Outcomes of target vessel endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

Effect of fenestration configuration on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fenestration configuration and fenestration gap on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed, including patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with F/BEVAR that incorporated at least one small fenestration to a renal artery. The renal fenestrations were divided into groups 1 (8 × 6 mm) and 2 (6 × 6 mm). Primary patency, target vessel instability (TVI), freedom from secondary interventions (SIs), occurrence of type IIIc endoleak, all related to the renal arteries, were analyzed at 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year landmarks. The fenestration gap (FG) distance was analyzed as a modifier, and clustering was addressed at the patient level.

RESULTS

A total of 796 patients were included in this study, 71.7% male, with a mean age of 73.3 ± 8.1 years. The mean follow-up was 30.0 ± 20.6 months. Of the 1474 small renal fenestrations analyzed, 47.6% were 8 × 6 mm, and 52.4% were 6 × 6 mm. At the 30-day landmark, primary patency (99.9% vs 98.0%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), freedom from TVI (99.6% vs 97.1%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), and freedom from SI (99.8% vs 98.4%; P value = .022 for groups 1 and 2, respectively) were higher in 8 × 6 compared with 6 × 6 fenestrations, and the incidence of acute kidney injury was similar across the groups (92.6% vs 92.7%; P value = .953 for groups 1 and 2 respectively). The primary patency at 1 and 5 years was higher in 8 × 6 fenestrations (1-year: 98.8% vs 96.9%; 5-year: 97.8% vs 95.7%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P values = .010 and .021 for 1 and 5 year comparisons, respectively). The freedom from SIs was significantly higher among 6 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (93.1% vs 96.4%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P value = .007). The groups were equally as likely to experience a type Ic endoleak (1.3% and 1.6% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6mm fenestrations, respectively, P = .689). The 6 × 6 fenestrations were associated with higher risk of kidney function deterioration (17.8%) when compared with 8 × 6 fenestrations (7.6%) at 5 years (P < .001). The risk of type IIIc endoleak was significantly higher among 8 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (4.9% and 2% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6 mm fenestrations, respectively; P = .005). A FG ≥5 mm negatively impacted the cumulative 5-year freedom from TVI (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.714, FG <5 mm = 0.857; P < .001; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.761, FG <5 mm = 0.929; P < .001) and the cumulative 5-year freedom from type IIIc endoleak (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.759, FG <5 mm = 0.921; P = .034; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.853, FG <5 mm = 0.979; P < .001) in both groups and the cumulative 5-year patency in group 2 (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.963, FG <5 mm = 0.948; P = .572; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.905, FG <5 mm = 0.938; P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Fenestration configuration for the renal arteries impacts outcomes. The 8 × 6 small fenestrations have better patency at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, whereas 6 × 6 small fenestrations are associated with lower rates of SIs, primarily due to a lower incidence of type IIIc endoleaks. FG ≥5 mm at the level of the renal arteries significantly impacts the freedom from TVI, freedom from type IIIc endoleak, and 5-year patency independently of the fenestration size or vessel diameter.

Midterm single center results with the use of custom-made endografts with inner branches, a call for attention

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the patency of bridging covered stents (BCS) bridged to inner branches in custom-made thoracoabdominal endografts.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (f/b EVAR) in whom the reno-visceral target vessels (TV) were bridged with a BCS to an inner branch of a custom made (CMD) endograft.. Technical success and perioperative complications were noted. Follow-up BCS patency were evaluated and in patients with follow-up, two groups based on BCS were created, a group with BCS occlusion and a group with BCS patent. Uni und multivariable analysis were performed to analyze factors related to visceral and renal bridging stent occlusion.

RESULTS

From 2019-2022, 69 patients undergoing complex aortic repair had at least one TV bridged to an inner branch built into a CMD endograft. 86% of the grafts had only inner branches, whereas 14% had a mix of fenestrations for the visceral TV and inner branches for the renal arteries. Twenty-five percent of patients presented as urgency and received an endograft originally designed for another patient and available on our shelf at the time. 245 TVs were connected to inner branches: celiac trunk (CT): 54, superior mesenteric artery (SMA): 59, renal artery (RA): 132. Technical success was 99%. There was a 23% complication and 9% perioperative mortality rate. At follow-up, we identified 6% of visceral and 14% of renal BCS occlusions. The primary patency for RA BCS was 83% at 12 months and 58% at 24 months. For the CT-SMA BCS, Kaplan-Maier (KM) showed a patency of 99% and 96% at 12 and 24 months. In the univariate analysis a misaligned TV ostium (p 0.001), the postoperative BCS diameter on postoperative CTA (p 0.02) and the preoperative infrarenal aortic angle >60º (0.007) were correlated with RA BCS occlusion. In the multivariate analysis only the misaligned TV ostium (p 0.002) and infrarenal angle > 60° (p 0.01) were significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series of complex aortic repair, the incorporation of inner branches to bridge TVs is associated with a high renal BCS occlusion rate. Improper alignment of the branches with the TV ostium and acute aortic angles might play a significant role. Further research on this technology is needed.

Midterm Outcomes of Patients With Complex Aortic Aneurysms Treated Using Mixed and Matched Endoprosthesis From Different Manufacturers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate outcomes of patients with complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs) undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (f/b-EVAR) using a combination of endoprostheses from different manufacturers.

METHODS

The study is a 2-center retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases of patients with cAAs undergoing f/b-EVAR using a combination of endoprostheses from different manufacturers from 2013 to 2023. Primary endpoints included technical success, major adverse events and reintervention rates. Technical success was defined as implantation of the device without type I or type III endoleak or conversion to open repair. Secondary endpoints included mortality and mid-term device performance.

RESULTS

During this time, 353 patients with cAAs underwent f/b-EVARs at both centers. Of these, 80 (22.7%) required use of a combination of devices from 4 different manufacturers for repair. Fifty-one (64%) were treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and 29 (36%) for pararenal aneurysms. Majority (74%) were male with a median age of 75 (69, 81) years and aneurysm size of 65 (59, 72) mm. Thirty-five (44%) patients required a proximal thoracic stent graft-W.L. Gore (17), Cook, Medtronic, and Terumo (6), respectively. Seventy-seven (96%) patients required a bifurcated device, including Cook Flex (34), Gore (40), and Medtronic (3). Twelve patients underwent common iliac artery aneurysm repair with a Gore iliac branched endoprosthesis. One hundred fifty-four limbs were implanted: Gore: 68, Cook: 82 and Medtronic: 4. Three hundred fourteen target vessels were incorporated. Median operating room time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time and dose were 209 (186, 278) minutes, 100 (50, 663) mL, 77 (59, 100) minutes, 2385 (1415, 3885) mGy, respectively. Three endoleaks were observed on completion angiography-2 type Ic and 1 type IIIa-all of which resolved at 1 month. Fifteen MAEs were observed in 11 patients at 30 days, including 3 (3.9%) deaths, 7 renal insufficiency, 1 renal failure requiring dialysis, 2 MI and paraplegia, respectively. At a median follow-up of 400 (85, 1132) days, there were 8 reinterventions for endoleaks in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mixed devices proximal and distal to f/b-devices built to treat patients with cAAs is safe and has good mid-term results.

CLINICAL IMPACT

While not yet formally assessed in randomized clinical trials or endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the practice of utilizing devices from various manufacturers to address complex aortic anatomy is widespread in everyday clinical settings, yet outcomes remain insufficiently documented. To our knowledge, ours is the first manuscript demonstrating that the use of endoprostheses from different manufacturers for treating patients with complex aortic aneurysms is both safe and yields favorable mid-term results. This frequently employed strategy warrants further exploration through meticulously designed clinical trials, aiming to furnish vascular specialists with a well-founded guideline based on robust clinical evidence.

A prevention protocol reduces spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair (B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida and the University of Alabama at Birmingham) since inception.

METHODS

Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015 to December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort (n = 402) and were compared with the pre-protocol cohort (n = 160; January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence, and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysm dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, although more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (86.1% vs 55.0%; P < .001). Thoracoabdominal aneurysm was the most common indication in both groups. Cerebrospinal fluid drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients vs 3.0% of post-protocol patients (P < .001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs 5.0%, respectively (P < .001). Thirty-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs 2.2%; P = .02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs 88.3%; log-rank P = .35). Among patients with SCI, 1-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in patients undergoing B/FEVAR, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall 1-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among patients with SCI highlights the importance of preventative measures.

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in post-endovascular aneurysm repair endoleak detection using dual-energy computed tomography angiography

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in detecting endoleaks in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using dual-energy computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Material and methods

The study involved 95 patients who underwent EVAR and subsequent CTA follow-up. Dualenergy scans were performed, and images were reconstructed as linearly blended (LB) and 40 keV virtual monoenergetic (VMI) images. The AI tool PRAEVAorta®2 was used to assess arterial phase images for endoleaks. Two experienced readers independently evaluated the same images, and their consensus served as the reference standard. Key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), were calculated.

Results

The final analysis included 94 patients. The AI tool demonstrated an accuracy of 78.7%, precision of 67.6%, recall of 10 71.9%, F1 score of 69.7%, and an AUC of 0.77 using LB images. However, the tool failed to process 40 keV VMI images correctly, limiting further analysis of these datasets.

Conclusions

The AI tool showed moderate diagnostic accuracy in detecting endoleaks using LB images but failed to achieve the reliability needed for clinical use due to the significant number of misdiagnoses.

