advent of endovascular therapy has driven a revolution in the management of TBAD. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was rapidly adopted for the treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection due to significantly improved morbidity and mortality when compared with tradition open surgical techniques, its role in the management of uncomplicated dissection remained controversial. However, the accumulation of favorable data on aortic remodeling and survival following early TEVAR for uncomplicated dissection is driving a shift in paradigm and practice. This is particularly true of patients exhibiting certain features at the time of presentation that are associated with increased risk of failure of optimal medical therapy. This article reviews the current evidence in the literature addressing TEVAR for acute, uncomplicated TBAD. In addition, it presents the state of the art in FDA-approved thoracic endograft platforms, guidance regarding case planning, and step-by-step procedural description, including the management of common challenges, and complications.

Secondary Interventions After TEVAR for Aortic Dissection

The goal of thoracic endograft placement in type B aortic dissection is to prevent aneurysmal degeneration and other complications. Although TEVAR is a highly effective tool for managing type B aortic dissection, many patients will require additional interventions. In this article, we present a case-based review of techniques for the management of persistent false lumen perfusion and stent-graft induced new entry tears after TEVAR for aortic dissection.

Ab ovo: Factors Affecting the Radial Stiffness of Thoracic Aorta Stent-Grafts

The aim of the investigation was to study the factors influencing the radial stiffness of the thoracic aorta stent-grafts with the stent elements made of nitinol tubes by laser cutting and thermal shape setting.

Effect of Vessel Tortuosity on Stress Concentration at the Distal Stent-Vessel Interface: Possible Link With New Entry Formation Through Biomechanical Simulation

A computational approach is used to investigate potential risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in aortic dissection (AD) patients. Patient-specific simulations were performed based on computed tomography images acquired from six AD patients (three dSINE and three non-dSINE) to analyze the correlation between anatomical characteristics and stress/strain distributions. Sensitivity analysis was carried out using idealized models to independently assess the effect of stent graft length, stent tortuosity and wedge apposition angle at the landing zone on key biomechanical variables. Mismatch of biomechanical properties between the stented and nonstented regions led to high stress at the distal stent graft-vessel interface in all patients, as well as shear strain in the neighboring region, which coincides with the location of tear formation. Stress was observed to increase with the increase of stent tortuosity (from 263 kPa at a tortuosity angle of 50 deg to 313 kPa at 30 deg). It was further amplified by stent graft landing at the inflection point of a curve. Malapposition of the stent graft led to an asymmetrical segment within the aorta, therefore changing the location and magnitude of the maximum von Mises stress substantially (up to +25.9% with a +25 deg change in the distal wedge apposition angle). In conclusion, stent tortuosity and wedge apposition angle serve as important risk predictors for dSINE formation in AD patients.

Changes of stent-graft orientation after frozen elephant trunk treatment in aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate the extent of stent-graft (SG) elastic recoil in the descending aorta after the frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute (AAD) and chronic (CAD) aortic dissection as well as the impact of SG movement on distal stent graft-induced new entry (d-SINE).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 149 (105 AAD, 44 CAD) of 259 aortic dissection patients after the frozen elephant trunk procedure between January 2005 and April 2019. Inclusion criteria were at least 1-year computed tomography angiography (CTA) aortic examinations during a follow-up time of 3.8 ± 2.7 years and absence of open or endovascular reintervention. Multiplanar reconstruction of CTA scans was used to define the SG vector position and movement in a virtual Cartesian coordinate system. The angle φ of vector movement and changes of aortic areas at the distal landing zone were analysed.

RESULTS

The distal SG position changed over time in the cranial (10.06 ± 11.12 mm), dorsal (8.45 ± 11.12 mm) and lateral (4.96 ± 9.89 mm) directions (P < 0.001). The total change of φ (4.08 ± 7.03°) was greater in AAD than in CAD (P = 0.026). d-SINE was more common in CAD (P < 0.001) and was associated with the size of the aortic area, aortic area enlargement and continuous SG unfolding (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

With the frozen elephant trunk technique, movement and change of SG orientation in the descending aorta were observed over time. Elastic recoil was greater in AAD than in CAD. The incidence of d-SINE was particularly dependent on the size of the aortic lumen and SG radial expansion and less on elastic recoil.

