Delayed referral of venous ulcers increases resource usage

The influence of socioeconomic factors on intervention and postoperative healing of venous ulcers: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

In previous studies, venous ulcers (VUs) have been found to occur more often in patients with lower socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore if socioeconomic factors influence the delay of referral to a vascular service or the time to healing after superficial venous intervention.

METHOD

In this prospective study, patients answered a questionnaire about the duration and recurrence of their VU, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol, social and physical activities, ambulatory status, education, marital status, housing, perceived economic status and dependence on home care. Postoperative complications, VU healing and recurrence were noted one year after superficial venous intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included in this study (30 females and 33 males), with a mean age of 71.2 years (range: 37-92 years). Duration of the present VU in patients was: <3 months in 48%; 3-6 months in 27%; 6-12 months in 11%; and >12 months in 14%. Risk factors for delayed referral were recurrent VU (odds ratio (OR): 4.92; p=0.021); walking impairment (OR: 5.43; p=0.009) and dependence on home care (OR: 4.89: p=0.039) in a univariable analysis. The latter was the only significant finding in a multivariable analysis with socioeconomic risk factor (OR: 4.89; p=0.035). In 85% of patients, their VU healed without recurrence during one year follow-up. Healing took longer if the patients: were of older age (p=0.033); had a normal BMI (independent samples t-test, p=0.028); had a recurrent VU (OR: 5.00; p=0.049); or walking impairment (Fishers exact test, OR: 9.14; p=0.008), but no significant socioeconomic risk factors were found.

CONCLUSION

In this study, socioeconomic factors were not important risk factors for delayed referral of VU patients to a vascular service or prolonged healing time after superficial venous intervention.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

This work was supported by the Scandinavian Research Foundation for Varicose Veins and other Venous Diseases (SFÅV) and by ALF funding from Region Örebro County. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Sheath-Based Combined Foam Sclerotherapy to Promote Management of Extensive Insufficiency of the Great Saphenous Vein in Venous Ulcers

Background: Foam sclerotherapy is considered an acceptable method to treat great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency, promoting occlusion of its trunk and eradicating reflux. Various modalities and techniques have been described, varying form foam infusion through multiple short cannulae along the GSV to catheter-directed techniques in order to facilitate complete proximal GSV occlusion and improve technical and clinical success. Purpose: To present a modification of the sclerotherapy tehcnique where the presence of venous ulcers poses an extra challenge to the treatment of GSV treatment. Technique: We describe a technical proposal of single foam perfusion through a 11 cm 5F sheath placed at the knee level combined with simultaneous retrograde infusion below the knee. Perivenous tumescent segmental infiltration with cold normal saline at 4°C is applied initially to reduce the diameter in those GSV >6-7 mm. Conclusions: This combination avoids multiple vein cannulation in the GSV along the thigh as well as the need for antegrade infusion when GSV cannulation at the lower tibia is prohibited by a large ulcer area.

Customizing foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein: A proposed algorithm to enhance technical efficacy

OBJECTIVES

The catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy (FS) and the suggested perivenous tumescent application for great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter reduction are suggested to improve technical and clinical results; yet, their use is reported rather indiscriminately. Our aim is to introduce an algorithm categorising the use of technical modalities accompanying ultrasound-guided FS of the GSV and present the technical efficacy of FS through a 5 F × 11  cm sheath placed at the knee level.

METHODS

Representative cases of GSV insufficiency were chosen to describe our methodology.

RESULTS

Sole sheath-directed FS can achieve complete GSV occlusion proximally at a level comparable to the catheter-directed technique. We apply perivenous 4°C cold tumescent to GSV >6 mm even in the standing position to ensure diameter reduction of the proximal GSV as close to the saphenofemoral junction. We use long catheters only to overcome large varicosities above the knee level that could otherwise compromise the adequate foam infusion from the sheath tip. When GSV insufficiency extends along the entire limb and severe skin lesions preclude the antegrade distal catheterisation, the sheath-directed FS in the thigh can be concomitantly combined with retrograde FS from catheterisation just below the knee.

CONCLUSIONS

A topology-oriented methodology with sheath-directed FS is technically feasible and avoids indiscriminate use of more complex modalities.