Kidney autotransplantation as a key solution for a BEVAR type IIIb endoleak

OBJECTIVES

Target vessel endoleaks are one of the most common causes of revision procedures after a fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair. Usually, a redo stenting is an effective therapy, however, not always feasible. We present a case of a hybrid treatment for a type IIIb endoleak using the renal autotransplantation technique.

METHODS

A 60-year-old man with a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm has been treated with a custom-made branched endoprosthesis. Occlusion of the bridging stent to the right renal artery with total infarction of the right kidney was identified one week later and conservatively managed. After four years, a type IIIb endoleak was identified. Endovascular treatment was attempted unsuccessfully. So, the endoleak was corrected using a hybrid strategy with the kidney autotransplantation technique.

RESULTS

A left kidney autotransplantation followed by an aortic stent-graft relining with a tubular graft has been done uneventfully, in a phased manner. Postoperative computed tomography angiography confirmed the patency of vascular reconstructions with no endoleaks. No adverse events occurred during one year of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlights kidney autotransplantation as a viable solution for a hybrid treatment of target vessel endoleaks and shows that this technique can assist complex endovascular aortic reconstructions.

Prendes C, Stana J, Tsilimparis N. Analysis of Target Vessel Instability in Fenestrated Endovascular Repair (f-EVAR) in Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Pathologies

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of target vessel anatomy and post-stenting geometry on the outcome of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR). Methods: A retrospective review of data from a single center was conducted, including all consecutive fenestrated endovascular aortic repairs (f-EVARs) performed between September 2018 and December 2023 for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs). The analysis focused on the correlation of target vessel instability to target vessel anatomy and geometry after stenting. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were the 30-day and follow-up re-interventions. Results: A total of 136 patients underwent f-EVAR with 481 stented target vessels. A total of ten target vessel instabilities occurred including three in visceral and seven instabilities in renal vessels. The cumulative incidence of target vessel instability with death as the competing risk was 1.4%, 1.8% and 3.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. In renal target vessels (260/481), a diameter ≤ 4 mm (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.035-1.274, p = 0.009) and an aortic protrusion ≥ 5.75 mm (OR 8.21, 95% CI 3.150-12-23, p = 0.027) was associated with an increased target vessel instability. In visceral target vessels (221/481), instability was significantly associated with a preoperative tortuosity index ≥ 1.25 (HR 15.19, CI 95% 2.50-17.47, p = 0.045) and an oversizing ratio of ≥1.25 (HR 7.739, CI % 4.756-12.878, p = 0.049). Conclusions: f-EVAR showed favorable mid-term results concerning target vessel instability in the current cohort. A diameter of ≤4 mm and an aortic protrusion of ≥5.75 mm in the renal target vessels as well as a preoperative tortuosity index and an oversizing of the bridging stent of ≥1.25 in the visceral target vessels should be avoided.

Clinical Impact and Determinants of Fenestration to Target Vessel Misalignment in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

This single centre, retrospective study (2014 - 2022) on juxta-, pararenal, or thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms treated by fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) was conducted to investigate the clinical impact and determinants of fenestration to target vessel misalignment in FEVAR.

METHODS

Pre-operative supracoeliac, pararenal, and infrarenal aortic angles were measured on three dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) reconstructions. Two components of misalignment were measured on the first post-operative CTA: horizontal misalignment (angle between the fenestration and the target vessel ostium on perpendicular CTA cuts) and vertical misalignment (vertical distance between the fenestration and the target vessel at its origin). Endpoints were freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) and alignment change over time.

RESULTS

Of 65 patients treated by FEVAR, 60 (202 target arteries) with juxta-, pararenal (80%), or thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (20%) were included. Mean horizontal misalignment was 9 ± 12° (median 5°; IQR 0 - 16) and mean vertical misalignment was 0.7 ± 1 mm (median 0 mm, IQR 0 - 1). Freedom from TVI was 92% (95% CI 88 - 98) at 36 months. Horizontal misalignment > 15° was significantly associated with TVI (HR 5.19; 95% CI 1.54 - 17.48; p = .008); vertical misalignment did not significantly impact TVI (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.56 - 1.73; p = .97). By multivariable analysis, pararenal aortic angle (OR 1.01 per increased degree of angulation; 95% CI 1.00 - 1.02; p = .044), bridging distance > 5 mm (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.11; p = .003), and use of higher profile endografts in tortuous iliac access (OR 7.55; 95% CI 4.55 - 1.11; p = .003) were associated with clinically significant misalignment. Bridging distance > 5 mm (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.02 - 11.29; p = .044), degree of baseline misalignment (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.08; p = .036), and persistence of any primary endoleak for > 6 months (OR 5.85; 95% CI 1.23 - 29.1; p = .023) were associated with misalignment increase during follow up.

CONCLUSION

Horizontal misalignment > 15° is associated with worsened target vessel outcomes. This may occur as a result of excessive iliac access tortuosity, high pararenal aortic angulation, and bridging distance > 5 mm.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of fenestrated or branched devices after previous open surgical aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Despite open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms being considered as a durable solution, disease progression and para-anastomotic aneurysms may require further repair, and fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) may be applied to address these pathologies. The aim of this systematic review was to assess technical success, mortality, and morbidity (acute kidney injury, spinal cord ischemia) at 30 days, and mortality and reintervention rates during the available follow-up, in patients managed with F/BEVAR after previous OSR.

METHODS

The PRISMA statement was followed, and the study was pre-registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42022363214). The English literature was searched, via Ovid, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, through November 30, 2022. Observational studies and case series with ≥5 patients (2000-2022), reporting on F/BEVAR outcomes after OSR, were considered eligible. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence. The primary outcome was technical success, mortality, and morbidity at 30 days. Data on the outcomes of interest were synthesized using proportional meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1694 articles. Eight retrospective studies (476 patients) were considered eligible. In 78.3% of cases, disease progression set the indication for reintervention. Technical success was estimated at 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-98%; I2 = 0%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 79%-99%). Thirty-day mortality was 2% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-28%). The estimated spinal cord ischemia and acute kidney injury rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-30%) and 6% (95% CI, 2%-15%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 1%-40%), respectively. During follow-up, overall mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-12%; I2 = 34%; 95% PI, 0%-45%) and aorta-related mortality was 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-3%). The rate of reinterventions was 16% (95% CI, 9%-26%; I2 = 22%; 95% PI, 3%-50%).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available literature, F/BEVAR after OSR may be performed with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity during the perioperative period. Follow-up aortic-related mortality was 1%, whereas the reintervention rates were within the standard range following F/BEVAR.

Individualizing Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Modular Imaging Algorithm

OBJECTIVES

Surveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) is mainly directed by one-size-fits-all approaches instead of personalized decision making, even though treatment strategies and often endografts themselves are tailor-made to adjust for individual patients. We propose a modular imaging algorithm that escalates surveillance imaging based on invasiveness and need.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study of single-center data, results of a modular imaging algorithm were analyzed. The algorithm is characterized by initiating the examination with standard B-mode then transitioning to Duplex ultrasound, B-Flow, and CEUS. Additional CT(A) studies are conducted where required. The study population included both patients receiving EVAR or FEVAR. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding endoleak detection.

RESULTS

The study population included 28 patients receiving EVAR and 40 patients receiving FEVAR. They accounted for 101 follow-up visits, which led to 431 distinct imaging studies. CEUS has the highest endoleak detection rate, followed by CTA and B-Flow. Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow resulted in 0 and 1 false positive cases, respectively, considering CEUS the reference standard. In a select group of six patients, CEUS was omitted after endoleaks were displayed by Duplex ultrasound or B-Flow, leading to a successful type II coiling and no aneurysm-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed modular algorithm showed great potential to incorporate principles of personalized medicine in surveillance after endovascular aortic treatment. Since Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow rarely cause false positive endoleaks, more resource-intensive and invasive imaging studies such as CEUS and CTA can be omitted after positive identification.

Fate of primary determinate and indeterminate target vessel endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of primary determinate and indeterminate target vessel endoleaks (TVELs) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study (2014-2023) on F-BEVAR for thoracoabdominal (TAAAs) or pararenal aortic aneurysms (PRAAs). TVELs were classified as "primary" if present at the first postoperative computed tomography angiogram. Endoleaks were defined "determinate" (dELs) if the cause (type Ic or IIIc) and implicated target vessel were identifiable and "indeterminate" (iELs) if contrast enhancement was detectable at the level of fenestrations/branches without any evident source. Endoleaks involving multiple inflows (type II and target vessels) were defined as "complex" (cELs). Endpoints were endoleak spontaneous resolution, 1-year aneurysm sac failure to regress (>5 mm diameter decrease), and 4-year endoleak-related secondary interventions. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

There were 142 patients with JRAAs/PRAAs (n = 85; 60%) or TAAAs (n = 57; 40%), with 513 target arteries incorporated through a fenestration (n = 294; 57%) or directional branch (n = 219; 43%). Fifty-nine primary TVELs (12%) were identified in 35 patients (25%), a dEL in 20 patients (14%) and iEL in 15 (11%); 22 (15%) had a determinate or indeterminate cEL. Overall spontaneous resolution rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51%-87%) at 4 years. cELs (odds ratio [OR], 5.00; 95% CI, 1.10-49.4; P < .001) and iELs after BEVAR (OR, 9.43; 95% CI, 3.41-56.4; P = .002) were more likely to persist >6 months, and persistent forms were associated with sac failure to regress at 1 year (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.03-12.59; P = .040). Overall freedom from endoleak-related reinterventions was 85% (95% CI, 79%-92%) at 4 years, 92% (95% CI, 87%-97%) for those without primary TVELs and 62% (95% CI, 46%-84%) for those with any primary TVEL (P < .001). In particular, cELs (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.4-18.81; P = .020) were associated with an increased need for reintervention. In case a secondary intervention was needed, iEL or cEL had an increased risk for multiple secondary procedures (hazard ratio, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.22-10.34; P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary TVELs are frequent after F-BEVAR, and a clear characterization of the endoleak source by computed tomography angiogram is not possible in 40% of patients. Most primary TVELs spontaneously resolve, but during follow-up, patients with any primary TVEL experience a worsened freedom from endoleak-related reinterventions that is mostly driven by persistence of cELs and post-BEVAR iELs. Multiple secondary procedures may be required in case of iELs or cELs.

