Physical therapy management, surgical treatment, and patient-reported outcomes measures in a prospective observational cohort of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

Rapid Functional Recovery After Thoracic Outlet Decompression in a Series of Adolescent Athletes With Chronic Atraumatic Shoulder-Girdle Pain, Scapular Winging/Dyskinesis, and Normal Electrodiagnostic Studies

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous shoulder-girdle pain and scapular winging/dyskinesis can be caused by several neuromuscular disorders identifiable by electrodiagnostic studies (EDX). We describe a group of adolescent athletes with this clinical presentation but normal EDX, followed by later development of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).

METHODS

We identified patients referred for evaluation of NTOS that had a history of chronic atraumatic shoulder-girdle pain, scapular winging/dyskinesis, and normal EDX. Each was refractory to conservative management and underwent supraclavicular decompression and brachial plexus neurolysis for NTOS. Functional disability was quantified by Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores.

RESULTS

There were 5 female patients with a mean age at symptom onset of 14.2 ± 0.4 years, including spontaneous severe pain in the shoulder, scapula, and arm, along with prominent scapular winging/dyskinesis, and normal EDX. Symptoms had persisted for 18.9 ± 4.0 months prior to referral, with pronounced upper extremity disability (mean QuickDASH, 54.6 ± 6.9). By 3 months after surgical treatment for NTOS, all 5 patients experienced near-complete symptom resolution, including scapular winging/dyskinesis, with markedly improved function (mean QuickDASH, 2.2 ± 1.3) and a return to normal activity.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with chronic atraumatic shoulder-girdle pain, scapular winging/dyskinesis, and normal EDX may develop dynamic brachial plexus compression characteristic of NTOS, exhibiting an ischemic "Sunderland-zero" nerve conduction block for which surgical decompression can result in rapid and substantial clinical improvement. The presence of surgically treatable NTOS should be considered for selected patients with long-standing scapular winging/dyskinesis who fail conservative management.

Utilization and Effectiveness of Pectoralis Minor Tenotomy in the Surgical Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists concerning the optimal utilization and effectiveness of pectoralis minor tenotomy (PMT) in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).

METHODS

Between January 2020 and July 2023, 355 patients with NTOS underwent primary surgical treatment. Prospectively collected data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Overall mean patient age was 35.9 ± 1.9 years, 76% were female, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score at presentation was 60.3 ± 3.2, reflecting substantial disability. Surgical treatment was based on localized tenderness/symptoms to palpation, with 322 (91%) undergoing combined supraclavicular decompression and PMT (SCD + PMT) and 33 (9%) selected for isolated PMT when findings were solely confined to the subcoracoid space. Mean operative time (29 ± 5 vs 164 ± 9 min, P < .01) and hospital stay (0.3 ± 0.1 vs 4.0 ± 0.2 days, P < .01) were both lower after isolated PMT, with no significant differences in postoperative complications or rehospitalization. During follow-up of 26.7 ± 1.5 months, QuickDASH scores declined by 41.2% ± 2.3% (P < .0001) and patient-rated outcomes were excellent in 34%, good in 41%, fair in 22%, and poor in 4%. Fewer patients had poor-rated outcomes after SCD + PMT (2%) than after isolated PMT (19%) (P < .01). Recurrent symptoms requiring supraclavicular reoperation occurred in 16 patients after SCD + PMT (5%) and in 5 patients after isolated PMT (15%) (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pectoralis minor tenotomy (PMT) has an important role in surgical treatment of NTOS, mainly as an adjunct in combination with SCD. While highly selected patients can do well after isolated PMT as a short outpatient procedure with rapid recovery, there is a greater potential for poor outcomes and supraclavicular reoperation than after SCD + PMT.

A surgical approach to complex regional pain syndrome with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in a reoperation patient

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) are two etiologies of chronic pain. TOS is a group of conditions that occur due to compression of the neurovascular structures of the upper extremity while CRPS is a disorder characterized by chronic and unremitting pain. This case highlights the experience of a 22-year-old female who presented following a traumatic injury to her left arm and was initially diagnosed with neurogenic TOS and later CRPS. Over a 10-year-period, she underwent a total of four operations to try and address her debilitating pain. In our third-time reoperation, symptoms of both pathologies nearly completely resolved with extensive neurolysis of the left brachial plexus and application of a scar tissue barrier.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

ABSTRACT

Thoracic outlet syndrome is a complex syndrome that manifests with symptoms based on the presumed injury or impairment of the neurovascular structures in the thoracic outlet space with its intricate anatomy and pathophysiology. The thoracic outlet is a specific anatomical region with three distinct anatomical spaces - interscalene triangle, the costoclavicular space, and the retro-pectoralis minor space. Thoracic outlet syndrome is classified into neurogenic, venous, and arterial thoracic outlet syndrome and often poses diagnostic challenge to implicate a specific condition or cause. Many cases of thoracic outlet syndrome can be effectively managed through conservative measures, but patients with refractory symptoms may warrant surgical intervention. Modalities such as intramuscular anesthetic and botulinum toxin injections hold promise as diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic procedures. Further research and collaboration are needed to develop algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome symptoms. This review aims to explore our understanding of thoracic outlet syndrome, with a focus on current evidence and emerging trends.

Current Clinical Concepts: Rehabilitation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) involves inconsistent symptoms, presenting a challenge for medical providers to diagnose and treat. Thoracic outlet syndrome is defined as a compression injury to the brachial plexus, subclavian artery or vein, or axillary artery or vein occurring between the cervical spine and upper extremity. Three common subcategories are now used for clinical diagnosis: neurogenic, arterial, and venous. Postural position and repetitive motions such as throwing, weightlifting, and manual labor can lead to symptoms. Generally, TOS is considered a diagnosis of exclusion for athletes due to the poor accuracy of clinical testing, including sensitivity and specificity. Thus, determining a definitive diagnosis and reporting injury is difficult. Current literature suggests there is not a gold standard diagnostic test. Rehabilitation has been shown to be a vital component in the recovery process for neurogenic TOS and for arterial TOS and venous TOS in postoperative situations.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Primer for Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgeons

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a complex condition and is commonly misunderstood. Historically, much of this confusion has been because of its grouping with other diagnoses that have little in common other than anatomic location. Modern understanding emphasizes the role of small unmyelinated C type pain and sympathetic fibers. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, after ruling out other common conditions. Hand therapy is usually the first-line treatment with variable success. Local anesthetic, botulinum toxins, or steroid injections can aid in diagnosis and offer short-term relief. Although surgery can yield reliable results, it is technically challenging, and the preferred surgical approach is a matter of debate. Despite limitations in diagnosis and treatment, recognition and successful treatment of this condition can be highly impactful for the patient.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and controversies in diagnosis and management

Compression of the neurovascular structures at the level of the scalene triangle and pectoralis minor space is rare, but increasing awareness and understanding is allowing for the treatment of more individuals than in the past. We outlined the recognition, preoperative evaluation, and treatment of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Recent work has illustrated the role of imaging and centrality of the physical examination on the diagnosis. However, a fuller understanding of the spatial biomechanics of the shoulder, scalene triangle, and pectoralis minor musculotendinous complex has shown that, although physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, a poor response to physical therapy with a sound diagnosis should not preclude decompression. Modes of failure of surgical decompression stress the importance of full resection of the anterior scalene muscle and all posterior rib impinging elements to minimize the risk of recurrence of symptoms. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a rare but critical cause of disability of the upper extremity. Modern understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluation have led to a sounder diagnosis. Although physical therapy is a mainstay, surgical decompression remains the gold standard to preserve and recover function of the upper extremity. Understanding these principles will be central to further developments in the treatment of this patient population.

