1
|
Krafcik BM, Gladders B, Jarmel I, Moore K, Cai M, Fowler X, Suckow BD, Stone DH, Columbo JA, Davies L, Goodney PP. The Sustained Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Vascular Surgical Care Delivery. Ann Vasc Surg 2024:S0890-5096(24)00244-9. [PMID: 38815917 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated postponement of vascular surgery procedures nationally. Whether procedure volumes have since recovered remains undefined. Therefore, our objective was to quantify changes in procedure volumes and determine whether surgical volume has returned to its pre-pandemic baseline. METHODS This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study between 2018 and 2023 utilizing the US Fee-for-Service Medicare 5% National Sample as part of the VA Disrupted Care National Project. We studied patients who underwent one of three procedures: abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair for intact aneurysms, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and major lower extremity amputation (LEA). The case volume of each quarter of 2020-2023 was compared to its corresponding pre-pandemic quarter in 2019. We then performed a sub-analysis of these trends by sex, age, and race. RESULTS We identified 21,031 procedures: 4,411 AAA repair, 8,361 CEA, and 8,259 LEA. The average percent change during the baseline pre-pandemic period from 2018 to 2019 was -4.3% for AAA repair, -8.5% for CEA, and -2.6% for LEA. Compared to Q2 of 2019, Q2 of 2020 demonstrated that AAA repair procedures decreased by 47%, CEA by 40%, and LEA by 14%. While procedures initially rebounded in Q3 of 2020, volumes did not return to their pre-pandemic baseline, demonstrating a persistent volume reduction (-16% AAA, -22% CEA, and -11% LEA). Thereafter, procedure counts again declined in Q1 of 2022 (-25% AAA, -34% CEA, and -25% LEA). CONCLUSIONS Despite a perception that vascular surgical care was singularly disrupted at the outset of the pandemic, there has been a sustained reduction in vascular surgical volume since 2019. Not only have procedure volumes not returned to pre-pandemic baseline, but it also appears that there has been a cumulative incremental impact on overall procedure volume. The impact of these findings on long term population health remain uncertain and necessitate a better understanding of post-pandemic care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna M Krafcik
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.
| | - Barbara Gladders
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | | | - Kayla Moore
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Ming Cai
- The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Department of General Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Xavier Fowler
- The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Department of General Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Bjoern D Suckow
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - David H Stone
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jesse A Columbo
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
| | - Louise Davies
- The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; The VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu H, Fang Y, Chou CA, Fard N, Luo L. A reinforcement learning-based optimal control approach for managing an elective surgery backlog after pandemic disruption. Health Care Manag Sci 2023; 26:430-446. [PMID: 37084163 PMCID: PMC10119544 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-023-09636-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Contagious disease pandemics, such as COVID-19, can cause hospitals around the world to delay nonemergent elective surgeries, which results in a large surgery backlog. To develop an operational solution for providing patients timely surgical care with limited health care resources, this study proposes a stochastic control process-based method that helps hospitals make operational recovery plans to clear their surgery backlog and restore surgical activity safely. The elective surgery backlog recovery process is modeled by a general discrete-time queueing network system, which is formulated by a Markov decision process. A scheduling optimization algorithm based on the piecewise decaying [Formula: see text]-greedy reinforcement learning algorithm is proposed to make dynamic daily surgery scheduling plans considering newly arrived patients, waiting time and clinical urgency. The proposed method is tested through a set of simulated dataset, and implemented on an elective surgery backlog that built up in one large general hospital in China after the outbreak of COVID-19. The results show that, compared with the current policy, the proposed method can effectively and rapidly clear the surgery backlog caused by a pandemic while ensuring that all patients receive timely surgical care. These results encourage the wider adoption of the proposed method to manage surgery scheduling during all phases of a public health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huyang Xu
- College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuanchen Fang
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| | - Chun-An Chou
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nasser Fard
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Li Luo
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Association of Elective Surgical Volume With State Executive Order Curtailing Elective Surgery in Michigan During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann Surg 2023; 277:223-227. [PMID: 34387197 PMCID: PMC8840988 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate changes in elective surgical volume in Michigan while an executive order (EO) was in place curtailing elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Many state governors enacted EOs curtailing elective surgery to protect scare resources and generate hospital capacity for patients with COVID-19. Little is known of the effectiveness of an EO on achieving a sustained reduction in elective surgery. METHODS This retrospective cohort study of data from a statewide claims-based registry in Michigan includes claims from the largest private payer in the state for a representative set of elective operations on adult patients from February 2 through August 1, 2020. We reported trends in surgical volume over the period the EO was in place. Estimated backlogs in elective surgery were calculated using case counts from the same period in 2019. RESULTS Hospitals achieved a 91.7% reduction in case volume before the EO was introduced. By the time the order was rescinded, hospitals were already performing elective surgery at 60.1% of pre-pandemic case rates. We estimate that a backlog of 6419 operations was created while the EO was in effect. Had hospitals ceased elective surgery during this period, an additional 18% of patients would have experienced a delay in surgical care. CONCLUSIONS Both the introduction and removal of Michigan's EO lagged behind the observed ramp-down and ramp-up in elective surgical volume. These data suggest that EOs may not effectively modulate surgical care and could also contribute to unnecessary delays in surgical care.
