Surgeon experience association with patient selection and outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

A unique technique for thoracoabdominal aortic repair for 10 years: Normothermic iliac perfusion

BACKGROUND

The modality of thoracoabdominal aortic repair (TAAR) is mainly based on left heart bypass (LHB) in western countries, while in our team, it is mainly based on a unique technique, normothermic iliac perfusion, and there is a lack of systematic reports and long-term results. To describe the operative technique and summarize the patient characteristics and outcomes of TAAR with normothermic iliac perfusion in our team in the last decade. Meanwhile, to explore the influence of different previous surgical history on prognosis.

METHODS

137 consecutive patients who received TAAR with normothermic iliac perfusionby single surgeon from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Operative details were described and data were grouped according to previous surgical history. Early operative mortality and adverse events were summarized. Survival over time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort was 42.39 ± 11.76 years old, 70.07% were male. 63 (46%) patients had no previous surgery, 53 (39%) patients had total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR_FET), and 21 (15%) patients had thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Operative mortality was 4.38%, the incidence of early paraplegia was 6.57%, and previous surgery had no significant effect on prognosis (p = .294). Cumulative survival was 92.1% at 3 years and 90.8% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The normothermic iliac perfusionfor TAAR is feasible regardless of previous surgery, as long as there are no complicating factors. And the early outcomes are satisfactory and the long-term outcomes are reliable.

Center-level outcomes following elective fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database

OBJECTIVE

Hospital volume is associated with mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (B-FEVAR) has been increasingly used for repair of complex thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms, but evidence of a center-volume relationship is limited. We aimed to measure the association of center volume with in-hospital mortality, postoperative outcomes, and 1-year survival following B-FEVAR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective endovascular thoracoabdominal and complex abdominal aneurysm repair with branch intervention (2014-2021) listed within the national Vascular Quality Initiative Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair/Complex EVAR database were analyzed. Centers were grouped into quartiles by mean annual procedure volume. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and mixed effects Cox regression were used to evaluate 1-year survival.

RESULTS

A total of 4302 adult elective F-BEVAR procedures were identified at a total of 163 centers. In-hospital mortality did not differ by hospital volume (quartile [Q]1 = 35/1059 [3.3%]; Q2 = 30/1063 [2.8%]; Q3 = 33/1120 [2.9%]; and Q4 = 44/1060 [4.2%]; P = .308). The high volume group had a higher rate of major complication (Q1 = 14.9%; Q2 = 12.8%; Q3 = 13.3%; and Q4 = 20.1%; adjusted P < .001). Physician-modified grafts were more frequently employed in high-volume centers (Q1 = 4.5%; Q2 = 18.7%; Q3 = 11.3%; and Q4 = 19.2%; P < .001), with a decreased incidence of any endoleak noted at the end of the procedure (Q1 = 34.9%; Q2 = 32.8%; Q3 = 30.0%; and Q4 = 29.0%; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, in-hospital mortality was not associated with center volume, comparing very low volume to medium- and high-volume centers (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] vs Q4: Q1 = 1.1 [0.6-1.9], Q2 = 0.6 [0.4-1.1], and Q3 = 0.9 [0.5-1.5]; all P > .05). No significant difference was found in 1-year survival between center volume groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality is not associated with procedure volume within centers performing complex endovascular aortic repair. However, complication rates and endoleak may be associated with procedure volume. Long-term outcomes by annualized procedure volume, specifically graft durability and sac expansion, should be investigated.

Surgeon volume and outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) at high-volume hospitals has previously been associated with lower perioperative mortality, but the impact of annual surgeon volume on outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI remains unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data from patients with BTAI that underwent TEVAR between 2013 and 2023. Annual surgeon volumes were computed as the number of TEVARs (for any pathology) performed over a 1-year period preceding each procedure and were further categorized into quintiles. Surgeons in the first volume quintile were categorized as low volume (LV), the highest quintile as high volume (HV), and the middle three quintiles as medium volume (MV). TEVAR procedures performed by surgeons with less than 1-year enrollment in the VQI were excluded. Using multilevel logistic regression models, we evaluated associations between surgeon volume and perioperative outcomes, accounting for annual center volumes and adjusting for potential confounders, including aortic injury grade and severity of coexisting injuries. Multilevel models accounted for the nested clustering of patients and surgeons within the same center. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with grade IV BTAI was performed.

RESULTS

We studied 1321 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI (28% by LV surgeons [0-1 procedures per year], 52% by MV surgeons [2-8 procedures per year], 20% by HV surgeons [≥9 procedures per year]). With higher surgeon volume, TEVAR was delayed more (in <4 hours: LV: 68%, MV: 54%, HV: 46%; P < .001; elective (>24 hours): LV: 5.1%; MV: 8.9%: HV: 14%), heparin administered more (LV: 80%, MV: 81%, HV: 87%; P = .007), perioperative mortality appears lower (LV: 11%, MV: 7.3%, HV: 6.5%; P = .095), and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke was lower (LV: 6.5%, MV: 3.6%, HV: 1.5%; P = .006). After adjustment, compared with LV surgeons, higher volume surgeons had lower odds of perioperative mortality (MV: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.97; P = .039; HV: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.16-1.22; P = .12; MV/HV: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96; P = .038) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke (MV: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .011; HV: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = .008). Sensitivity analysis found lower adjusted odds for perioperative mortality (although not significant) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke for higher volume surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, higher surgeon volume is independently associated with lower perioperative mortality and postoperative stroke, regardless of hospital volume. Future studies could elucidate if TEVAR for non-ruptured BTAI might be delayed and allow stabilization, heparinization, and involvement of a higher TEVAR volume surgeon.