Diagnosis and management of thoracic outlet syndrome in athletes

The physical demands of sports can place patients at elevated risk of use-related pathologies, including thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Overhead athletes in particular (eg, baseball and football players, swimmers, divers, and weightlifters) often subject their subclavian vessels and brachial plexuses to repetitive trauma, resulting in venous effort thrombosis, arterial occlusions, brachial plexopathy, and more. This patient population is at higher risk for Paget-Schroetter syndrome, or effort thrombosis, although neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is still the predominant form of the disease among all groups. First-rib resection is almost always recommended for vascular TOS in a young, active population, although a surgical benefit for patients with nTOS is less clear. Practitioners specializing in upper extremity disorders should take care to differentiate TOS from other repetitive use-related disorders, including shoulder orthopedic injuries and nerve entrapments at other areas of the neck and arm, as TOS is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. For nTOS, physical therapy is a cornerstone of diagnosis, along with response to injections. Most patients first undergo some period of nonoperative management with intense physical therapy and training before proceeding with rib resection. It is particularly essential for ensuring that athletes can return to their baselines of flexibility, strength, and stamina in the upper extremity. Botulinum toxin and lidocaine injections in the anterior scalene muscle might predict which patients will likely benefit from first-rib resection. Athletes are usually satisfied with their decisions to undergo first-rib resection, although the risk of rare but potentially career- or life-threatening complications, such as brachial plexus injury or subclavian vessel injury, must be considered. Frequently, they are able to return to the same or a higher level of play after full recovery.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery and robotic-assisted first-rib excision and thoracic outlet syndrome decompression

Multiple surgical approaches have been used in the management of thoracic outlet syndrome. These approaches have traditionally been "open" approaches and have been associated with the inherent morbidities of an open approach, including a risk of injury to the neurovascular structures due to traction and trauma while resecting the first rib. In addition, there has been concern that recurrence of symptoms may be related to incomplete resection of the rib with conventional open techniques. With the advent of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, surgeons began to explore first-rib resection via a thoracoscopic approach. Unfortunately, the existing video-assisted thoracic surgery technology and equipment was not well suited to working in the apex of the chest. With the introduction and subsequent progress in robotic surgery and instrumentation, this dissection can be performed with all the advantages of robotics, but also with minimal traction and trauma to the neurovascular structures, and incorporates almost complete resection of the rib with minimal residual stump. Robotics has developed as a reliable, safe, and less invasive approach to first-rib resection, yielding excellent results while limiting the morbidity of the procedure.

Role of Lifestyle in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The presence of a positional compression of the neurovascular bundle in the outlet between the thorax and the upper limb during arm movements (mainly abduction) is common but remains asymptomatic in most adults. Nevertheless, a certain number of subjects with thoracic outlet positional compression will develop incapacitating symptoms or clinical complications as a result of this condition. Symptomatic forms of positional neurovascular bundle compression are referred to as "thoracic outlet syndrome" (TOS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This paper aims to review the literature and discuss the interactions between aspects of patients' lifestyles in TOS. The manuscript will be organized to report (1) the historical importance of lifestyle evolution on TOS; (2) the evaluation of lifestyle in the clinical routine of TOS-suspected patients, with a description of both the methods for lifestyle evaluation in the clinical routine and the role of lifestyle in the occurrence and characteristics of TOS; and (3) the influence of lifestyle on the treatment options of TOS, with a description of both the treatment of TOS through lifestyle changes and the influence of lifestyle on the invasive treatment options of TOS.

RESULTS

We report that in patients with TOS, lifestyle (1) is closely related to anatomical changes with human evolution; (2) is poorly evaluated by questionnaires and is one of the factors that may induce symptoms; (3) influences the sex ratio in symptomatic athletes and likely explains why so many people with positional compression remain asymptomatic; and (4) can sometimes be modified to improve symptoms and potentially alter the range of interventional treatment options available.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed descriptions of the lifestyles of patients with suspected TOS should be carefully analysed and reported.

Possible role of the botulinum toxin in the management of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is related to the compression and/or the traction of the upper-limb neurovascular bundle, responsible for a chronic painful impairment. Neurogenic TOS (NTOS) is the most common manifestation. It remains a challenging diagnosis and its treatment is also difficult. Botulinum toxin (BTX) has been described to help both the diagnosis and the symptoms improvement.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature research was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases to collect studies reporting the use of BTX in NTOS management. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the included studies were evaluated using the GRADE approach.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We included 10 original articles representing 555 patients. Various outcomes were considered, and results varied from a study to another. Symptoms relief varied from an absence of BTX effectiveness to 84.1% of improvement; relief duration was also reported from none to 88 days. BTX injections were debatable predictors of surgical procedure successes due to low evidence. There was a huge gap between the studies concerning side-effects of the BTX procedures, from none to 100% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence for considering BTX injection as a validated tool for the management of NTOS. There might be a slight effect on symptoms, but outcomes are very variable, which prevents further interpretations. The use of BTX should be evaluated in larger prospective cohorts with more standardized outcomes.

Congenital, Acquired, and Trauma-Related Risk Factors for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome-Review of the Literature

Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders that affect the upper extremity and neck, resulting in compression of the neurovascular bundle that exits the thoracic outlet. Depending on the type of compressed structure, the arterial, venous, and neurogenic forms of TOS are distinguished. In some populations, e.g., in certain groups of athletes, some sources report incidence rates as high as about 80 cases per 1000 people, while in the general population, it is equal to 2-4 per 1000. Although the pathogenesis of this condition appears relatively simple, there are a very large number of overlapping risk factors that drive such a high incidence in certain risk groups. Undoubtedly, a thorough knowledge of them and their etiology is essential to estimate the risk of TOS or make a quick and accurate diagnosis.

Robotic First Rib Resection in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Current Literature

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) involves the compression of neurovascular structures in the thoracic outlet. TOS subtypes, including neurogenic (nTOS), venous (vTOS), and arterial (aTOS) are characterized by distinct clinical presentations and diagnostic considerations. This review explores the incidence, diagnostic challenges, and management of TOS with a focus on the innovative approach of Robotic First Rib Resection (R-FRR). Traditional management of TOS includes conservative measures and surgical interventions, with various open surgical approaches carrying risks of complications. R-FRR, a minimally invasive technique, offers advantages such as improved exposure, reduced injury risk to neurovascular structures, and shorter hospital stays. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the outcomes of R-FRR for TOS. Data from 12 selected studies involving 397 patients with nTOS, vTOS, and aTOS were reviewed. The results indicate that R-FRR is associated with favorable intraoperative outcomes including minimal blood loss and low conversion rates to traditional approaches. Postoperatively, patients experienced decreased pain, improved function, and low complication rates. These findings support R-FRR as a safe and effective option for medically refractory TOS.