Improved Detection of Endoleaks in Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Dual-Energy CT Angiography Following EVAR

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and virtual noncontrast (VNC) phase in the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). The potential dose reduction of abbreviated examination protocols was calculated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven patients after the EVAR procedure were enrolled in this study. An initial single-source noncontrast acquisition was followed by two dual-energy acquisitions (arterial and 60 s delayed). Fast-kVp switching scanner was used. VNC images were reconstructed from the delayed phase. First examination session (reference) included a full triphasic study protocol consisting of true noncontrast (TNC) images and two postcontrast phases, the latter ones presented as classical polyenergetic reconstructions. Reading sessions II and III were performed by two independent and blinded readers evaluating VMIs in abbreviated protocols-biphasic (VNC + arterial, delayed phase), monophasic (VNC + delayed phase). The diagnostic accuracy of sessions II and III was calculated.

RESULTS

The calculated sensitivity of the biphasic protocol with the use of VMIs in endoleak detection was 100%, with a statistically significant increase in the number of endoleaks detected in comparison with the reference study. The monophasic protocol showed 83.33% sensitivity. The use of abbreviated examination protocols led to a decrease in the mean effective dose (ED) of 23.28% (biphasic protocol) and 61.37% (monophasic protocol).

CONCLUSION

The use of VMIs increases the number of endoleaks diagnosed with a possible radiation reduction by up to ¼ (biphasic protocol). Further reduction to a monophasic protocol leads to over 60% dose reduction but with a decrease in diagnostic accuracy.

One-year results of a balloon expandable endoprosthesis as a bridging stent for branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

This post-market multicenter registry aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the GORE VIABAHN VBX balloon expandable endoprosthesis (VBX stent) implanted in peripheral vessels. In this subgroup analysis, we assessed the outcomes of the VBX stent as a bridging stent graft for visceral vessels during branched endovascular aortic repair at 1 year.

METHODS

A single cohort from a prospective, multicenter, observational, 16-site European registry. Patients were enrolled from November 2018 to March 2022. Endpoints included 1-year primary patency (PP), primary assisted patency (PAP), and secondary patency (SP), stent graft-related death and serious adverse events through 30 days.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were enrolled in this registry sub-cohort, 57 (78.1%) were male, and the mean age was 73 ± 8.1 years. Thoracoabdominal aneurysms predominated the cohort with 68 patients (93.2%), followed by five patients (6.8%) with pararenal and infrarenal aneurysms. Overall, 233 target vessels were treated with the index bridging graft. The overall per stent graft analysis demonstrated a PP of 95.8% at 1 year; PAP was 95.8%, and SP reached 97.9%. The per-target vessel analysis demonstrated a PP, PAP, and SP in the celiac trunk of 100%, 100%, and 100%; in the superior mesenteric artery of 96.0%, 96.0%, and 100%, and in the renal arteries of 94.2%, 94.2%, and 95.1%, respectively. Four patients (5%) died at 1 year; none of the deaths were device-related. The composite endpoint of target vessel technical success and freedom from VBX stent-related serious adverse events through 30 days was achieved in 98.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective post-market multicenter registry, the VBX stent demonstrated excellent results at 1 year, with almost 96% primary patency and 98% secondary patency. Patency in the renal arteries seems to be lower. Nevertheless, the VBX stent appears to be a reliable bridging stent for branched endovascular aortic repair.

Mid-Term Outcomes of a Pre-Cannulated Iliac Branched Device in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortoiliac Aneurysms: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

The aim was to assess the mid-term results of the E-iliac branched device. Baseline and follow-up data of this monocentric retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with aortoiliac aneurysms treated with iliac branched devices between 2016 and 2023 were extracted from the hospital records. Preoperative and follow-up CT scans were analyzed regarding endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac remodeling, and device patency. Overall, 50 devices were implanted in 38 patients with a median age of 69 (IQR 62-78) years, and 1.6 bridging stent grafts per vessel were implanted through transfemoral (22/50; 44%) or upper extremity access (28/50; 56%). Primary technical success and assisted technical success were 97% (37/38) and 100% (38/38), respectively. No migration, no type I or III endoleaks, no stroke, colonic ischemia, aneurysm rupture, or conversion during the early and mid-term follow-ups (11 months, IQR 5-26) were observed. Aneurysm sac enlargement or shrinkage was observed in 0% (0/38) and 16% (6/38) patients, respectively. E-iliac-related re-interventions were seen only during the early follow-up: two thrombectomies with bare-metal stent relining after thrombosis of the iliac limb. Bridging stent graft and E-iliac patency during the mid-term follow-up were 100%. E-iliac showed encouraging mid-term results in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with high technical success and a low re-intervention rate.

Mid-term Renal and Mesenteric Artery Outcomes During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the United States Aortic Research Consortium

OBJECTIVE

To report mid-term outcomes of renal-mesenteric target arteries (TAs) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND

TA instability (TAI) is the most frequent indication for reintervention after FB-EVAR.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients enrolled in 9 prospective nonrandomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. TA outcomes through 5 years of follow-up were analyzed for vessels incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches (DBs), including TA patency, endoleak, integrity failure, reintervention, and instability.

RESULTS

A total of 1681 patients had 6349 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted using 3720 fenestrations (59%), 2435 DBs (38%), and 194 scallops (3%). Mean follow was 23 ± 21 months. At 5 years, TAs incorporated by fenestrations had higher primary (95 ± 1% vs 91 ± 1%, P < 0.001) and secondary patency (98 ± 1% vs 94 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and higher freedom from TAI (87 ± 2% vs 84 ± 2%, P = 0.002) compared with TAs incorporated by DBs, with no differences in other TA events. DBs targeted by balloon-expandable stent-grafts had significantly lower freedom from TAI (78 ± 4% vs 88 ± 1%, P = 0.006), TA endoleak (87 ± 3% vs 97 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and TA reintervention (83 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1%, P < 0.001) compared with those targeted by self-expandable stent-grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of renal and mesenteric TA during FB-EVAR is safe and durable with high 5-year patency rates and low freedom from TAI. DBs have lower patency rates and lower freedom from TAI than fenestrations, with better performance for self-expandable stent grafts as compared with balloon-expandable stent grafts.

Comparative outcomes of physician-modified fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of post-dissection and degenerative complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated-branched endovascular repair has become a favorable treatment strategy for patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) who are high risk for open repair. Compared with degenerative aneurysms, post-dissection aneurysms can pose additional challenges for endovascular repair. Literature on physician-modified fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (PM-FBEVAR) for post-dissection aortic aneurysms is sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PM-FBEVAR for degenerative and post-dissection cAAAs or TAAAs.

METHODS

A single-center institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients that underwent PM-FBEVAR between 2015 and 2021. Infected aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and clinical outcomes were compared between degenerative and post-dissection cAAAs or TAAAs. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes included technical success, major complications, endoleak, target vessel instability, and reintervention.

RESULTS

Of the 183 patients who underwent PM-FBEVAR in the study, 32 had aortic dissections, and 151 had degenerative aneurysms. There was one 30-day death (3.1%) in the post-dissection group and eight 30-day deaths (5.3%) in the degenerative aneurysm group (P = .99). Technical success, fluoroscopy time, and contrast usage were similar between the post-dissection and degenerative groups. Reintervention during follow-up (28% vs 35%; P = .54) and major complications were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Endoleak was the most common reason for reintervention, with the post-dissection group having a higher rate of type IC, II, and IIIA endoleaks (31% vs 3%; P < .0001; 59% vs 26%; P = .0002; and 16% vs 4%; P = .03). During the mean follow-up of 14 months, all-cause mortality was similar between the groups (12.5% vs 21.9%; P = .23).

CONCLUSIONS

PM-FBEVAR is a safe treatment for post-dissection cAAAs and TAAAs with high technical success. However, endoleaks requiring reintervention were more frequent in post-dissection patients. The impact of these reinterventions on long-term durability will be assessed with continued follow-up.

Fate of target visceral vessels in fenestrated and branched complex endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

To assess branch vessel outcomes after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms analyzing possible factors influencing early and long-term results.

METHODS

The Italian Multicentre Fenestrated and Branched registry enrolled 596 consecutive patients treated with fenestrated and branched endografts for complex aortic disease from January 2008 to December 2019 by four Italian academic centers. The primary end points of the study were technical success (defined as target visceral vessel [TVV] patency and absence of bridging device-related endoleak at final intraoperative control), and freedom from TVV instability (defined as the combined results of type IC/IIIC endoleaks and patency loss) during follow-up. Secondary end points were overall survival and TVV-related reinterventions.

