Velez FF, Rajani RR, Malone DC, Sun LA, Bloudek L, Carter K, Panaccio M, Niklason LE. Budget impact model of acellular tissue engineered vessel for the repair of extremity arterial trauma when autologous vein is not feasible.
J Med Econ 2025;
28:323-334. [PMID:
39964834 DOI:
10.1080/13696998.2025.2469460]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2025] [Revised: 02/14/2025] [Accepted: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
AIMS
To predict the budget impact of Symvess (Symvess is a trademark of Humacyte Global, Inc.) (acellular tissue engineered vessel-tyod [ATEV]) for extremity arterial trauma repair when autologous vein repair is not feasible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The 3-year budget impact of adding ATEV as a repair option alongside autologous vein, prosthetic graft, and "non-autologous other" grafts was evaluated from the perspectives of a Level I trauma center and third-party commercial payers. Conduit-specific complication rates were obtained from two clinical studies for ATEV and from the published literature and analysis of the PROOVIT registry for other conduits. Costs were compared pre- and post-ATEV availability. Conduit-related costs and complications included conduit infections, amputations, vein harvest site infection, surgical re-interventions, rehabilitation after amputation, and 12-month post-discharge costs. Impact on operating room (OR) time and readmissions was evaluated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty.
RESULTS
With introduction of ATEV, there was a 29.8% reduction in amputations and a 29.5% reduction in graft infections over 3 years. From a Level I trauma center perspective, seven patients were expected to receive an ATEV over 3 years, with cumulative cost savings of $80,650 (2.3% decrease). OR time would decrease by 8.6 h, and readmission-related costs would be reduced by 16.7% with ATEV availability. From the third-party commercial payer perspective, 35 patients were expected to receive ATEV, with a budget impact showing a savings of -$0.08 per member per month after 3 years. For trauma centers, sensitivity analysis showed that cost drivers were amputation risk associated with "non-autologous other" graft types and market share of autologous vein (short ischemia time).
LIMITATIONS
Uncertainty surrounding model parameters.
CONCLUSIONS
ATEV was projected to be cost-saving over 3 years for both trauma centers and third-party payers due to reductions in the costs related to amputations and conduit infections.
Collapse