General Overview and Diagnostic (Imaging) Techniques for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome is an uncommon and controversial syndrome. Three different diagnoses can be made based on the compressed structure, arterial TOS, venous TOS, and neurogenic TOS, though combinations do exist as well. Diagnosing NTOS is difficult since no specific objective diagnostic modalities exist. This has resulted in a lot of controversy in recent decades. NTOS remains a clinical diagnosis and is mostly diagnosed based on the exclusion of an extensive list of differential diagnoses. To guide the diagnosis and treatment of TOS, a group of experts published the reporting standards for TOS in 2016. However, a consensus was not reached regarding a blueprint for a daily care pathway in this document. Therefore, we constructed a care pathway based on the reporting standards for both the diagnosis and treatment of NTOS patients. This care pathway includes a multidisciplinary approach in which different diagnostic tests and additional imaging techniques are combined to diagnose NTOS or guide patients in their treatment for differential diagnoses. The aim of the present work is to discuss and explain the diagnostic part of this care pathway.

Considerations for Surgical Treatment of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether the first rib resection, performed via a supraclavicular (SCFRR) or transaxillary (TAFRR) approach, is necessary for patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS). In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we performed a direct comparison of patient-reported functional outcomes following different surgical approaches for nTOS.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, Google Scholar, and the gray literature. Data were extracted based on the procedure type. Well-validated patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed in separate time intervals. Random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles were included, with 11 discussing SCFRR (812 patients), 6 discussing TAFRR (478 patients), and 5 discussing rib-sparing scalenectomy (RSS; 720 patients). The mean difference between preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was significantly different comparing RSS (43.0), TAFRR (26.8), and SCFRR (21.8). The mean difference between preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores was significantly higher for TAFRR (5.3) compared to SCFRR (3.0). Derkash scores were significantly worse for TAFRR compared to RSS or SCFRR. RSS had a success rate of 97.4% based on Derkash score, followed by SCFRR and TAFRR at 93.2% and 87.9%, respectively. RSS had a lower complication rate compared to SCFRR and TAFRR. There was a difference in complication rates: 8.7%, 14.5%, and 3.6% for SCFRR, TAFRR, and RSS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean differences in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and Derkash scores were significantly better for RSS. Higher complication rates were reported after the first rib resection. Our findings suggest that RSS is an effective option for the treatment of nTOS.

TYPE OF STUDY/ LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Part II: Consensus on the Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies' Section of Peripheral Nerve Surgery

BACKGROUND

In the first part of this report, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies' section of peripheral nerve surgery presented a systematic literature review and consensus statements on anatomy, classification, and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) along with a subclassification system of neurogenic TOS (nTOS). Because of the lack of level 1 evidence, especially regarding the management of nTOS, we now add a consensus statement on nTOS treatment among experienced neurosurgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To document consensus and controversy on nTOS management, with emphasis on timing and types of surgical and nonsurgical nTOS treatment, and to support patient counseling and clinical decision-making within the neurosurgical community.

METHODS

The literature available on PubMed/MEDLINE was systematically searched on February 13, 2021, and yielded 2853 results. Screening and classification of abstracts was performed. In an online meeting that was held on December 16, 2021, 14 recommendations on nTOS management were developed and refined in a group process according to the Delphi consensus method.

RESULTS

Five RCTs reported on management strategies in nTOS. Three prospective observational studies present outcomes after therapeutic interventions. Fourteen statements on nonsurgical nTOS treatment, timing, and type of surgical therapy were developed. Within our expert group, the agreement rate was high with a mean of 97.8% (± 0.04) for each statement, ranging between 86.7% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

Our work may help to improve clinical decision-making among the neurosurgical community and may guide nonspecialized or inexperienced neurosurgeons with initial patient management before patient referral to a specialized center.

Anatomically Complete Supraclavicular Reoperation for Recurrent Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics, Operative Findings, and Long-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of reoperations for recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) remain undefined.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2019, 90 patients with recurrent NTOS underwent anatomically complete supraclavicular reoperation after previous operation(s) performed at other institutions using either supraclavicular (Prev-SC = 48), transaxillary (Prev-TA = 31), or multiple/combination (Prev-MC = 11) approaches. Prospectively maintained data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 39.9 ± 1.4 years, 72% were female, and the mean interval after previous operation was 4.1 ± 0.6 years. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 62 ± 2, reflecting substantial preoperative disability. Residual scalene muscle was present in 100% Prev-TA, 79% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). Retained/residual first rib was present in 90% Prev-TA, 75% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). There were no differences in operative time (overall 210 ± 5 minutes), length of hospital stay (4.7 ± 0.2 days), or 30-day readmissions (7%). During follow-up of 5.6 ± 0.3 years, the improvement in QuickDASH scores was 21 ± 2 (36% ± 3%) (P < .01) and patient-rated outcomes were excellent in 10%, good in 36%, fair in 43%, and poor in 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomically complete decompression for recurrent NTOS can be safely and effectively accomplished by supraclavicular reoperation, regardless of the type of previous operation. Residual scalene muscle and retained/residual first rib are more frequently encountered after transaxillary operations than after supraclavicular or multiple/combined operations. Supraclavicular reoperation can achieve significant symptom reduction and functional improvement for approximately 90% of patients with recurrent NTOS.

Pedro M, Kretschmer T, Heinen C, Rosahl SK, Antoniadis G. Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) refers to a group of disorders in which there is compression of and/or damage to the neurovascular structures at the thoracic outlet, i.e., at the transition from chest to neck. The incidence of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is estimated to be 2-3 / 100 000 / year, with an estimated prevalence of 10 / 100 000. Patients present with upper extremity sensorimotor symptoms that are often related to movement. The aim of the present article is to highlight the clinical presentation patterns of nTOS and to provide an overview of its diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

Selective literature search for prospective observational studies and RCTs, including systematic reviews and metaanalyses.

RESULTS

There is no multicenter randomized controlled trial available on the treatment of nTOS. Prospective observational studies with a hierarchical study design report a positive effect of physiotherapy in 27-59% of cases. After unsuccessful conservative treatment, up to 56-90% benefit from surgical management. Patients with nTOS are more severely affected compared with those with other forms of TOS and benefit less from transaxillary first rib resection. nTOS patients who underwent supraclavicular decompression without rib resection had excellent surgical outcomes in 27%, good outcomes in 36%, acceptable outcomes in 26%, and poor surgical outcomes in 11% of cases. There is no systematic comparison available of the types of surgical management involved. Also, there is currently no uniform classification available for all medical sub-disciplines. Therefore, interpretation, and comparability of the study results are limited.

CONCLUSION

Although nTOS is the most common form of TOS, studies on its treatment are currently limited in terms of numbers and quality. The type of surgical management varies according to the experience and preference of the surgeon, treating specialty, special anatomic features, and clinical symptoms.

When healing hands hurt: Epidemiology of thoracic outlet syndrome among physicians

BACKGROUND

Thoracic outlet syndrome is an infrequent condition which results in disability in use of upper extremity. While is often associated with manual labor, industrial workers, and accidents, it has not been reported in a physician population. Given the investment of time and effort in training to become a physician, the impact of TOS may be devastating. Our objective is to report the presentation and outcome of TOS in physicians.

METHODS

A prospectively surgical database was reviewed for physicians who sought care of disabling TOS between 1997 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, outcome and pathological data were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed based on Somatic Pain Scale (SPS), Quick DASH scores, and Derkash scores. Results were also assessed based on return to employment.