RESULTS

We excluded 591 patients (3 patients with a surgical debranching and 2 patients who died before completion from the study cohort) were treated for a total of 1991 visceral vessels targeted by either a directional branch or a fenestration. The overall technical success rate was 98.4%. Failure was related to the use of an off-the-shelf (OTS) device (custom-made device vs OTS, HR, 0.220; P = .007) and a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% (HR, 12.460; P < .001). The mean follow-up time was 25.1 months (interquartile range, 3-39 months). The overall estimated survival rates were 87%, 77.4%, and 67.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (standard error [SE], 0.015, 0.022, and 0.032). During follow-up, TVV branch instability was observed in 91 vessels (5%): 48 type IC/IIIC endoleaks (2.6%) and 43 stenoses-thromboses (2.4%). The extent of aneurysm disease (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm [TAAA] types I-III vs TAAA type IV/juxtarenal aortic aneurysm/pararenal aortic aneurysm) was the only independent predictor for developing a TVV-related type IC/IIIC endoleak (HR, 3.899; 95% confidence interval [CI]:, 1.924-7.900; P < .001). Risk of patency loss was independently associated with branch configuration (HR, 8.883; P < .001; 95% CI, 3.750-21.043) and renal arteries (HR, 2.848; P = .030; 95% CI, 1.108-7.319). Estimated rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reintervention were 96.6%, 93.8%, and 90% (SE, 0.005, 0.007, and 0.014) and 97.4%, 95.0%, and 91.6% (SE, 0.004, 0.007, and 0.013), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative failure to bridge a TVV was associated with a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% and the use of OTS devices. Midterm outcomes were satisfying, with an estimated 5-year freedom from TVV instability and reintervention of 90.0% and 91.6%, respectively. During follow-up, the larger extent of aneurysm disease was associated with an increased risk of TVV-related endoleaks, whereas a branch configuration and renal arteries were more prone to patency loss.

Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients

Purpose

The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer custom-made and off-the-shelf inner-branched endograft in a mixed patient cohort.

Methods

This retrospective, monocentric study between 2019 and 2022 included 44 patients treated with inner-branched aortic stent grafts (iBEVAR) as custom-made device (CMD) or off-the-shelf device (E-nside) with at least four inner branches. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success.

Results

Overall, 77% (n = 34) and 23% (n = 10) of the patients (mean age 77 ± 6.5 years, n = 36 male) were treated with a custom-made iBEVAR with at least four inner branches and an off-the-shelf graft, respectively. Treatment indications were thoracoabdominal pathologies in 52.2% (n = 23), complex abdominal aneurysms in 25% (n = 11), and type Ia endoleaks in 22.7% (n = 10). Preoperative spinal catheter placement was performed in 27% (n = 12) of patients. Implantation was entirely percutaneous in 75% (n = 33). Technical success was 100%. Target vessel success manifested at 99% (178/180). There was no in-hospital mortality. Permanent paraplegia developed in 6.8% (n = 3) of patients. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 0-52 months). Three late deaths (6.8%) occurred, one related to an aortic graft infection. Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year survival manifested at 95% and branch patency at 98% (177/180). Re-intervention was necessary for a total of six patients (13.6%).

Conclusions

Inner-branch aortic stent grafts provide a feasible option for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies, both elective (custom-made) and urgent (off-the-shelf). The technical success rate is high with acceptable short-term outcomes and moderate re-intervention rates comparable to existing platforms. Further follow-up will evaluate long-term outcomes.

Emergent endovascular treatment options for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.

Impact of stent-graft complexity on mid-term results in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair of juxtarenal and suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The impact of stent-graft complexity on clinical outcome after fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has been conflicting in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare mid-term results of stent-grafts with renal fenestrations alone with more complex stent-grafts including mesenteric fenestrations.

METHODS

A single center retrospective study was conducted on 154 patients, who underwent FEVAR from 2006 to 2020 at our institution.

RESULTS

There were 54 (35.1%) patients in the renal FEVAR group and 100 (64.9%) patients in the complex FEVAR group. Median follow-up of the total group was 25 months (IQR 7-45). There were no significant differences in technical success and perioperative mortality. Intraoperative complications (4% vs. 18%, P=0.001), operative time (145 min vs. 191 min, P=0.001), radiation dose (119372 mGy*cm² vs. 159573 mGy*cm², P=0.004) and fluoroscopy time (39 min vs. 54 min, P=0.007) were significantly lower in the renal FEVAR group. During follow-up target vessel instability, endoleaks and reinterventions were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center retrospective study, renal FEVAR was a safe and effective treatment for patients with juxtarenal AAA demonstrating fewer intraoperative complications and similar mid-term outcomes as complex FEVAR. If the anatomy is compatible for renal FEVAR, it might be unnecessary to expose patients to potentially more complications by choosing a complex FEVAR strategy.

Midterm results on a new self-expandable covered stent combined with branched stent grafts: Insights from a multicenter Italian registry

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the technical periprocedural and midterm outcomes of endovascular repairs with multibranched endovascular repair or iliac branch devices combined with a new self-expanding covered stent.

METHODS

The COvera in BRAnch registry is a physician-initiated, multicenter, ambispective, observational registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04598802) enrolling patients receiving a multibranched endovascular repair or iliac branch devices procedure mated with Bard Covera Plus (Tempe, AZ) covered stent, designed to evaluate the outcomes of the covered stent mated with patient-specific and off-the-shelf branched stent graft. Primary end points were technical success, branch instability, and freedom from aortic and branch-related reintervention within 30 days and at follow-up. Preoperative characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes definitions were graded according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-four patients (76 years; range, 70-80 years; 79% males) in 24 centers were enrolled for a total of 708 target vessels treated. The covered stents were mated with an off-the-shelf graft in 556 vessels (79%) and a custom-made graft in 152 (21%). Three hundred seven adjunctive relining stents in 277 vessels (39%) were deployed, of which 116 (38%) were proximal, 66 (21%) intrastent, and 125 (41%) distal. Adjunctive relining stent placement was more frequent when landing in a vessel branch instead of the main trunk (59% vs 39%; P = .031), performing a percutaneous access (49% vs 35%; P < .001), using a stent with a diameter of 8 mm or greater (44% vs 36%; P = .032) and a length of 80 mm or greater (65% vs 55%; P = .005), when a post-dilatation was not performed (45% vs 29%; P < .001) and when an inner branch configuration was used (55% vs 35%; P < .001). Perioperative technical bridging success was 98%. Eight patients (3%) died in the perioperative period. Two deaths (1%) were associated with renal branch occlusion followed by acute kidney injury and paraplegia. Follow-up data were available for 638 vessels (90%) at a median of 32 months (Q1, Q3, 21, 46). Branch instability was reported in 1% of branches. Forty-six patients (17%) died during follow-up, nine (3%) of them owing to aortic-related causes. Primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 99% (581/587), 99% (404/411), and 97% (272/279), respectively. Branch instability was associated with patient-specific devices (9% vs 4%; P = .014) and intrastent adjunctive stent placement (12% vs 2%; P = .003), especially when a bare metal balloon-expandable stent was used (25% vs 3%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of this new self-expanding covered stent mated with branched endografts proved to be safe and feasible with high technical procedural success rates. Low rates of branch instability were observed at midterm follow-up. Comparative studies with other commercially available covered stents are warranted.

Outcomes of Secondary Endovascular Aortic Repair After Frozen Elephant Trunk

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by means of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

This single-center prospective study was conducted in a tertiary aortic center on consecutive patients having undergone TEVAR with an endograft covering most of the 10 cm FET module with 2 to 4 mm oversizing. All patients were monitored by computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at sixth month and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

From January 2015 to July 2022, among 159 patients who received FET, 30 patients (18.8%) underwent a TEVAR procedure (13 for a thoracoabdominal aneurysm, 11 for a chronic aortic dissection and 6 for an emergency procedure). All connections were successfully achieved with 2 postoperative deaths (6.6%) and 1 paraplegia (3.3%). At a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-34.7), 5 patients (25%) required a fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) extension followed by 4 patients with 5 reinterventions, 3 for a Type 3 endoleak due to disconnection between FET and TEVAR endograft, and 2 unrelated to the FET for a secondary Type 1C endoleak. All reinterventions were successful, without mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, FET connection with a TEVAR endograft was effective with low postoperative morbidity but with a risk of aortic reintervention related to disconnection between the FET and TEVAR endograft. These results suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit in patients following connection of the FET with a TEVAR endograft.

CLINICAL IMPACT

In this series of 30 patients, midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) showed 3 disconnections (10%) with a Type 3 endoleak between FET and TEVAR. These findings suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit. But so far, only a few studies provide some information after one year while the risk of disconnection increases over time and becomes a concern after 3 years. This is the new message brought by our study.

