Hybrid operative thrombectomy is noninferior to percutaneous techniques for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

Central Venous Catheter as a Novel Approach to Postoperative Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) along with postoperative thrombolysis (POT) has been the standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT). However, commonly used catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) approaches for POT carry certain disadvantages, including the need for a sheath, inferior comfortability, and catheter-related complications. Therefore, we propose a new simplified method of POT using a central venous catheter (CVC).

METHODS

The retrospective study analyzed patients with IFDVT who underwent POT using CVC from January 2020 to August 2021. The treatment modalities included filter placement, thrombus removal, iliac vein obstruction release, postoperative CVC thrombolysis, filter retrieval, and adequate full course anticoagulation.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent PMT surgery with a procedure success rate of 100%. In the post-PMT CVC thrombolysis, the puncture sites were located in the below-knee vein, including 58.97% in the peroneal vein. The mean duration of CVC-directed thrombolysis was 3.69 ± 1.08 days, and the total urokinase dose was 2.27 ± 0.71 MIU. A total of 37 patients (94.87%) had successful thrombolysis with a length of hospital stay of 5.82 ± 2.21 days. During CVC-directed thrombolysis, only four minor bleeding complications occurred, two of which were indwelling catheter-related. During the 12-month follow-up period, the patency rate and post-thrombotic syndrome incidences were 97.44% and 2.56%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Thrombolysis through a CVC is a feasible, safe, and effective POT method, and could be an alternative to the conventional CDT approach for patients with IFDVT.

Long-term integrity of 53 iliac vein stents after catheter-directed thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term surveillance data on venous stent integrity is sparse. There is limited knowledge on whether duplex ultrasound (DUS) can detect potential stent deformities such as kinking, straightening, and fracture, which may impact long-term patency of the stented veins.

PURPOSE

To assess venous stent integrity after at least five years of follow-up and to establish the efficacy of DUS as surveillance in patients with venous stent.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with acute iliac-femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and stenting >5 years before follow-up. Stents were evaluated with 3D volume low dose non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and DUS for kinking, straightening, stent fracture, and patency. Results from CT scans and DUS were compared to assess the overall agreement between the methods.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 13.2 years (mean = 11.2 years; range = 5.2-15.8 years). 3D CT reconstructions showed normal stent configuration in 47 stents (89%). All intact stents were identified by DUS. In the remaining six stents, 3D CT reconstructions showed compression, tapering, kinking, and minor fracture. DUS recognized all stent complications except the minor fracture. Overall agreement between CT and DUS was 98% (kappa = 0.90). Two cases of stent occlusion were found.

CONCLUSION

The long-term physical resilience of iliac vein stents evaluated with 3D CT in patients treated with CDT for iliofemoral DVT was high. Stent deformities were mostly compression, whereas fracture was rarely seen. DUS seems to be sufficient to evaluate venous stent integrity.

Stellenwert der operativen multimodalen venösen Thrombektomie bei der Behandlung der akuten iliofemoralen Thrombose

Für das Gros aller Patienten mit tiefer Beinvenenthrombose ist ein konservatives Vorgehen mit Antikoagulation und Kompression die Therapie der Wahl. In ausgewählten Fällen kann jedoch auch ein rekanalisierendes Therapieverfahren zum Einsatz kommen. Dies gilt speziell für besonders ausgedehnte Thrombosen mit Beteiligung der Vena cava oder der Beckenetage. Die multimodale operative Thrombektomie kann ein drohendes postthrombotisches Syndrom abwenden. Die Vorteile der operativen Therapie liegen vor allem in der hohen Effektivität und einer breiten Anwendbarkeit, auch bei Kontraindikation zur Fibrinolysetherapie.

Cotinine inhibits TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and improves deep vein thrombosis in rats

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to explore the regulatory mechanisms and influences of cotinine on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in rats via the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor κ binding (TLR-4/NF-κB) pathway.

METHODS

In this experimental study, 30 SD rats were randomly assigned to control group, sham operation group, model group, cotinine (10 μg/kg) group, and model + cotinine (10 μg/kg) group. The thromboxane B2 (TXB2), 6-keto-PGF1α, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), TLR4, NF-κB, and p65 mRNA and protein expression and tissue changes were analyzed by ELISA, Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining, RT-PCR, and Western blot.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the control and sham operation groups (P>0.05). The model and cotinine groups showed significantly higher mRNA and protein levels of TXB2, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), PAI, TLR-4, and NF-κB, and significantly lower levels of 6-keto-PGF1α and t-PA than the control and sham operation groups (P<0.05), and the model + cotinine group showed significantly higher mRNA and protein levels of TXB2, IL-6 and TNF-α, PAI, TLR-4, and NF-κB and significantly lower levels of 6-keto-PGF1α and t-PA than the model group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cotinine can aggravate thrombus and inflammation in rats with DVT, and the mechanism may be associated with the activation of the TLR-4/NF-κB inflammatory signaling pathway.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis

Iliofemoral venous thrombosis carries a high risk for pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndrome complicating 30% to 71% of those affected. The clinical scenarios in which iliofemoral venous thrombosis is managed may be diverse, presenting a challenge to identify optimum therapy tailored to each situation. Goals for management include preventing morbidity from venous occlusive disease, and morbidity and mortality from pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation remains the standard of care for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, although a role for more aggressive therapies with catheter-based interventions or surgery exists in select circumstances. Results from recent prospective trials have improved patient selection guidelines for more aggressive therapies, and have also demonstrated a lack of efficacy for certain conservative therapies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Advances in Operative Thrombectomy for Lower Extremity Venous Thrombosis

Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The mainstay of therapy is medical. However, anticoagulation does not remove the thrombus and restore venous patency. In select patients, early thrombus removal and anticoagulation can restore venous patency, preserve venous valve function, and may reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome. Catheter-directed therapies are minimally invasive with low complication rates. However, in patients with a contraindication to thrombolytic agents who can receive anticoagulation, open thrombectomy should be considered if indications for thrombus removal are met and patients are good operative risks.