A S-Shaped Association of Distal Oversizing Ratio with Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Stanford B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the nonlinear association of the distal oversizing ratio with distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and to find the optimal value of the distal oversizing ratio for prevention strategy of dSINE.

METHODS

Total of 177 patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD from the Registry Of type B aortic dissection with the Utility of STent graft were retrospectively investigated. Patients were stratified into two groups on the median distal oversizing ratio: lower group (≤16%, n = 88) and higher group (>16%, n = 89). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of dSINE. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the association of the distal oversizing ratio with dSINE. Restricted cubic smoothing spline plots and two-piecewise regression were used to analyze the possible nonlinear association.

RESULTS

Eleven patients developed dSINE (6.21%) during the median follow-up time of 12.37 months (interquartile range, 8.07-18.17 months). An S-shaped association of the distal oversizing ratio with dSINE was identified. When the distal oversizing ratio was ≤40%, the risk of dSINE increased with distal oversizing ratio, and the risk of dSINE was highest when the distal oversizing ratio reached 40% (adjusted HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.011). A larger distal oversizing ratio over 40% did not generate a greater risk of dSINE (adjusted HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; P = 0.455).

CONCLUSIONS

This study substantiated previous findings that the dSINE was associated with the increasing distal oversizing ratio. We also found an S-shaped association between the distal oversizing ratio and dSINE after TEVAR for TBAD. The distal oversizing ratio of 40% can be used for stratified management of patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD.

Midterm outcomes of fenestrated TEVAR using physician-modified endovascular grafts for zone 2

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the experience and midterm outcomes of physician-modified endovascular grafts for zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 51 consecutive patients (mean age 57.6 ± 12.5 years, 39 males) treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair using physician-modified endovascular grafts for reconstructing the left subclavian artery from November 2015 to December 2019. The primary endpoints during follow-up were the overall mortality, aorta-related mortality, and major complications. The secondary endpoints were reintervention and the patency of the target branches, the demographics and technical details were also described and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three thoracic stent-grafts were deployed in 51 patients and emergency surgery was performed in 10 patients (19.6%). Technical success was 94.1% (48/51). The incidence of perioperative complications was 15.7%, and the 30-day mortality was 0%. At a mean follow-up of 42.0 ± 14.4 months (range, 14-63 months), all the left subclavian arteries remained patent. All-cause mortality was 3.9% (2/51) and not aorta-related deaths. Estimated survival at one and three years was 98.0 ± 1.9% and 96.0 ± 2.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician-modified endovascular grafts is feasible and effective to preserve left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch pathologies with unhealthy proximal landing zone.

Influence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on true lumen helical morphology for Stanford type B dissections

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can change the morphology of the flow lumen in aortic dissections, which may affect aortic hemodynamics and function. This study characterizes how the helical morphology of the true lumen in type B aortic dissections is altered by TEVAR.

METHODS

Patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent computed tomography angiography before and after TEVAR were retrospectively reviewed. Images were used to construct three-dimensional stereolithographic surface models of the true lumen and whole aorta using custom software. Stereolithographic models were segmented and co-registered to determine helical morphology of the true lumen with respect to the whole aorta. The true lumen region covered by the endograft was defined based on fiducial markers before and after TEVAR. The helical angle, average helical twist, peak helical twist, and cross-sectional eccentricity, area, and circumference were quantified in this region for pre- and post-TEVAR geometries.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (61.3 ± 8.0 years; 12.5% female) were treated successfully for type B dissection (5 acute and 11 chronic) with TEVAR and scans before and after TEVAR were retrospectively obtained (follow-up interval 52 ± 91 days). From before to after TEVAR, the true lumen helical angle (-70.0 ± 71.1 to -64.9 ± 75.4°; P = .782), average helical twist (-4.1 ± 4.0 to -3.7 ± 3.8°/cm; P = .674), and peak helical twist (-13.2 ± 15.2 to -15.4 ± 14.2°/cm; P = .629) did not change. However, the true lumen helical radius (1.4 ± 0.5 to 1.0 ± 0.6 cm; P < .05) and eccentricity (0.9 ± 0.1 to 0.7 ± 0.1; P < .05) decreased, and the cross-sectional area (3.0 ± 1.1 to 5.0 ± 2.0 cm²; P < .05) and circumference (7.1 ± 1.0 to 8.0 ± 1.4 cm; P < .05) increased significantly from before to after TEVAR. The distinct bimodal distribution of chiral and achiral native dissections disappeared after TEVAR, and subgroup analyses showed that the true lumen circumference of acute dissections increased with TEVAR, although it did not for chronic dissections.

