Contemporary outcomes of thoracofemoral bypass

Combined coronary artery bypass with descending thoracic aorta to bifemoral bypass grafting using minimal invasive technique

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) often coexist and are prevalent due to population ageing, smoking, diabetes, unhealthy lifestyles, and the epidemic of obesity. In high-risk patients, it is critical to minimize the overall burden of surgery to avoid poor outcomes and morbidity. Here, we present a case of successful coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with thoraco-bifemoral bypass surgery for PVD via a left thoracotomy approach. Traditionally, median sternotomy is done for these kinds of surgeries. However, we preferred thoracotomy over sternotomy to avoid morbidity in old age. Our case suggests that combined CABG with thoraco-bifemoral bypass via thoracotomy approach is a reliable surgical option depending on the anatomy of the lesion.

Long-Term Results of Thoracofemoral Bypass in the Initial Treatment of Juxtarenal Total Aortic Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Thoracofemoral bypass has been applied mostly secondary to previous procedures in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, its application as an initial treatment is less common, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. The aim of this analysis was to review the 16-year experience and long-term outcomes of 31 consecutive patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the primary procedure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The occlusion and calcified plaques of the abdominal aorta at the renal level were common characteristics of all patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: severe claudication group (Rutherford III group) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia group (Rutherford IV-V). Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups, and t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare continuous variables according to their distributions. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to depict the time-to-event data.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients [age: 62 (56-67.5); male: 87%] underwent thoracofemoral bypass. Among the 31 patients, 21 (67.7%) belonged to the severe claudication group (Rutherford III), while 10 (32.3%) were in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford IV-V). Twenty-two patients (83.8%) remained asymptomatic after thoracofemoral bypass. The mean follow-up duration was 79 ± 32 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n = 1). Major complications were observed in 9.6% of patients (n = 3; respiratory: 6.4%, retroperitoneal hematoma: 3.2%). No significant difference was found between the claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia groups regarding major complications (3.2% vs. 6.4%, P = NS). Minor complications occurred in 41.9% of patients, including pleural effusion 9.6% (n = 3), acute kidney injury 9.6% (n = 3), gastrointestinal bleeding 3.2% (n = 1), paralytic ileus 6.4% (n = 2), and superficial skin infection 12.9% (n = 4). The rate of postoperative superficial skin infection was higher in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group compared to the claudication group (4 [40%] vs. 0 [0%], P: 0.007). The univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that hypertension and diabetes mellitus were not related to primary patency of the thoracofemoral bypass graft. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated primary patency for the entire study was 96% ± 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.6-100), and the secondary patency was 96.3% ± 6% (95% CI: 89.4-100). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate after thoracofemoral bypass was 93.4% ± 3 (95% CI: 91-100).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated in this study that thoracofemoral bypass can yield good outcomes when preferred as the initial treatment in selected patients with juxtarenal total aortic occlusion. Despite being a complex surgical technique, thoracofemoral bypass has shown to have safe, acceptable mortality and morbidity rates, as well as excellent long-term follow-up results in selected patients.

Outcomes of one-staged procedures to treat aortic coarctation complicated by cardiac anomalies

OBJECTIVE

One-staged surgical treatment of aortic coarctation combined with cardiac anomalies is challenging. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of bilateral aortofemoral bypass technique in one-staged surgery treating coractation by comparing surgical outcomes with catheter intervention plus stent (hybrid).

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2017, 50 patients underwent one-staged surgical procedures to treat coarctation and repair concomitant cardiac anomalies, like aortic root dilatation, cardiac valvular disease and so on. Among them, 30 patients underwent bilateral aortofemoral bypass and 20 patients underwent hybrid procedure to treat coarctation. We retrospectively analyzed the data of these patients and compared the early and late results.

RESULTS

All the baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups except that the mean age of bypass group was 39.5 ± 14.0 years which was older than hybrid group (27.9 ± 8.5 years, P = 0.002). Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no hospital death or other severe complications. Immediately after surgery, in bypass and hybrid group, the mean upper-limb systolic blood pressure decreased from 159.4 to 119.7 mmHg and 148.4 to 111.6 mmHg, the median peak systolic gradient decreased from 68.0 to 10 mmHg and 46.5 to 10 mmHg respectively (P = 0.09). And the mean upper-lower limbs gradient decreased from 21.7 to 5.9 mmHg and 21.0 to 2.7 mmHg respectively (P = 0.104). The mean follow-up time was 76.92 ± 18.7 in bypass group and 85.4 ± 20.6 months in hybrid group. There were 4 late deaths in bypass group (one died of gastrointestinal bleeding, one died of pulmonary embolism and the other two died of heart failure caused by mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction). The follow-up peak systolic gradient and other blood pressure parameters showed stable and no differences between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The bilateral aortofemoral bypass surgery is a safe and effective method which can be used in one-staged surgical strategy to treat coarctation complicated by cardiac anomalies and can be an alternative to the hybrid method.

