Stent characteristics of 32 patients with early (<14 days) iliofemoral stent occlusion

RevCore thrombectomy system for treatment of chronic left external and common iliac vein stent occlusion

In recent years, deep venous stenting has increasingly become a treatment strategy for post-thrombotic syndrome. Stent thrombosis can occur, resulting in symptom recurrence despite medical therapy, and there are few options available for durable stent patency restoration. We present a case of a 50-year-old male with prior iliocaval reconstruction that experienced recurrent left lower extremity swelling secondary to occlusion of left external iliac and common iliac vein stents during follow-up. Mechanical thrombectomy with the RevCore System and angioplasty was performed. One month later, the patient demonstrated widely patent bilateral iliac vein stents and complete symptomatic resolution. The RevCore System is a feasible alternative for treatment of chronic in-stent thrombosis.

Lower extremity woven and nonwoven venous stent morphology and luminal changes

OBJECTIVE

Venous stents are a common treatment modality for obstructive venous disease. Venous stents differentiate themselves by either a woven or braided structure, open or closed cell arrangement or based on material composition (elgiloy vs nitinol). Changes in the morphology of venous stents over time may contribute to restenosis or thrombosis. Woven elgiloy stents are prone to proximal and distal edge deformation compared with dedicated venous stents, which offer increased radial force at stent edges. The objective of this study is to describe luminal morphological changes among various venous stents and between woven to nonwoven venous stent configuration, over time.

METHODS

A retrospective review at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2021 identified patients treated with venous stents. Patients with iliac and/or femoral venous stents with intraoperative intravascular ultrasound and a postoperative computed tomography scan were included in the study. Cross-sectional diameters measurements were taken at proximal, middle, and distal portions of each stent from intravascular ultrasound examination at the time of initial stenting and compared with the cross-sectional diameter measurements taken from computed tomography imaging at follow-up. A paired t test was used to compare the luminal change with a D'Agostino-Pearson test used for normality.

RESULTS

Fifty-four stents distributed among 38 patients were identified. The mean time to follow-up was 17.5 months. Stents were placed in the common iliac vein (n = 37, 68.5%), external iliac vein (n = 14, 25.9%), and common femoral vein (n = 3, 5.6%). Implanted stents included the Boston Scientific Wallstent (n = 23, 42.6%), Bard Venovo (n = 3, 5.6%), Boston Scientific Vici (n = 23, 42.6%), and Medtronic Abre (n = 5, 9.3%). The mean luminal loss was measured at 2.12 mm proximally (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.60; P<.001), 1.29 mm at the mid-stent (95% CI, 0.83-1.74, P<.001), and 1.56 mm distally (95% CI, 0.99-2.12; P<.001). There was no significant difference in luminal changes between woven and nonwoven stents at proximal (P = .374), middle (P = .179), and distal (P = .609) stent measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports morphological changes within venous stents and between woven and nonwoven venous stents. Our findings demonstrate that the edge-stent luminal decrease traditionally attributed to woven configurations also occurs with the newer nonwoven stents. Additional factors such as anatomical location, pelvic curvature, and other external forces may be accountable for this change rather than geometrical configuration of the stent.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Venous Interventions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Interventions for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disorders have increased with technical advances and more trained venous specialists. Antithrombotic therapy is essential to clinical and procedural success; however, post-procedural therapeutic regimens exhibit significant heterogeneity due to limited prospective randomized data as well as incomplete mechanistic understanding of the critical factors driving long-term patency. Post-interventional antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic venous disorders should adhere to existing venous thromboembolism management guidelines, which include 3-6 months of therapeutic anticoagulation at minimum and consideration of extended therapy in patients with higher risk of thrombosis due to procedural or patient factors. The additive benefit of antiplatelet agents in the acute and intermediate period is unknown, having shown improved long-term stent patency in some retrospective studies. Dual and/or triple agent therapy should be limited based on individual risks of thrombosis and bleeding. The treatment of non-thrombotic disorders is more heterogeneous, though patients with limited flow, extensive stent material, or underlying prothrombotic states such as malignancy or chronic inflammation may benefit from single- or multi-agent antithrombotic therapy. However, the agent, dose, and duration of therapy remain indeterminate. Future prospective studies are warranted to improve patient risk stratification and standardize post-procedural antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving venous interventions.

