Effect of iliac tortuosity on outcomes after iliac branch procedures

The Bell-Bottom Technique versus Branched Stent Grafts in Endovascular Treatment of Diseased Common Iliac Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the use of iliac branched endoprosthesis reduces perioperative complications compared to the bell-bottom technique in patients with common iliac artery aneurysm or ectasia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of studies in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to March 2024. Following the PRISMA protocol, 91 articles were analyzed. A restricted maximum likelihood model with random effects with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals was applied for binary outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and Higgins and Thompson's I2 statistic. Significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Six cohort studies involving 2,899 patients were included, of which 863 underwent repair with branched endoprosthesis. There was no statistically significant difference observed for endoleaks: of any type (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.60; p=0.20), type 1a (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.20 to 6.40; p=0.90), type 1b (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.97; p=0.42), and type 2 (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.71; p=0.44). However, type 3 endoleaks were less frequent in the bell-bottom group (OR 9.00; 95% CI 1.09 to 74.17; p=0.04) . Additionally, perioperative mortality (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.27; p=0.26), mesenteric ischemia (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.01 to 2.54; p=0.18), iliac artery injury (p=0.06) and buttock claudication (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.08; p=0.06) also did not statistically differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Branched endoprosthesis and bell-bottom techniques did not differ regarding perioperative mortality rates, internal iliac artery occlusion, and mesenteric ischemia rates. However, the use of branched endoprostheses was associated with a higher incidence of type 3 endoleaks compared to the bell-bottom technique.

A Dedicated Algorithm for Endovascular Approach as a First-Line Treatment Option for Visceral Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Few data are reported in literature about visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) management. The aim of the present study was to analyze VAAs management in a single institution, with a dedicated algorithm for endovascular approach as the first line treatment.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with a VAA submitted to either endovascular repair or open surgery from 2016 to 2023 were included. A dedicated algorithm was used to evaluate the endovascular approach feasibility assessing on the preoperative computed tomography angiography the following parameters: (a) the tortuosity of the involved artery (<150°), (b) the healthy arterial diameter (>4 mm), (c) the VAA proximity to the hilum and/or the presence of a bifurcation of the aneurysmatic artery, and (d) the circumferential calcium presence. An endovascular approach was chosen if (a) and (b) criteria were satisfied without (c) and (d) ones. Otherwise, it was deemed a challenging anatomy, and an open surgical treatment was considered. In the absence of (a) and/or (b) criteria open surgery was the preferred option.

RESULTS

Thirty-one asymptomatic aneurysms (28 patients) were treated electively. The most frequent VAA location was the splenic artery (18 cases; 58%), followed by the renal arteries (6 cases; 19%), the common hepatic artery (5 cases; 16%), the gastroepiploic artery (1 case, 3.2%) and the pancreatoduodenal artery (1 case; 3%). Twenty-two aneurysms (71%) were initially treated by an endovascular approach (stent-graft deployment and/or transcatheter embolization) with 3 (13%) of them needing a surgical conversion. Nine aneurysms (29%) were submitted directly to a surgical treatment (aneurysm resection with or without interposition bypass) with no peri-operative and long-term complications. Technical success was 90.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular management as a first line approach is safe and effective in most cases. A preoperative dedicated algorithm is useful to identify suitable cases. Open surgery can be considered an alternative option in specific challenging anatomical situations or in case of endovascular failure.

Initial Experience of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Iliac Bifurcation Technique

INTRODUCTION

The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB.

CONCLUSION

The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.

Image-based assessment of aortoiliac aneurysm anatomical characteristics in patients from the global iliac branch study

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular repair is the preferred treatment for aortoiliac aneurysm, with preservation of at least one internal iliac artery recommended. This study aimed to assess pre-endovascular repair anatomical characteristics of aortoiliac aneurysm in patients from the Global Iliac Branch Study (GIBS, NCT05607277) to enhance selection criteria for iliac branch devices (IBD) and improve long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Pre-treatment CT scans of 297 GIBS patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair were analyzed. Measurements included total iliac artery length, common iliac artery length, tortuosity index, common iliac artery splay angle, internal iliac artery stenosis, calcification score, and diameters in the device's landing zone. Statistical tests assessed differences in anatomical measurements and IBD-mediated internal iliac artery preservation.

RESULTS

Left total iliac artery length was shorter than right (6.7 mm, P = .0019); right common iliac artery less tortuous (P = .0145). Males exhibited greater tortuosity in the left total iliac artery (P = .0475) and larger diameter in left internal iliac artery's landing zone (P = .0453). Preservation was more common on right (158 unilateral, 34 bilateral) than left (105 unilateral, 34 bilateral). There were 192 right-sided and 139 left-sided IBDs, with 318 IBDs in males and 13 in females.

