Community distress and risk of adverse outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention

The Effect of Social Determinants of Health in Treating Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Social determinants of health (SDOHs) are broadly defined as nonmedical factors that impact the outcomes of one's health. SDOHs have been increasingly recognized in the literature as profound and modifiable factors on the outcomes of vascular care in peripheral artery disease (PAD) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) despite surgical and technological advancements. In this paper, we briefly review the SDOH and its impact on the management and outcome of patients with CLTI. We highlight the importance of understanding how SDOH impacts our patient population so the vascular community may provide more effective, inclusive, and equitable care.

How multidisciplinary clinics may mitigate socioeconomic barriers to care for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Although multidisciplinary clinics improve outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), their role in addressing socioeconomic disparities is unknown. Our institution treats patients with CLTI at both traditional general vascular clinics and a multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program (LPP). The LPP is in a minority community, providing expedited care at a single facility by a consistent team. We compared outcomes within the LPP with our institution's traditional clinics and explored patients' perspectives on barriers to care to evaluate if the LPP might address them.

METHODS

All patients undergoing index revascularization for CLTI from 2014 to 2023 at our institution were stratified by clinic type (LPP or traditional). We collected clinical and socioeconomic variables, including Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Patient characteristics were compared using χ2, Student t, or Mood median tests. Outcomes were compared using log-rank and multivariable Cox analysis. We also conducted semi-structured interviews to understand patient-perceived barriers.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2023, 983 limbs from 871 patients were revascularized; 19.5% of limbs were treated within the LPP. Compared with traditional clinic patients, more LPP patients were non-White (43.75% vs 27.43%; P < .0001), diabetic (82.29% vs 61.19%; P < .0001), dialysis-dependent (29.17% vs 13.40%; P < .0001), had ADI in the most deprived decile (29.38% vs 19.54%; P = .0061), resided closer to clinic (median 6.73 vs 28.84 miles; P = .0120), and had worse Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage (P < .001). There were no differences in freedom from death, major adverse limb event (MALE), or patency loss. Within the most deprived subgroup (ADI >90), traditional clinic patients had earlier patency loss (P = .0108) compared with LPP patients. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that increasing age, heart failure, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and increasing WIfI stage were independently associated with earlier death, and male sex was associated with earlier MALE. Ten traditional clinic patients were interviewed via convenience sampling. Emerging themes included difficulty understanding their disease, high visit frequency, transportation barriers, distrust of the health care system, and patient-physician racial discordance.

CONCLUSIONS

LPP patients had worse comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation yet had similar outcomes to healthier, less deprived non-LPP patients. The multidisciplinary clinic's structure addresses several patient-perceived barriers. Its proximity to disadvantaged patients and ability to conduct multiple appointments at a single visit may address transportation and visit frequency barriers, and the consistent team may facilitate patient education and improve trust. Including these elements in a multidisciplinary clinic and locating it in an area of need may mitigate some negative impacts of socioeconomic deprivation on CLTI outcomes.

Impact of regional differences and neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on the outcomes of patients with lower extremity wounds evaluated by a limb-preservation service

OBJECTIVE

Management of lower extremity (LE) wounds has evolved with the establishment of specialized limb preservation services. Although clinical factors contribute to limb outcomes, socioeconomic status and community factors also influence the risk for limb loss. The Distressed Community Index (DCI) score is a validated index of social deprivation created to provide an objective measure of economic well-being in United States communities. Few studies have examined the influence of geographic deprivation on outcomes in patients with LE wounds. We examined relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and outcomes of inpatients evaluated by a dedicated limb preservation service (Functional Limb Extremity Service [FLEX]).

METHODS

Inpatients referred to FLEX over a 5-year period were included. Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) staging was collected. DCI scores were determined using seven indices based on ZIP Code. Outcomes included any minor or major amputations, any endovascular or open LE revascularization, or wound care procedures. Disease etiology, demographic, and anthropometric data were collected. Associations between neighborhood deprivation and limb-specific outcomes were evaluated in models for the DCI and each of its components separately.

RESULTS

A total of 677 patients were included. Thirty-eight percent were female, with a mean age of 64 years. Sixty percent had WIfI stage 3 or 4 risk of amputation, and 43% had WIfI stage 3 or 4 risk of revascularization. Mean ankle-brachial index and toe pressure were 0.96 (standard deviation [SD], 0.43) and 80 (SD, 57) mmHg. Thirty-five percent were non-White. Amputation was performed in 31% of patients, whereas 17% underwent revascularization. The mean distress score was 64 (SD, 24). Mean DCI scores did not differ across WIfI scores. Likewise, overall DCI distress score was not related to any of the outcomes in univariable or multivariable linear regression models. In univariable linear regression models for amputation, higher poverty rate (odds ratio for SD increase 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.42; P = .025) was significantly associated with the outcome. In multivariable models, neither DCI distress score nor any of its components remained significantly associated with the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite known racial disparities in limb-specific outcomes, an aggregate measure of community level distress was not found to be related to outcomes. Although the poverty rate demonstrated a significant relationship with amputation in univariable analysis, this association was not found in multivariable models. Notably, non-White race emerged as a predictor of amputation, underscoring the importance of addressing racial disparities in LE outcomes. Further investigation of potential determinants of LE outcomes is needed, particularly the interaction of such factors with race.

Scoping Review of Screening and Assessment Tools for Social Determinants of Health in the Field of Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of implementing the concept of social determinants of health (SDOH) in the clinical practice of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the tools available to assess SDOH have not been systematically investigated. We conducted a scoping review for tools to assess SDOH and comprehensively evaluated how these tools could be applied in the field of CVD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases on July 25, 2023. Studies that evaluated an SDOH screening tool with CVD as an outcome or those that explicitly sampled or included participants based on their having CVD were eligible for inclusion. In addition, studies had to have focused on at least one SDOH domain defined by Healthy People 2030. After screening 1984 articles, 58 articles that evaluated 41 distinct screening tools were selected. Of the 58 articles, 39 (67.2%) targeted populations with CVD, whereas 16 (27.6%) evaluated CVD outcome in non-CVD populations. Three (5.2%) compared SDOH differences between CVD and non-CVD populations. Of 41 screening tools, 24 evaluated multiple SDOH domains and 17 evaluated only 1 domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review revealed recent interest in SDOH in the field of CVD, with many useful screening tools that can evaluate SDOH. Future studies are needed to clarify the importance of the intervention in SDOH regarding CVD.