Impact of intentional accessory renal artery coverage on renal outcomes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

Modified Ex Vivo Renal Reconstruction to Facilitate Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of a Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

PURPOSE

To report the use of modified ex vivo renal artery (RA) reconstruction in a patient with 2 small right RAs (RRAs) in anticipation of planned fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA).

CASE REPORT

A staged hybrid repair was utilized in a patient with Extent II TAAA involving celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), single left RA (LRA), and 2 small (<3 mm) RRAs. The first-stage operation consisted of hepato-renal bypass using modified ex vivo renal reconstruction with single end-to-end anastomosis to both RAs using a saphenous vein graft. A second stage FB-EVAR was performed using patient-specific manufactured stent-graft with 3 fenestrations for the CA, SMA, and LRA 6 weeks later. The patient recovered with no complications. At 4 years, the patient had widely patent hepato-renal bypass and target vessels with normal renal function.

CONCLUSION

The use of adjunctive hybrid procedures may optimize or facilitate FB-EVAR. In this patient, salvage of 2 small RAs was not ideally suited for branch stenting but was possible using modified ex vivo RA reconstruction with preservation of kidney parenchyma and function.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This case report illustrates a hybrid approach to overcome one of the most frequent limitations to total endovascular incorporation of renal arteries, eg small diameter, early bifurcation and multiple vessels. The modified ex vivo technique allows meticulous renal artery reconstruction without the deleterious effect of warm ischemia and without the cumbersome reconstruction of ureter and vein that is needed with traditional on table ex vivo auto transplantation. The technique is used in a minority of cases and adds the morbidity of open approach. Case selection is of paramount importance.

Case Series on Double-Barrel Stenting for the Renal Arteries Associated With Fenestrated Repair (FEVAR) of Complex Anatomy Aortic Aneurysms

The double-barrel stenting (DBS) is a technique in which 2 parallel stents are simultaneously deployed through the same reinforced fenestration, into 2 adjacent target vessels. Prior reports describe the application of this technique for the treatment of superior mesenteric artery dissection with aneurysmal degeneration, coronary artery bifurcations, aortic arch branches, and intracranial aneurysms. The DBS technique is particularly useful in the context of fenestrated repair (FEVAR) of complex anatomy aortic aneurysms when the origin of visceral arteries branch off the aorta very close to each other or present early branches. We herein describe a case series including 7 patients who underwent a FEVAR procedure for thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in which the presence of accessory renal arteries (ARA) or early renal branches was the reason for the application of this technique. Technical success was 100% and all stents were patent in the last follow-up CT scan (follow-up range: 1.8-62.8 months). There was only 1 small endoleak from indetermined source potentially related to the DBS, but the aneurysm sac decreased in size during follow-up and no secondary intervention was needed. Therefore, the DBS technique is a viable option for the incorporation of ARA or early renal branches to a fenestrated repair of aortic aneurysms with complex anatomy.

Impact of Accessory Renal Artery Embolization on Renal Deterioration Under Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management strategy for patients with accessory renal arteries undergoing endovascular aortic repair is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of accessory renal artery (aRA) embolization on postoperative renal deterioration and to identify the predictors of postoperative renal deterioration in patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted at our hospital. Of 331 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair between April 2011 and February 2021, 29 patients with an aRA were included in this study. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal volume reduction rate, infarcted renal volume, and quantity of contrast use for postoperative renal deterioration were analyzed. The correlation coefficients of the correlations between infarcted renal volume, renal volume reduction rate, and decrease in eGFR and the rate of aRA diameter were also analyzed. Multivariable nominal logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the odds of postoperative renal deterioration.

RESULTS

The renal volume reduction rate and infarcted renal volume had a significant positive correlation with the decrease in eGFR. Body surface area and preoperative renal volume were significantly but negatively correlated with the decrease in eGFR. The infarcted renal volume, renal volume reduction rate, and decrease in eGFR were significantly and positively correlated with the aRA diameter. The odds ratio for decreased eGFR rate in preoperative renal volume was .96 (95% CI 0.930‒.996, P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR with aRA embolization impacts postoperative renal deterioration in patients with preoperative low renal volume, and the diameter of the embolized aRA might be a predictor of postoperative renal deterioration.

Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts for Preservation of Main and Accessory Renal Arteries in Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of reporting outcomes of complex aortic aneurysm treatment such as juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, where additional techniques to preserve renal artery perfusion are required.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent emergent and elective aortic repair with fenestrated PMEGs between March 2019 and January 2023. Endpoints were technical success, reinterventions, secondary reinterventions and target vessel patency.

RESULTS

Forty-seven target vessels in 37 patients (23 male, median age 75 years) were targeted, of which 44 were renal arteries (RAs) with a mean diameter of 5.4 ± 1.0 mm. Thirteen were accessory RAs and six had a diameter ≤ 4 mm. Technical success rate was 87% overall; 97% for main and 62% for accessory RAs respectively. Target vessel patency and freedom from secondary reintervention was 100% and 97% at 30 days and 96% and 91% at one year, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Fenestrated physician-modified endografts are safe and effective for the treatment of patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms when incorporating main renal arteries. Limited technical success may be expected when targeting accessory renal arteries, especially when small in diameter. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm durability of PMEGs for renal artery preservation.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography study of the renal arterial vasculature anatomy and its variations in a Bulgarian adult population

PURPOSE

Renal arterial anatomy has a great clinical importance during surgical and endovascular procedures. However, comprehensive data on renal arterial variations in the Bulgarian population has not yet been provided. The aim of this study was to conduct a detailed research about the normal anatomy and variations of the renal arteries in the Bulgarian population.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-one patients underwent contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography scans for the period 2016-2021. The images were retrospectively reviewed. Number, branching pattern, origin level and course of the renal arteries were noted. Data were categorized on the basis of laterality, gender and symmetry.

RESULTS

Only 46.3% of the patients exhibited normal renal arterial anatomy. Variations were observed in 301 patients (53.7%). The most common variant was the presence of accessory renal arteries (ARA), discovered in 41.2% of the subjects. There was no significant difference based on gender and laterality (p > 0.05). Hilar ARA (72.6%) were significantly more common than polar ARA (p < 0.001). The most common origin location of the main renal arteries and ARA was the aorta, followed by the common iliac arteries. Early division was observed in 21.7% of the patients, significantly more common on the right. Precaval course was found in 0.5% of the right main renal arteries and in 30% of ARA and the difference was significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results show novel insight into the prevalence of renal arterial variations in the Bulgarian population. Anatomic renal vasculature variants are common therefore awareness is crucial for the success of surgical and interventional procedures.

Reconstruction of the accessory renal artery with autogenous vessels in aortic hybrid surgery: A case report

OBJECTIVE

Accessory renal artery (ARA) is a common variant of renal vessels. Currently, there are some controversies about reconstruction strategy and few cases reported in the literature. Individualized treatment should be carried out according to preoperative renal function evaluation and technical level.

METHODS

In this paper, a 50-year-old male patient was reported, who developed a dissecting aneurysm after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and needed further intervention. Imaging showed that the left kidney was supplied by bilateral renal artery (false lumens), and there were left renal malperfusion complicated with abnormal renal function.

RESULTS

Autologous blood vessels were used to successfully reconstruct ARA with during hybrid surgery. Renal perfusion and renal function recovered rapidly after operation. There was no abnormality in renal indexes after 3 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

It is beneficial and necessary to reconstruct ARA for patients with renal malperfusion or abnormal renal function before operation.

Postoperative management in patients with complex aortic aneurysms

Patients with complex aortic aneurysms (CAA) are often high risk due to advanced age and widespread atherosclerosis affecting numerous vascular territories. Therefore, a thorough perioperative evaluation is needed prior to performing in any type of aortic repair, regardless of whether an endovascular or open surgical approach is selected. Because these operations are technically demanding and often result in end organ ischemia, it is not surprising that complex aortic repair carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Disabling complications such as dialysis, major stroke and paraplegia constitute the main limitation of complex aortic repair. The aim of this article was to review postoperative management to mitigate complications after CAA repair.