CONCLUSION

This study provides comprehensive pre-treatment iliac anatomy analysis in patients undergoing endovascular repair with IBDs, highlighting differences between sides and sexes. These findings could refine patient selection for IBD placement, potentially enhancing outcomes in aortoiliac aneurysm treatment. However, the limited number of females in the study underscores the need for further research to generalize findings across genders.

Impact of iliac access in elective and non-elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is nowadays the establishment treatment for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) both in elective and urgent setting. Despite the large applicability and satisfactory results, the presence of hostile iliac anatomy affects both technical and clinical success. This narrative review aimed to report the impact of iliac access and related adjunctive procedures in patients undergoing EVAR in elective and non-elective setting. Hostile iliac access can be defined in presence of narrowed, tortuous, calcified, or occluded iliac arteries. These iliac characteristics can be graded by the anatomic severity grade score to quantitatively assess anatomic complexity before undergoing treatment. Literature shows that iliac hostility has an impact on device navigability, insertion and perioperative and postoperative results. Overall, it has been correlated to higher rate of access issues, representing up to 30% of the first published EVAR experience. Recent innovations with low-profile endografts have reduced large-bore sheaths related issues. However, iliac-related complications still represent an issue, and several adjunctive endovascular and surgical strategies are nowadays available to overcome these complications during EVAR. In urgent settings iliac hostility can significantly impact on particular time sensitive procedures. Moreover, in case of severe hostility patients might be written off for EVAR repair might be inapplicable, exposing to higher mortality/morbidity risk in this urgent/emergent setting. In conclusion, an accurate anatomical evaluation of iliac arteries during preoperative planning, materials availability, and skilled preparation to face iliac-related issues are crucial to address these challenges.

Association Between Aneurysm Wall Inflammation Detected by Imaging Perivascular Fat and Secondary Intervention Risk for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients After Endovascular Repair

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between the imaging biomarker (volumetric perivascular characterization index [VPCI]) which indicates the aortic wall inflammation by mapping the spatial changes of perivascular fat attenuation on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and the reintervention risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

METHODS

This case-control study included AAA patients undergoing EVAR from a single center (n=260). Cases were AAA patients undergoing reintervention after EVAR and a 1:1 frequency-matched control group of AAA patients post-EVAR with a shrunken or ≥3-year stable sac and free of reintervention signs during the follow-up. The predictive variable (VPCI trajectory) was converted to binary variables according to the changing trend of VPCI with follow-up time. As a quasi-complete separation data pattern, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression was used to screen and prove the VPCI trajectory as the best predictor, and the performance was evaluated by calculating the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, 15 AAA patients after EVAR with type I/III endoleak, aneurysm rupture, or impending rupture were included. Compared with the 1:1 frequency-matched controls with a shrunken or ≥3-year stable sac and free of reintervention signs during the follow-up, VPCI trajectories of the case group were all upward trends, whereas the controls showed 86.7% downward trends (p<0.001). The best predictive model of lasso regressions included 4 variables, and VPCI trajectory was the most outstanding, followed by the proximal landing zone, the distal landing zone, and the infrarenal β angle. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of predicting the risk of reintervention were as follows, respectively: 93.3%, 100%, and 86.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The wall inflammation detected by imaging perivascular adipose tissue based on the CTAs was strongly associated with the reintervention risk for AAA patients after EVAR, which might hold major promise as a new imaging biomarker for the mechanism and treatment study of human AAAs before and after EVAR.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The study introduces a novel imaging biomarker which indicates the aortic wall inflammation by mapping spatial changes of perivascular fat attenuation on CTA. This biomarker demonstrates a strong association with the reintervention risk in AAA patients after EVAR. Incorporation of VPCI into clinical practice has the potential to enhance the traditional surveillance methods (CT/CTAs) by providing clinicians with a non-invasive method to assess aortic wall inflammation and predict the risk of reintervention. Additionally, this study might offer a valuable tool for mechanism and treatment research in humans with AAAs both pre- and post-EVAR, ultimately improving patient outcomes and refining therapeutic strategies.

Results of iliac branch devices for hypogastric salvage after previous aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the "REsults of iliac branch deviceS for hypogastriC salvage after previoUs aortic rEpair (RESCUE)."

