1
|
Chou EL, Lu E, Dake MD, Fischbein MP, Bavaria JE, Oderich G, Makaroun MS, Charlton-Ouw KM, Naslund T, Suckow BD, Matsumura JS, Patel HJ, Azizzadeh A. Initial Outcomes of the Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 104:147-155. [PMID: 38492730 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) has dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality of intervention. Injuries requiring zone 2 coverage of the aorta traditionally require left subclavian artery (LSA) sacrifice or open revascularization. Furthermore, these injuries are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and long-term morbidity. Here we report 1-year outcomes of total endovascular repair of BTAI with the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for LSA preservation. METHODS Across 34 investigative sites, 9 patients with BTAI requiring LSA coverage were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective study of a single-branched aortic endograft. The thoracic branch endoprosthesis device allows for graft placement proximal to the LSA and incorporates a single side branch for LSA perfusion. RESULTS This initial cohort included 8 male and 1 female patient with a median age of 43 (22, 76) and 12 months of follow-up. Five total years of follow-up are planned. All participants had grade 3 BTAI. All procedures took place between 2018 and 2019. The median injury severity score was 2 (0, 66). The median procedure time was 109 min (78, 162). All aortic injuries were repaired under general anesthesia and with heparinization. A spinal drain was used in one patient. Post-deployment balloon angioplasty was conducted in one case at the distal landing zone. There was one asymptomatic LSA branch occlusion 6 months after repair. It was attributed to the purposeful proximal deployment of the branch stent to accommodate an early vertebral takeoff. The occlusion did not require revascularization. There were no strokes, mortalities, or aortic adverse events (migration, endoleak, native aortic expansion, dissection, or thrombosis) through 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Initial cohort outcomes suggest that endovascular repair of zone 2 BTAI is feasible and has favorable outcomes using the thoracic branch device with LSA preservation. Additional cases and longer-term follow-up are required for a definitive assessment of the device's safety and durability in traumatic aortic injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Chou
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Eileen Lu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael D Dake
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona Health System, Tucson, AZ
| | - Michael P Fischbein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Hospitals, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PE
| | | | - Michel S Makaroun
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PE
| | - Kristofer M Charlton-Ouw
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Naslund
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Bjoern D Suckow
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jon S Matsumura
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ali Azizzadeh
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Takayama H, Hohri Y, Brinster DR, Chen EP, El-Hamamsy I, Elmously A, Derose JJ, Hisamoto K, Lau C, Okita Y, Peterson MD, Spielvogel D, Youdelman BA, Pacini D. Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae179. [PMID: 38724247 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. METHODS In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. RESULTS Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. CONCLUSIONS It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular, & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yu Hohri
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular, & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek R Brinster
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ismail El-Hamamsy
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adham Elmously
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular, & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist, Huston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph J Derose
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Hisamoto
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Christopher Lau
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yutaka Okita
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Mark D Peterson
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Spielvogel
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin A Youdelman
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Davide Pacini
- Cardiac Surgery Department, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jia S, Zhang H, Jia X, Xiong J, Ma X, Xu Y, Zhang M, Rong D, Guo W. Preclinical Evaluation of a Modular Inner-Branched Stent Graft to Reconstruct the Left Subclavian Artery in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Experimental Study in Pigs. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241241921. [PMID: 38561988 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241241921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In approximate 40% of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures, the left subclavian artery (LSA) needs to be covered to obtain sufficient proximal sealing zone. To preserve the LSA during the TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) adjacent to LSA, our team designed a modular single inner-branched stent graft. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of deploying a modular single inner-branched stent graft in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Modular inner-branched stent grafts were implanted in 14 pigs via right femoral and right carotid arterial access. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and angiography were performed in all pigs to appraise the morphological characteristics of the stent grafts at the end of follow-up. The pigs were then euthanized, and tissues were collected for gross and histological examination. RESULTS The technical success rate was 100% (14/14). One pig suddenly died 5 hours after operation, and 1 pig died after completing the follow-up CTA. During the follow-up period, all surviving pigs showed good mental state, normal diets and activities. Computed tomography angiography examinations showed that all stent grafts were intact without fracture. All bridging covered stents were patent. Angiography showed that the position, shape, and adhesion of the stent grafts were good, and no obvious endoleaks were found. Histological examination showed that the biocompatibility of the stent grafts was good. CONCLUSIONS This study's outcomes demonstrate that it is safe and feasible to deploy a modular single inner-branched stent graft in a porcine model. CLINICAL IMPACT This device is the first modular device designed to treat TBAD adjacent to LSA in China. This device is a modular two-component system consisting of a thoracic aortic stent graft with a retrograde inner branch and a bridging covered stent. The modular design and the retrograde inner branch are the two important innovations of this device. Theoretically, the device could make it easier and safer for clinicians to treat TBAD adjacent to the LSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senhao Jia
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongpeng Zhang
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Jia
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Xiong
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Ma
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yongle Xu
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Minhong Zhang
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Rong
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bi J, Dai X. Editorial: Critical issues and hot topics in endovascular repair of aortic dissection. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1396852. [PMID: 38576425 PMCID: PMC10991818 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1396852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxue Bi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Precise Vascular Reconstruction and Organ Function Repair, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiangchen Dai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Precise Vascular Reconstruction and Organ Function Repair, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DiLosa K, Pozolo C, Heafner T, Humphries M, Kwong M, Maximus S. Early experience with the Gore TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis for treatment of acute aortic pathology. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2024; 10:101363. [PMID: 38130369 PMCID: PMC10731599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The Gore TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved device for zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair, allowing for graft placement proximal to the left subclavian artery origin and maintaining vessel patency through a side branch. We describe our experience with the Gore TBE device in 20 patients for acute indications, including blunt thoracic aortic injuries, complicated dissections, and ruptured aneurysms. Technical success, with exclusion of pathology and left subclavian patency, was 100% without major complications within 30 days. Our early Gore TBE device experience demonstrates safe use in acute aortic pathology without an increased risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn DiLosa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Cara Pozolo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Thomas Heafner
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Misty Humphries
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Mimmie Kwong
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Steven Maximus
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bacri C, Ata Ozdemir B, Hireche K, Alric P, Canaud L. Zone 2 Aortic Arch Repair With Single-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts, at Least 3 Years of Follow-up. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231215779. [PMID: 38049943 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231215779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to report the efficiency and safety of single-fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in zone 2 aortic arch pathologies with at least 3 years of follow-up. METHODS All consecutive patients with a pathological aortic arch who underwent aortic repair combined with homemade single-fenestrated stent-graft from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. The patients with a target vessel different from the left subclavian artery (LSA) were excluded. RESULTS A total of 63 patients were treated for a pathological arch in zone 2 with a single-fenestrated PMEG. 73% were male, and the mean age was 65 years old. 25% were treated for a degenerative aneurysm, 19% for a post dissection aneurysm and 24% for an acute type B dissection. 52% of the patients were treated as an emergency and half of those for an aortic rupture. The LSA fenestration was stented in 70%. During 30 days of follow-up, 2 strokes (3%) were reported, 6 patients (10%) died with 4 of those treated for aortic rupture and 1 had a retrograde aortic dissection. During at least 3 years of follow-up (median 49 months), no reintervention was needed for endoleaks, there was no stent fracture or stent migration. No patient died from an aortic cause. Subgroup analysis comparing the endovascular treatment for various aortic pathologies did not find significant differences in death rate or comorbidity including stroke. When comparing emergent and elective aortic repair, operating time was similar (64 vs 65 minutes), and the LSA fenestration was less frequently stented (52%) in the emergency group. There was no difference in stroke frequency. There was a higher rate of death in the emergency group at 30 days of follow-up, but no patient died from aortic cause in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Aortic arch repair with single-fenestrated PMEGs for zone 2 pathological arch disease is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. It is suitable for emergency situations. CLINICAL IMPACT Single-fenestrated PMEG for the left subclavian artery is a safe and efficient option in the short and medium term for the treatment of the aortic arch in zone 2 with 98% technical success. It allows for aortic repair and subclavian artery revascularization in a single step for all patients. It is suitable for a range of main pathologies, including degenerative, dissection-related, isthmus rupture, and embolic pathologies. Additionally, it is always available and easily utilized in emergency cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Bacri