Risk factors for target vessel endoleaks after physician-modified fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair for postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Patients with postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) have been more likely to develop endoleaks than those with degenerative TAAAs after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors for target vessel (TV)-related endoleaks after visceral segment F/BEVAR for postdissection TAAAs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with degenerative and postdissection TAAAs treated with F/BEVAR between 2017 and 2021. All the patients had undergone computed tomography angiography before and 3 months, 6 months, and annually after discharge. Two experienced vascular surgeons had used data from computed tomography angiography and vascular angiography to judge the presence of endoleaks. The study end points were mortality, aneurysm rupture, and the emergence of and reintervention for TV-related endoleaks.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients (mean age, 66 ± 10 years; 69% men) had undergone F/BEVAR for 99 postdissection TAAAs and 96 degenerative TAAAs. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 12 months, we found that the patients with postdissection TAAAs were younger (age, 64 ± 10 years vs 69 ± 9 years; P = .001), had required more prior aortic repairs (58% vs 40%; P = .012), and had had a higher body mass index (26.1 ± 3.4 kg/m² vs 24.8 ± 3 kg/m²; P = .008), a larger visceral segment aortic diameter (47.1 ± 7.5 mm vs 44.5 ± 7.5 mm; P = .016), and more TV-related endoleaks (18% vs 7%; P = .023) compared with those with degenerative TAAAs. Of the 99 patients with postdissection TAAAs, 327 renal-mesenteric arteries were revascularized using 12 scallops, 141 fenestrations, and 174 inner or outer branch stents. A total of 25 TV-related endoleaks were identified among 18 patients during follow-up, including 6 type Ic (retrograde from the distal end of the branch), 3 type IIIb (bridging stent fabric tear), and 16 type IIIc endoleaks (detachment or loose connection of the bridging stent). The patients with an endoleak had had a larger visceral aortic diameter (52.7 ± 6.4 mm vs 45.8 ± 7.2 mm; P < .001) and had undergone revascularization of more TVs (3.7 ± 0.7 vs 3.2 ± 0.9; P = .032). In contrast, true lumen compression did not seem to affect the occurrence of TV endoleaks (39% vs 27%; P = .323). The use of presewn branch stents in the fenestration position was associated with a lower risk of TV-related endoleaks (5% vs 11%; P = .025). In addition, TVs derived entirely or partially from the false lumen were more prone to the development of endoleaks after reconstruction (19% vs 4% [P < .001]; and 15% vs 4% [P = .047], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients with postdissection TAAAs were more likely to have TV-related endoleaks after F/BEVAR in the visceral region than those with degenerative TAAAs. Additionally, patients with a larger aortic diameter and a greater number of fenestrations in the visceral region were more likely to have experienced TV-related endoleaks. Branch vessels deriving from the false lumen were also more likely to develop endoleaks after reconstruction, and prefabricated branch stents were related to a lower possibility of TV-related endoleaks.

Analysis of predisposing factors for type III endoleaks from directional branches after branched endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Mid-term durability of branches has already been established, and BF-branched and fenestrated endovascular repair has shown comparable results with open repair in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Nevertheless, target vessel instability remains the most frequent adverse event after complex endovascular aortic repair. Type III endoleaks from directional branches have been reported with a low incidence, but risk factors for this complication have not been investigated yet.

METHODS

This was a dual-center observational retrospective cohort study. Data were collected prospectively for each patient treated with branched endovascular repair between April 2008 and December 2019. The primary outcome was to assess potential risk factors for branch disconnection and fracture. A logistic regression analysis was performed, including preoperative and postoperative measurements as well as intraoperative details. A Cox regression hazard analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of preoperative aneurysm diameter and target vessel angulation on the outcome during follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-five target visceral vessels (TVVs) in 91 patients were considered suitable for cannulation. Technical success was 96.9% (286/295 TVVs). The median follow-up was 32.5 months (interquartile range, 14.2-50.1 months). Twelve type III endoleaks from directional branches were detected (4.2%; 5 bridging stent graft fractures and 7 disconnections). Five type III endoleaks involved the celiac trunk (one fracture and four disconnections), five the superior mesenteric artery (four fractures and one disconnection), and two the renal arteries (both disconnections). The median time to type III endoleak was 22.2 months (interquartile range, 10.9-37.6 months). Preoperative TAAA diameter (P = .028), preoperative TVV angulation (P = .037), the use of a BeGraft stent graft as bridging stent graft (P = .001), and different stent types on the same vessel (P = .048) were associated with type III endoleak at univariable analysis. Using a BeGraft stent graft (P = .010) was the only significant factor predisposing to type III endoleak at multiple logistic regression. The Cox regression analysis showed a two-fold increased risk for type III endoleak for every 10-mm increase in preoperative TAAA diameter (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.72; P = .028) and a 1.5 increased risk every 12° increase of preoperative TVV angulation (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.10; P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Type III endoleaks from directional branches are a non-negligible complication after branched endovascular repair, with a relevant incidence. They tended to be clustered on specific patients, and aneurysm diameter and TVV angulation are strictly associated with the outcome. Different stent types on the same vessel should be avoided whenever possible. An intensified follow-up should be adopted for patients with large aneurysms, implanted with first-generation BeGraft, or who have been already diagnosed with type III endoleaks.

Realignment of Migrated Celiac Stent Graft After Branched Stent Graft Implantation Through Retrograde Cannulation of the Superior Mesenteric Artery Using a Single Vascular Access

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to present an endovascular management of a type IIIc endoleak (EL) in a patient with migration of the bridging stent graft of the celiac trunk (CT) after branched aortic aneurysm repair with retrograde cannulation of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA).

TECHNIQUE

The therapy was applied in a 62-year-old man who underwent a branched EVAR 2 years ago. Meanwhile, the patient was treated due to type Ia EL 6 months ago. The patient suffered in the last days from unclear hemorrhage clinically correlated with weakness. In the computed tomography angiography (CTA), an EL IIIc with a migration of the bridging stent graft from the CT branch was displayed. As vascular access, the left axillar artery was used. Due to the misaligned bridging stent graft, an antegrade cannulation was impossible, so cannulation was performed retrograde through the SMA using pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal arteries. Thereafter, the EL could be repaired with bridging stent grafts. The postinterventional control showed a satisfying reconstruction without EL or embolization.

CONCLUSION

Most of the complications such as type IIIc EL after complex endovascular repair can also be treated endovascularly. This sophisticated treatment requires that necessary materials and experience are available.

Preliminary outcomes of the LifeStream balloon-expandable stentgraft in Zenith Iliac branch device to preserve pelvic circulation: A Korean multicenter study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate early outcomes of aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysm repair using the Zenith® Bifurcated Iliac Side (ZBIS) stent graft combined with the LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent as a bridging stentgraft.

METHODS

Between August 2018 and February 2020, 38 patients (37 male, mean age 72.7 years) received 46 LifeStream stents in conjunction with 38 ZBIS stent grafts to bridge hypogastric arteries for aneurysm repair in six university hospitals in Korea. The primary outcomes were technical success rate and procedure-related complications. Secondary outcomes were bridging stent graft patency and re-intervention.

RESULTS

All procedures were performed as elective standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and unilateral iliac branch device (IBD). Mean follow-up was 13.1 months, and patient overall survival rate was 96.7%. Technical success rate was 76.3% (n = 29). Causes of failure included seven total endoleaks; six type Ic and one type IIIc from the IBD junction, one unintentional IIA coverage, and one failure to deploy the IIA stent graft. Procedure-related complications occurred in two patients: one LifeStream migration and one ZBIS stent graft migration. Overall patency rates for the LifeStream and ZBIS stents were 97.4% and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter preliminary experience with the LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent in IBD demonstrated good patency; however, an unexpectedly high rate of type Ic endoleaks was observed. Combined use of the LifeStream stent with the ZBIS stent graft is safe and feasible to preserve pelvic circulation with good patency and a low rate of device-related reintervention.

Risk factors for target vessel endoleaks after physician-modified fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic arch repair: A retrospective study

Objective

Fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic arch repair (fb-arch repair) is an effective option for treating complex aortic arch lesions, including thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections. However, the relatively high rate of re-intervention due to target vessel (TV)-related endoleaks have raised concerns. This study aimed to determine risk factors for TV-related endoleaks after fb-arch repair.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing fb-arch repair between 2017 and 2021in nanjing drum tower hospital of China. All the patients underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) before surgery; at discharge; and at 3 months, 6 months, and yearly post-discharge. All procedures are performed with physician modified grafts. Two experienced vascular surgeons used CTA and vascular angiography data to assess endoleaks. The study endpoints were mortality, aneurysm rupture, and emergence of and re-intervention for TV-related endoleaks.

Results

During the follow-up period, 218 patients underwent fb-arch repair. There were seven perioperative deaths and four deaths during follow-up (two myocardial infarctions and two malignancies). There were nine additional patients who were excluded from the study (two strokes, three with abnormal aortic arch anatomy, and four with insufficient clinical data). Among the 198 patients considered (mean age, 59 ± 13.3 years; 85% male), 309 branch arteries were revascularized. A total of 35 TV-related endoleaks were identified in 28 patients during a mean follow-up of 23 ± 14 months (median 23, IQR 26.3): six type Ic, 4 type IIIb, and 20 type IIIc endoleaks. Patients in the endoleak group had greater aortic arch segment diameters (43.1 ± 5.1 vs. 40.3 ± 4.7; P = 0.004) and a greater number of TVs revascularized (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8; P = 0.004) than those in the non-endoleak group. However, the morphological classification of the aortic arch did not seem to affect the occurrence of TV endoleaks (13%, 14%, and 15% for type І, II, and III aortic arches, respectively; P = 0.957). Pre-sewing branch stents in the fenestration position reduced the risk of TV endoleaks (5% vs. 14%; P = 0.037). Additionally, in TVs affected by aortic aneurysm or dissection, the risk of endoleaks increased after reconstruction (17% vs. 8%; P = 0.018). The incidence of secondary TV-related endoleaks after fb-arch repair was 14.1%.

Conclusion

The data from this study showed that the incidence of secondary target vessel related endoleaks after fb-arch repair is approximately 14.1%. Additionally, patients with a larger aortic arch diameter or more revascularized arteries during surgery were at increased risk TV-related endoleaks. The target vessels originating from the false lumen or aneurysm sac are more prone to endoleaks after reconstruction. Finally, prefabricated branch stents reduced risk of TV-related endoleaks.

