Outcomes of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in narrow aortic bifurcations using the ultra-low profile “INCRAFT” device: A retrospective multicenter study

The Ultra-Low-Profile Minos Endograft in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Standard and Hostile Anatomy. A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Narrow and tortuous iliac axes are the second most common reason the feasibility of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and low-profile endografts were conceived to overcome the limitation of narrow and tortuous iliac axes. This study aims to report the initial results of EVAR performed with the ultra-low-profile Minos® abdominal endograft through a retrospective study conducted across 3 high-volume centers.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database collecting all consecutive EVAR performed with the Minos endograft across 3 Centers of Vascular Surgery between 2020 and 2023. Patients' clinical and operative data, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety patients received EVAR with the Minos endograft. Assisted technical success was 100%, with 6 unplanned adjunctive procedures. Two perioperative complications required reinterventions: 1 access site surgical bleeding and an iliac limb occlusion. All unplanned adjunctive procedures and early reinterventions (8 in 7 patients) occurred in abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile iliac arteries or narrow carrefour. Over a mean follow-up of 14.2 ± 9.6 months, no deaths were observed, and all patients completed the scheduled surveillance protocol. Late reinterventions were 6 (6.7%): 2 type IA endoleaks (ELs), 1 type IB EL, 1 type II EL, and 2 limb occlusions. There was no significant difference in reintervention rates between aneurysms with hostile and standard anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Minos endograft is safe and effective in treating aneurysms with hostile and standard anatomy, and its results are maintained at a mean follow-up of 14 months. A larger sample size and a longer follow-up are necessary to assess the results on the longer term.

The Role of Narrow Aortic Bifurcation in Affecting EVAR Treatment and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered a risk factor for endograft thrombosis after aorto-biiliac endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for aortic or iliac aneurysm. Nowadays, no consensus on the threshold diameter for the definition of NAB is reached and other aortic bifurcation features are rarely considered. The aim of the study is to assess the EVAR outcomes using bifurcated endograft according to anatomical characteristics of aortic bifurcation.

METHODS

The study included patients treated with primary EVAR from 2016 to 2022. A retrospective analysis of single-center prospectively collected database was performed. Patients were classified in standard aortic bifurcation (SAB) (aortic bifurcation diameter >20 mm), NAB (≤20 mm and >16 mm), and extremely NAB (eNAB) (≤16 mm). The 3 groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, risk factors, procedure setting (elective or urgent/emergent), and type of deployed endograft. In NAB and eNAB groups, severe calcification (SC) and length of stenotic aortic bifurcation >10 mm (long-NAB) were assessed from preoperative imaging. In SAB, NAB, and eNAB groups, following outcomes were evaluated: rate of intraoperative iliac endograft stenting (unilateral or kissing stenting), primary patency (PP), freedom from endograft-related reintervention, and overall survival during follow-up.

RESULTS

The total number of deployed aorto-biiliac endografts was 365 (mean age: 76.6 ± 7.4 years; male 89.3%): SAB 298 (81.6%), NAB 57 (15.6%), and eNAB 10 (2.7%) cases. Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers were more frequent in patients with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.002, 0.039, and 0.010, respectively). In NAB and eNAB groups, SC was reported in 18/67 cases (26.9%) and long-NAB in 15/67 cases (25.4%). Patients with eNAB have more frequent SC of aortic bifurcation (60% vs. NAB 21.1%, P = 0.018) and long-NAB (50% vs. NAB 17.5%, P = 0.023). In SAB, NAB, and eNAB, intraoperative iliac endograft stenting was performed in 34/298 (11.4%), 9/57 (15.8%), and 5/10 (50%), respectively (P = 0.001). Kissing stenting was performed more frequently in groups with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.010). Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 21.5 months. At 1, 3, and 5 years, PP was 98.5%, 96.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. eNAB had lower rate of PP compared to NAB group (P = 0.030). Long-NAB had lower rate of PP (P = 0.035). At 1, 3, and 5 years, endograft-related reintervention was 96.8%, 86.7%, and 76.7%, respectively, with no differences between 3 groups (P = 0.423). At 1, 3, and 5 years, survival was 92.5%, 77.6%, and 58.1%, respectively, with no difference between SAB, NAB, and eNAB (P = 0.673).