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Baris Ata Ozdemir
- Department of Vascular Surgery, North Bristol National Health Service Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kheira Hireche
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Physiology and Experimental Medicine of the Heart and Muscles, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Alric
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Physiology and Experimental Medicine of the Heart and Muscles, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Ludovic Canaud
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Physiology and Experimental Medicine of the Heart and Muscles, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peterss S, Stana J, Rantner B, Buech J, Radner C, Konstantinou N, Hagl C, Pichlmaier M, Tsilimparis N. Expert opinion: How to treat type IA endoleakage. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2023; 31:604-614. [PMID: 36740844 DOI: 10.1177/02184923231154742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Type Ia endoleaks due to failed sealing or loss of landing zone and the adequate management thereof remain crucial for long-term therapeutic success following TEVAR. This expert opinion summarizes our institutional experience with endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid techniques in the context of recent scientific publications. The rapid turnover of technical innovations, but most importantly outcome data demonstrate the requirement for increasingly patient-tailored treatment strategies and the need for specialized aortic centers. The latter should offer a complete range of treatment options, an adequate perioperative management, and the highest level of multidisciplinary expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Peterss
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Rantner
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Joscha Buech
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Caroline Radner
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Konstantinou
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Hagl
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pichlmaier
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kwan KJS, Li HL, Chan YC, Cheng SWK. Safety and Efficacy of Inner Branched Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease: A Systematic Review. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231197395. [PMID: 37646117 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231197395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a descriptive overview on the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular arch repair with inner branched endoprosthesis (bTEVAR) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Pre-defined search terms were used to interrogate PubMed and OVID Medline databases from January 1999 to July 2022. Patient characteristics, indication for treatment, procedural data, mortality rates, postoperative complications, and reintervention rate during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS Nineteen articles were included, encompassing a total of 618 patients who received bTEVAR, most of which were double-branched (63.9%, n=395). The main indication for treatment was aneurysm secondary to chronic aortic dissection (38.8%, n=240/618) with a mean maximum diameter of 58.3±11.4 mm. Pooled mean technical success rate was 97.4±4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.1%-99.5%); 2 and 3 patients required conversion to chimney technique and open repair, respectively. Among the pooled rates of early complications, postoperative stroke was the highest (10.5%; 95% CI=6.8%-14.3%). Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality rate was 5.5% (95% CI=2.6%-9.7%). Forty patients (6.5%; 95% CI=2.5%-9.5%) required early reintervention. During a mean follow-up of 20.7±13.5 months, the mortality rate was 18.2% (n=108/593; 95% CI=8.6%-20.6%) where 12 (11.1%) were aortic-related. Pooled late reintervention rate was 9.6% (95% CI=4.8%-14.3%). Comparison of demographics and outcomes found no significant difference between single and double bTEVAR. CONCLUSION Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a promising approach for aortic arch pathologies with a high technical success rate despite a steep learning curve. However, contemporary outcomes reflect that postoperative stroke remains the predominant concern. Further experience and long-term follow-up are required to sufficiently elucidate the safety and durability of bTEVAR in the management of aortic pathologies for high-risk patients. CLINICAL IMPACT This systematic review summarized the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with different inner branched stent-grafts for the management of aortic arch pathologies. Pooled results from nineteen studies with 618 patients demonstrated a high technical success rate and an acceptable mortality rate. However, postoperative stroke remains the major concern. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate its durability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine J S Kwan
- International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hai-Lei Li
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yiu Che Chan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Stephen W K Cheng
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gedney R, Wooster M. Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Arch Disease. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:615-627. [PMID: 37455028 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Aortic arch and descending thoracic pathology have historically remained in the realm of open surgical repair. Technology is quickly pushing to bring these under the endovascular umbrella, with lower morbidity repairs proving safe in their early experience. Much work remains particularly for acute aortic syndromes, however, to understand who is best treated medically, surgically, endovascularly, or with hybrid approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gedney
- Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, MSC 25, STE 654, Charleston, SC 29924, USA
| | - Mathew Wooster
