2
|
Chui J, Ng W, Yang V, Duggal N. The Impact of Neuroanesthesia Fellowship Training and Anesthesiologist-Surgeon Dyad Volume on Patient Outcomes in Adult Spine Surgery: A Population-Based Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024:00008506-990000000-00115. [PMID: 38910335 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Extensive research has explored the impact of surgeons' characteristics on patient outcomes; however, the influence of anesthesiologists remains understudied. We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of anesthesiologists' characteristics on in-hospital morbidity after spine surgery. METHODS Adult patients who underwent spine surgery at the London Health Science Centre, Ontario, Canada between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2023 were included in this study. Data was extracted from the local administrative database. Five anesthesiologists' characteristics (neuroanesthesia fellowship and residency training backgrounds, surgeon familiarity, annual case volume, and sex) were examined as primary exposures. The primary outcome was composite in-hospital morbidity, encompassing 141 complications. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between anesthesiologists' characteristics and postoperative morbidity with adjustment of patients' sex, Charlson Comorbidities Index, surgical complexity, and surgeon characteristics. RESULTS A total of 7692 spine surgeries were included in the analysis. Being a neuroanesthesia fellowship-trained anesthesiologist and high anesthesiologist-surgeon annual dyad volume were associated with reduction in in-hospital comorbidity; adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.58 (0.49-0.69; P<0.001) and 0.93 (0.91-0.95; P<0.001), respectively. Conversely, anesthesiologist annual case volume, characteristics of residency training and anesthesiologist sex showed only nuanced associations with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Neuroanesthesia fellowship training and high surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad familiarity was associated with a reduction in in-hospital morbidity following spine surgery. These findings underscore the superiority of structured fellowship education over case exposure experience alone, advocate for dedicated neuroanesthesia teams with high surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad volume and recognize neuroanesthesia as a crucial subspecialty in spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chui
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
- Clinical Neurological Science, University of Western Ontario and London Health Science Centre
| | - Wai Ng
- Clinical Neurological Science, University of Western Ontario and London Health Science Centre
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario
| | - Victor Yang
- Clinical Neurological Science, University of Western Ontario and London Health Science Centre
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario
- Lawson Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Duggal
- Clinical Neurological Science, University of Western Ontario and London Health Science Centre
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Y, Wu Y, Li X, Turner SR, Zheng B. Increased team familiarity for surgical time savings: Effective primarily in complex surgical cases. Surgeon 2024; 22:80-87. [PMID: 37880073 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cohesion between team members is critical for surgical performance. Our previous study has shown that the experience of working together (measured by Team Familiarity Score, TFS) helps reduce procedure time (PT). However, that conclusion was found in a relatively small sample size. With a large dataset including mixed general surgical procedures, we hypothesize that team familiarity makes a significant contribution to the improvement of team performance in complex cases, rather than in medium or basic surgical cases, measured by the procedure time, length of hospital stays (LOS), and surgical cost (COST). STUDY DESIGN Patient demographics, operation, and patient outcome data of 922 general surgery cases were included. The cases were divided into three subgroups, including basic, medium, and complex surgical procedures. TFS and an Index of Difficulty of Surgery (IDS) were calculated for each procedure. Simple linear regression and random forest regressions were performed to analyze the association between surgical outcomes and all included independent variables (TFS, IDS, patient age, patient weight, and team size). RESULTS When applied to complex cases, procedure time (r = -0.21) and cost (r = -0.23) dropped as TFS increases. In basic and medium surgical cases, increasing team familiarity failed to shorten the procedure time on average. CONCLUSION Team familiarity is more important in complex cases because there is greater potential for improvement through team collaboration compared to basic and medium cases. Caution will be needed when applying team familiarity scores for examining surgical team performance in large databases with skewed to basic surgical cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Zhang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Yun Wu
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Xinming Li
- Department of Mechanic Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Bin Zheng
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hallet J, Sutradhar R, Jerath A, d’Empaire PP, Carrier FM, Turgeon AF, McIsaac DI, Idestrup C, Lorello G, Flexman A, Kidane B, Kaliwal Y, Chan WC, Barabash V, Coburn N, Eskander A. Association Between Familiarity of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad and Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:465-473. [PMID: 36811886 PMCID: PMC9947805 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance The surgeon-anesthesiologist teamwork and relationship is crucial to good patient outcomes. Familiarity among work team members is associated with enhanced success in multiple fields but rarely studied in the operating room. Objective To examine the association between surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad familiarity-as the number of times working together-with short-term postoperative outcomes for complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based retrospective cohort study based in Ontario, Canada, included adults undergoing esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, and hepatectomy for cancer from 2007 through 2018. The data were analyzed January 1, 2007, through December 21, 2018. Exposures Dyad familiarity captured as the annual volume of procedures of interest done by the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad in the 4 years before the index surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Ninety-day major morbidity (any Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5). The association between exposure and outcome was examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Seven thousand eight hundred ninety-three patients with a median age of 65 years (66.3% men) were included. They were cared for by 737 anesthesiologists and 163 surgeons who were also included. The median surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad volume was 1 (range, 0-12.2) procedures per year. Ninety-day major morbidity occurred in 43.0% of patients. There was a linear association between dyad volume and 90-day major morbidity. After adjustment, the annual dyad volume was independently associated with lower odds of 90-day major morbidity, with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; P = .01) for each incremental procedure per year, per dyad. The results did not change when examining 30-day major morbidity. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults undergoing complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery, increasing familiarity of the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad was associated with improved short-term patient outcomes. For each additional time that a unique surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad worked together, the odds of 90-day major morbidity decreased by 5%. These findings support organizing perioperative care to increase the familiarity of surgeon-anesthesiologist dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Jerath
