Caudally directed in situ fenestrated endografting for emergent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

In situ laser fenestration of aortic septum to bridge false and true lumen during endovascular repair of aortic dissection

Fenestration of the septum between the true and false lumen might be necessary after aortic dissection. We report the technical aspects of in situ laser fenestration of the aortic dissection septum. Two illustrative cases are provided: a 56-year-old man with false lumen deployment of a frozen elephant trunk graft, and a 67-year-old man who underwent fenestrated endovascular aortic repair with a target branch vessel off the false lumen. In both cases, the septum was crossed using in situ laser fenestration. This technique is a precise option to enable passage between true and false lumens during endovascular repair of an aortic dissection.

Laser assisted trans-endograft coil embolization of a type II endoleak

A type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair can be challenging to stop. Numerous methods have been described, including trans-arterial, trans-lumbar, trans-caval, trans-endograft, peri-endograft, and open and laparoscopic surgical techniques. We present our experience with a laser-assisted trans-endograft approach, including technical variations of previous descriptions that might improve efficacy. In select cases, the laser-assisted trans-endograft approach might provide the most direct method of accessing and occluding the vessels feeding type II endoleaks.

Descending thoracic aortic emergencies: Past, present, and future

The most important descending thoracic aortic (DTA) pathologies are aneurysms, dissections, and traumatic injuries. In acute settings, these conditions can constitute a significant risk of bleeding or ischemia of vital organs, resulting in a fatal outcome. Morbidity and mortality associated with aortic pathologies remain significant, despite improvements in medical therapy and endovascular techniques. In this narrative review, we present an overview of the transitions in the management of these pathologies and discuss current challenges and future perspectives. Diagnostic challenges include differentiating between thoracic aortic pathologies and cardiac diseases. Efforts have been made to identify a blood test that can rapidly differentiate these pathologies. Computed tomography is the cornerstone of diagnosing thoracic aortic emergencies. Our understanding of DTA pathologies has improved substantially due to the significant advancement in imaging modalities in the last 2 decades. On the basis of this understanding, the treatment of these pathologies has been revolutionized. Unfortunately, robust evidence from prospective and randomized studies is still lacking for the management of most DTA diseases. Medical management plays a crucial role in achieving early stability during these life-threatening emergencies. This includes intensive care monitoring, heart rate and blood pressure control, and considering permissive hypotension for patients presenting with ruptured aneurysms. Over the years, surgical management of DTA pathologies changed from open repair to endovascular repair with dedicated stent-grafts. Techniques in both spectrums have improved substantially.

Comparative Early Results of In-Situ Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair and Other Emergent Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair Techniques for Ruptured Suprarenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms at a Regional Aortic Center

INTRODUCTION

Emergent endovascular repair of suprarenal (SRAAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) poses a significant challenge due to the need for branch vessel incorporation, time constraints, and lack of dedicated devices. Techniques to incorporate branch vessels have included parallel grafting (PG), physician modified endografts (PMEG), double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device (DB/rIBE), and in situ fenestration (ISF). This study describes a single-center experience and the associated outcomes when using these techniques for ruptured SRAAA and TAAA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAA and TAAAs from July 2014 - March 2021 with branch vessel incorporation was performed. Clinical presentation, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of those who underwent ISF were compared to those who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse events including myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, renal dysfunction, new onset dialysis, bowel ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent endovascular repair for ruptured SRAAA and TAAA, 18 of whom underwent ISF repair. Seventy-two percent of ISF patients were hypotensive prior to surgery, compared to 46% of the patients who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques (PMEG, PG, or DB/rIBE). The total procedural and fluoroscopy times were similar between the two groups despite a greater mean number of branch vessels incorporated with the ISF technique (3.1 vs. 2.2 per patient, P = .015). In-hospital mortality was 19% for all ruptures, and 25% for ruptures with hypotension. Compared to the non-ISF group, in-hospital mortality trended lower in the ISF group (11% vs. 25%, P = .233), reaching statistical significance when comparing patients who presented with hypotension (8% vs 45%, P =.048). The rate of major adverse events was 57% across all techniques and did not significantly differ between the ISF and non-ISF groups, with postoperative renal dysfunction being the most frequent complication (48%). Overall, ISF became the most commonly utilized technqiue later in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

While emergent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAA/TAAA remains a challenge, a number of techniques are available for expeditious treatment. In this series, ISF was associated improve survival, including a 5-fold reduction in mortality in patients presenting with hypotension, and has now become the dominant technique at our center. Despite these advantages, postoperative complications and reinterventions are common. Further experience and longer-term follow-up is needed to validate these initial results and assess durability.