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, MSC 25, Suite 654, Charleston, SC 29924, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rohlffs F, Grandi A, Panuccio G, Detter C, von Kodolitsch Y, Kölbel T. Endovascular Options for the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch - A Scoping Review. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00316-3. [PMID: 37328096 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The gold standard for aneurysmal repair of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch has been open surgery with an established track record of good results in suitable patients. In recent years, with innovations in the endovascular field alternative endovascular solutions for pathologies of the aortic arch and ascending aorta became available. At first reserved only for highly selected patients unfit for open surgery, endovascular aortic arch repair is now being offered to patients with suitable anatomy in high volume referral centers after discussion in an interdisciplinary team. The present scoping review aims at providing an overview on indications, available devices, technical aspects and feasibility studies of endovascular arch repair both in elective and emergent situations, including also experiences and considerations from our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yskert von Kodolitsch
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pitcher GS, Newhall KA, Stoner MC, Mix DS. Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft for treatment of a subacute type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101193. [PMID: 37274439 PMCID: PMC10238452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
An 80-year-old man presented with a subacute zone 3-5 type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture and visceral and lower extremity malperfusion. He underwent emergent zone 2 repair with a Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft with inclusion of the left subclavian artery for a dominant left vertebral artery. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated. Type B aortic dissections can be anatomically complex, and rupture is a rare complication in the subacute phase. We report the novel use of a Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft for the management of type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture and demonstrate its feasibility for patients with type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grayson S. Pitcher
- Correspondence: Grayson S. Pitcher, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramakrishnan G, Beliveau L, Shinn K, Gable C, Brinkman W, Shutze W, Gable D. Real-world comparative claims analysis of a novel single-branched aortic stent graft device versus thoracic endograft placement with extra-anatomic debranching/revascularization in zone 2 aortic disease. Proc AMIA Symp 2023; 36:422-426. [PMID: 37334086 PMCID: PMC10269387 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2212585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) involving landing zone 2 can require extra-anatomic debranching (SR-TEVAR) to ensure left subclavian artery perfusion, resulting in increased costs. A single-branch device (Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis [TBE], WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) provides a total endovascular solution. Comparative cost analysis of patients undergoing zone 2 TEVAR requiring left subclavian artery preservation with TBE versus SR-TEVAR is presented. Methods A single-center retrospective cost analysis was performed for aortic diseases requiring a zone 2 landing zone (TBE vs. SR-TEVAR) from 2014 to 2019. Facility charges were collected from the universal billing form UB-04 (form CMS 1450). Results Twenty-four patients were included in each arm. There were no significant differences in the overall mean procedural charges between the two groups: TBE, $209,736 ($57,761) vs. SR-TEVAR $209,025 ($93,943), P = 0.94. TBE resulted in reduced operating room charges ($36,849 [$8750] vs. $48,073 [$10,825], P = 0.02) and reduced intensive care unit and telemetry room charges, which did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.23 and 0.12, respectively). Device/implant charges were the primary cost driver in both groups. Charges associated with TBE were significantly higher: $105,525 ($36,137) vs. $51,605 ($31,326), P > 0.01. Conclusions TBE had similar overall procedural charges despite higher device/implant-related expenses and reduced facility resource utilization (lower operating room, intensive care unit, telemetry, and pharmacy charges).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh Ramakrishnan
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lauren Beliveau
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital – Plano, Plano, Texas
| | - Kathryn Shinn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital – Plano, Plano, Texas
| | - Cara Gable
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - William Brinkman
- Division of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital – Plano, Plano, Texas
| | - William Shutze
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital – Plano, Plano, Texas
| | - Dennis Gable
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital – Plano, Plano, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Netsanet A, Cotton J, Suarez-Pierre A, Hoffman J, Aftab M, Reece B, Rove JY. Cardiac Surgeons Highlight the Need for Innovation Stewardship: Noteworthy in 2022. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 27:136-144. [PMID: 37098029 DOI: 10.1177/10892532231173090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Modern cardiac surgery has rapidly evolved to treat complex cardiovascular disease. This past year boasted noteworthy advances in xenotransplantation, prosthetic cardiac valves, and endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Newer devices often offer incremental design changes while demanding significant cost increases that leave surgeons to decide if the benefit to patients justifies the increased cost. As innovations are introduced, surgeons must continuously aim to harmonize short- and long-term benefits with financial costs). We must also ensure quality patient outcomes while embracing innovations that will advance equitable cardiovascular care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adom Netsanet