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers have more frequently smaller aortic bifurcation diameter. eNAB patients have more challenging anatomical characteristics compared with NAB group, requiring higher rate of intraoperative stenting, especially kissing stenting. Mid-term PP seems to be negatively influenced by aortic bifurcation ≤16 mm and long-NAB.

Low profile endografts for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Favorable midterm outcomes have been reported with the use of low-profile endografts (LPE), but long-term data is still needed. Furthermore, it is unclear if each of these LPE may have advantages over the other, which may, in turn, affect the outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature about complications and reintervention rates of patients submitted to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using LPE.

MATHERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted including articles that reported 30-days and follow-up mortality, complications, and reintervention rates of patients treated with EVAR using Incraft (Cordis), Zenith LP/Alpha (Cook Medical Inc) and Ovation (Endologix) endografts.

RESULTS

36 papers were evaluated, reporting results of 582 patients treated with Zenith device, 1211 with Incraft and 3449 with Ovation. During follow up, similar survival and freedom from reintervention rates were reported among the various types of endograft both at 1 and 3 years. The incidence of limb stenosis/kinking was significantly higher in patients treated with Zenith LP/Alpha (2.1%, P = 0.008), while the Incraft device had a significantly lower proportion of type III endoleaks (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival and freedom from reintervention rates were comparable among the three LPEs. The Cook Zenith device had the highest rates of limb stenosis/kinking, while the Incraft device had the lowest occurrence of type III endoleak.

PROSPERO

Registration number: CRD42022315875.

The influence of narrow aortic bifurcation on limb graft patency: a two-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) has been considered as a potential risk factor for graft limb thrombosis after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to compare mid- and long-term outcome of EVAR in patients with NAB and standard aortic bifurcation (SAB).

METHODS

Data from patients receiving EVAR were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. In case of angiographic limb stenosis (>50%), additional stenting was performed. Patients with a NAB (≤20mm) were included in the NAB group, the remaining patients in the SAB group. Primary endpoints were limb thrombosis rate and technical success.

RESULTS

A total of 902 patients were included; 18.3% (N.=165/902) in the NAB and 81.7% (N.=737/902) in the SAB group. Mean follow-up time was 43 months (range 0-198 months). Bilateral stenting of the aortic bifurcation was performed in 2.7% (N.=27/902), 8.5% (N.=14/165) in the NAB and 1.4% (N.=10/737) in the SAB group (P=0.001). Limb thrombosis was found in 2.8% (N.=25/902), 3.6% (N.=6/165) in the NAB and 2.6% (N.=19/737) in the SAB group (P=0.55). Technical success was 97.8%, 98.8% in the NAB and 97.6% in the SAB group (P=0.33). Device related reintervention rate was 16% (N.=144/902), 15.2% in the NAB and 16.1% in the SAB group (P=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard EVAR could safely be performed in patients with NAB (≤20mm) when a low threshold for additional stenting was applied. This resulted in no significant higher incidence of limb thrombosis. Additional stent deployment did not increase the complication rate.

Five-year outcomes of the Bi- versus Trimodular EndurantTM stent-graft in 100 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic repair