RESULTS

A total of 19 MDs were identified, from 1687 TOS cases. The group included 13 (63%) men, 6 (31%) women, average age 45 year (range 27-57). Presentations included 1 (5.3%) Arterial TOS (ATOS), 9 (47.4%) Venous TOS (VTOS), and 9 (47.4) Neurogenic TOS (NTOS). All patients were right-handed, and symptomatic side was dominant hand in 7 (37%). Etiologies included repetitive motion injury, athletic injury, and congenital bony abnormalities. Repetitive motion was associated with 3/9 (33%) NTOS. Significant athletic activities were noted in 12 of 19 (63%), including 8/9 (89%) VTOS and 4/9 (44%) NTOS. Athletic activities associated with VTOS included triathletes (2), rock climbing (1), long distance swimming (2), weightlifting (3). Of the 9 NTOS cases, 3 weightlifting, 1 skiing. Congenital causes included 1 (5%) abnormal first rib, and 1 (5%) cervical rib. Time from symptom onset to consultation varied significantly according to diagnosis: ATOS 6 days, VTOS 97 days, NTOS 2,335 days (p<0.05). All underwent first rib resection (FRR), and four (4) required contralateral FRR. Time from surgery to last follow up averaged 1,005 days (range: 37 to 4535 days). On presentation, 6 were work disabled, 13 were work restricted. Following surgery 4 remained work restricted with mild to moderate symptoms. After surgery, standardized outcomes (SPS, Quick DASH, Derkash score) improved in all metrics. All who were initially disabled returned to work without restriction. Significant non-TOS related co-morbidities were present in all who had residual restriction. Return to work was documented in all.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it has not been reported, physicians are subject to developing TOS. Causes include repetitive motions, athletic injuries, and congenital bony abnormalities. Surgical decompression is beneficial with significant reduction in pain and disability. Physicians are highly motivated and insightful; accordingly, they have a very high probability of successful work resumption, with all returning to their medical positions.

Thoracic outlet syndrome: a review for the primary care provider

CONTEXT

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) symptoms are prevalent and often confused with other diagnoses. A PubMed search was undertaken to present a comprehensive article addressing the presentation and treatment for TOS.

OBJECTIVES

This article summarizes what is currently published about TOS, its etiologies, common objective findings, and nonsurgical treatment options.

METHODS

The PubMed database was conducted for the range of May 2020 to September 2021 utilizing TOS-related Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic literature review was conducted to identify the most common etiologies, the most objective findings, and the most effective nonsurgical treatment options for TOS.

RESULTS

The search identified 1,188 articles. The automated merge feature removed duplicate articles. The remaining 1,078 citations were manually reviewed, with articles published prior to 2010 removed (n=771). Of the remaining 307 articles, duplicate citations not removed by automated means were removed manually (n=3). The other exclusion criteria included: non-English language (n=21); no abstracts available (n=56); and case reports of TOS occurring from complications of fractures, medical or surgical procedures, novel surgical approaches, or abnormal anatomy (n=42). Articles over 5 years old pertaining to therapeutic intervention (mostly surgical) were removed (n=18). Articles pertaining specifically to osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) were sparse and all were utilized (n=6). A total of 167 articles remained. The authors added a total of 20 articles that fell outside of the search criteria, as they considered them to be historic in nature with regards to TOS (n=8), were related specifically to OMT (n=4), or were considered sentinel articles relating to specific therapeutic interventions (n=8). A total of 187 articles were utilized in the final preparation of this manuscript. A final search was conducted prior to submission for publication to check for updated articles. Symptoms of hemicranial and/or upper-extremity pain and paresthesias should lead a physician to evaluate for musculoskeletal etiologies that may be contributing to the compression of the brachial plexus. The best initial provocative test to screen for TOS is the upper limb tension test (ULTT) because a negative test suggests against brachial plexus compression. A positive ULTT should be followed up with an elevated arm stress test (EAST) to further support the diagnosis. If TOS is suspected, additional diagnostic testing such as ultrasound, electromyography (EMG), or magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (MRI/MRA) might be utilized to further distinguish the vascular or neurological etiologies of the symptoms. Initial treatment for neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is often conservative. Data are limited, therefore there is no conclusive evidence that any one treatment method or combination is more effective. Surgery in nTOS is considered for refractory cases only. Anticoagulation and surgical decompression remain the treatment of choice for vascular versions of TOS.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common form of TOS is neurogenic. The most common symptoms are pain and paresthesias of the head, neck, and upper extremities. Diagnosis of nTOS is clinical, and the best screening test is the ULTT. There is no conclusive evidence that any one treatment method is more effective for nTOS, given limitations in the published data. Surgical decompression remains the treatment of choice for vascular forms of TOS.

Use of hand hydraulic dynamometers as an overall evaluation of the upper-limb weakness in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome

Patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome report pain and upper-limb weakness. They complain about weakness occurring on the entire upper-limb, especially at the hand and the shoulder levels. Hydraulic dynamometers can reliably assess the strength of the hand, and isokinetic shoulder testing can provide accurate and reliable evaluations of the rotators strength. Yet, isokinetic proximal assessment needs expensive tools, whereas hydraulic hand dynamometers are cheap and easy to use. We aimed to assess the correlation between the isokinetic shoulder strength and the hand grip and the key pinch strength. The grip strength was evaluated with a hydraulic hand dynamometer and the key pinch with a pinch gauge. Isokinetic rotators strength tests were performed using a Humac Norm® dynamometer at 60 and 180°/s. One-hundred and thirty patients had been included, 72% of women, mean age of 39.8 ± 9.5. Symptomatic hands presented a strength deficit of 12.2% on the grip (p < 0.0001) and 10% on the key pinch (p = 0.01). Isokinetic strength was lower on the symptomatic shoulders at 60 and 180°/s concerning medial rotators [−10.3 and −8.8%, respectively (p = 0.02)] and lateral rotators [−10.8 and −10%, respectively (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03)]. There was a moderate correlation between the grip strength of the symptomatic upper-limbs and the isokinetic rotators strength (p < 0.001). The key pinch strength was moderately correlated to the isokinetic medial and lateral rotators strength at 60°/s (p < 0.001). Hand dynamometers could prove useful during medical consultations or in outpatient management to assess upper-limb overall weakness, but isokinetic measurement remains the gold standard for a precise evaluation.

Reoperative Brachial Plexus Neurolysis After Previous Anatomically Complete Supraclavicular Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A 10-Year Single-Center Case Series

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) remains a considerable challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of reoperative brachial plexus neurolysis in patients with recurrent NTOS.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2019, 85 patients underwent reoperative supraclavicular brachial plexus neurolysis for recurrent NTOS after a previous anatomically complete supraclavicular decompression. Data from a prospectively maintained database were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean patient age at reoperation was 36.9 ± 1.3 (range 15-64) years, 75% were female, and the interval after previous primary operation was 2.5 ± 0.2 years. Intervening injury had precipitated recurrent NTOS in 14 patients (16%), and the mean Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score before reoperation was 65.2 ± 2.6, reflecting substantial disability. Operative findings consisted of dense fibrous scar tissue surrounding/encasing the brachial plexus. Compared with the previous primary operations, reoperations had a shorter operative time (198 ± 4 vs 161 ± 5 minutes, P < .01) and hospital stay (4.4 ± 0.2 vs 3.6 ± 0.1 days, P < .01), but there were no significant differences in the frequency of prolonged hospitalization (7.1% vs 4.7%), early reoperation (3.5% vs 1.2%), or 30-day hospital readmission (8.2% vs 7.1%). During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, QuickDASH scores improved by 23.3 ± 2.6 (34.2% ± 3.6%; P < .01) and patient-rated outcomes were excellent in 24%, good in 42%, fair in 26%, and poor in 8%.