The preservation of accessory renal arteries should be considered the treatment of choice in complex endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate renal function and renal parenchymal length changes secondary to the coverage or preservation of accessory renal arteries (ARA) in complex aortic repair.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (f-b EVAR) who present ARA. Two groups were created, a preserved ARA group, with incorporation of the vessel as a dedicated fenestration or branch in the endograft plan, and a non-preserved ARA group, without incorporation of them. Early >30% decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), kidney infarcts and endoleaks (EL) were evaluated. Mid-term results with freedom from kidney shrinkage (defined as length decrease > 10%) at follow-up, freedom from GFR decrease >30% or need for postoperative dialysis at follow-up were also analyzed. Primary assisted patency of incorporated ARA was calculated.

RESULTS

From 2011-2020, 145 patients undergoing complex aortic repair presented with an ARA. After excluding ruptured aneurysms, 33 patients had the ARA preserved with their incorporation into the stentgraft (preserved ARA group), and 99 did not have preservation of them (not-preserved ARA group). There were no statistical differences in demographics or type of aneurysm. Patients in the ARA-preserved group had more ARA (median of 2 per patient vs 1 in the non-preserved ARA group, p 0,01) and bigger ARA (median 4 vs 3 mm in the non-preserved ARA group, p 0,001).Early postoperative worsening >30% of GFR (23 vs 6%, p 0,03) as well as postoperative renal infarction (57% vs 6%, p 0,001) and ARA-related EL (20 vs 0%, p 0,01) were statistically higher for the not-preserved ARA group.Mid-term kidney length showed significant shrinkage in the not-preserved ARA group compared to the ARA preserved group (9,7 vs 0%, p 0,001). Freedom from >30% GFR decline at 2 years was significantly higher for the preserved ARA group (83% vs 47%, p 0,01).Two-years primary assisted patency of incorporated ARA was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

In complex aortic repair incorporation of ARA is feasible, with low complications and good primary assisted patency at 2 years. It leads to less postoperative early renal dysfunction as well as higher freedom for mid-term renal disfunction and kidney shrinkage.

Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta

BACKGROUND

The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.

METHODS

An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I² = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I² = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I² = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I² = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I² = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I² = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I² = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.

Midterm Outcomes of a Prospective, Nonrandomized Study to Evaluate Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Using Fenestrated-Branched Endografts

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the midterm outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of pararenal (PRA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

FB-EVAR has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to open repair, but there is limited midterm data.

METHODS

A total of 430 patients (302 males, mean age 74 ± 8 years) treated by FB-EVAR were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized investigational device exemption study. Endpoints included 30-day mortality and major adverse events (MAEs), freedom from all cause and aortic-related mortality, target vessel patency, and freedom from secondary intervention and target vessel instability.

RESULTS

There were 133 PRAs and 297 TAAAs with 1673 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches (3.9 ± 0.5 vessels/patient). At 30 days or within the hospital stay if longer than 30 days, there were 4 (0.9%) deaths. MAEs included new-onset dialysis in 8 patients (2%), permanent paraplegia or stroke in 10 patients each (2%), and respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy in 2 patients (0.5%). After a mean follow-up of 26 ± 20 months, there were 3 (0.7%) aortic-related deaths from SMA stent occlusion, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or complications of open arch repair. At 5 years, freedom from all-cause and aortic-related mortality were 57% ± 5% and 98% ± 1%, respectively. Freedom from secondary intervention was 64% ± 4%, primary target vessel patency was 94% ± 1%, and freedom from target vessel instability was 89% ± 2% at same interval. One patient (0.2%) had nonfatal aneurysm treated using endovascular repair.

CONCLUSION

FB-EVAR is safe and effective for treatment of PRA and TAAAs with low rate of aortic-related mortality and aneurysm rupture on midterm follow-up.