BACKGROUND

Recent studies on the Endurant™ endografts mainly compared outcomes of the bimodular stent-graft to other manufacturer's endografts or reported results for cases outside manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU), while data on the experience of standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) inside manufacturer's IFU comparing the bi- with the trimodular device is limited.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: 1) infrarenal aneurysms (>50 mm diameter) treated by Endurant^TM II (END II) or Endurant^TM IIs (END IIs) stent-graft inside manufacturer's IFU; 2) available CTA with 1 mm reconstruction of the entire aorta prior to intervention. Endpoints comparing the devices included technical success, 30-day mortality, rate of complications (bleeding with conversion to open repair, stent-graft stenosis/occlusion, acute distal embolism, infection or postprocedural necessity of dialysis), endoleaks and reinterventions (5-year follow-up). Aneurysm sac diameters were compared between baseline preinterventional CTA and last post-interventional CTA.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (90% male, mean age 74 years) treated with END II (N.=66) or END IIs (N.=34) were included. Technical success was 99%. One procedure-related active bleeding occurred ending up in surgical conversion (END II N.=1). 30d mortality was 0%. No initial type I/III endoleaks were present. Re-interventions were required in 19/100 (19%) of patients (END II N.=10; END IIs N.=9, P=0.17). The outcome of EVAR including technical success, 30d mortality, rate of complications, endoleaks and re-interventions showed no significant differences comparing END II/IIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year outcomes of EVAR show consistently safe and effective results for either END II or IIs device.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With AFX Stent-Grafts or Tube Grafts for Sacciform Infrarenal Pathologies in a Narrow Aortic Anatomy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated with tube grafts and AFX stent-graft in the narrow infrarenal aortic anatomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) or sacciform aneurysms of the infrarenal aorta and an aortic bifurcation diameter ≤20 mm who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with bifurcated AFX or tube stent-grafts (TUBE) between 2012 and 2020 were included. Demographic data and the outcome of the AFX group were compared with the TUBE group. All morphological measurements in the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were performed in the aortic centerline.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (female: 12/51; 29%; median age: 72 years [63, 77]) with a median follow-up of 10 (3, 39) months, were included, of whom 35/51 (69%) had PAUs and 11/51 were symptomatic (22%). The aortic bifurcation diameter was 17 mm (15, 18) with severe calcifications in 25/51 (49%). The distal aortic landing zone was longer in the TUBE group (9 mm vs 24 mm; p<0.001). The technical success was 96% with a median aneurysm shrinkage of 8% (3, 13), which was comparable between the groups (p=0.264). Periprocedural mortality, conversion to open surgery, myocardial infarction, and stroke were not observed. Two type Ia endoleaks (EL) and 2 type Ib EL occurred, all in the TUBE group (Type 1 EL; 19 vs 0%; p=0.013). The limb patency in the AFX group was 100%. One patient with a tube graft developed an infrarenal aortic thrombosis 40 months after the intervention. The reintervention rate in the TUBE group was higher (14 vs 0%; p=0.032) and included 3 aortic cuff implantations and 1 covered endovascular aortic reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB).

CONCLUSION

AFX stent-graft showed a lower rate of type I endoleaks and reinterventions in sacciform infrarenal aortic pathologies during the early and midterm follow-up.

Use of the AFX Stent Graft in Patients with Extremely Narrow Aortic Bifurcation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction

This study analyzed the patient outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal aortic pathologies with very narrow aortic bifurcations using the AFX stent graft.

Methods

The data was retrieved from the archived medical records of 35 patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (48.6%) or penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) (51.4%) with very narrow aortic bifurcation between January 2013 and May 2020. Patient survival, freedom from endoleak (EL), and limb occlusion were estimated applying the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 20.4 ± 22.8 months. The mean aortic bifurcation diameter was 15.8 ± 2.2 mm. Technical success was 100%, and no procedure-related deaths occurred. Two type II ELs occurred within 30-day follow-up. We observed one common iliac artery stenosis at four months and one type III EL at 54 months in the same patient, both of which required re-intervention. Overall patient survival was 95 ± 5% (AAA: 100%; PAU: 89 ± 10%), freedom from limb occlusion was 94 ± 5% (AAA: 91 ± 9%; PAU: 100%), freedom from type II EL was 94 ± 4% (AAA: 88 ± 8%; PAU: 100%), and freedom from EL type III was 83 ± 15% (AAA: 80 ± 18%; PAU: 100%) at the end of the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Very narrow aortic bifurcations may predispose patients to procedure-related complications following EVAR. Our results suggest a safe use of the AFX stent graft in such scenarios. The overall short- and long-term procedure-related patient outcomes are satisfying albeit they may seem superior for PAU when compared to AAA.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Bifurcated Stent Grafts in Patients with Narrow Versus Regular Aortic Bifurcation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered as a risk factor for endograft limb thrombosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of narrow aortic bifurcation on outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched electronic bibliographic databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients with NAB versus those with regular aortic bifurcation. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and those of continuous outcomes using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for expected heterogeneity, the random-effects model was applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included, reporting a total of 2,673 patients (412 with NAR and 2,261 with friendly anatomy). Perioperative mortality was similar between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.30-4.34, P = 0.85, I² = 0%). Limb stenosis and kinking requiring additional intraoperative procedures was significantly more common among patients with NAB (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.16-4.22, P < 0.00001, I² = 0%). Nevertheless, 30-day reintervention rate was similar between the groups, as was the rate of limb occlusion during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that at the expense of significantly more intraoperative additional procedures, EVAR with bifurcated devices can be safely performed in patients with NAB.

