Gravity force is not a sole explanation of reflux flow in incompetent great saphenous vein.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019;
7:693-698. [PMID:
31281101 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.04.012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gravity, reservoir size, and competence of the ostial valve on venous reflux in different body positions.
METHODS
Our study included 61 lower limbs with primary incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV). The diameter of the GSV and its cross-sectional area, time-averaged mean velocity (TAMEAN), and reflux time (RT) were measured with duplex ultrasound with pulsed wave Doppler. Reflux volume (RV) and reflux volume flow rate (Q) were calculated. The measurements were carried out in three body positions: horizontal, A; seated upright with stretched legs, B; and vertical, C. Distal automatic cuff compression-decompression (120 mm Hg) was used as a provocation maneuver.
RESULTS
There was 100% occurrence of reflux in the patient positions B and C. Reflux was observed in 91.8% of cases in position A. All reflux parameters (TAMEAN, RT, Q, RV) and the size of the vein were significantly different in the three studied positions. The patient's height did not influence the magnitude of change in reflux parameters. All reflux parameters increased more significantly when the position changed from A to B than from B to C (TAMEAN, +103% and +37%; GSV diameter, +33% and +5%; RV, +408% and +65%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Observed positional changes in reflux parameters suggest that gravitational forces are not a sole explanation for reflux flow in incompetent GSV. It is likely that the gravitational effect on venous flow is mediated by the changes in vein diameter and the total volume of the venous reservoir of the leg.
Collapse