CONCLUSIONS

The unchanged helical angle and average and peak helical twists as a result of TEVAR suggest that the angular positions of the true lumen are constrained and that the endografts were helically conformable in the angular direction. The decrease of helical radius indicated a straightening of the corkscrew shape of the true lumen, and in combination with more circular and expanded lumen cross-sections, TEVAR produced luminal morphology that theoretically allows for lower flow resistance through the endografted portion. The impact of TEVAR on dissection flow lumen morphology and the interaction between endografts and aortic tissue can provide insight for improving device design, implantation technique, and long-term clinical outcomes.

Diameter change in completely remodelled proximal descending aorta after acute type I dissection repair: implications for estimating the pre-dissection size

 

OBJECTIVES

Pre-dissection diameter of the proximal descending thoracic aorta (p-DTA), if available, would be the reference for determining the size of the stent graft or elephant trunk. Acute type B dissection is known to increase p-DTA diameter by 23% (Rylski factor). This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of estimating post-remodelling diameter of the p-DTA based on the Rylski factor and other post-dissection morphological parameters in acute type I dissection, based on the assumption that the post-remodelling diameter is similar to the pre-dissection diameter.

METHODS

In 60 patients with acute type I dissection showing complete remodelling of the p-DTA false lumen after surgical repair, preoperative and post-remodelling computed tomography scans were reviewed. Parameters, including maximal true lumen diameter (TLDmax) and aortic area-derived diameter divided by the Rylski factor (AoDRylski), were measured at the p-DTA.

RESULTS

After complete remodelling, p-DTA diameter decreased by 4.1 mm (P < 0.001). The equivalent to the Rylski factor was 15%. Both TLDmax and AoDRylski frequently showed ≥2 mm discrepancy from post-remodelling aortic diameter (36.7% and 48.3%, respectively, P = 0.30). When 2 parameters coincided within 2 mm, two-third of their estimations were accurate. AoDRylski was more accurate than TLDmax in patients with a large extent of circumferential dissection, and vice versa with less circumferential dissection (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Prediction of post-remodelling aortic diameter relying on a single morphologic parameter carries a substantial risk of overestimation and underestimation. Evaluation based on the extent of circumferential dissection together with the 2 parameters may provide a more reliable estimation.

[Quo vadimus? Fundamental problems of developing hybrid prostheses of thoracic aorta]