Postoperative Outcomes and Reinterventions Following Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Post-Dissection and Complex Degenerative Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Background: The outcome of FBEVAR in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has not been well established in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare midterm outcomes following FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms to degenerative aneurysms. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing FBEVAR in a single center between 2017 and 2020. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of patients with post-dissection aneurysms were compared to those with degenerative outcomes. The primary end point was unplanned reinterventions. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of worse outcomes. Results: A total of 137 subjects with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years were included in the study, out of which 30 presented post-dissection aneurysms (22%). Custom-made devices were employed in 119 patients, off-the-shelf devices in 13 and physician-modified endografts in 5, with incorporation in 505 target vessels. The technical success rate was comparable in both groups (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.21). However, the one-year freedom from unplanned reintervention was lower in the post-dissection group (67% vs. 89%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms is associated with a favorable technical success rate, but reintervention rates remain high. Long procedural duration and the use of adjunctive techniques are associated with increased risk of reinterventions.

Endovaskuläre Aortenreparatur bei Endoleaks

Sämtliche Patienten nach endovaskulärer Versorgung eines Aortenaneurysmas bedürfen einer regelmäßigen Nachkontrolle, zumeist in jährlichem Abstand. Der kontrastmittelverstärkte Ultraschall und die Computertomographie-Angiographie (CTA) sind die wichtigsten diagnostischen Modalitäten für die Erkennung von Endoleaks. Die (CTA) erlaubt eine bessere Unterscheidung der verschiedenen Endoleak-Typen. Sogenannte Hochdruck-Endoleaks (Typ I und Typ III) stellen, wenn sich nicht kurzzeitig ein Spontanverschluss zeigt, eine absolute Indikation zur Nachbehandlung dar. Typ-II-Endoleaks weisen in der Mehrzahl einen benignen Verlauf auf. Wenn kein Wachstum des Aneurysmasacks erfolgt, kann eine Nachkontrolle im gewohnten Intervall durchgeführt werden. Typ-II-Endoleaks mit assoziiertem Wachstum des Aneurysmasacks können durch Embolisation der verantwortlichen Gefäße behandelt werden. Ob eine Behandlung immer durchgeführt werden muss, ist umstritten. Eine Behandlungsindikation von einem Typ-II-Endoleak mit wachsendem Aneurysmasack ist jedoch gegeben, wenn durch eine Verkürzung des Aneurysmahalses ein sekundäres Typ-I-Endoleak droht. Typ-I-Endoleaks stellen die Hauptlimitation der Stentgraft-Therapie dar. Die beste Prävention eines Typ-I-Endoleaks ist die Bereitstellung einer adäquaten proximalen Landezone. Dies kann durchaus bedeuten, dass fenestrierte Stentgrafts verwendet werden müssen. Die Verwendung von Schrauben oder anderen Fixationsinstrumenten zur sicheren Behandlung auch kurzer Hälse ist derzeit noch in der Studienphase.

COELIAC INCORPORATION STRATEGY IMPACTS VISCERAL BRANCH VESSEL STABILITY IN FENESTRATED ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR

OBJECTIVE

During fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR), mesenteric vessels may be incorporated with a scallop or fenestration. The benefits/harms of techniques to incorporate the coeliac axis (CA) have not been assessed for their impact on procedural complexity versus perioperative and longer-term outcomes; this assessment may instruct a balanced operative strategy for the CA and complex FEVAR, minimizing adverse intra/perioperative events, and maximizing durability.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing fenestrated or scalloped CA incorporation during FEVAR for a juxtarenal/pararenal/suprarenal aortic aneurysm (January 2015-December 2019) were reviewed (n=159) for demographics, intra-procedural/perioperative outcomes, and reinterventions to 5 years. Mean follow-up for all groups was 3.28 years. The primary outcome of CA instability (occlusion/stenosis/endoleak/reintervention) was assessed. CA-specific reintervention, reintervention-free survival, and all-cause mortality were assessed against incorporation strategy. Secondarily, the harm of CA stenting, comprising intraoperative harms and perioperative adverse outcomes was interrogated.

RESULTS

The CA was incorporated with a stented fenestration (n=74), an unstented fenestration (n=59), and a minority with scallop (n=26). There were no between group differences in operative indication, or anatomic aneurysm/CA features. Fenestrated stented and unstented patients had longer aortic coverage but the same primary technical success. At follow-up, three CA endoleaks occurred in stented fenestrated patients, although scallop patients more often had type 3 endoleaks at the SMA and renal fenestrations (23%). Elevated CA instability in fenestrated unstented patients was driven by CA occlusion (16.9%), but not associated with CA reintervention, worse reintervention-free survival, or all-cause mortality. Regression analysis for visceral branch instability revealed significant predictors of CA non-stenting and diminished aortic coverage.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the practice of not stenting a CA fenestration does not pose a perioperative or long-term clinical harm. At follow-up, not stenting the CA is associated with CA instability, however, both fenestration groups are preferable to a shorter (scalloped) endograft as increasing aortic coverage reduces non-CA branch vessel instability.

Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies Between Self- and Balloon-Expandable Bridging Stent Grafts in Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

PURPOSE

Currently there is no robust evidence which type of bridging stent graft provides better outcomes after branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR). Self-expanding (SESG) and balloon-expandable (BESG) stent grafts are both commonly used to connect branches to their respective target vessels (TV). The aim of the current review was to evaluate the impact of the type of bridging stent grafts on TV outcomes during the mid-term follow-up after BEVAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study protocol was registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42021274766). A search of the English literature was conducted, using PubMed and EMBASE databases via Ovid and Cochrane database via CENTRAL, from inception to June 30, 2021, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Only comparative studies on BEVAR reporting TV outcomes related to BESG vs SESG were considered eligible. Individual studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The primary outcomes were primary patency, freedom from endoleak, TV instability, and re-intervention between BESG and SESG, used as bridging stents in branches. The outcomes were summarized as odds ratio along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI), through a paired meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Five out of 609 articles published from 2016 to 2020 were included in the analysis. In total, 1406 TV were revascularized, 547 (38.9 %) with BESGs and 859 with SESGs. The overall pooled primary patency (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.09; p=.256, I²=4.24%) and freedom from branch-related endoleak (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.17-1.48; p<.122, I²=0.18%) did not differ between the stent types during the available follow-up (17 months, range = 12-35 months). In 4 studies (619 TV), SESG required fewer secondary interventions (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.23-1.83; p=.009, I²=0%) and TV instability rate was lower (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.33-1.65; p=.003, I²=0%) compared with BESG during the available follow-up.

CONCLUSION

BESG and SESG seem to perform similarly in terms of primary patency and branch-related endoleak during the mid-term follow-up. Current data from retrospective studies suggest that overall TV instability and re-intervention rates are favorable for SESG as bridging stent grafts in BEVAR.

Geometrical Determinants Of Target Vessel Instability In Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

To investigate geometrical determinants of target vessels instability in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), using a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) post-implantation analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed single-center data on consecutive patients undergoing FEVAR (2014-2021). Geometrical analysis consisted in the assessment of bridging stent lengths and diameters, stent conformation, and graft misalignment. Bridging stent length was categorized in three components: protrusion length (PL) into the main endograft, bridging length (BL) between the fenestration and the origin of the target vessel, and sealing length (SL) of apposition in the target vessel. The conformation was measured as "flare ratio" (ratio of maximum to minimum bridging stent diameter within the PL). "Horizontal misalignment" was measured as the angle between the fenestration and the target vessel ostium on CTA axial cuts. The primary endpoint was freedom from target vessel instability; secondary endpoints were target vessels primary patency and freedom from related endoleaks. Time-dependent outcomes were estimated as Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox proportional hazards were used to identify predictors of target vessel instability.

RESULTS

There were 46 patients (juxta/pararenal: n=34, 74%; thoracoabdominal: n=11, 26%), with 147 target arteries incorporated through a bridging stent. Freedom from target vessel instability was 87% (95%CI 80-94) at 42 months. Primary patency was 98% (95%CI 96-100) and freedom from endoleak was 85% (95%CI 76-93). PL (HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.22-5.28; P=.923), SL (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.87-1.03; P=.238) and flare ratio (HR 4.66, 95%CI 0.57-37.7; P=.149) were not associated with target vessel instability. By multivariate analysis, a BL>5 mm (HR 4.98, 95%CI 1.13-21.85; P=.033) was significantly associated with instability. Patients with a BL≥5 mm had a significantly higher degree of horizontal misalignment (21±12° vs 9±13°; P=.011).

CONCLUSION

An optimal geometrical conformation between the bridging stent and the main endograft at the level of target vessels is warranted to improve the mid-term outcomes of FEVAR. A BL >5mm was associated with a higher risk of target vessel instability, likely as a result of a less accurate endograft alignment. The sizing and planning of FEVAR should be performed in order to maintain a BL< 5mm.

Impact of gap distance between fenestration and aortic wall on target artery instability following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Target artery (TA) instability is the most frequent indication for secondary intervention following fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gap distance between the endograft reinforced fenestration and TA origin at the aortic wall (fenestration gap, FG) on target-related outcomes following FB-EVAR.

METHODS

Clinical data and imaging of 430 patients enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR using manufactured stent-grafts were reviewed. Three hundred and forty patients (79%) had >1 vessel incorporated by fenestration. FG distance was retrospectively measured on postoperative imaging and classified into three groups: no gap (FG=0 mm), FG distance 1-4 mm, and FG≥5 mm. Primary outcome was freedom from TA instability. Secondary endpoints included TA-related endoleak, TA secondary intervention, and TA patency.

