Superior hemodynamic performance of a thigh-length versus knee-length intermittent pneumatic compression device

Compression Stocking Length Effects on Oedema, Pain, and Satisfaction in Nursing Students: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Professional practitioners who are required to stand for long periods of time frequently complain about vein-related symptoms. Compression stocking are effective for vein-related symptoms, but there is not enough evidence on the effect of the length of compression stockings for nursing students. To compare oedema, pain, and satisfaction according to different lengths of compression stockings worn by female nursing students. This study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial. The participants included 20 female nursing students in their first semester of clinical practice training. Compression stockings with 25–32 mmHg pressure were used in the study; the participants were divided into two groups based on the length of compression stocking: knee length and thigh length. Differences between groups regarding pain, oedema, and satisfaction were analysed using t-tests, paired t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests, when appropriate. There were no significant differences in pain, oedema, and satisfaction between the two groups. However, pain in right legs of the thigh-length stocking group significantly increased after clinical training shift compared with that before the shift (t = −2.377, p = 0.041). Both groups reported high satisfaction. There were no differences in pain, oedema, and satisfaction in both legs based on the length of compression stockings, but side effects appeared in participants wearing the thigh-length stockings; nevertheless, satisfaction was high in both groups. It may be important to suggest nursing students to wear knee-length compression stockings during clinical practice training.

[S1 guideline on intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)]

Under the direction of the German Society of Phlebology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie) and in cooperation with other specialist associations, the S1 guideline on intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) was adopted in January 2018. It replaces the previous guideline from March 2005. The aim of the guideline is to optimize the indication and therapeutic use of IPC in vascular diseases and edema. An extensive literature search of MEDLINE, existing guidelines, and work relevant to the topic was performed. In view of the often methodologically weak study quality with often small numbers of cases and heterogeneous treatment protocols, recommendations can often only be derived from the available data using good clinical practice/expert consensus. Intermittent pneumatic compression is used for thromboembolism prophylaxis, decongestive therapy for edema, and to positively influence arterial and venous circulation to improve clinical symptoms and accelerate ulcer healing in both the outpatient and inpatient care setting. The therapy regimens and devices used depend on the indication and target location. They can be used as outpatient and inpatient devices as well as at home for long-term indications. A target indication is thrombosis prophylaxis. IPC should be used in severe chronic venous insufficiency (stages C4b to C6), in extremity lymphedema as an add-on therapy and in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) with stable intermittent claudication or critical ischemia. IPC can be used in post-traumatic edema, therapy-resistant venous edema, lipedema and hemiplegia with sensory deficits and edema. Absolute and relative contraindications to IPC must be taken into account and risks considered and avoided as far as possible. Adverse events are extremely rare if IPC is used correctly. If the indication and application are correct-also as an add-on therapy-it is a safe and effective treatment method, especially for the treatment of the described vascular diseases and edema as well as thrombosis prophylaxis.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces sludge in the popliteal vein

BACKGROUND

The common peroneal nerve stimulator (CPNS) is a UK-approved device for reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. It resembles a wrist watch and is placed over the common peroneal nerve, discharging electricity at a rate of 1 impulse/s. It has been presumed that as blood flow slows, erythrocytes aggregate into ultrasound-detectable echogenic particles, described as venous sludge. The aim of the study was to determine whether the CPNS reduces venous sludge by using an ultrasound-derived gray-scale (0-255) venous sludge index (VSI).

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy volunteers had their right popliteal vein video recorded using B-mode ultrasound at 22 frames/s in longitudinal and transverse views, standing and lying. This was performed first with the CPNS off and then with the CPNS on. The CPNS impulse intensity used was set from 1 to 7 for each individual, and the level was sufficient to cause an outward jerking movement of the foot. A single frame of the possible 154 frames, lasting 7 seconds, was selected using a random number generator for the image analysis. The "brightness" of the erythrocyte aggregates (pixels) within a circular sampling area was quantified using the VSI. The brighter the sample, the greater the sludge.

RESULTS

Values are expressed as median (interquartile range). On standing with the device off, there was a significantly higher VSI (P < .0005) compared with lying (longitudinal view, 27.7 [18.8-41.4] vs 11.7 [5.5-17.5]; transverse view, 20.7 [13.6-32.2] vs 11.4 [6.3-15.9]). Activation of the CPNS significantly reduced all the VSI values (P < .0005) shown (longitudinal view, 2 [1.1-3.2] and 1.5 [0.5-3.1]; transverse view, 1.1 [0.6-2.7] and 0.8 [0.5-2.1]).

CONCLUSIONS

The CPNS device significantly reduces venous sludge within the popliteal vein irrespective of whether the subject is standing or lying down or of the longitudinal or transverse position of the ultrasound transducer. The principal mode of action of the device in the claim that it may reduce venous thromboembolism risk may be through a reduction of venous sludge. However, the relationship between erythrocyte aggregation, venous stasis, and venous thromboembolism risk requires more investigation.