This article is a review briefly characterizing the state of the art of hybrid surgery of the thoracic aorta using the frozen elephant trunk technique worldwide and in Russia, also discussing unsolved problems of fundamental science, being key issues in creation of new models of hybrid prostheses of the thoracic aorta. The main attention is paid to the problem of radial stiffness of the stent-graft portion of the prosthesis. Performed is a detailed analysis of the factors influencing this characteristic of the sent graft: shape, size and number of cells of the stent element, thickness of the nitinol wire it is made of, method of edge connection, nitinol properties depending on the alloy grade and methods of thermoforming. It is shown that excessive stiffness leads to the development of d-SINE syndrome. This is followed by discussing the problem of optimal stiffness of stent grafts, based on the design of stent graft elements and elastic properties of the wall of the true channel of a dissecting aortic aneurysm. Also proposed is an approach to solving the problem of d-SINE, consisting in creation of conical stent grafts and/or a gradual decrease of radial stiffness of stent elements in the direction of the distal portion. Comprehensively addressed are disadvantages of the graft portion of the prosthesis, in 95% of items made of polyethylene terephthalate fiber: susceptibility to degradation associated with manufacturing defects and intraoperative microdamages, abrasive effect in the zone of contact with stent elements, partial postoperative hydrolysis and an inflammatory reaction to a foreign body, often being clinically pronounced. Also touched upon are certain aspects of creating hermetic coatings of the graft portion, with the use of vancomycin possessing low cytotoxicity as part of an antibacterial component being promising. As a whole, it is demonstrated that advances in creating a novel generation of hybrid prostheses should be associated with new approaches and materials, to be obtained at the junction of medicine and fundamental sciences.

Relevance of Aortic Dissection Chronicity to the Development of Stent Graft-induced New Entry

BACKGROUND

The relevance of aortic dissection chronicity to the development of stent graft-induced new entry (SINE) is unknown.

METHODS

This study enrolled 69 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic aortic dissection from January 2006 to December 2017 and were followed up for ≥6 months. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were stratified according to TEVAR timing into an early group (≤6 months from the onset of aortic dissection) and a late group (>6 months after the onset). The incidence of SINE as well as the interval between TEVAR and the development of SINE was compared between these groups.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, SINE occurred in 12% (3/26) and 35% (15/43) of patients in the early and late groups, respectively (P = .029). The interval between TEVAR and SINE development was significantly longer in the late group than the early group (median, 92 days vs 1144 days, respectively; P = .002). According to the multivariate analysis results, the late group (hazard ratio, 3.667; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-12.968; P = .044) and the distal oversizing ratio (hazard ratio, 1.492; 95% confidence interval, 1.071-2.080; P = .018) were the independent predictors for SINE development.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR should be performed in the early period of the chronic phase to prevent SINE. Close and lifelong follow-up is mandatory for patients who undergo TEVAR >6 months after onset because SINE can develop several years after TEVAR in those patients.

Influence of TEVAR on blood pressure in subacute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients with refractory and non-refractory arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to compare the modifications of systemic blood pressure in patients with subacute type b aortic dissection (TBAD) and refractory (rHTN) and non-refractory arterial hypertension (N-rHTN) treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups, rHTN defined as blood pressure >140/90 mmHg with ≥5 antihypertensive drugs and patients with N-rHTN. Primary endpoint was the variation of mean systolic, diastolic and overall pressure (MSP, MDP and MAP) before and after antihypertensive treatment or TEVAR. Secondary endpoints were the 30-days mortality. Fifty-seven patients were included in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 44 Patients of the TEVAR group 21 were included in the N-rHTN group. The MSP before and after surgery for the N-rHTN group was 130 (±10 SD) and 111 (±22 SD) mmHg, P=0.01. In the rHTN group 164 (±17 SD) and 118 (±17 SD) mmHg (P=0.01). The reduction of MSP was greater in the rHTN group (P=0.01). The MAP before and after the TEVAR for the N-rHTN group was 90 (±10 SD) and 74 (±12 SD) mmHg (P=0.01), in the rHTN group 111 (±14 SD) and 70 (±9 SD) mmHg (P=0.01). The overall mortality rate group was 2.2% (1/44).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for TBAD appears to positively affect blood pressure in patients with rHTN and N-rHTN.

An Innovative Customized Stent Graft Manufacture System Assisted by Three-Dimensional Printing Technology

BACKGROUND

Commercially available thoracic aortic stent grafts rarely match the geometric characteristics of the aorta perfectly, which can lead to complications. Customization maybe a solution for this problem, but the delay inherent in the current manufacturing process makes it unable to meet the urgent requirement of acute aortic events. We established and optimized a rapid design and manufacture system for a customized aortic stent graft assisted by 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology. We also evaluated the preliminary feasibility and capability of this customized stent graft.