Operation time and clinical outcomes for open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms to remain stable in the endovascular era

Objective

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become a routine procedure worldwide. Ultimately, the increasing number of EVAR cases entails changing conditions for open surgical repair (OSR) regarding patient selection, complexity, and surgical volume. This study aimed to assess the time trends of open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in a high-volume single center in Austria over a period of 20 years, focusing on the operation time and clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for infrarenal AAAs with OSR or EVAR between January 2000 and December 2019 was performed. Infrarenal AAA was defined as the presence of a >10-mm aortic neck. Cases with ruptured or juxtarenal AAAs were excluded from the analysis. Two cohorts of patients treated with OSR at different time periods, namely, 2000-2009 and 2010-2019, were assessed regarding demographical and procedure details and clinical outcomes. The time periods were defined based on the increasing single-center trend toward the EVAR approach from 2010 onward.

Results

A total of 743 OSR and 766 EVAR procedures were performed. Of OSR cases, 589 were infrarenal AAAs. Over time, the EVAR to OSR ratio was stable at around 50:50 (p = 0.488). After 2010, history of coronary arterial bypass (13.4% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.027), coronary artery disease (38.1% vs. 25.1%, p = 0.004), peripheral vascular disease (35.1% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.001), and smoking (61.6% vs. 34.3%, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Age decreased from 68 to 66 years (p = 0.023). The operation time for OSR remained stable (215 vs. 225 min, first vs. second time period, respectively, p = 0.354). The intraoperative (5.8% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.502) and postoperative (18.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.479) complication rates also remained stable. The 30-day mortality rate did not change over both time periods (3.0% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.666).

Conclusion

Balanced EVAR to OSR ratio, similar complexity of cases, and volume over the two decades in OSR showed stable OSR time without compromise in clinical outcomes.

Low-volume surgeons can have better outcomes at certain hospital settings for open abdominal aortic repairs

OBJECTIVE

The volume-outcomes relationship is cross-cutting among open abdominal aortic operations, where higher-volume surgeons have better perioperative outcomes. However, there has been minimal focus on low-volume surgeons and how to improve their outcomes. This study sought to identify if there are any differences in outcomes among low-volume surgeons for open abdominal aortic surgeries by different hospital settings.

METHODS

We used the 2012-2019 Vascular Quality Initiative registry to identify all patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery for aneurysmal or aorto-iliac occlusive disease by a low-volume surgeon (<7 operations annually). We categorized high-volume hospitals using three distinct definitions: those that performed ≥10 operations annually, those with at least one high-volume surgeon, and by the number of surgeons (1-2 surgeons, 3-4 surgeons, 5-7 surgeons, and 8+ surgeons). Outcomes included 30-day perioperative mortality, overall complications, and failure-to-rescue. We compared outcomes among low-volume surgeons using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions across each of these three hospital categorizations.

RESULTS

Among 14,110 patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery, 10,252 (7 3%) were performed by 1155 low-volume surgeons. Two-thirds of these patients (66%) underwent their surgery at a high-volume hospital, fewer than one-third (30%) at a hospital that had at least one high-volume surgeon, and one-half (49%) at hospitals with at least five surgeons. Among all patients operated on by low-volume surgeons, rates of 30-day mortality were 3.8%, perioperative complications were 35.3%, and failure-to-rescue were 9.9%. Low-volume surgeons operating at high-volume hospitals for aneurysmal disease had lower rates of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.90) and failure-to-rescue (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98), but similar rates of complications (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.27). Similarly, patients undergoing their operation at hospitals that had at least one high-volume surgeon had lower rates of death (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99) for aneurysmal disease. Patient outcomes among low-volume surgeons for aorto-iliac occlusive disease did not vary by hospital setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing open abdominal aortic surgery have a low-volume surgeon, where outcomes are slightly better for those taking place at a high-volume hospital. Focused and incentivized interventions may be needed to improve outcomes among low-volume surgeons across all practice settings.

