1
|
Farber E, Zhu M, McNamara T, Cheng TW, Alonso A, Siracuse JJ. Patients Experience Significant Long-Term Social and Health Challenges After Major Lower Extremity Amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 109:291-296. [PMID: 39069122 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major lower extremity amputation is a significant life-changing event that can have long-term implications. The goal of this study was to assess long-term medical outcomes and social determinants of health (SDH) challenges in this population. METHODS A retrospective review of major lower extremity (previously mentioned ankle) amputations (2018-2022) was performed at a safety-net tertiary care center. Patients who participated in an SDH survey between 6 months and 1.5 years postoperatively were included for survey analysis. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS There were 100 patients included. Mean age was 61.5 years and 23% were of female gender. The majority (57%) were Black race, 20% White race, and 21% Hispanic ethnicity. Comorbidities included diabetes (78%), chronic kidney disease (51%), coronary artery disease (31%), congestive heart failure (23%), previous cerebrovascular events (19%), and 37% used opioids preadmission. At baseline, the majority (62%) lived at home. Guillotine amputation was performed in 24%, with definitive amputation in the following and previously mentioned knee in 67% and 33%, respectively. Median length of stay was 7 days. Readmission at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year was 13%, 30%, and 43% respectively. The average follow up was 839 days. At long-term follow up, 55% lived at home, 25% used opioids, and only 25% were independently ambulatory. In the SDH survey at follow up, 32% identified at least one SDH challenge, with younger patients more often affected (58 vs. 63 years, P = 0.031). SDH challenges consisted of food insecurity (17%), housing insecurity (13%), transportation challenges (13%), seeking employment (8%), difficulty paying for utilities (5%) and medications (4%), seeking further education (5%), and difficulty caring for family/friends (4%). On multivariable analysis, having at least one SDH challenge was independently associated with 1-year readmission (odds ratio 6.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-35.8, P < 0.001). Older age was associated with lower long-term independent ambulation (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS After major lower extremity amputation, patients have significant medical and social challenges with fewer living at home, the majority were not independently ambulatory, and one-third having at least one SDH challenge. Improvements in long-term support including medical, social, and rehabilitation services are required for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Max Zhu
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas McNamara
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas W Cheng
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea Alonso
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tullos A, Wunnava S, Medina D, Sheahan C, Chawla A, Torrance B, Brooke A, Donovan M, Palit T, Sheahan M. Vascular complications secondary to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta placement at a Level 1 Trauma Center. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80:64-69. [PMID: 38493898 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is designed to manage severe hemorrhagic shock. Popularized in medical care during military conflicts, the concept has emerged as a lifesaving technique that is utilized around the United States. Literature on risks of REBOA placement, especially vascular injuries, are not well-reported. Our goal was to assess the incidence of vascular injury from REBOA placement and the risk factors associated with injury and death among these patients at our institution. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent REBOA placement between September 2017 and June 2022 at our Level 1 Trauma Center. The primary outcome variable was the presence of an injury related to REBOA insertion or use. Secondary outcomes studied were limb loss, the need for dialysis, and mortality. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, χ2, and t-tests as appropriate for the variable type. RESULTS We identified 99 patients who underwent REBOA placement during the study period. The mean age of patients was 43.1 ± 17.2 years, and 67.7% (67/99) were males. The majority of injuries were from blunt trauma (79.8%; 79/99). Twelve of the patients (12.1%; 12/99) had a vascular injury related to REBOA placement. All but one required intervention. The complications included local vessel injury (58.3%; 7/12), distal embolization (16.7%; 2/12), excessive bleeding requiring vascular consult (8.3%; 1/12), pseudoaneurysm requiring intervention (8.3%; 1/12), and one incident of inability to remove the REBOA device (8.3%; 1/12). The repairs were performed by vascular surgery (75%; 9/12), interventional radiology (16.7%; 2/12), and trauma surgery (8.3%; 1/12). There was no association of age, gender, race, and blunt vs penetrating injury to REBOA-related complications. Mortality in this patient population was high (40.4%), but there was no association with REBOA-related complications. Ipsilateral limb loss occurred in two patients with REBOA-related injuries, but both were due to their injuries and not to REBOA-related ischemia. CONCLUSIONS Although vascular complications are not unusual in REBOA placement, there does not appear to be an association with limb loss, dialysis, or mortality if they are addressed promptly. Close coordination between vascular surgeons and trauma surgeons is essential in patients undergoing REBOA placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Tullos
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Sanjay Wunnava
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Daniela Medina
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Claudie Sheahan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Amit Chawla
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Bruce Torrance
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Amadis Brooke
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Melissa Donovan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Tapash Palit
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Malachi Sheahan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brenner M. The Role of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:311-323. [PMID: 38453304 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been utilized by trauma surgeons at the bedside for over a decade in both civilian and military settings. Both translational and clinical research suggest it is superior to resuscitative thoracotomy for specific patient populations. Technological advancements in recent years have significantly enhanced the safety profile of REBOA. Resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta has also swiftly found implementation in patients in shock from non-traumatic hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Brenner