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pablo Perez d’Empaire
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - François M. Carrier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexis F. Turgeon
- CHU de Québec–Université Laval Research Centre, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma– Emergency–Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel I. McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology and The Wilson Centre, University Health Network–Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Idestrup
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gianni Lorello
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alana Flexman
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Victoria Barabash
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Powezka K, Pettipher A, Hemakom A, Adjei T, Normahani P, Mandic DP, Jaffer U. A Pilot Study of Heart Rate Variability Synchrony as a Marker of Intraoperative Surgical Teamwork and Its Correlation to the Length of Procedure. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:8998. [PMID: 36433593 PMCID: PMC9695825 DOI: 10.3390/s22228998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Quality of intraoperative teamwork may have a direct impact on patient outcomes. Heart rate variability (HRV) synchrony may be useful for objective assessment of team cohesion and good teamwork. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using HRV synchrony in surgical teams. Secondary aims were to investigate the association of HRV synchrony with length of procedure (LOP), complications, number of intraoperative glitches and length of stay (LOS). We also investigated the correlation between HRV synchrony and team familiarity, pre- and intraoperative stress levels (STAI questionnaire), NOTECHS score and experience of team members. Methods: Ear, nose and throat (ENT) and vascular surgeons (consultant and registrar team members) were recruited into the study. Baseline demographics including level of team members’ experience were gathered before each procedure. For each procedure, continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) recording was performed and questionnaires regarding pre- and intraoperative stress levels and non-technical skills (NOTECHS) scores were collected for each team member. An independent observer documented the time of each intraoperative glitch. Statistical analysis was conducted using stepwise multiple linear regression. Results: Four HRV synchrony metrics which may be markers of efficient surgical collaboration were identified from the data: 1. number of HRV synchronies per hour of procedure, 2. number of HRV synchrony trends per hour of procedure, 3. length of HRV synchrony trends per hour of procedure, 4. area under the HRV synchrony trend curve per hour of procedure. LOP was inversely correlated with number of HRV synchrony trends per hour of procedure (p < 0.0001), area under HRV synchrony trend curve per hour of procedure (p = 0.001), length of HRV synchrony trends per hour of procedure (p = 0.002) and number of HRV synchronies per hour of procedure (p < 0.0001). LOP was positively correlated with: FS (p = 0.043; R = 0.358) and intraoperative STAI score of the whole team (p = 0.007; R = 0.493). Conclusions: HRV synchrony metrics within operating teams may be used as an objective marker to quantify surgical teamwork. We have shown that LOP is shorter when the intraoperative surgical teams’ HRV is more synchronised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Powezka
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - Allan Pettipher
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Apit Hemakom
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Tricia Adjei
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Pasha Normahani
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - Danilo P. Mandic
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Usman Jaffer
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parker SH, Lei X, Fitzgibbons S, Metzger T, Safford S, Kaplan S. The Impact of Surgical Team Familiarity on Length of Procedure and Length of Stay: Inconsistent Relationships Across Procedures, Team Members, and Sites. World J Surg 2020; 44:3658-3667. [PMID: 32661690 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05657-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Team familiarity has been shown to be important for operative efficiency and number of complications, but it is unclear for which types of operations and for which team members familiarity matters the most. The objective of this study is to further our understanding of familiarity in the OR by quantifying the relative importance of familiarity among all possible core team dyads, and defining the impact of team level familiarity on outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a retrospective chart and administrative data review, five years of data from two health systems (14 hospitals) and across two procedures, (knee arthroplasty and lumbar laminectomy) were included. Multilevel modeling approach and a dominance analysis were conducted. RESULTS For each previous surgery that any two members of the core surgical team had participated in together, the length of surgery decreased significantly. The familiarity of the scrub and the surgeon was the most significant relationship for knee arthroplasty across the two hospitals, and laminectomies at one hospital. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between familiarity of the surgical team and surgical efficiency may be more complex than previously articulated. Familiarity may be more important for certain types of procedures. The familiarity of certain dyads may be more important for certain types of procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Henrickson Parker
- Department of Biomedical Science, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA. .,Department of Psychology, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, 2 Riverside Cir, Roanoke, VA, 24014, USA.
| | - Xue Lei
- Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Shimae Fitzgibbons
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas Metzger
- Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Shawn Safford
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Seth Kaplan
- Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|