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jake Cotton
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Jordan Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Muhammad Aftab
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brett Reece
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jessica Y Rove
- University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
DiBartolomeo AD, Miranda E, Pyun AJ, Fleischman F, Magee GA, Han SM. Utilization of retrograde left subclavian branch portal of Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for physician modified fenestrated branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101135. [PMID: 36970139 PMCID: PMC10033987 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
A 75-year-old man who had undergone zone 2 thoracic endovascular repair of a symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer using a Gore TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) device (W.L. Gore & Associates) 5 years before had presented with an enlarging extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. A physician-modified five-vessel fenestrated-branched endograft repair was performed using preloaded wires. The visceral renal vessels were sequentially catheterized from the left brachial access via the TBE portal, and the endograft was deployed in staggered fashion. At 1 year of follow-up, imaging studies demonstrated a stable aneurysm sac, patent visceral renal branches, and no endoleak. The retrograde portal of Gore TAG TBE can facilitate fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
|
15
|
Vacirca A, Tenorio ER, Mesnard T, Sulzer T, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mirza AK, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Technical tips and clinical experience with the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis®. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:18-25. [PMID: 36534126 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12564-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been widely accepted as a treatment option in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections who have suitable anatomy. It is estimated that up to 60% of patients treated by TEVAR require extension of the repair into the distal aortic arch across Ishimaru zone 2. In these patients, coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) without revascularization has been associated with increased risk of arm ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord injury. The Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) is the first off-the-shelf thoracic branch stent-graft approved by the Federal Drug Administration for treatment of distal aortic arch lesions requiring extension of the proximal seal into zone 2. This article summarizes the technical pitfalls and clinical outcomes of the TBE® device in zone 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vacirca
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Titia Sulzer
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ying Huang
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liang NL, Dake MD, Fischbein MP, Bavaria JE, Desai ND, Oderich GS, Singh MJ, Fillinger M, Suckow BD, Matsumura JS, Patel HJ, Makaroun MS. Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms with the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 64:639-645. [PMID: 35970335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aortic aneurysms involving aortic arch vessels are anatomically unsuitable for standard thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) without cervical debranching of the arch vessels. Three year outcomes of a single branched thoracic endograft following previous publication of peri-operative and one year outcomes are reported. METHODS This was a multicentre feasibility trial of the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE), a thoracic endovascular graft incorporating a single retrograde branch for aortic arch vessel perfusion. The first study arm enrolled patients with an intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysm extending to the distal arch with left subclavian artery (LSA) incorporation (zone 2). The second arm enrolled patients with arch aneurysms requiring incorporation of the left carotid or innominate artery (zone 0/1) and extra-anatomic surgical revascularisation of the remaining aortic arch vessels. Outcomes at three years are reported. RESULTS The cohort comprised 40 patients (31 zone 2, nine zone 0/1). The majority were male (52%). Mean follow up was 1 408 ± 552 days in the zone 2 and 1 187 ± 766 days in the zone 0/1 cohort. During three year follow up there was no device migration, fracture, or aortic rupture in either arm. In the zone 2 arm, freedom from re-intervention was 97% at one and three years but there were two side branch occlusions. Two patients had aneurysm enlargement > 5 mm without documented endoleak or re-intervention. Freedom from death at one and three years was 90% and 84%. In the zone 0/1 arm there were no re-interventions, loss of branch patency, or aneurysm enlargement at three years. Cerebrovascular events occurred in three patients during follow up: two unrelated to the device or procedure, and one of unknown relationship. Two patients in this arm died during the follow up period, both unrelated to the procedure or the aneurysm. CONCLUSION Initial three year results of the TBE device for endovascular repair of arch aneurysms show favourable patency and durability with low rates of graft related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan L Liang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Michael D Dake
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona Health System, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Michael P Fischbein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Hospitals, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nimesh D Desai
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Singh
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark Fillinger
- Section of Vascular of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Bjoern D Suckow
- Section of Vascular of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Jon S Matsumura
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison WI, USA
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Centre, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michel S Makaroun