Collapse
|
4
|
He Y, Wang R, Wang F, Chen L, Shang T, Zheng L. The clinical effect and safety of new preoperative fasting time guidelines for elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 2022; 11:563-575. [PMID: 35402209 PMCID: PMC8984990 DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional fasting and no drinking schemes (fasting for 8-12 hours and no drinking for 4-6 hours) affect the metabolism of the body. The new guidelines put forward by the American Association of Anesthesiologists (fasting for 6 hours, no drinking for 2 hours) obviously reduce the time of fasting and no drinking, but the clinical efficacy and safety need to be further confirmed. In this study, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the new guidelines and traditional protocols was conducted to provide an evidence-based foundation for elective surgery. METHODS The articles were searched in PubMed, EBSCO, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, CNKI, China Biomedical Resources Database, Wanfang Database, Weipu, and Western Biomedical Journal Literature Database. RCTs related to fasting before surgery during the screening period were selected. Chinese and English search keywords included elective surgery, preoperative, fasting and no drinking, patient comfort, thirst, hunger, collapse, hypoglycemia, preoperative gastric volume, preoperative gastric juice pH, and intraoperative gastric volume. The RevMan 5.3 software provided by Cochrane collaboration network was used to evaluate the quality of included documents. Two professionals independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS A total of 6 studies were included. The incidence of hunger in patients undergoing elective surgery in the experimental group and control group was significantly different [Z=3.90; relative risk (RR) =0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.76; P<0.0001]. The incidence of thirst was significantly different between the experimental group and control group (Z=7.22; RR =0.21; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.32; P<0.00001). DISCUSSION Meta-analysis results confirmed that the new guidelines can significantly reduce the hunger and thirst of patients, improve their satisfaction after surgery, and can be applied clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuying He
- Operating Room, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Rongrong Wang
- Nursing Department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Operating Room, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Lili Chen
- Nursing Department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Tingting Shang
- Operating Room, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Luya Zheng
- Service Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gupta R, Mouawad NJ, Yi JA. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery: Health care systems, economic, and clinical implications. Semin Vasc Surg 2021; 34:74-81. [PMID: 34642039 PMCID: PMC8285216 DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) pandemic is responsible for more than 500,000 deaths in the United States and nearly 3 million worldwide, profoundly altering the landscape of health care delivery. Aggressive public health measures were instituted and hospital efforts became directed at COVID-19–related concerns. Consequently, routine surgical practice was virtually halted, resulting in billions of dollars in hospital losses as pandemic costs escalated. Navigating an uncertain new landscape of scarce resource allocation, exposure risk, role redeployment, and significant practice pattern changes has been challenging. Furthermore, the overall effect on the financial viability of the health care system and vascular surgical practices is yet to be elucidated. This review explores the economic and clinical implications of COVID-19 on the practice of vascular surgery in addition to the health care system as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gupta
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, 12631 E. 16(th) Avenue, Room 5405 MC C312, Aurora, CO, 80045
| | - Nicolas J Mouawad
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, McLaren Health System-Bay Region, Auburn Hills, MI; Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - Jeniann A Yi
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, 12631 E. 16(th) Avenue, Room 5405 MC C312, Aurora, CO, 80045.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Felfeli T, Ximenes R, Naimark DMJ, Hooper PL, Campbell RJ, El-Defrawy SR, Sander B. The ophthalmic surgical backlog associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based and microsimulation modelling study. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E1063-E1072. [PMID: 34815262 PMCID: PMC8612655 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Jurisdictions worldwide ramped down ophthalmic surgeries to mitigate the effects of COVID-19, creating a global surgical backlog. We sought to predict the long-term impact of COVID-19 on the timely delivery of non-emergent ophthalmology sub-specialty surgical care in Ontario. METHODS This is a microsimulation modelling study. We used provincial population-based administrative data from the Wait Time Information System database in Ontario for January 2019 to May 2021 and facility-level data for March 2018 to May 2021 to estimate the backlog size and wait times associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. For the postpandemic recovery phase, we estimated the resources required to clear the backlog of patients accumulated on the wait-list during the pandemic. Outcomes were accrued over a time horizon of 3 years. RESULTS A total of 56 923 patients were on the wait-list in the province of Ontario awaiting non-emergency ophthalmic surgery as of Mar. 15, 2020. The number of non-emergency surgeries performed in the province decreased by 97% in May 2020 and by 80% in May 2021 compared with the same months in 2019. By 2 years and 3 years since the start of the pandemic, the overall estimated number of patients awaiting surgery grew by 129% and 150%, respectively. The estimated mean wait time for patients for all subspecialty surgeries increased to 282 (standard deviation [SD] 91) days in March 2023 compared with 94 (SD 97) days in 2019. The provincial monthly additional resources required to clear the backlog by March 2023 was estimated to be a 34% escalation from the prepandemic volumes (4626 additional surgeries). INTERPRETATION The estimates from this microsimulation modelling study suggest that the magnitude of the ophthalmic surgical backlog from the COVID-19 pandemic has important implications for the recovery phase. This model can be adapted to other jurisdictions to assist with recovery planning for vision-saving surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Felfeli
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Raphael Ximenes
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - David M J Naimark
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Philip L Hooper
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Robert J Campbell
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Sherif R El-Defrawy
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Beate Sander
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Felfeli), University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Ximenes), University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Naimark), Toronto, Ont.; Ivey Eye Institute (Hooper), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Kensington Vision and Research Centre (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Sander), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|