RESULTS

A total of 1558 renal-mesenteric TAs were incorporated by 1104 reinforced fenestrations and 454 directional branches (DBs), with a mean of 3.9±0.5 vessels per patient. Mean FG distance was 2.8±4.5mm with FG distance of 0mm for 646 TAs, 1-4mm for 209 TAs, and ≥5mm for 249 TAs. FG distance ≥5mm was associated with significantly lower (p<.001) freedom from TA instability, type IC/IIIC endoleak, and secondary interventions at 5-years. As compared to DBs, fenestrations with FG ≥5mm had similar primary patency and freedom from TA instability, but significantly lower freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak (91±2 vs 95±1%, log rank=0.02) and secondary interventions (87±3% vs 93±2%, log rank=0.02) at 5-years. Independent predictors of TA instability included post-dissection TAAAs (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.4) and FG distance ≥5mm (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-1.8). TAs incorporated by reinforced fenestrations had higher primary (99±0.8% vs 97±1.0%, p=.039) and secondary patency rates (100% vs 98±1.0%, p=.012) at 5-years compared DBs, with the lowest primary patency observed for renal DBs (80±6% v 92±2% p=.008).

CONCLUSION

FG distance ≥5mm was independently associated with increased risk of TA instability, type IC/IIIC endoleaks, and secondary interventions in patients treated by FB-EVAR using fenestrated designs. Targets incorporated by DBs have lower 5-year primary and secondary patency as compared to those with reinforced fenestrations, with the lowest 5-year patency of 80% for renal branches. As compared to DBs, fenestrations with FG ≥5mm carried higher risk of type IC/IIIC endoleak and secondary interventions. Independent predictors of TA instability included post-dissection TAAAs and greater FG distance, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy and larger TA diameters were protective.

Long-term Outcomes after FEVAR for Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (jAAA) disease is safe and effective with good short- and mid-term outcomes. Durability issues focus mainly on proximal and distal seal as well as target vessel (TV) instability, and long-term data is scarce. In previous publications we have reported short-term outcomes after FEVAR while comparing early- and late-experience patient groups, as well as long-term results for the early cohort. In this series we provide long-term outcome in the late experience cohort treated with FEVAR in Vascular Center Malmö.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated in Vascular Center Malmö with FEVAR for jAAA between 2007 and 2011 were included. Data was collected retrospectively from medical- and imaging records. Follow up consisted of a clinical examination 1 month post-operatively, and computed tomography angiography combined with plain abdominal X-ray at 1 and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Primary endpoints were TV instability, reinterventions and survival. Changes in aneurysm diameter and renal function as well as endoleaks were also analyzed.

RESULTS

94 patients were treated. Median follow-up time was 89 (range 0-152) months. 280 fenestrations or scallops were employed of which 205 were stented. Technical success was 89.4%. Primary TV patency was 94% ± 1 % at 1year, 90% ± 2% at 3 years and 89% ± 2% at 5 years. 37 (39.4%) patients needed a total of 70 reinterventions and mean time to first reintervention was 21 ± 3.97 months. 5 (5.3%) patients died of aneurysm related causes and overall survival was 95.7% ± 2.1% at 1 year, 87.1% ± 3.5% at 3 years and 71.0 ± 4.7% at 5 years. A stable or decreasing aortic diameter after treatment was seen in 91% of cases. Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) fell from 59.2 ± 14.9 ml/min/1.73m² pre-operatively to 50.0 ± 18.6 ml/min/1.73 m² at end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Long-term results after treatment of jAAA with FEVAR remain good and the treatment is safe and effective. Although the need for reintervention remains high, long-term renal function and survival support the use of FEVAR as a valid treatment option for jAAA disease.

Impact of target visceral vessel anatomical configuration on early complications following endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Impact of target visceral vessel anatomical configuration on early complicatins following endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms Objectives: Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (fEVAR-bEVAR) is a viable treatment option for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms but target visceral stent (TVS) endoleak and thrombosis remain a limiting factor. This study aims to evaluate TVS anatomy impact on one-year risk of thrombosis and endoleak.

METHODS

Patients treated with fEVAR-bEVAR for thoracoabdominal aneurysms between 2008-2020 in our centre were enrolled. We recorded comorbidities, operative details, one-month postoperative CT scan (anatomical reference), and TVS behaviour: thrombosis and endoleak at one-year follow-up. For each TVS, different points were identified using a centre-lumen-line: (A) TVS origin, (B) end of branch/fenestration, (C) visceral vessel entry, (D) end of TVS, (E) 1-cm distally. We analyzed TVS tortuosity ((centre-lumen-line/straight distance)-1, in %), image vector analysis of each segment in 2D (antero-posterior, left-right) and 3D (craneo-caudal displacement), and centre-lumen-line analysis (bending in ABC and CDE). Three independent observers performed a blind analysis, and anatomical differences between bEVAR/fEVAR, and cases with/without 1-year thrombosis and TVS endoleak, were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves (Log-Rank test), and T-Test/Wilcoxon signed-ranks test respectively.

RESULTS

54 patients (72±713 years mean age; 182 TVS: 50 branches, 132 fenestrations) met the inclusion criteria. bEVAR cases had longer stents, with more caudal 3D angulation and greater ABC angulated segment. After excluding bEVAR cases (low case number), 97 fEVAR TVS were analyzed. Five thrombosis and seven endoleaks were observed. While anatomical configuration showed no association to thrombosis, it was related to endoleak: these cases presented more tortuous stents (5.97%±0.10, 21.40%±0,22, P=.011), with more angulated centre-lumen-line at ABC segment (5.69°±15.77°, 7.18°±7.77°, P=.012), and more upward-pointing stents in the origin of the stent (AB: 89.07°±24.46°, 109.09°±16.56°, P=.012; BC: 87.86°±21.10°, 113.11°±22.23°, P=.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical configuration of the TVS is associated with stent type I-III endoleak, but not thrombosis, at one-year following fEVAR. Cases with endoleak presented more tortuous stents, with a more angulated exit from the endograft and upward-pointing of the origin of the stent.

Mechanical Behaviour of Fenestrations in Current Aortic Endografts

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the mechanical characteristics of current commercially available fenestrated endografts (FE). The performance of the fenestrations according to the design were compared as the relationship between a bridging covered stent graft (CSG) and the fenestration.

METHODS

A total of 21 Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) and 17 Anaconda (Terumo Company, Inchinnan, UK) fenestrations were studied. Radial extension tests were performed, inserting two half cylinders spaced up to 2 mm in a 7 mm diameter fenestration from each device. Branch pull out force was measured to test the stability of the assembly with a calibrated 8 mm branch and two CSGs: Advanta V12 (Atrium Medical; Hudson, NH, USA) and BeGraft Peripheral Stent Graft (Bentley InnoMed GmbH, Hechingen, Germany). A branch was inserted in both the 7 mm diameter fenestrations and in a control 7 mm fenestration. Fatigue tests were performed on the devices to assess long term outcomes of the endograft.

RESULTS

Over a 2 mm vertical displacement, the resulting loading curves look similar for both devices. The force value level was 33.4 ± 6.9 N for the Cook fenestration and 54.45 ± 18 N for the Anaconda fenestration (p = .001). With respect to an 8 mm calibrated branch, the required extraction strength from the fenestration was statistically significantly greater with the Anaconda device (9.5 ± 4.7 N vs. 4.49 ± 0.28 N; p = .001). The required strength to extract the V12 CSG from a control cylindered shape was statistically significantly higher than for the BeGraft CSG (6.75 ± 2.86 N vs. 1.83 ± 0.67 N; p = .003). The surface area of the fenestration of the Cook device was increased with cycling (7 200 cycles) compared with the Anaconda device (15.5% vs. 6.5% hole surface area increase).

CONCLUSION

The mechanical performance of the fenestration can be fine tuned by considering its design. A CSG optimising the performance of the fenestration and the CGS-fenestration interface could reduce the risk of leakage in clinical practice.

Reinterventions after fenestrated and branched endografting for degenerative aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated/branched endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) is widely accepted technique to treat juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (J/P-AAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) for patients at high-surgical risk. However, the follow-up results should be carefully evaluated, especially in terms of the reintervention rate. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate the early and mid-term reinterventions after FB-EVAR for J/P-AAAs and TAAAs and their effects on follow-up survival.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2019, all consecutive patients who had undergone F/B-EVAR for J/P-AAAs or TAAAs were prospectively enrolled. Cases requiring reinterventions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with aortic dissection were excluded from the present analysis. Reinterventions were classified as follows: access related, aortoiliac related, or target visceral vessel (TVV) related. Freedom from reintervention and survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 221 F/B-EVAR procedures were performed for 111 J/P-AAAs (50.3%) and 110 TAAAs (49.7%) in an elective (182; 82%) or urgent (39; 18%) setting. The median follow-up was 27 months (interquartile range, 13 months). Overall, 41 patients had undergone 52 reinterventions (single, 30 [14%]; multiple, 11 [5%]; access related, 17 [33%]; aortoiliac related, 6 [12%]; TVV related, 29 [55%]). Of the 52 reinterventions, 32 (62%) and 20 (38%) had occurred within and after 30 days, respectively. Eight reinterventions (15%) had been were performed in an urgent setting. Endovascular and open reinterventions were performed in 32 (62%) and 20 (38%) cases, respectively. Open reinterventions were frequently access related (access, 16; no access, 4; P ≤ .001). Technical success was 95% (39 patients); failures consisted of one splenic artery rupture and one renal artery loss. Patients undergoing reintervention had more frequently undergone a primary urgent F/B-EVAR (urgent, 12 of 39 [31%]; elective, 29 of 182 [16%]; P < .001) and had had TAAAs (TAAAs, 34 of 41 [83%]; J/P-AAAs, 7 of 41 [17%]; P < .001). The patients with TAAAs had had a greater incidence of TVV-related reintervention (TAAAs, 26 of 28 [93%]; J/P-AAAs, 2 of 28 [7%]; P < .001) and multiple reinterventions (TAAAs, 9 of 11 [82%]; J/P-AAAs, 2 of 11 [18%]; P = .03) compared with those with J/P-AAAs. Survival at 3 years was 75%. Freedom from reintervention was 81% at 3 years. Patients who had undergone reinterventions had lower 3-year survival (reintervention, 61%; no reintervention, 77%; P = .02). Preoperative chronic renal failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.6; P = .02), TAAAs (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8; P = .03), and urgent primary F/B-EVAR procedures (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9; P = .01) were independent predictors of late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Reinterventions after F/B-EVAR are not uncommon and were related to TVVs in only one half of cases. Most of them can be performed in an elective setting using endovascular techniques. The technical success rate was excellent. Reinterventions were more frequent after TAAAs and urgent F/B-EVAR procedures and had a significant effect on overall survival in these situations.