- UCLA Department of Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue #72, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brenner M, Zakhary B, Coimbra R, Scalea T, Moore L, Moore E, Cannon J, Spalding C, Ibrahim J, Dennis B. Balloon Rises Above: REBOA at Zone 1 May Be Superior to Resuscitative Thoracotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:261-271. [PMID: 38078640 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of Zone 1 REBOA for life-threatening trauma has increased dramatically. STUDY DESIGN The Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery database was queried for blunt and penetrating trauma between 2013 and 2021. Outcomes were examined both for mechanisms of injury combined and separately and for combinations of abdominal injury with and without traumatic brain injury and chest injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score >2). RESULTS A total of 531 patients underwent REBOA (408 with blunt injury and 123 with penetrating injury) and 1,603 (595 with blunt injury and 1,008 with penetrating injury) underwent resuscitative thoracotomy (RT). Mean age was 38.5 ± 16 years and mean injury severity score was 34.5 ± 21; 57.7% had chest AIS score of more than 2, 21.8% had head AIS score of more than 2, and 37.3% had abdominal AIS score of more than 2. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale was 4.9 + 4, and systolic blood pressure at aortic occlusion (AO) was 22 + 40 mmHg. No differences in outcomes in REBOA or RT patients were identified between institutions (p > 0.5). After inverse probability weighting, Glasgow Coma Scale, age, injury severity score, systolic blood pressure at AO, CPR at AO, and blood product transfusion, REBOA was superior to RT in both blunt (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% CI 1.9 to 11.7) and penetrating (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.7 to 14) injuries, across all spectrums of injury (p < 0.01). Overall mortality was significantly higher for AO more than 90 minutes compared with less than 30 minutes in blunt (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 15) and penetrating (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 25) injuries. Duration of AO more than 60 minutes was significantly associated with mortality after penetrating abdominal injury (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 22) and abdomen and head (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 18). CONCLUSIONS In-hospital survival is higher for patients undergoing REBOA than RT for all injury patterns. Complete AO by REBOA or RT should be limited to less than 30 minutes. Neither hospital and procedure volume nor trauma verification level impacts outcomes for REBOA or RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Brenner
- From the Department of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Brenner)
| | - Bishoy Zakhary
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA (Zakhary, Coimbra)
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA (Zakhary, Coimbra)
| | - Thomas Scalea
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Scalea)
| | - Laura Moore
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (L Moore)
| | - Ernest Moore
- Department of Surgery, Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center, Denver, CO (E Moore)
| | - Jeremy Cannon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Cannon)
| | - Chance Spalding
- Department of Surgery, Ohio Health Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Spalding)
| | - Joseph Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Orlando Health Medical Group Surgery, Orlando, FL (Ibrahim)
| | - Bradley Dennis
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (Dennis)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fontenelle Ribeiro Junior MA, Salman SM, Al-Qaraghuli SM, Makki F, Abu Affan RA, Mohseni SR, Brenner M. Complications associated with the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): an updated review. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9:e001267. [PMID: 38347890 PMCID: PMC10860083 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has become part of the arsenal to temporize patients in shock from severe hemorrhage. REBOA is used in trauma to prevent cardiovascular collapse by preserving heart and brain perfusion and minimizing distal hemorrhage until definitive hemorrhage control can be achieved. Significant side effects, including death, ischemia and reperfusion injuries, severe renal and lung damage, limb ischemia and amputations have all been reported. The aim of this article is to provide an update on complications related to REBOA. REBOA has emerged as a critical intervention for managing severe hemorrhagic shock, aiming to temporize patients and prevent cardiovascular collapse until definitive hemorrhage control can be achieved. However, this life-saving procedure is not without its challenges, with significant reported side effects. This review provides an updated overview of complications associated with REBOA. The most prevalent procedure-related complication is distal embolization and lower limb ischemia, with an incidence of 16% (range: 4-52.6%). Vascular and access site complications are also noteworthy, documented in studies with incidence rates varying from 1.2% to 11.1%. Conversely, bleeding-related complications exhibit lower documentation, with incidence rates ranging from 1.4% to 28.6%. Pseudoaneurysms are less likely, with rates ranging from 2% to 14%. A notable incidence of complications arises from lower limb compartment syndrome and lower limb amputation associated with the REBOA procedure. Systemic complications include acute kidney failure, consistently reported across various studies, with incidence rates ranging from 5.6% to 46%, representing one of the most frequently documented systemic complications. Infection and sepsis are also described, with rates ranging from 2% to 36%. Pulmonary-related complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and multisystem organ failure, occur in this population at rates ranging from 7.1% to 17.5%. This comprehensive overview underscores the diverse spectrum of complications associated with REBOA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Farah Makki
- Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foley MP, Walsh SR, Doolan N, Vulliamy P, McMonagle M, Aylwin C. Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lower Extremity Vascular Complications after Arterial Access for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): An Inevitable Concern? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:103-118. [PMID: 36796674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporise non-compressible torso haemorrhage. Recent data have suggested that vascular access complications secondary to REBOA placement are higher than initially anticipated. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence rate of lower extremity arterial complications after REBOA. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, Embase, conference abstract listings, and clinical trial registries. REVIEW METHODS Studies including more than five adults undergoing emergency REBOA for exsanguinating haemorrhage that reported access site complications were eligible for inclusion. A pooled meta-analysis of vascular complications was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird weights for the random effects model, presented as a Forest plot. Further meta-analyses compared the relative risk of access complications between different sheath sizes, percutaneous access techniques, and indications for REBOA. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS No randomised controlled trials were identified, and the overall study quality was poor. Twenty-eight studies including 887 adults were identified. REBOA was performed for trauma in 713 cases. The pooled proportion rate of vascular access complications was 8.6% (95% confidence interval 4.97 - 12.97), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 67.6%). There was no significant difference in the relative risk of access complications between 7 and > 10 F sheaths (p = .54), or between ultrasound guided and landmark guided access (p = .081). However, traumatic haemorrhage was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications compared with non-traumatic haemorrhage (p = .034). CONCLUSION This updated meta-analysis aimed to be as comprehensive as possible considering the poor quality of source data and high risk of bias. It suggested that lower extremity vascular complications were higher than originally suspected after REBOA. While the technical aspects did not appear to impact the safety profile, a cautious association could be drawn between REBOA use for traumatic haemorrhage and a higher risk of arterial complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Power Foley
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland; Blizard Institute for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Stewart R Walsh
- Lambe Institution for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Surgical Research Support Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nathalie Doolan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Paul Vulliamy
- Blizard Institute for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher Aylwin
- Blizard Institute for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Trauma Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shaw J, Brenner M. Resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta in the modern era: Expanding indications, optimal techniques, unresolved issues, and current results. Semin Vasc Surg 2023; 36:250-257. [PMID: 37330238 DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta has been used by trauma surgeons at the bedside for more than a decade in civilian and military settings. Translational and clinical research suggests it is superior to resuscitative thoracotomy for select patients. Clinical research suggests outcomes are superior in patients who received resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta compared with those who did not. Technology has advanced considerably in the past several years, leading to the improved safety profile and wider adoption of resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta. In addition to trauma patients, resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta has been rapidly implemented for patient with nontraumatic hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Shaw
- Department of Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue #72, Los Angeles, California, 90024
| | - Megan Brenner
- Department of Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue #72, Los Angeles, California, 90024.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laverty RB, Treffalls RN, McEntire SE, DuBose JJ, Morrison JJ, Scalea TM, Moore LJ, Podbielski JM, Inaba K, Piccinini A, Kauvar DS. Life over limb: Arterial access-related limb ischemic complications in 48-hour REBOA survivors. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92:723-728. [PMID: 34789696 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is increasingly used in some trauma settings. Arterial access-related limb ischemic complications (ARLICs) resulting from the femoral arterial access required for REBOA are largely under reported. We sought to describe the incidence of these complications and the clinical, technical, and device factors associated with their development. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of records of adult trauma patients from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute care surgery registry between October 2013 and September 2020 who had REBOA and survived at least 48 hours. The primary outcome was ARLIC, defined as clinically relevant extremity ischemia or distal embolization. Relevant factors associated with ARLIC were also analyzed. RESULTS Of 418 identified patients, 36 (8.6%) sustained at least one ARLIC; 22 with extremity ischemia, 25 with distal embolism, 11 with both. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were similar between ARLIC and no ARLIC groups. Access-related limb ischemic complication was associated with larger profile devices (p = 0.009), cutdown access technique (p = 0.02), and the presence of a pelvic external fixator/binder (p = 0.01). Patients with ARLIC had higher base deficit (p = 0.03) and lactate (p = 0.006). One hundred fifty-six patients received tranexamic acid (TXA), with 22 (14%) ARLICs. The rate of TXA use among ARLIC patients was 61% (vs. 35% TXA for non-ARLIC patients, p = 0.002). Access-related limb ischemic complication did not result in additional in-hospital mortality, however, ARLIC had prolonged hospital LOS (31 vs. 24 days, p = 0.02). Five ARLIC required surgical intervention, three patch angioplasty (and two with associated bypass), and four ARLIC limbs were amputated. CONCLUSION Femoral artery REBOA access carries a risk of ARLIC, which is associated with unstable pelvis fractures, severe shock, and strongly with the administration of TXA. Use of lower-profile devices and close surveillance for these complications is warranted in these settings and caution should be exercised when using TXA in conjunction with REBOA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and Epidemiologic, Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Laverty
- From the Department of Surgery (R.B.L.), Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Houston; Department of Surgery, University of the Incarnate Word School of Medicine (R.N.T.), San Antonio; Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Service (S.E.M., D.S.K.), Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland/R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (J.J.D., J.J.M., T.M.S.), Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center-Houston (L.J.M., J.M.P.), Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Hospital (K.I., A.P.), Los Angeles, California; and Department of Surgery (D.S.K.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lawrence PF. Journal of Vascular Surgery – August 2021 Audiovisual Summary. J Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
Saving lives and limbs: Challenges for the REBOA aficionado. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:477. [PMID: 34303474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|