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yao S, Chen X, Liao Y, Ding G, Li D, Qin G, Qiao R, Sun X, Zheng Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery with a Castor stent graft. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1052094. [PMID: 36523362 PMCID: PMC9745178 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1052094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the rapid development of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), it is still a challenge to maintain the blood flow of the branch arteries above the aortic arch in Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery (LSA). The Castor stent graft is an integrated, customized, single-branch stent that enables reconstruction of the LSA. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Castor stent graft for type B aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS An extensive electronic literature search (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022322146) was undertaken to identify all articles published up to August 2022 that described thoracic aortic repair with branch stents in the treatment of type B aortic dissection involving the LSA. The quality of the included studies was analyzed using the MINORS criteria. The primary outcome measures were the technical success rate, early mortality rate, endoleak rate, and 1-year survival rate. The secondary outcome measures were the stroke rate, left upper extremity ischemia rate, and target vessel patency rate. RESULTS Eleven studies involving 415 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. The LSA was successfully preserved in all procedures. The technical success rate was 97.5% (95% CI: 0.953-0.991); the intraoperative endoleak rate was 0.1% (95% CI: 0.000-0.012); the intraoperative LSA patency rate was 99.52%; the intraoperative LSA stent deformation and stenosis rate was 0.15% (95% CI: 0.000-0.051); the early type I endoleak rate was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.003-0.035); the 30-day mortality rate was 0.96%; the early reintervention rate was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.000-0.040); and the perioperative stroke rate was 0% (95% CI: 0.000-0.005). The 1-year survival rate was 99.7% (95% CI: 0.976-1.000). The half-year LSA patency rate was 99.3%, the 1-year LSA patency rate was 97.58%, and the 2-year LSA patency rate was 95.23%. During the follow-up period, the leakage rate was 0.3% (95% CI: 0.000-0.017), the incidence of left upper extremity ischemia rate was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.000-0.035), and the deformation and stenosis rate of the LSA stent was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.046). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis shows that endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection using the Castor stent-graft may be technically feasible and effective. However, this conclusion needs to be interpreted with caution, as the quality of evidence for all outcomes is between low and very low. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022322146].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shihua Yao
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xu Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yalin Liao
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Gangbing Ding
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Dagang Li
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Gengliang Qin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruiguo Qiao
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Sun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qijun Zheng
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vacirca A, Dias Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Huang Y, Tenorio ER, Estrera A, Oderich GS. Timing of Intervention for Aortic Intramural Hematoma. Ann Vasc Surg 2022:S0890-5096(22)00614-8. [PMID: 36309166 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Intramural hematoma (IMH) is one of the acute aortic syndromes along with acute aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer. The three conditions can occur alone or in combination with overlapping presentation. Medical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment is tailored depending on clinical presentation, timing, and location within the aorta. Among patients who present with acute IMH affecting the ascending aorta (Type A), urgent open surgical repair is considered the primary line of treatment in patients who are suitable candidates and unstable. The management of IMH in the descending aorta and aortic arch (Type B) is similar to that applied to treat acute dissections in the same segment. Medical treatment with sequential imaging is recommended in patients with uncomplicated course, and endovascular repair is indicated in patients with rupture, persistent pain, end-organ ischemia, or rapid aortic enlargement. This review discusses the ideal timing for treatment of IMH.
Collapse
|
19
|
Nana P, Tyrrell MR, Guihaire J, Le Houérou T, Gaudin A, Fabre D, Haulon S. A review: Single and multi-branch devices for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies with proximal sealing in Ishimaru Zone 0. Ann Vasc Surg 2022:S0890-5096(22)00618-5. [PMID: 36309169 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Recently published experience has shown that endovascular management of the aortic arch, including sealing in the proximal zones, can be a viable option for patients considered unfit for conventional open repair. Endograft designs vary and include single or multibranch devices, with or without the addition of surgical debranching. Initial reports show that both techniques can be performed with high technical success and acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in high volume centers. Single branch devices, available off-the-shelf, may provide a treatment option for emergent presentations where patients cannot wait for the design and manufacture of a customized endograft. Double or triple branched endografts are now increasingly implanted in high-volume aortic centers. The purpose of this review is to describe the single and multibranched endovascular devices currently available for aortic arch repair, their associated published outcomes, and to discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages.