CONCLUSION

Reoperative supraclavicular brachial plexus neurolysis is technically challenging but safe and effective treatment for recurrent NTOS, with significant improvements in symptoms and function. Diminishing perineural scar tissue development and avoiding secondary injury would likely decrease the need for reoperations.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Part I: Systematic Review of the Literature and Consensus on Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Classification of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies' Section of Peripheral Nerve Surgery

BACKGROUND

Although numerous articles have been published not only on the classification of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) but also on diagnostic standards, timing, and type of surgical intervention, there still remains some controversy because of the lack of level 1 evidence. So far, attempts to generate uniform reporting standards have not yielded conclusive results.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the body of evidence and reach a consensus among neurosurgeons experienced in TOS regarding anatomy, diagnosis, and classification.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE was performed on February 13, 2021, yielding 2853 results. Abstracts were screened and classified. Recommendations were developed in a meeting held online on February 10, 2021, and refined according to the Delphi consensus method.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (on surgical, conservative, and injection therapies), 4 "guideline" articles (on imaging and reporting standards), 5 observational studies (on diagnostics, hierarchic designs of physiotherapy vs surgery, and quality of life outcomes), and 6 meta-analyses were identified. The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies' section of peripheral nerve surgery established 18 statements regarding anatomy, diagnosis, and classification of TOS with agreement levels of 98.4 % (±3.0).

CONCLUSION

Because of the lack of level 1 evidence, consensus statements on anatomy, diagnosis, and classification of TOS from experts of the section of peripheral nerve surgery of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies were developed with the Delphi method. Further work on reporting standards, prospective data collections, therapy, and long-term outcome is necessary.

Reliability and Validity of the Elevated Arm Stress Test in the Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To assess the test-retest reliability and validity of the elevated arm stress test (EAST) as measured by the duration in a cohort of patients with suspected neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data METHODS: Patients evaluated for NTOS between January 2017 and September 2018 were identified. Test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for duration of the EAST. For the validity analysis, patients were classified in a proven NTOS group or a symptomatic control group without NTOS using the SVS-reporting standards and the outcome of thoracic outlet decompression (TOD) surgery. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was made for the duration of EAST. The area under the curve (AUC), and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the EAST.

RESULTS

In total, 428 patients with suspected NTOS retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, 61 were excluded because no EAST data was available. Another 101 patients were excluded because of inconclusive reporting standards, arterial or venous TOS, or because TOD surgery was not performed or had a negative result. The validity analysis in the remaining 266 patients showed an AUC for the duration of the EAST of 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.69). The positive predictive value of the duration ranged between 65% and 66%, and the negative predictive value between 53% and 58%. For the test-retest reliability analysis, 118 patients were excluded because they performed only one measurement in a 100-day time period. Analysis in the remaining 148 patients showed an ICC value of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.55-0.74) for duration.

CONCLUSION

The EAST measured by the duration showed a moderate test-retest reliability, but the discriminative value was low in the diagnosis of NTOS. The outcome of the EAST measured by the duration should be used with caution.

A Rare Case of Bilateral Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Following Neck Injury

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS) is a rare condition caused by compression of the neurovascular structures of the thoracic outlet. Patients with TOS are found to have a greater prevalence of supernumerary or abnormal first ribs compared to the general population. Symptoms can sometimes be incited by a neck injury, especially in patients with abnormal cervical anatomy. This case report highlights a unique patient with bilateral cervical ribs who presented with complicated symptoms following a neck injury who required a series of surgical interventions to improve.

Redo surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is useful

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (NTOS) has shown good outcome in numerous case series. However, 5-30% of patients will have persistent or recurrent symptoms, caused by incomplete first rib resection, reattachment of residual scalene muscle, fibrous scarring around the brachial plexus or a wrong NTOS diagnosis. In patients with a sound diagnosis of recurrent or persisting NTOS, not responding to conservative measures, a secondary procedure can be considered. We report the results of redo thoracic outlet decompression surgery through the supraclavicular approach (SC-REDO-TOD) for persistent or recurrent NTOS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed. Every patient referred from September 2016 until January 2020 was eligible for inclusion. In a SC-REDO-TOD we perform complete (cartilage-cartilage) resection of the first rib, any bony and fibrous anomalies, complete anterior and middle scalenectomy and complete neurolysis of the brachial plexus (= complete anatomical decompression of the brachial plexus). Clinical outcomes were assessed by questionnaires including the DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), CBSQ (Cervico-Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire) and TOS disability scale.

RESULTS

In total, 45 patients had a SC-REDO-TOD. The median duration of hospital admission after SC-REDO-TOD was 1.41 days (IQR 1.00). In total 30/45 (66.66%) patients had recurrent NTOS and 15/45 (33.33%) patients had persisting NTOS. Postoperative complications were seen in 8 (18.18%) patients. 1 Patient had postoperative complications with permanent impairment (Horner syndrome). 7 Patients had postoperative complications with full recovery (3 patients had a chylous leakage which was treated with a median-chain triglycerides diet for 6 weeks, 3 patients had transient phrenic nerve palsy with full recovery < 6 weeks, 1 patient had a discrete Horner syndrome which resolved in 6 weeks). The median time of follow-up was 19.50 months (interquartile range (IQR) 14.00) and the response rate to the questionnaires was 91.11% at 6 months and 64.44% at 12 months. We found a positive and statistically significant difference for DASH score, CBSQ score and TOS Disability Scale score comparing scores for all patients. (DASH score: p<0.001; CBSQ score: p<0.001; TOS Disability Scale: p<0.001). Patients with first rib remnants showed a significant better response (lower DASH, CBSQ and TOS Disability Scale scores) compared to patients without first rib remnants (DASH score: p=0.004; CBSQ score: p<=0.014; TOS Disability Scale: p=0.009).

CONCLUSION

SC-REDO-TOD after a previous NTOS surgery shows good results with a low risk of permanent impairment. NTOS patients with first rib remnants after primary surgery seem to benefit the most from REDO surgery.

Evaluation Of Quality Of Life After Surgical Treatment Of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the quality of life of surgically treated patients for TOS.

