Development of functionally patent lymphatic meshes in postsurgical long-term resolution of peripheral secondary lymphedema

Secondary Lymphedema: Clinical Interdisciplinary Tricks to Overcome an Intriguing Disease

Secondary lymphedema is a complex pathology which is very impairing to the patient, consisting of fluid accumulation in the tissue, accompanied by alteration of the interstitial fibrous tissue matrix, deposition of cellular debris and local inflammation. It develops mostly in limbs and/or external genitals because of demolishing oncological surgery with excision of local lymph nodes, or it may depend upon inflammatory or infective diseases, trauma, or congenital vascular malformation. Its treatment foresees various approaches, from simple postural attitude to physical therapy, to minimally invasive lymphatic microsurgery. This review focuses on the different types of evolving peripheral lymphedema and describes potential solutions to single objective symptoms. Particular attention is paid to the newest lymphatic microsurgical approaches, such as lymphatic grafting and lympho-venous shunt application, to successfully heal, in the long term, serious cases of secondary lymphedema of limbs or external genitals. The presented data also emphasize the potential role of minimally invasive microsurgery in enhancing the development of newly formed lymphatic meshes, focusing on the need for further accurate research in the development of microsurgical approaches to the lymphatic vascular system.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes After Genital Lymphedema Surgery: Microsurgical Reconstruction Versus Excisional Procedures

INTRODUCTION

Genital lymphedema (GL) surgery can be either palliative or functional. Palliative procedures involve excision of the affected tissue and reconstruction by either local flaps or skin grafts. Reconstructive procedures aim to restore lymphatic flow through microsurgical lymphaticovenous anastomoses (LVAs). This systematic analysis of outcomes and complication rates aims to compare outcomes between these surgical treatment options for GL.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database was performed with the following search algorithm: (lymphorrhea or lymphedema) and (genital or scrotal or vulvar) and (microsurgery or "surgical treatment"), evaluating outcomes, and complications after surgical treatment of GL.

RESULTS

Twenty studies published between 1980 and 2016 met the inclusion criteria (total, 151 patients). Three main surgical treatments for GL were identified. Surgical resection and primary closure or skin graft was the most common procedure (46.4%) with a total complication rate of 10%. Surgical resection and flap reconstruction accounted for 39.1% of the procedures with an overall complication rate of 54.2%. Lympho venous shunt (LVA) procedures (14.5%) had a total complication rate of 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates a lack of consensus in both the preoperative assessment and surgical management of GL. Patients receiving excisional procedures tended to be later stage lymphedema. Patients in the excision and flap reconstruction group seemed to have the highest complication rates. Microsurgical LVAs may represent an alternative approach to GL, either alone or in combination with traditional procedures.

Innovative microsurgical treatment of male external genitals lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema of male external genital organs, characterized by increase in genital organs volume, tissue fibrosis, erysipelas, and objective difficulties in the normal use of lower limbs and the penis, is a very common and impairing consequence of invasive surgery, radical lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy of the pelvic-inguinal area. Standard surgical approach to lymphedema are either very invasive and/or at high risk of lymphedema recurrence and do not guarantee an efficient long-term treatment. Alternatively, we developed a microsurgical technique to perform direct anastomoses between the lymphatic collectors of the spermatic funiculum afferent to the external iliac chains and the vessels tributary to the spermatic vein. This innovative approach, although surgically demanding, provided a long term successful treatment of external genitals with no clinical complications, low invasivity, rapid post-surgical recovery, minor tissue demolition and satisfactory post-surgical functional and esthetic results. In addition, lympho-venous microsurgery seems to trigger the local development of new lymphatic vessels that not only canalize along new collecting channels, but also form complex meshes in proximity to the anastomosis area, thus improving lymphedema also in adjacent tissues like lower limbs, supplied by lymphatics emptying into common developed lymphatic shunt.