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs) after previous open aortic repair (OAR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) at seven centers were captured. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the type of repair originally performed. Early outcomes included immediate technical success and perioperative adverse events. Late outcomes included survival, side branch (SB) primary patency, SB instability, and new onset buttock claudication.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (82 male) were included in the study, 10 of them received bilateral implantation of IBDs. This resulted in a total of 104 devices included in the final analysis. Indication for treatment were endoleak 1b or progressive iliac aneurysmal degeneration or distal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms; 73 were implanted after previous EVAR and 31 after previous OAR. Technical success was 100% in both groups. The 3-year rate of freedom from SB instability was 90.1% after previous EVAR and 85.4% after previous OAR, respectively (P = .05). The 3-year estimates of SB primary patency were significantly lower in patients who had received OAR as compared with those that had received EVAR (89.8% vs 94.9%; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment with IBDs following previous OAR or EVAR is safe and effective up to 3 years. Freedom from SB instability during follow-up was lower in patients who had previously undergone OAR than EVAR.

Penumbra Indigo Percutaneous Aspiration Thrombectomy System in the treatment of Aortic Endograft Iliac Limb Occlusion: Results from an Italian Multicentre Registry

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Penumbra Indigo percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy (PAT) system in the clinical presentation of iliac limb occlusion (ILO) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, multicentre study conducted in eight Italian vascular centres. Consecutive patients presenting with ILO after EVAR were eligible. To assess vessel revascularisation, Thrombo-aspiration In Peripheral Ischaemia (TIPI) classification (score 0-3) was used at presentation (t1), after PAT (t2), and after adjunctive procedures (t3). Successful revascularisation was considered TIPI 2-3 (near complete or complete). Primary intra-operative outcomes were technical success (TS) of Indigo PAT and combined TS of PAT associated with adjunctive procedures when needed. Primary follow up outcomes were safety and effectiveness at one, six, and 12 months.

RESULTS

From September 2019 to December 2021, there were 48 ILO and 17 patients (35%) [median age 75 years, IQR 71, 83 years; male, 14 (82%); urgent, 8 (47%)] were treated and enrolled. The median time after primary EVAR was 24 months (IQR 0, 42 months). The median clot age from ILO diagnosis to PAT was three days (IQR 1, 12 days). Ten patients (59%) presented with limb threatening ischaemia. At t1, TIPI 0 and 1 was present in 13 (76%) and four (24%) cases, respectively. At t2, primary TS (TIPI 2-3) was achieved in 14 cases (82%) after Indigo PAT (p < .001). Fifteen patients (88%) required adjunctive procedures (14 re-linings, one surgical patch angioplasty). At t3, combined TS was achieved in 16 cases (94%). Intra-operative complication included one (6%) distal embolisation, treated successfully. The 30 day mortality was one case (6%) due to pneumonia. At one, six, and 12 months, clinical success was 100% without ILO recurrence. The median follow up was 23 months (IQR 11, 41 months): at 18 months, survival and freedom from re-intervention were 91 ± 8% and 90 ± 9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study reports for the first time the efficacy and safety of Penumbra Indigo PAT for ILO after EVAR, with promising technical and clinical success up to one year.

Use of Secondary Iliac Branch Devices after Previous Endovascular Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of iliac branch devices (IBDs), as secondary procedure, for the treatment of type Ib endoleak or evolution of iliac artery disease after prior endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for thoraco-abdominal (TAAAs) or abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

A multicentre observational study of three European centres. The study included 75 patients (age 71 ± 9 years, 96% men) with previous EVAR (n = 64, 85%) or fenestrated or branched (FB) EVAR (n = 11, 15%). Overall, 88 IBDs were implanted to treat aneurysmal iliac artery evolution in 40 (53%) and type Ib endoleak in 35 (47%) cases, respectively. Thirteen (17%) patients received bilateral IBDs. Internal iliac artery (IIA) catheterisation was done through a transaxillary access (n = 82, 93%) or up and over (n = 6, 7%) technique. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints were 30 day major adverse event, early and long term freedom from re-intervention and target vessel instability.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful (100%). During hospitalisation, there were four (5%) major adverse events and three (4%) early re-interventions, but no death, stroke, or damage to previous endografts. The median follow up was 47 (interquartile range 42) months, and the five year survival rate was 78 ± 6% with no aortic related death. Cox's regression analysis showed pre-operative renal function impairment (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 10.1; p = .033), and primary TAAA repair (HR 6.1; 95% CI 1.6-22.3; p = .006) as independent factors for long term mortality. Freedom from re-interventions was 85 ± 4% at five years with 11 (12%) cases (five endoleaks, four IBD thromboses, two stenoses). IIA instability was reported in three (3%) limbs and freedom from IIA instability was 95 ± 3% after 60 months.

CONCLUSION

Secondary IBD after EVAR is a safe and effective procedure with high technical success and low complication rates. The technique of choice to revascularise the IIA seems not to affect early and follow up results. Long term durability of IBD repair is acceptable with low rates of IIA re-intervention.