Experienced operators achieve superior patency and wound complication rates with endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest compared with open harvest in lower extremity bypasses

A Comprehensive Clinical Outcome Analysis of Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Background: The long saphenous vein is routinely used for coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and two primary techniques are commonly utilized: endoscopic vessel harvesting (EVH) and open vessel harvesting (OVH). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the EVH and OVH techniques used for CABG within the confines of a tertiary hospital. Methods: The clinical data of all patients subjected to either EVH or OVH for CABG surgery between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to discern variations in the rates of postoperative complications between EVH and OVH. Results: A cohort of 1884 individuals were included in this study, 75.3% of whom underwent EVH. Notably, the incidence of postoperative leg wound complications was significantly different between the patients who underwent OVH and the patients who underwent EVH, with incidence rates of 18.6% and 32%, respectively (p < 0.001). Leg wound complications (p < 0.001; OR 1.946; 95% CI 1.528-2.477) and leg wound infections (p = 0.050, OR 1.517, 95% CI 0.999-2.303) were significantly associated with OVH. Moreover, leg wound hematoma (p = 0.039, OR = 0.402, 95% CI = 0.169-0.957) and EVH were strongly associated. Conclusions: The large sample of patients and the inclusion of a range of Asian ethnic groups provided notable insights into postoperative complications related to different modalities. EVH was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative leg wound complications, which suggests that EVH is a better modality for those undergoing CABG surgery.

Ten-year experience of infrainguinal bypass with endoscopic vein harvest

OBJECTIVES

There is conflicting data comparing minimally invasive vein harvest (MIVH) using endoscopic technique and open vein harvest (OVH) in terms of bypass patency, wound infection incidence, and patient morbidity. Our institution has performed MIVH since 2003 for peripheral bypass procedures with a consistent team of specialized endoscopic vein harvesters. This study reviewed the major outcomes of MIVH infrainguinal bypass at our institution given a predominant cohort of critical limb ischemia.

METHODS

We performed a 10-year, retrospective, single-institution review from January 2005 to December 2014, identifying all patients undergoing MIVH for obstructive infrainguinal disease. Primary outcomes were primary patency, operative time, intraoperative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), and freedom from amputation.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients (70% male) underwent MIVH infrainguinal bypass at an average age of 68 ± 12 years old, an obesity prevalence of 28%, and with critical limb ischemia in 81% of the patient cohort (20% rest pain, 61% tissue loss/gangrene). Ninety-four percent of patients had no intraoperative complications, 2.5% had adverse cardiac or technical complications, and 4.2% of patients required transfusion. Average operative time was 4.2 h. Femoral-popliteal TASC classification C and D constituted 80% of our patient cohort. At the last follow-up, toe pressures had increased from 30 ± 30 to 62 ± 40 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Primary bypass patency in the first 30 days was 95%. SSI incidence requiring surgical treatment was only 6%. Our median length of stay was 4.0 days, with median intravenous narcotic use of 1 day. In addition, 77% of patients returned to their baseline mobility at first follow-up (median 19 days), and 83% of patients had freedom from amputation at last follow-up (median 820 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In a center with experience in MIVH and a consistent group of experienced endoscopic vein harvesters, MIVH bypass has excellent patency, low surgical site infection, short length of stay, and prompt return to baseline mobility.

"In Vitro" Evaluation of Energy-Based Sealing of Graft Side Branches in Bypass Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to compare the in vitro efficacy of electrothermal bipolar [EB] vessel sealing and ultrasonic harmonic scalpel [HS] versus mechanical interruption, with conventional ties or surgical clips (SC), in sealing saphenous vein (SV) collaterals, during its eventual preparation for bypass surgery.

METHODS

Experimental in vitro study on 30 segments of SV. Each fragment included two collaterals at least 2 mm in diameter. One of them was sealed by ligation with 3/0 silk ties (control) and the other one with EB (n = 10), HS (n = 10) or medium-6 mm SC (n = 10). After incorporation in a closed circuit with pulsatile flow, the pressure was progressively increased until causing rupture. Collateral diameter, burst pressure, leak point, and histological study were recorded.