Immediate postprocedure anticoagulation with factor Xa inhibitors of venous stents for nonthrombotic venous lesions does not increase stent patency

BACKGROUND

Many clinicians will prescribe anticoagulation therapy for patients after iliac vein stenting to prevent early or late stent thrombosis. At present, it is unknown whether therapeutic anticoagulation has any effect on stent patency. Thus, we assessed the role of short-term anticoagulation on iliac vein stent patency in patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective medical record review of all iliac vein stents placed for NIVLs at the Center for Vascular Medicine from January 2018 to December 2019. We compared the stent patency in the two groups. The anticoagulation (AC) group had received rivaroxaban or apixaban postoperatively for a minimum of 90 days and were compared with a group that had received no postoperative anticoagulation (NAC). Stent patency was assessed using transabdominal ultrasound at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. At the discretion of the treating physician, the patients who demonstrated thrombus layering on surveillance ultrasound scanning continued rivaroxaban or apixaban until thrombus resolution was observed. The demographics and stent location, diameter, and length were assessed. Stent patency was analyzed using life table analyses. Differences in stent patency were analyzed using GraphPad Prism, version 8, statistical software (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, Calif) and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

RESULTS

The number of patients and stents in each group were as follows: AC group, 299 patients and 308 stents; and NAC group, 77 patients and 90 stents. The average age was 52.24 ± 13.44 years and 55.63 ± 14.49 years in the AC and NAC groups, respectively (P ≤ .065). Women constituted 76% of the patients in the AC group and 72% in the NAC group. The average stent diameter and length for the AC group was 20 ± 2 mm and 77 ± 13 mm and for the NAC group was 19 ± 2 mm and 82 ± 9 mm, respectively. The stents had been placed in the right common iliac vein, bilaterally, or left common iliac vein territory in 15%, 3%, and 82% in the AC group and 18%, 2%, and 80% in the NAC group, respectively. The cumulative stent patency at 30 months was 98.7% and 94.6% for the NAC and AC groups, respectively (P ≤ .83). All the stents placed were Wallstents (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass). A total of eight insertion site thromboses occurred that did not affect stent patency: five in the AC group (1.6%) and three in the NAC group (4.5%; P = .15). In addition, 19 patients demonstrated evidence of thrombus layering, with 6 receiving extended anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that perioperative stent thrombosis in patients with NIVLs is uncommon. Thus, anticoagulation for perioperative stent thrombosis prophylaxis is not necessary. Anticoagulation should only be used for patients with insertion site thromboses and should be considered if thrombus layering is observed on surveillance scanning.

What are the ideal characteristics of a venous stent?

Historically, the stents used in the venous system were not dedicated scaffolds. They were largely adapted arterial stents. An essential feature of a venous stent is compliance, in order to adapt its crosssectional area to the vein. It should also be crush resistant, corrosion resistant and fatigue resistant. The material should be radiopaque, for follow-up. Another characteristic of the ideal venous stent is flexibility, to adapt its shape to the vein, not vice versa. The scaffold should be uncovered too, in order to avoid the occlusion of collaterals. The ideal venous stent should not migrate, so it is necessary a large diameter and a long length. The radial force is important to prevent migration. However, current stents derived from arterial use display high radial force, which could affect the patency of the thin venous wall. Alternatively, if the stent has an anchor point, that permits a passive anchoring, the radial force required to avoid migration will be lower. Dedicated venous stents were not available until very recently. Furthermore, there is a preclinical study about a new compliant nitinol stent, denominated Petalo CVS. Out of the commonest causes of large veins obstruction, dedicated venous stent could also treat other diseases described more recently, such as the jugular variant of the Eagle syndrome, JEDI syndrome and jugular lesions of the chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency that result unfavorable for angioplasty according to Giaquinta classification.