Outcomes of Advanta V12 Covered Stents After Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose:

Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is a well-established endovascular treatment option for pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in which balloon-expandable covered stents (BECS) are used to bridge the fenestration to the target vessels. This study presents midterm clinical outcomes and patency rates of the Advanta V12 BECS used as a bridging stent.

Methods:

All patients treated with FEVAR with at least 1 Advanta V12 BECS were included from 2 large-volume vascular centers between January 2012 and December 2015. Primary endpoints were freedom from all-cause reintervention, and freedom from BECS-associated complications and reintervention. BECS-associated complications included significant stenosis, occlusion, type 3 endoleak, or stent fracture. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality in-hospital and during follow-up.

Results:

This retrospective study included 194 FEVAR patients with a mean age of 72.2±8.0 years. A total of 457 visceral arteries were stented with an Advanta V12 BECS. Median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 24.6 (1.6, 49.9) months. The FEVAR procedure was technically successful in 93% of the patients. Five patients (3%) died in-hospital. Patient survival was 77% (95% CI 69% to 84%) at 3 years. Freedom from all-cause reintervention was 70% (95% CI 61% to 78%) at 3 years, and 33% of all-cause reinterventions were BECS associated. Complications were seen in 24 of 457 Advanta V12 BECSs: type 3 endoleak in 8 BECSs, significant stenosis in 4 BECSs, occlusion in 6 BECSs, and stent fractures in 3 BECSs. A combination of complications occurred in 3 BECSs: type 3 endoleak and stenosis, stent fracture and stenosis, and stent fracture and occlusion. The freedom from BECS-associated complications for Advanta V12 BECSs was 98% (95% CI 96% to 99%) at 1 year and 92% (95% CI 88% to 95%) at 3 years. The freedom from BECS-associated reinterventions was 98% (95% CI 95% to 100%) at 1 year and 94% (95% CI 91% to 97%) at 3 years.

Conclusion:

The Advanta V12 BECS used as bridging stent in FEVAR showed low complication and reintervention rates at 3 years. A substantial number of FEVAR patients required a reintervention, but most were not BECS related.

Geometric Analysis to Determine Kinking and Shortening of Bridging Stents After Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

Purpose

To evaluate bridging stent geometry in patients who underwent branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR) and to correlate the outcomes with intrinsic bridging stent characteristics aiming to identify the stent(s) that guarantees the best performance.

Methods

Pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography images of all patients undergoing B-EVAR between September 2016 and April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Following geometrical features were measured: target vessel take-off angle (TOA); longitudinal stent shortening; shape index (SI), intended as ratio between minimum and maximum diameter of the lumen cross sections, averaged on three segments: zone 1 (proximal stented zone), zone 2 (intermediate), and zone 3 (distal).

Results

Thirty-eight branches (8 right (RRA) and 8 left renal arteries (LRA), 11 superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), 11 celiac trunks (CTR)) were treated. Fluency (Bard Peripheral Vascular), COVERA (Bard Peripheral Vascular), and VBX (WLGore&Assoc) stent-grafts were implanted in 10, 12, and 16 branches, respectively. Pre-operative TOA was more acute in RRA and LRA when compared to CTR and SMA, and straightened in post-operative configuration (109.86 ± 28.65° to 150.27 ± 21.0°; P < 0.001). Comparable values of SI among the stent types were found in zone 1 (P = 0.08), whereas higher SI in VBX group was detected in zones 2 (P < 0.001) and 3 (P < 0.001). The VBX group was also the most affected by stent shortening (11.12 ± 5.65%; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Our early experience showed that the VBX stent offers greater stent circularity than the other devices even if a greater shortening has been observed drawing attention with regards to the decision of the nominal stent length.

Comprehensive Review of Physician Modified Aortic Stent Grafts: Technical and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Physician modified stent grafts (PMSGs) present satisfactory results in selected cases of complex aortic pathologies. However, the technique lacks standardisation and depends on the surgeon and aortic segment. The aim of this article is to review comprehensively the technical details and clinical results of PMSGs related to patients with pathology in all aortic locations.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search (last search 20 April 2020) identified 20 relevant papers in the English language published over the last 20 years evaluating clinical outcomes after a PMSG and specifying the technical details to design it.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and eleven patients were included in the analyses, with 59% being operated on as an emergency. Ninety-two per cent of abdominal aortic segment PMSGs (A-PMSGs) were performed either as an emergency or before 2012. The main indications were available in 670 cases; 435 were degenerative aneurysms (64.9%) and 171 were aortic dissections (25.5%). Most of the endografts used were composed of polyethylene terephthalate, except for the Ankura (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China]; n = 50, 7.5%). The Valiant (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) represented 65% (n = 169) of aortic arch PMSGs (aa-PMSGs) and the Zenith platform (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) 51% (n = 139) of A-PMSGs. A snare was used to reinforce the fenestration in 458 PMSGs (66%) and a cautery device cut the fenestration in 484 (75%) PMSGs. No bridging stent was used in 47 (7.0%) PMSGs (these aa-PMSGs had large fenestrations). Technical success ranged from 87.5% to 100% and 30 day mortality from 0% to 8%. Primary branch patency ranged from 96.3% to 100% at 12 month follow up. Zero to 14% of patients experienced type 3 or type 1 endoleak at 14.8 month follow up.

CONCLUSION

PMSG is a useful technique, particularly when validated treatments are not available. However, it is a non-standardised technique and the long term consequences of modifications remain unknown.

Aortic endograft and bridging stent-graft remodeling after branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

The results of branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms are mainly dependent on durability of the graft used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling, and their impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year.

METHODS

Computed tomoangiographies of 43 patients (43 aortic main body mated with 171 bridging stent-grafts) were analyzed before and after branched endovascular repair as well as after a follow-up of 12 months. Primary endpoint was aortic main body remodeling (migration >5 mm, shortening >5 mm, scoliosis >5° or lordosis >5°). Shortening was defined as a reduced length in the long axis, scoliosis as left-right curvature, and lordosis as antero-posterior curvature. Aortic main body remodeling, aneurysm sac changes, and bridging stent-graft tortuosity were evaluated to study their correlations and the impact on the bridging stent-graft instability.

RESULTS

At 12 months, aortic main body remodeling was observed in 72% of the cases, migration in 39.5% (mean 5.21 mm), shortening in 41.9% (mean 5.79 mm), scoliosis in 58.1%, (mean 10.10°), lordosis in 44.2% (mean 5.78°). Migration, shortening, and scoliosis were more frequent in patients with larger aneurysms (p = .005), while scoliosis was significantly more frequent in type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm (p = .019). Aortic main body remodeling was significantly associated to bridging stent-graft remodeling (r: 0.3-0.48). The bridging stent-graft instability rate was 9.3%. Despite a trend toward significance (p = .07), none of the evaluated aortic main body and bridging stent-graft changes were associated with bridging stent-graft instability at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic main body remodeling is frequent especially in large and extended thoracoabdominal aneurysm aneurysms. Aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling was significantly correlated. While these geometric changes had no significant impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year, a close long-term follow-up after branched endovascular repair could predict bridging stent-graft failures.

Short-term outcomes of inner branches for endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

To report our early experience using endografts with inner branches for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated in our institution for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and TAAAs with custom-made stent grafts consisting of one or more inner branches. Data collected included patients demographics, aortic aneurysm morphology, stent grafts features, perioperative morbidity and mortality and short-term reintervention and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (18 males, mean age 70 ± 7.1) were included. Indications for surgery included TAAAs (12, 41%) juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (10, 37%), type 1A endoleaks (4, 15%) and paraanastamotic aneurysms (1, 4%). A total of 90 inner branches were used. Twenty-one (78%) of the stent grafts consisted only of inner branches and six (22%) had a combination of inner branches with either fenestrations or outer branches. Technical success was achieved in 26/27 (96%) of the patients. There was one perioperative mortality. Six patients suffered from major perioperative adverse events. Mean follow-up was seven months (range 1-23). During the follow-up period, four patients (15%) required reinterventions. Branch-related reinterventions were performed in two (7%) patients. No occlusions of inner branches occurred during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Inner branches in branched endovascular aneurysm repairs offer a feasible option for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and TAAAs. The procedures can be completed with high technical success and with acceptable short-term branch-related reintervention rates. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term durability of this technology.

Reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair of aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms requires incorporation of side branches using specially designed aortic stent grafts with fenestrations, directional branches, or parallel stent grafts. These techniques have been increasingly used and reported in the literature. The purpose of this document is to clarify and to update terminology, classification systems, measurement techniques, and end point definitions that are recommended for reports dealing with endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms involving the renal and mesenteric arteries.