RESULTS

Burst pressure was higher for SC (1320.20 ± 373.847 mmHg) as compared with EB (942.2 ± 344.9 mmHg, p = 0.065), and especially with HS (637.00 ± 320.61 mmHg, p = 0.0001). No statistically significant difference between EB and HS was found, and bursting always happened at supraphysiological pressures. The leak point for HS was always detected in the sealing zone (10/10), while for EB and SC, it occurred in the sealing zone only in 6/10(60%) and 4/10(40%), respectively (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Energy delivery devices showed similar efficacy and safety in sealing of SV side branches. Although bursting pressure was lower than with tie ligature or SC, non-inferiority efficacy was shown at the range of physiological pressures in both, EB and HS. Due to their speed and easy handling, they may be useful in the preparation of the venous graft during revascularization surgery. However, remaining questions about healing process, potential spread of tissue damage and sealing durability, will require further analysis.

Lower Extremity Bypass

The original description of the lower extremity bypass (LEB) provided surgeons with a reliable method of limb revascularization. The tenets of the operation have formed the foundation for the advances of surgical care. A careful evaluation of the chronic limb-threatening ischemia patient due to the numerous comorbid conditions is paramount to obtain the best possible outcomes. Use of all adjuncts including judicious target vessels control, completion imaging, and vein harvesting techniques to ensure optimal outcomes because a functioning LEB remains a key to successful limb salvage.

How to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Vascular Surgery: A Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

This review aims to identify and review the current evidence for preventing postoperative surgical site infections in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery or infrainguinal arterial surgery.

METHODS

Extended literature review of clinical trials that examined the prevention of postoperative surgical site infections in abdominal aortic aneurysm or infrainguinal arterial surgery. Searches were conducted on Ovid MEDLINE (1950 - 13 March 2020) using key terms for vascular surgery, surgical site infections and specific preventative techniques. Articles were included if they discussed a relationship between a preventative technique and surgical site infections in abdominal aortic aneurysm or infrainguinal arterial surgery. The GRADE guidelines were used to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

21 techniques and 81 studies were included. Prophylactic antibiotics and negative pressure wound therapy have a high quality of evidence for the prevention of surgical site infections in abdominal aortic aneurysm or infrainguinal arterial surgery. A moderate quality evidence base was identified for gentamicin containing collagen implant (confined to high surgical site infection risk centers). Currently, there is a low or very low quality of evidence to suggest a reduction in the surgical site infection rate for combination therapy, glycaemic control, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening and absorbable suture. Evidence suggests no beneficial effect for nutritional supplementation, chlorhexidine bath, hair removal therapy, Staphylococcus aureus nasal eradication, cyanoacrylate microsealant, silver grafts, rifampicin bonded grafts, triclosan coated suture and postoperative wound drains. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest may reduce surgical site infection rate (very low quality of evidence) but may lower long-term patency. Autologous vein grafts may increase surgical site infections (very low quality of evidence) but may provide better long-term patency rates in above-knee infrainguinal bypass surgery. There was no identified evidence for perioperative normothermia, electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer or Dermabond and Tegaderm for surgical site infection prevention in vascular surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antibiotics and postoperative negative pressure wound therapy are effective in the prevention of postoperative surgical site infection in abdominal aortic aneurysm or infrainguinal arterial surgery. There exists a significant risk of bias in the literature for many preventative techniques and further studies are required to investigate the efficacy of gentamicin containing collagen implant, and specific combination therapies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of saphenous vein harvesting and grafting for lower extremity arterial bypass

OBJECTIVE

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the short- and long-term outcomes of different harvesting and grafting techniques in patients undergoing lower extremity arterial bypass.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases (up to December 1, 2019) for comparative trials investigating different harvesting and bypass grafting techniques.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 37 studies for our review. Skip incision harvesting showed a similar high primary patency rate (Peto odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.04; P = .20) with continuous incision harvesting and comparable low wound complication rates (relative risk, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.91-2.66; P = .11) with endoscopic harvesting. In situ bypass grafting a long-term patency similar to that of reversed grafting (Peto OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.75-1.37; P = .93). However, for femoropopliteal bypass, the reversed bypass grafting group had significantly lower 2-year (Peto OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P < .001) and 5-year (Peto OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04) failure rates compared with the in situ bypass grafting group. For infrapopliteal bypass, the in situ bypass grafting group had significantly lower 1-year (Peto OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04-2.28; P = .03), 2-year (Peto OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.02; P = .003), and 3-year (Peto OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.13-4.05; P = .02) failure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Skip incision harvesting can be considered the first-line harvesting strategy. For patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass, reversed bypass grafting seems to result in better long-term patency. In contrast, for those undergoing infrapopliteal bypass, in situ bypass grafting resulted in superior long-term patency.