Early and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair with an ultra-low-profile endograft from the Triveneto Incraft Registry

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the early and midterm outcomes of the Incraft (Cordis Corp, Bridgewater, NJ) ultra-low-profile endograft by analyzing data from the Triveneto Incraft Registry (TIR).

METHODS

TIR is an independent multicenter cohort registry of 10 vascular surgery units in the Triveneto area (Northeast Italy). A prospective analysis of patients electively treated with Incraft from September 2014 to June 2019 was performed. The main outcomes were technical success, major 30-day complications, 30-day aneurysm-related death, freedom from reintervention, and mortality rate during follow-up and were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between anatomic complexity factors and reintervention.

RESULTS

During the study period, 209 patients were included in the registry. Their mean age was 76.9 ± 7.7 years and the Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score was 0.97 ± 0.52. Most patients (n = 181; 86.6%) had presented with at least one complex anatomic factor: aortic neck angle α <135° in 31 patients (14.8%), conic neck in 17 patients (8.2%), iliac tortuosity index τ >1.5 in 102 (48.8%), iliac artery calcification >50% in 106 (50.7%), and external iliac artery <6 mm in 45 (21.5%). The concurrent presence of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors was present in 67 patients (32.1%). The technical success rate was 99.5%, and the early major complication rate was 1.5% (one limb occlusion, one iliac branch stenosis, one type III endoleak [EL]). No 30-day mortality was recorded. The mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 13.2 months. The overall mortality was 9.5% (n = 18), none related to the aneurysm. The freedom from reintervention rate was 92.1%. Of these patients, six (3.2%) had been treated for type II EL embolization, one (0.5%) for type IA EL, four (2.1%) for iliac branch occlusion, and one (0.5%) for flow-limiting external iliac artery dissection. None of the single anatomic factors analyzed were predictive of reintervention. However, the association of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors was predictive of related reintervention (hazard ratio, 7.25; P = .014). The crude reintervention rate in this complex subgroup of patients was low (4 of 67; 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the TIR have demonstrated excellent early and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair using the Incraft stent graft in patients with complex anatomy. The concurrent presence of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors still represent an issue for endovascular aneurysm repair success. However, the technical characteristics of this device resulted in low intervention rates, even for patients with these challenging issues.

An update on the improvement of patient eligibility with the use of new generation endografts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), performed within device instructions for use (IFU), offers improved outcomes. New endograft designs attempt to increase eligibility rates of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients treated within device IFU. We aim to examine the anatomic suitability of the Ovation endograft in our AAA patients and compare it with the other contemporary devices.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Three-hundred and seven consecutive elective AAA patients treated during a 5-year period were included. Patient-specific anatomic characteristics were based on endograft IFUs to determine eligibility rates of each system.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twenty-five patients underwent EVAR and 82 open surgery. Ineligibility for device implantation was significantly lower for the Ovation iX system (32%) compared to other devices (AFX-2:49%, Altura:49%, Anaconda:54%, Endurant II:46%, Excluder:52%, Excluder Conformable:39%, Incraft:43%, E-Tegra:52%, Zenith-Alpha:52%; P-Value<0.001). The Alto system (next-generation Ovation) achieved an even lower ineligibility rate of 30% (P = 0.008). Short proximal aortic neck length followed by access vessel inadequacy were the primary reasons for ineligibility.