METHODS

A prospective observational study including patients treated surgically for TOS, on 2018. Two standardized questionnaires: Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) were used. The SF-12 consists of a physical and mental component (PCS-SF-12 and MCS-SF-12). The questionnaires were completed during the preoperative and postoperative consultations and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

We performed 53 interventions. The population was mostly female (n = 35, 66.0%) of 40.1±10.0 years. The preoperative DASH score was 46.3±19.7. It was 40.9±21.7 at 6 weeks, 33.5±22.7 at 3 months, 28.9±22.6 at 6 months, and 21.1±20 at 9 to 12 months. The improvement of DASH becomes statistically significant at 3 months (p = 0.036), 6 months (p = 0.002), and 12 months (p = 0.001). The preoperative MCS-SF-12 was 36.6±9.4. It was 41.6±10.9 at 6 weeks, 43.8±11.1 at 3 months, 46.2±11.8 at 6 months, and 51.4±8 at 8 to 12 months. The improvement of MCS-SF-12 became significant at 3 months (p=0.009), 6 months (p=0.001), and 12 months (p=0.001). The preoperative PCS-SF-12 was 35.5±6.4. It was 37.1±8.7 at 6 weeks, 39.9±8.7 at 3 months, 41.6±8.4 at 6 months, and 46.1±8.1 to 12 months. The improvement of PCS-SF-12 became significant at 6 months (p=0.005) and 12 months (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The surgical management of TOS allows an improvement of quality of life in short and medium term.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Single Center Experience on Robotic Assisted First Rib Resection and Literature Review

Background

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a pathological condition caused by a narrowing between the clavicle and first rib leading to a compression of the neurovascular bundle to the upper extremity. The incidence of TOS is probably nowadays underestimated because the diagnosis could be very challenging without a thorough clinical examination along with appropriate clinical testing. Beside traditional supra-, infraclavicular or transaxillary approaches, the robotic assisted first rib resection has been gaining importance in the last few years.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent robotic assisted first rib resection due to TOS at Lucerne Cantonal Hospital and then we performed a narrative review of the English literature using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus.

Results

Between June 2020 and November 2021, eleven robotic assisted first rib resections were performed due to TOS at Lucerne Cantonal Hospital. Median length of stay was 2 days (Standard Deviation: +/– 0.67 days). Median surgery time was 180 min (Standard Deviation: +/– 36.5). No intra-operative complications were reported.

Conclusions

Robotic assisted first rib resection could represent a safe and feasible option in expert hands for the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Rehabilitation in Overhead Athletes With Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a clinical diagnosis resulting from the impingement of neurovascular structures between the clavicle and first rib. Effective prevention and nonoperative treatment in high-performance athletes with TOS are not well documented. The objective of reporting this case was to discuss the symptom progression, relevant clinical findings, and rehabilitation of an overhead athlete with diagnosed neurogenic TOS. Numerous rehabilitative techniques may be used to treat an athlete with TOS, with an emphasis on restoring full shoulder mobility, motor control, and normalized scapular mechanics in a throwing athlete, as well as improving functional thoracic range of motion. Modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation and targeted muscle exercises are incorporated in the process. In the case presented, a collegiate-level throwing athlete returned to full participation at her previous level of play within 18 weeks of rehabilitation initiation. This report details the clinical findings and treatment options available to address pathology in an overhead athlete with a diagnosis of TOS. The clinical case example shows techniques that may help guide the clinician in establishing effective nonoperative or postoperative treatments for TOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Digital Biomarkers for the Objective Assessment of Disability in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is a musculoskeletal disorder in which compression of the brachial plexus between the scalene muscles of the neck and the first rib results in disabling upper extremity pain and paresthesia. Currently there are no objective metrics for assessing the disability of nTOS or for monitoring response to its therapy. We aimed to develop digital biomarkers of upper extremity motor capacity that could objectively measure the disability of nTOS using an upper arm inertial sensor and a 20-s upper extremity task that provokes nTOS symptoms. We found that digital biomarkers of slowness, power, and rigidity statistically differentiated the affected extremities of patients with nTOS from their contralateral extremities (n = 16) and from the extremities of healthy controls (n = 13); speed and power had the highest effect sizes. Digital biomarkers representing slowness, power, and rigidity correlated with patient-reported outcomes collected with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the visual analog scale of pain (VAS); speed had the highest correlation. Digital biomarkers of exhaustion correlated with failure of physical therapy in treating nTOS; and digital biomarkers of slowness, power, and exhaustion correlated with favorable response to nTOS surgery. In conclusion, sensor-derived digital biomarkers can objectively assess the impairment of motor capacity resultant from nTOS, and correlate with patient-reported symptoms and response to therapy.

Evaluation and Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome with an Overview of Surgical Approaches: A Comprehensive Review

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) represents a disorder believed to involve compression of one or more neurovascular elements as they exit the thoracic outlet. This comprehensive literature review will focus on the occurrence, classification, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic measures, and both nonoperative and operative therapies for NTOS. NTOS represents the most common subtype of thoracic outlet syndrome and can significantly impair quality of life. Botulinum toxin injection into the anterior scalene muscle, or even the middle scalene or pectoralis minor muscles, can reduce the symptoms of this syndrome. The best available evidence for botulinum toxin therapy to the cervicothoracic muscles supports the value of this treatment for reducing pain in the affected extremity, and for an approximate duration of 2 months or more. Surgical approaches and newer minimally invasive surgical approaches offer high rates of improvement in select centers.

Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Continuous Perineural Local Anesthetic Infusion for Postoperative Pain Control After Supraclavicular Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Matched Case-Control Comparison

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if single injection erector spinae plane blocks are associated with improved pain control, opioid use, numbness, length of stay, or patient satisfaction compared to intraoperatively placed continuous perineural infusion of local anesthetic after decompression of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center of eighty patients that underwent supraclavicular decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome between May 2019 and January 2020. Forty consecutive patients treated with single-injection preoperative erector spinae plane blocks were retrospectively compared to 40 age- and gender-matched controls treated with continuous perineural infusion.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of mean pain scores was not significantly different between the erector spinae and perineural infusion groups over the three-day study period (4.2-5.3 vs 3.0-5.1 P=0.08). On post-operative day 0, mean pain scores were significantly higher in the erector spinae group (4.2 vs 3.0, P=0.02). While statistically significant, the score was still lower in the erector spinae group on day 0 than on day 1,2, or 3 in either group. Opioid use, nausea, length of stay and patient satisfaction were also similar. Upper extremity numbness was significantly less severe in the erector spinae group (36% vs 73% moderate-extreme, P=0.03) at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventy-two-hour perineural local anesthetic infusion did not provide superior analgesia compared to preoperative single-injection erector spinae blocks. Furthermore, there was significantly less long-term postoperative numbness associated with erector spinae blocks compared to perineural local anesthetic infusion.

Shoulder Isokinetic Strength Deficit in Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is an impairing painful condition. Patients usually report upper-limb pain, weakness and paresthesia. Shoulder weakness is frequently reported but has never been described with objective strength evaluation. We aimed to compare isokinetic shoulder strength between patients with NTOS and healthy controls. Patients and controls were prospectively evaluated with an isokinetic strength test at 60 and 180°/s, and an endurance test (30 repetitions at 180°/s) of the shoulder rotators. Patients were functionally assessed with QuickDASH questionnaires. One hundred patients and one hundred healthy subjects were included. Seventy-one percent of patients with NTOS were females with a mean age of 39.4 ± 9.6. They were compared to controls, 73% females and the mean age of 38.8 ± 9.8. Patients' mean QuickDASH was 58.3 ± 13.9. Concerning the peak of strength at 60°/s, the symptomatic limbs of patients with NTOS had significantly 21% and 29% less strength than the control limbs for medial and lateral rotators, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). At 180°/s, the symptomatic limbs had significantly 23% and 20% less strength than the controls for medial and lateral rotators, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). The symptomatic limbs had significantly 45% and 30% less endurance than the controls for medial and lateral rotators, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). These deficits were correlated to the QuickDASH. Patients with NTOS presented a significant deficit of strength and endurance of the shoulder rotators correlated to disability. This highlights the interest in upper-limb strength evaluation in the diagnostic process and the follow-up of NTOS.