Collapse
|
20
|
Waterford SD, Ghoreishi M, Toursavadkohi S, Taylor BS. The 10 Commandments of Aortic Arch Endovascular Repair. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 17:266-272. [PMID: 35997683 DOI: 10.1177/15569845221116864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen D Waterford
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hamot, Erie, PA, USA
| | - Mehrdad Ghoreishi
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahab Toursavadkohi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bradley S Taylor
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chait J, Mendes BC, DeMartino RR. Anatomic factors to guide patient selection for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. Semin Vasc Surg 2022; 35:259-279. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
22
|
Dake MD, Brinkman WT, Han SM, Matsumura JS, Sweet MP, Patel HJ, Taylor BS, Oderich GS. Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysms with the GORE® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for Left Subclavian Artery Preservation. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1141-1149.e3. [PMID: 35709864 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE OR BACKGROUND Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has emerged as the dominant paradigm for treatment of patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. For aneurysms involving the aortic arch in the region of the left subclavian artery (LSA), branch vessel preservation to maintain blood flow to the LSA is recommended. Branched aortic endografts are an alternative to surgical revascularization of the LSA. METHODS Across 34 investigative sites, 84 patients with Zone 2 aneurysm were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective study of a single branched aortic endograft. The thoracic branch endoprosthesis device allows for graft placement proximal to the LSA and incorporates a single side branch for left subclavian perfusion. RESULTS Over half of the patients were male (63%). Their average age was 70 (±11) years. The aneurysm morphology was fusiform in 43 and saccular in 41 patients. The mean aneurysm diameter at screening was 56.2 mm. The mean follow up was 30 months (range 2.6 to 50.7 months). Reported here are the patient outcomes at 1 and 12 months. Pre-defined technical success with implantation of the device in landing Zone 2 was achieved in 92% (n=77) of patients. There were no cases of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, or new onset renal failure. There was no peri-operative (30-day) mortality. A single case each of permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred. Three patients experienced a procedure-related stroke. Through 12 months, four patients died; none of the deaths were adjudicated as related to the device or procedure. One aortic reintervention was required. A single case of aortic enlargement (core laboratory) was reported at 6 months. Type 1 (n=3) and III (n=5) endoleaks occurred in 9.8% of patients of which one (Type III) required reintervention. CONCLUSIONS Results from this device study in patients with Zone 2 aneurysm demonstrate that early safety and efficacy outcomes are maintained up to 12 months after the endovascular procedure with low mortality and reintervention rates and an acceptable frequency of procedural complications, including neurologic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Dake
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona Health System, Tucson, AZ.
| | | | - Sukgu M Han
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jon S Matsumura
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Joe D. Morris Collegiate Professor in Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Bradley S Taylor
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu J, Zhu H, Pei Y, Zhang H, Zhou J, Jing Z. A methylprednisolone-loaded and core-shell nanofiber-covered stent-graft to prevent inflammation and reduce degradation in aortic dissection. Biomater Res 2022; 26:15. [PMID: 35468814 PMCID: PMC9036796 DOI: 10.1186/s40824-022-00259-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stent-graft-induced inflammation is an independent risk factor for adverse aortic remodeling in aortic dissection. In this context, we asked that whether a methylprednisolone-loaded stent-graft could reduce inflammation and degradation. Methods First, a coaxial electrospinning technique was used to create a core-shell film with methylprednisolone encapsulated in the inner of poly (L-lactide-co-caprolactone) nanofibers for controllable drug release. Second, an in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the biocompatibility of the nanofiber meshes. Third, the porcine aortic dissection model was developed to investigate the therapeutic effects of the methylprednisolone-loaded stent-graft. Results The results demonstrated that the nanofiber-coated film with a methylprednisolone-poly-caprolactone core layer and a poly (L-lactide-co-caprolactone) shell layer could effectively sustain drug release in vitro. In vivo study showed that the methylprednisolone-loaded stent-graft could reduce degradtion of aortic dissection by regulating inflammation. Conclusions Overall, the controllable drug release by coaxial nanofiber is a promising approach to alleviate aortic inflammation and promote aortic remodeling after stent-graft implantation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40824-022-00259-5.