Safety and Cost Savings Associated with Reduced Inpatient Hospitalization for Microvascular Decompression

OBJECTIVES

Microvascular decompression (MVD) has grown as a first-line surgical intervention for severe facial pain from trigeminal neuralgia and/or hemifacial spasm. We sought to examine the safety and cost-benefits of discharging patients with MVD within 1 day of admission.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing MVD at our institution from 2008 to 2020. Patients were sorted by 1 day, 2 days, or >2 days until discharge and by year from 2008 to 2013, 2014 to 2018, or 2019 to 2020. Patient presenting characteristics, intraoperative measures, and complications were documented. Statistical differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance and χ2 analyses.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 976 patients undergoing MVD, with 231 (23.6%) between 2008 and 2013, 517 (52.9%) between 2014 and 2018, and 228 (23.3%) between 2019 and 2020. Over time, postoperative admission rates to the critical care unit, total inpatient hospital admission times, and Barrow Neurological Institute scores at first follow-up decreased. Postoperative complications, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, decreased significantly. In addition, patients discharged within 1 day of admission incurred a total hospital cost of $26,689, which was $3588 lower than patients discharged within more than 1 day of admission, P < 0.0001. Discharging carefully selected patients who are appropriate for discharge within 1 day of admission could translate to a potential cost-savings of $255,346 per year in our clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, MVDs are a safe, elective intervention. Our findings suggest that postoperative day 1 discharge in patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course may be safe while improving hospital resource use.

Mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have focused on patient-related risk factors to explain the higher mortality risk in women undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether hospital-related factors influence outcomes following AAA repair in women.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective AAA repair in 61 hospitals in the Netherlands were identified from the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit registry (2013-2018). A mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of sex on in-hospital and/or 30-day mortality. This analysis accounted for possible correlation of outcomes among patients who were treated in the same hospital, by adding a hospital-specific random effect to the statistical model. The analysis adjusted for patient-related risk factors and hospital volume of open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

RESULTS

Some 12 034 patients were included in the analysis. The mortality rate was higher in women than among men: 53 of 1780 (3.0 per cent) versus 152 of 10 254 (1.5 per cent) respectively. Female sex was significantly associated with mortality after correction for patient- and hospital-related factors (odds ratio 1.68, 95 per cent c.i. 1.20 to 2.37). OSR volume was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.91 (0.85 to 0.95) per 10-procedure increase) whereas no such relationship was identified with EVAR volume (OR 1.03 (1.01 to 1.05) per 10-procedure increase).

CONCLUSION

Women are at higher risk of death after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair irrespective of patient- and hospital-related factors.

miR-124a Involves in the Regulation of Wnt/β-Catenin and P53 Pathways to Inhibit Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm via Targeting BRD4

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) belongs to a progressive, gradual aortic rupture, which can lead to death without surgical intervention. The key factors regulating the occurrence and progress of AAA are not clear. Increasing studies have indicated that microRNA (miRNA) plays an important role in cancer development. miR-124a serves as a tumor suppressor in several neoplasms, and its upregulation can greatly inhibit the life activities such as malignant growth and migration of tumor cells.

AIM

The objective of this study is to explore the association of miR-124a with AAA and to uncover the regulated mechanism of miR-124a on AAA progression.

METHODS

The specimens from the AAA patients were used for observing the miR-124a expression, and human aortic endothelial cells (hAoECs) were treated with AngII to establish the AAA cell models. The quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), CCK-8, transwell assay, flow cytometry assay, and western blot were conducted to unearth the regulation mechanism of miR-124a on AAA, and the dual-luciferase reporter assay was employed to investigate the downstream target of miR-124a.

RESULTS

miR-124a was significantly downregulated in the whole blood of the patients, and the decreased miR-124a was also observed in AAA cell models. Overexpressing miR-124a could effectively inhibit the proliferation and migration and promote the apoptosis of the AAA cells. The dual-luciferase reporter assay confirmed that BRD4 was a downstream target of miR-124a, and BRD4 upregulation could obviously reverse the effects of miR-124a on the phenotype of AAA cells. Moreover, it was found that miR-124a could regulate the activities of Wnt/β-catenin and P53 pathways via targeting the BRD4.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that miR-124a could regulate the activities of Wnt/β-catenin and P53 to suppress the AAA progression via targeting the BRD4.

The relationship between cardiac surgeon experience and average patient risk profile: CA and NY statewide analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unknown how high and low-risk cases are distributed among cardiac surgeons of different experience levels. The purpose of this study was to determine if high and low-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) cases are distributed among surgeons in such a way that would optimize outcomes in light of recent studies that show mid-career surgeons may obtain better patient outcomes on more complex cases.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study using aggregated New York (NY) and California (CA) statewide surgeon-level outcome data, including 336 cardiac surgeons who performed 43,604 CABGs. The surgeon observed and expected mortality rates (OMR and EMR) were collected and the number of years-in-practice was determined by searching for surgeon training history on online registries. Loess and linear regression models were used to characterize the relationship between surgeon EMR and surgeon years-in-practice.

RESULTS

The median number of surgeon years-in-practice was 20 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-28) with a median annual case volume of 46 (IQR 19, 70.25). The median surgeon observed to expected mortality (O:E) ratio was 0.87 (IQR 0.19-1.4). Median EMR for CA surgeons was 2.42% and 1.44% for NY surgeons. Linear regression models showed EMR was similar across years in practice. Regression models also showed surgeon O:E ratios were similar across years-in-practice.

CONCLUSION

High and low-risk CABG cases are relatively equally distributed among surgeons of differing experience levels. This equal distribution of high and low-risk cases does not reflect a triaging of more complex cases to more experienced surgeons, which prior research shows may optimize patient outcomes.