Improvement of disability in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome by robotic first rib resection

BACKGROUND

Robotic transthoracic first rib resection (R-FRR) has advantages over traditional approaches however its impact on post-operative nTOS outcomes is unknown. Our primary objective was to determine improvement of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and disability following R-FRR in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS). Our secondary objective was to compare improvement of patient-reported pain between R-FRR and supraclavicular FRR (SC-FRR) in nTOS.

METHODS

We queried a prospectively-maintained, single surgeon, single institution database for nTOS patients undergoing R-FRR or SC-FRR with available pre-operative and post-operative PROMs. PROMs included the Disability of the Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (DASH) questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain.

RESULTS

Cohort 1 included 37 patients undergoing 40 R-FRRs and was comprised of 32 females, aged 36 years on average. Pre-operative VAS and DASH (6.0 and 64.2, respectively) improved significantly at the first (2.8 and 35.0, P<0.001 for both) and second post-operative visits (1.4 and 30.2, P<0.01 for both) which occurred at 2.6 and 15.3 weeks, respectively. Cohort 2 included 57 R-FRR performed in 53 patients, and 35 SC-FRRs performed in 34 patients. R-FRR and SC-FRR groups did not significantly differ in sex, age, hand dominance, TOS laterality, or pre-operative VAS. At first post-operative visit (2.4 weeks), R-FRR was associated with lower VAS scores (P=0.023) and greater VAS improvement than SC-FRR (53% and 27% decrease, respectively, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

R-FRR results in significant improvement in disability and pain in nTOS and may have a greater impact on patient-reported pain than SC-FRR in the early postoperative period.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in Athletes - Nonsurgical Treatment Options

ABSTRACT

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is an etiologically and clinically diverse disorder caused by compression of the brachial plexus traversing the thoracic outlet. Athletes who perform repetitive overhead activities are at risk of developing NTOS with sport-specific symptoms. This article reviews the controversial NTOS nomenclature, common sites of anatomic compression, and red flag symptoms that require immediate intervention. It also reviews the congenital, traumatic, and functional etiologies of NTOS, with a discussion of the differential diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, and workup for NTOS. Nonsurgical treatment is highlighted with an emphasis on thoracic outlet syndrome-specific physical therapy and updates on injection options and ultrasound guided hydrodissection. This article compares nonsurgical versus surgical functional outcome data with an emphasis on athletes with NTOS. Functional assessment tools and performance metrics for athletes are reviewed, as well as return to sport considerations.

Long-term outcome over a decade after first rib resection for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine long-term outcomes over a decade after first rib resection (FRR) in patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). A secondary aim was to investigate correlation of residual rib stump with long-term symptoms.

METHODS

This ambispective cohort included patients who underwent transaxillary FRRs for NTOS between 1998 and 2007. Short-term outcomes at 3-month clinical follow-up were retrospectively collected from medical records. Patients who agreed to participate in the study were invited to a long-term clinical follow-up in 2019. Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score and Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire were used. A chest X-ray limited to a clavicular projection was taken, and the length of the residual first rib was measured.

RESULTS

Twenty patients {mean age 41.8 [standard deviation (SD): 10.3 years]} who underwent 27 FRRs participated in the study. The mean follow-up time was 14.9 (SD: 3.6) years. Excellent or good recovery was noted after 16 (59.3% of operated arms) operations in the short-term follow-up and 22 (81.5%) operations in the long-term follow-up. No reoperations were necessary for residual symptoms. The mean Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire score was 26.7 (SD: 28.2) (maximum 120), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score was 21.1 (SD: 18.4) (maximum 100) points. Twenty-six patients (96.3%) had a noticeable residual first rib stump. The mean length of the residual first rib was 28.9 (SD: 9.5) mm. More than 30-mm rib stump did not indicate a worse long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed good long-term outcome without symptom recurrence after FRR for NTOS. In most patients, after surgery, quality of life and ability to work improved. Residual rib stump length was not associated with the treatment outcome.

Hand Strength Deficit in Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a chronic painful and disabling condition. Patients complain about upper-limb paresthesia or weakness. Weakness has been considered one of the diagnostic criteria of NTOS, but objective comparisons to healthy controls are lacking. We compared the grip and the key pinch strengths between NTOS patients and healthy controls. Grip strength was evaluated with a hydraulic hand dynamometer and the key pinch with a pinch gauge. All the patients with NTOS completed a QuickDASH. We included prospectively 85 patients with NTOS, 73% female and 27% male. The mean age was 40.4 ± 9.6. They were compared to 85 healthy subjects, 77.6% female and 22.4% male. Concerning the grip, symptomatic hands of NTOS patients had significantly 30% less strength compared to control hands (p ≤ 0.001), and 19% less strength compared to asymptomatic hands (p = 0.03). Concerning the key pinch, symptomatic hands of patients with NTOS had significantly 19.5% less strength compared to control hands (p ≤ 0.001). Grip and key pinch strengths had a significant correlation with the QuickDASH (r = −0.515 and r = −0.403, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). Patients with NTOS presented an objective hand strength deficit compared to healthy controls. This deficit was significantly correlated to the upper-limb disability. These findings confirm the interest of hand strength evaluation in the diagnostic process of patients with NTOS.

Physical Therapy Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a complex and challenging condition to manage. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide clinical decision making and therefore a need to individualize treatment. Examination includes identifying postural, anatomic, and biomechanical factors that contribute to compromise of the neurovascular structures. Patients can experience good outcomes with conservative management with pain science-informed physical therapy combined with biomechanical approaches addressing contributing impairments. Retraining movement patterns while maintaining patency allows for a greater tolerance to functional activities and can have a positive impact on quality of life. Close collaboration with the patient's care team is critical.

Feasibility and Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Care Pathway for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The North American Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) were published in 2016 to produce consistency in the diagnosis and treatment of NTOS, but outcomes resulting from following these standards are not yet available. The results of a standardised multidisciplinary care pathway for NTOS based on the North American SVS reporting standards for NTOS are reported.

METHODS

Patients referred between August 2016 and December 2019 with suspected NTOS were evaluated in this single center prospective cohort study. Diagnosis and treatment were performed according to a care pathway based on the North American SVS reporting standards. The outcome of surgically treated patients was determined by the Derkash score, thoracic outlet syndrome disability scale (TDS), Cervical Brachial Score Questionnaire (CBSQ), Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hands Dutch language version (DASH-DLV) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at three, six, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

Of 856 referred patients, 476 (55.6%) patients were diagnosed with NTOS. Dedicated physiotherapy was successful in 186 patients (39.1%). Surgical treatment was performed in 290 (60.9%) patients of whom 274 were included in the follow up. At a mean follow up of 16.9 ± 9.2 months, significant improvement (p < .001) in TDS, CBSQ, DASH-DLV, and SF-12 scores was seen in the surgical group between baseline and all follow up intervals. Derkash outcome after surgical intervention was excellent in 83 (30.3%), good in 114 (41.6%), fair in 43 (15.7%), and poor in 34 (12.4%) of the patients. Complications occurred in 16 (5.8%) patients, and 32 (10.4%) patients experienced recurrent or persistent NTOS complaints.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary care pathway based on the North American SVS reporting standards for NTOS helped to confirm the diagnosis in 56% of patients referred, and guided the selection of patients who might benefit from thoracic outlet decompression surgery after unsuccessful dedicated physiotherapy. Intermediate follow up showed good outcomes in the majority of surgically treated patients.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Thoracic outlet syndrome comprises a group of disorders that result in compression of the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels exiting the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include pain, paresthesia, pallor, and weakness depending upon the compromised structures. While consensus in diagnostic criteria has not yet been established, a thorough patient history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging studies are helpful in diagnosis. General first-line therapy for thoracic outlet syndrome is a conservative treatment, and may include physical therapy, lifestyle modifications, NSAIDs, and injection therapy of botulinum toxin A or steroids. Patients who have failed conservative therapy are considered for surgical decompression. This article aims to review the epidemiology, etiology, relevant anatomy, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Development and evolution of a robotic surgical technique for the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We describe the development and evolution of a surgical technique that uses the robotic da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) for the transaxillary approach to repair the disabling thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). We report our patient outcomes associated with the use of this robotic technique.