Collapse
|
24
|
Squiers JJ, DiMaio JM, Schaffer JM, Baxter RD, Gable CE, Shinn KV, Harrington K, Moore DO, Shutze WP, Brinkman WT, Gable DR. Surgical Debranching versus Branched Endografting in Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75:1829-1836.e3. [PMID: 34998942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization is recommended in patients undergoing elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with proximal zone 2 landing requiring coverage of the LSA. The gold-standard remains surgical LSA revascularization, but recently the feasibility of branched endografts has been demonstrated. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of these approaches. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR with proximal zone 2 landing at a single center from 2014-2020 was performed. Patients were divided into cohorts for comparison: those undergoing surgical revascularization (SR-TEVAR group) and those undergoing thoracic branched endografting with an investigational device (TBE group). Patients who did not receive LSA revascularization were excluded. Perioperative outcomes including procedural success, death, stroke, limb ischemia, and length of stay were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. The cumulative incidences of device-related endoleak (type I and III) and device-related reintervention, accounting for death as a competing hazard, were compared with the Fine-Gray test. RESULTS A total of 55 patients were included: 31 (56%) SR-TEVAR and 24 (44%) TBE. Preoperative demographics and comorbidities were similar between the groups. Procedural success was 100% in both cohorts, and there were no periprocedural strokes or left upper extremity ischemic events. One operative/30-day mortality (TBE 4.2% vs SR-TEVAR 3.2%, p=0.99) occurred in each cohort. Total operative time (minutes, TBE 203 ± 79 vs SR-TEVAR 250 ± 79 p=0.03) and total length of stay (days, TBE 5.2 ± 3.6 vs SR-TEVAR 9.9 ± 7.2, p=0.004) were both significantly shorter in the TBE group. There was no difference in mid-term survival (log-rank p=0.50), nor the cumulative incidence of device-related endoleak (Fine-Gray p=0.51) or reintervention (Fine-Gray p=0.72). There have been no occlusions of the TBE graft nor surgical bypass/transpositions after a mean follow-up for 28 ± 16 and 34 ± 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Thoracic branched endografting can be performed with similar procedural success and comparable safety profile to TEVAR with surgical revascularization, while reducing total length of stay, in patients requiring proximal zone 2 coverage. Mid-term outcomes of each approach are also similar. Prospective, randomized comparisons of these techniques are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Squiers
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX.
| | - J Michael DiMaio
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - Justin M Schaffer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - Ronald D Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center; Dallas, TX
| | - Cara E Gable
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University; College Station, TX
| | - Kathryn V Shinn
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - Katherine Harrington
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - David O Moore
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - William P Shutze
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - William T Brinkman
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| | - Dennis R Gable
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano; Plano, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Journal of Vascular Surgery – November 2021 Audiovisual Summary. J Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Schanzer
- From the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (A.S.); and the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston (G.S.O.)
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- From the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (A.S.); and the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston (G.S.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eilenberg W, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Eleshra AS, Heidemann F, Kölbel T. Bail-out technique to detach a locked Viabahn endoprosthesis in branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY CASES INNOVATIONS AND TECHNIQUES 2021; 7:593-596. [PMID: 34693084 PMCID: PMC8515410 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A 69-year-old female patient presented with a 5.8 cm thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm Crawford type II after partial arch replacement. She was treated by a branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure using a branched arch endograft with one retrograde branch to the left subclavian artery. After deployment of a Viabahn as a bridging covered stent to the left subclavian artery, the deployment line did not detach and the delivery catheter could not be removed. With the use of a physician-modified sidehole catheter and balloon fixation, the pulling line could be released without displacement of the Viabahn endoprosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf Eilenberg
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed S Eleshra
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Heidemann
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Stana J, Peterß S, Prendes CF, Stavroulakis K, Rantner B, Pichlmaier M, Tsilimparis N. [Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch - Endovascular Therapy Today and in the Future]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:479-485. [PMID: 34666362 DOI: 10.1055/a-1644-1759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Pathologies in the region of the aortic arch may occur in isolation, but adjacent segments of the thoracic aorta - the ascending or descending aorta - are much more commonly affected. The first surgical procedures to treat the aortic arch were performed nearly six decades ago. Despite numerous improvements and innovations in the 20th and early 21st centuries, these procedures are still associated with relevant operative mortality and neurological complication rates. Endovascular techniques and modern hybrid procedures are increasingly expanding the therapeutic spectrum in the aortic arch, although the open surgical approach is currently still the gold standard. Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysm was first performed in the early 1990s in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. It was not long before the first attempts at endovascular therapy were made for the treatment of the aortic arch. In 1996, Inoue et al. reported the use of the first commonly used endoprosthesis to treat aneurysms in the aortic arch. Continuous improvements and refinements in implantation techniques and also implanted material have resulted in endovascular therapy now being an increasingly important option compared to open surgical procedures in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta and has partially replaced them as the gold standard. This review article aims to provide an overview of the prerequisites, results, but also limitations of endovascular surgery of the aortic arch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Stana
- Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Sven Peterß
- Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Barbara Rantner
- Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Pichlmaier
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Standort Großhadern, München, Deutschland
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|