METHODS

Seven essential production steps comprised the rapid design and manufacture process for the customized stent graft system assisted by 3D printing technology. Optimization of the manufacture process was refined over time in 3 stages. Bench test and in vivo experiments were used to verify the feasibility of this system and evaluate the preliminary usability of the customized stent graft.

RESULTS

After optimization, the theoretical production time of the customized stent graft was reduced to approximately 12 hours. Bench test showed radial forces against the aorta wall were better distributed in the customized stent graft than in the control stent graft. In vivo experimental results showed that the customized stent graft system worked effectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It was feasible to rapidly design and manufacture a customized aortic stent graft assisted by 3D printing technology, which demonstrated better geometric compliance and physical characters in the bench test and in in vivo experimentation. The manufacturing process could be accelerated to approximately 12 hours, which might be optimized further to meet urgent clinic requirements.

Numerical modeling and simulations of type B aortic dissection treated by stent-grafts with different oversizing ratios

Retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair has been a major drawback of endovascular treatment. This study investigated the biomechanical mechanism of stent-graft-induced new lesions after implantation and analyzed the relationship between radial force and spring-back force of the stent-graft when it was implanted virtually under different oversizing ratios. Based on the computed tomography angiography images, a three-dimensional geometric model of a patient-specific aortic dissection was established. The stent was designed in CAD software and the stent-graft implantation procedure under different oversizing ratios was simulated in the finite element analysis software. Implantation simulations were performed six times for each stent-graft model under 0%, 3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15% oversizing ratios and the peak stress of the aorta was compared among groups. It was observed that the peak stress of the aorta was located where the proximal bare stent interacted with aortic wall and its value was increased by 62.2% from 0% to 15% oversizing ratio. The conclusions are reached that the long-term higher stress in the aortic wall may lead to the emergence of new lesions in these areas, and the radial force plays a key role in the formation of a new entry in the real aorta model.

Mid-Term Results of Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique for Chronic Aortic Dissection

Objective: In this study, we report our experience using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for chronic aortic dissection. Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2017, 15 patients underwent total arch replacement (TAR) with the FET technique for chronic aortic dissection (CAD). Results: Hospital mortality was 6.7% (n=1). No patients experienced spinal cord injury. Distal stent-induced new entry (dSINE) occurred in the early postoperative period in one patient. There were four unplanned additional operations to manage dSINE. Five patients suffered from dSINE, and aortoesophageal fistula developed in three of them. Short insertion length of the FET and large angle between the distal edge of the FET and the descending aorta were significantly more common in the dSINE group than in the non-dSINE group. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.3%, 93.3%, and 66.4%, respectively. The cumulative aortic event-free rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 85.7%, 77.1%, and 52.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The FET technique for CAD provided good early results. Short insertion length of the FET, however, can induce dSINE, which requires an additional operation at mid-term. Thus, surgical indication of the FET technique for CAD must be discussed.

The surgical management of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to review the surgical treatment of retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in our centre.

METHODS

From January 2014 to April 2018, 22 patients with RTAD after TEVAR were operated on in our centre. The mean age at operation was 52.0 ± 8.0 years old. The median interval between the primary TEVAR procedure and RTAD was 4.6 months (range 0-120 months). The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were calculated to evaluate the early and long-term results.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique and 2 patients received total arch replacement alone. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time and selective cerebral perfusion time were 172.4 ± 39.3, 100.1 ± 30.3 and 19.7 ± 10.5 min, respectively. The incidence of major adverse events was 18.6% (4/22), including stroke in 1 patient, myocardial dysfunction in 1 patient and renal failure necessitating dialysis in 3 patients. Death within 30 days was 13.6% (3/22 patients). The follow-up data were available for all 19 survivors. The mean follow-up period was 32.2 ± 16.2 months (range 10-62 months). No deaths or aortic-related events occurred during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Total arch replacement with or without the frozen elephant trunk technique was suitable for the management of RTAD after TEVAR, with acceptable early and long-term results.