METHODS

We present a retrospective review and analysis of data collected from a 16-year experience of a single surgeon using a robotic surgical system and technique for TOS surgery. From the initial design of an endoscope attached to a microvideo camera in 1982 to the adoption of the monorobotic arm with integrated voice in 1998, the main objective of the transaxillary approach has always been to improve visualization of congenital cervical anomalies of the scalene muscles. From February 2003 to December 2018, we performed 412 transaxillary decompression procedures using the robotic da Vinci Surgical System. The surgical procedure has been described in further detail and includes the following steps: (1) positioning of the patient into a lateral decubitus position and using a monoarm retractor; (2) creation of a mini-incision in the axillary area and creation and maintenance of the subpectoral anatomic working space; (3) placement of endoscopic ports and engagement of the robotic instrumentation; (4) dissection of extrapleural and intrapleural soft tissue; (5) creation of the "floater" first rib; (6) excision of the cervical bands and first rib; and (7) placement of thoracostomy tubes for drainage and closure of the incisions.

RESULTS

None of the patients died, and no patient experienced permanent neurovascular damage of the extremity. Of the 306 patients, 22 (5% of 441 operations) experienced complications. One patient developed postoperative scarring that required a redo operation with a robotic-assisted transaxillary approach.

CONCLUSIONS

With its three-dimensional visual magnification of the anatomic area, the endoscopic robotic-assisted transaxillary approach offers safe and effective management of disabling TOS symptoms. The endoscope facilitates observation of the cervical bands and the mechanism (pathogenesis) of the neurovascular compression that causes TOS, thereby allowing complete excision of the first rib, cervical bands, and scalene muscle. We sought to develop and perfect this robotic approach. The present study was not intended to be a comparative study to nonrobotic TOS surgery.

Subclavian Vessel Compression Assessed by Duplex Scanning in Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and No Vascular Signs

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is the most frequent form of TOS. It may affect both sides, but specific complementary exams are lacking. We aimed to evaluate duplex scanning results in a group of patients with unilateral or bilateral NTOS and no clinical vascular signs, referred for rehabilitation. We performed a retrospective observational study in patients with unilateral or bilateral NTOS and no vascular symptoms. Subclavian vessels were assessed by duplex scanning. Compressions were considered in case of >50% of increased or decreased blood flow. A total of 101 patients met NTOS criteria; mean age was 40 +/− 10.2; 79.2% women. Seventy patients had a unilateral NTOS and 31 a bilateral form. Duplex scanning showed that 56.4% of the patients had vessels compression, 55.7% in the unilateral group and 58.1% in the bilateral (p = 0.81). In unilateral NTOS, 21 (30%) patients had bilateral vascular compression, 17 (24.3%) had ipsilateral compression and 1 (1.4%) had contralateral compression. In bilateral NTOS, 15 (48.4%) had bilateral compression and 3 (9.7%) compression on only one side. We found a significant difference of the rate of vascular compressions between symptomatic and non-symptomatic upper-limbs, 54.5% vs. 32.9%, respectively, (p = 0.002) and a significant association between symptomatic upper-limbs and vascular compression (OR = 2.45 [95%IC: 1.33–4.49]; p = 0.002). The sensitivity and the specificity of the duplex scanning were 54.5% and 67%, respectively. The ROC curve area was of 0.608 [95%IC: 0.527–0.690]. Despite a highly significant association between symptomatic upper-limbs and vascular compression, duplex scanning did not help make the diagnosis of NTOS.

Safety of robotic first rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Robotic first rib resection (R-FRR) is an emerging approach in the field of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) that has technical advantages over traditional open approaches, including superior exposure of the first rib and freedom from retracting neurovascular structures. We set out to define the safety of R-FRR and compare it with that of the conventional supraclavicular approach (SC-FRR).

METHODS

We queried a prospectively maintained, single-surgeon, single-institution database for all FRR operations performed for neurogenic TOS and venous TOS. Preoperative, intraoperative, and complications were compared between approaches.

RESULTS

Seventy-two R-FRRs and 51 SC-FRRs were performed in 66 and 50 patients, respectively. These groups were not significantly different in age, body mass index, sex, type of TOS, or preoperative use of opioids. Length of procedure and hospital stay were not different between groups. Postoperative inpatient self-reported pain (visual analog scale score 4.7 vs 5.2; P = .049) and administered morphine milligram equivalents (37.5 vs 81.1 MME, P < .001) were significantly lower in R-FRR than SC-FRR. Brachial plexus palsy was less frequent after R-FRR than SC-FRR (1% vs 18%, P = .002) and resolved by 4 months in call cases. All cases were sensory palsies with the exception of 2 motor palsies, which were both in the SC-FRR group. In multivariable analyses, R-FRR was independently associated with less frequent total complications than SC-FRR (P = .002; odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

R-FRR provides outstanding exposure of the first rib and eliminates retraction of the brachial plexus and its consequences.

Respiratory Dysfunction in Individuals With Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength and endurance in individuals with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and healthy participants.

METHODS

Sixty-two individuals with TOS (mean age 30.81 ± 10.69 years; 10 male, 52 female) and 47 healthy individuals (mean age 30.64 ± 9.16 years; 14 male, 33 female) participated in this study. Pulmonary function testing was performed using a spirometer. Respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP] and maximal expiratory pressure [MEP]) were measured using a mouth pressure device. Respiratory muscle endurance was tested at 35% MIP and measured as the time in seconds from the start of the test to voluntary exhaustion.

RESULTS

Age distribution and physical characteristics were similar between the groups (P > .05). All pulmonary function parameters except for peak expiratory flow rate were similar in patients with TOS and healthy controls (P > .05). Patients with TOS had significantly lower peak expiratory flow rate, MIP, MIP%, MEP, MEP%, and respiratory muscle endurance compared with controls (P < .05). Forty-six patients with TOS (74.2%) had MIP values below the lower limit of the 95% CI of the control group (97.05-113.88 cmH₂O), and 53 patients with TOS (85.2%) had MEP values below the lower limit of the 95% CI of the control group (124.74-146.49 cmH₂O).

CONCLUSION

Expiratory flow rate and respiratory muscle strength and endurance may be adversely affected in TOS. Trunk muscles perform both postural and breathing functions. Therefore, disruption in one function may negatively affect the other.