CONCLUSION

The Ovation-iX included more patients with anatomic characteristics within device IFUs resulting in improved eligibility rates compared with the rest of contemporary devices. Its evolution, the Alto system, further improves patient eligibility due to the inclusion of shorter aortic necks.

EXPERT OPINION

The Ovation iX system presented a significantly better performance and was eligible for use in a greater number of patients in our series of elective AAA repairs, accommodating patient-specific aortic anatomies. Of course, performing EVAR within the endograft's IFU is important to achieve optimal and durable outcomes. The proximal neck length followed by the size of the access vessels are the two more common factors resulting in loss of eligibility. Except for overall eligibility rates, a case by case decision must be made on which is the most suitable device for each patient, based on the specific characteristics of its unique anatomy.

Multicenter Mid-term Results After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair with the Incraft® Device

OBJECTIVES

Durability after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered an ongoing topic of investigation and was always a point of concern with smaller profile devices. Recently released five-year clinical trial results using the Incraft® ultralow profile device are encouraging. However, additional real-life experience will need to assist these initial findings. Herein, we investigated the outcomes after EVAR, in real world practice using the Incraft® endograft (EG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-seven patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) ≥50 mm in diameter treated with the Incraft® device in three vascular centers were enrolled from November 2015 to July 2018. Follow-up was completed in August 2020. Selection of EVAR using the Incraft® device was individualized according to aorto-iliac morphologic features, comorbidities, history of previous abdominal surgery and preference of the patient. At the early phase of the study, we specifically opted for preferential use of this low profile EG mainly in cases of small and tortuous iliac vessels (more challenging access routes). At later stages, it was used according to surgeon preference and not specifically in complex anatomies (real-world conditions). End-points included technical success, perioperative complications, 30-day survival, endoleg patency, presence of endoleaks, sac enlargement >5 mm and clinical success.

RESULTS

The primary technical success rate was 97.4% before the addition of an aortic cuff and iliac extension for a type Ia and type Ib endoleak respectively, and the repair of a maldeployment iliac component (primary-assisted and secondary technical success, 100%). Intraoperative small type II endoleaks (visible in final angiogram) were noted in 19 patients (24.7%). There were no intraoperative deaths from AAA rupture, primary conversions or conversions to aortounilateral grafts. Two complications occurred, necessitating hybrid techniques for repair (replaced of a dislodged endoleg and distal external iliac artery hemostasis). No deaths were reported within 30 days. Occlusion of an endoleg, was observed in two patients, 6 and 14 months respectively after implantation (2.6%), and were treated by femoral-femoral PTFE bypass after unsuccessful endovascular recanalization. The latter required open conversion, 3 mo later, to repair compromised flow to the inflow iliac axis. Three patients (3.9%) experienced sac enlargement >5 mm in diameter compared with the 1-month CT scan. All of these had type II endoleaks and two received embolization procedures. Eleven patients died from causes unrelated to AAA repair. Clinical success was 97.3%, 92.8% and 89.4% through 1, 2 and 3 years respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR with the Incraft® device might be considered a reliable option in real-world conditions and not specifically only in complex iliac anatomies.

EVAR with Aortic Placement of a Single JOTEC E-iliac Stent-graft System in a Patient with Poliomyelitis Aortoiliac Deformities

Small-sized vessels can represent a contraindication to standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and more specifically, aortoiliac deformities resulting from poliomyelitis may add an adjunctive challenge for total endovascular repair. Herein we report a case of a 62-year-old man with a 55 mm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and a history of poliomyelitis. More specifically, a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showed a very narrow infrarenal aortic neck, measuring 13 mm in maximum diameter, and severely atrophic external iliac and common femoral arteries. A total endovascular repair was planned and realized with a single aortic JOTEC iliac branch and contralateral VBX placement. All prosthetic materials were delivered from the nonatrophic side. At the 1-year CTA, the aneurysm was successfully excluded and both iliofemoral axes were patent.