Descending thoracic aorta to bilateral femoral artery bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the management of atypical aortoiliac occlusive disease

Despite recent advancements in endovascular technology and the proven durability of open surgery, extensive thoracoabdominal aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) remains challenging to treat. In the present report, we have described the case of a 58-year-old woman with AIOD and multiple medical comorbidities. She successfully underwent a novel intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography-guided combined treatment with concurrent descending thoracic aorta to bilateral femoral artery bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. We have shown that this approach, which combines descending thoracic aorta to bilateral femoral artery bypass with thoracic endovascular aortic repair, is an effective treatment alternative for future cases of complex AIOD.

Symptomatic Diaphragmatic Hernia after Thoracofemoral Bypass

Despite its relative underutilization in the primary management of aortoiliac occlusive disease, thoracofemoral bypass is an attractive extra-anatomic surgical option in select patients. Thoracofemoral bypass classically entails passing a graft from the left chest into the retroperitoneal space through a small opening created in the diaphragm. While theoretically possible that this maneuver may predispose to a peri-graft diaphragmatic hernia, currently there are no cases of this complication reported in the literature, nor has its surgical repair been described. This case illustrates the rare complication of symptomatic diaphragmatic hernia following a thoracobifemoral bypass.

On-pump coronary artery bypass with concomitant descending thoracic aorta-bi-iliac bypass: A case report

The presence of critical coronary artery disease and concomitant critical limb ischemia represents a clinical challenge. Single-stage operations for cardiac and peripheral revascularization can be an option in such cases. The "Süzer technique" provides a more physiological extra-anatomical vascular reconstruction by using the descending thoracic aorta as the inflow source. This is an alternative to the more widely used technique of ascending aorta to bifemoral bypass and concomitant coronary revascularization. We report a case of critical limb ischemia with juxtrarenal aortic occlusion and left main coronary artery stenosis treated with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and descending thoracic aorto-bi-iliac bypass using a modification of the Süzer technique.

Thoracofemoral bypass outcomes in the Vascular Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVE

Thoracofemoral bypass (TFB) has been used infrequently but is an alternative for select patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. Limited data are available in the reported data regarding TFB, with all studies small, single-center series. We aimed to describe the perioperative and long-term survival, patency, and rate of major perioperative complications after TFB in a large national registry.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative suprainguinal bypass module was used to identify patients who had undergone TFB for occlusive disease from 2009 to 2019. A descriptive analysis was performed to provide the rates of survival, patency, major complications, and freedom from major amputation in the perioperative period and at 1 year of follow-up. Major complications were compared by procedure indication, with categorical variables analyzed using χ² tests and continuous variables using analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to estimate survival at the 1- and 5-year follow-up intervals and freedom from major amputation at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 154 TFB procedures were identified. Of the 154 patients, 59 (38.3%) had undergone previous inflow bypass and 22 (14.2%) had undergone previous leg bypass. The procedure indications included claudication (n = 66; 42.9%), rest pain (n = 59; 38.3%), tissue loss (n = 19; 12.3%), and acute limb ischemia (n = 10; 6.5%). Major complications (eg, wound infection, respiratory, major stroke, new dialysis, cardiac, embolic, major amputation, occlusion) occurred in 31.2% of the cohort. When examined by indication, the acute limb ischemia and claudication cohorts had an increased rate of major complications (acute limb ischemia, 60.0%; claudication, 34.8%; critical limb ischemia, 24.4%; P = .05). The survival rate at 30 days was 95.5%, with a Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year survival rate of 92.7% ± 2.2%. Primary patency at discharge from the index hospitalization was 92.9% and 89.0% at 1 year. Postoperative major amputation was required for 1 patient during the index hospitalization, for a Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from major amputation at 1 year of 97.1% ± 2.2%. Two patients developed in-hospital bypass occlusion and three patients developed occlusion within 1 year, for an overall freedom from occlusion rate of 96.8% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

TFB is associated with a high rate of perioperative major complications; however, the long-term survival and patency after TFB remained acceptable when performed for limb salvage. The high perioperative complication rates of TFB procedures performed for claudication suggest TFB should be used rarely in this population. These data can be used to counsel patients and aid in decision making before operative intervention.