Venous leg ulcers and prevalence of surgically correctable reflux disease in a national registry

BACKGROUND

Chronic venous disorders are common, with varicose veins occurring in ∼40% of the population. Venous leg ulcers affect 1% to 2% of the population, with the prevalence increasing ≤4% for those aged >65 years. Both conditions are expensive and together are responsible for ≤2% of the annual healthcare budget expenditure of Western societies. The ESCHAR (effect of surgery and compression on healing and recurrence) and EVRA (early venous reflux ablation) trials demonstrated that surgical correction of superficial venous reflux reduced ulcer recurrence, resulted in faster healing times (EVRA), and was proved cost-effective. Largescale data regarding patients with chronic venous leg ulcers presenting to venous centers with treatable superficial venous insufficiency has not been previously reported. Our study was designed to evaluate the percentage of patients with leg ulcers presenting to dedicated vein centers who were found to have surgically correctable superficial venous insufficiency.

METHODS

The American Vein & Lymphatic Society Patient Reported Outcome Venous Registry began collecting data in 2014 and is one of two national registries focused on chronic venous disorders. The database was queried first for the presence of an ulcer using the CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification (C6 status). These de-identified data were further correlated by crossing the number of ulcers for the same limb using the revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS). The demographics, index duplex ultrasound details, and rVCSS features for ulcer duration and compression use were analyzed. Once the presence of an ulcer had been validated by CEAP and rVCSS, the population was divided into groups according to the ultrasound-reported anatomic pathology (eg, normal, reflux, obstruction, reflux plus obstruction). The query was directed toward all patients seeking a venous evaluation at participating centers from January 2018 through January 2022.

RESULTS

More than 270,000 unique patient records were reviewed. Of the 270,000 records, 163,027 (60%) had had duplex ultrasound scans available, for 1794 unique patients (1879 limbs), representing 1.1% with a leg wound. Of these patients, 55.4% were men and 44.6% were women. Group S included patients with isolated superficial pathology (n = 1291; 68.7%). Group M included patients with mixed superficial and deep pathology (n = 238; 12.7%). Group D included patients with isolated deep vein pathology (n = 58; 3.1%). Finally, group N included patients with leg wounds but no venous pathology (n = 292; 15.5%). The rVCSSs for groups S and M were significantly higher than those for group N. In group S, the dominant patterns involved the great saphenous vein (GSV) above the knee (54.8%), the small saphenous vein (30.7%), and the anterior accessory GSV (14.4%). The frequency of single, double, and triple axial vein reflux identified 1.45 vessels eligible for ablation treatment per limb. In group M, the dominant patterns involved the GSV above the knee (61.7%), the small saphenous vein (26.2%), and the anterior accessory GSV (12.1%), for 1.52 axial segments per limb. Of the 84.4% of venous ulcer patients, duplex ultrasound analysis revealed that 97% of this large subset had had surgically correctable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The American Vein & Lymphatic Society Patient Reported Outcome Venous Registry demonstrated that 85% of the leg wounds in the present study were venous in origin and 97% possessed surgically correctable disease. Our findings support early referral to dedicated vein centers with appropriate venous reflux management as a part of the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with venous leg ulcers.

Comparative analysis of endovenous laser ablation versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Endovenous thermal and non-thermal therapeutic approaches have become standard of care for the treatment of venous insufficiency. However, comparative studies on its use in the population of venous leg ulcer patients are scarce.

METHODS

The present study aimed at a comparison of the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VUs). We retrospectively analyzed patient records of 68 patients with active VUs (C6 of the CEAP-classification), who underwent EVLA (n=33) or UGFS (n=35) between January 2001 and January 2021.

RESULTS

In 68 patients, 97 venous segments (GSV: 43, SSV: 17:, NSV: 37) were treated. Ulcer surface area at initial presentation did not differ significantly between both treatment groups (EVLA: 7.7±10.7 vs. UGFS: 8.5±16.3 cm² ; p=0.73). No significant difference regarding patient characteristics was found, with the exception of age, as patients receiving UGFS treatment were significantly older (EVLA: 61±17 vs. UGFS: 70±14 years; p=0.018). The rate of ulcer resolution was not significantly different between EVLA and UGFS groups (97.0% vs. 85.7%; p=0.20). Also, the mean time to complete ulcer healing after endovenous intervention was comparable (EVLA: 59±37 vs. UGFS: 63±41 days; p=0.68). However, the relapse rate was significantly higher for UGFS than for EVLA treated patients (31.4% vs. 3.0%; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Rates of ulcer resolution and ulcer healing time after endovenous intervention were comparable between both treatment modalities. However, a significantly higher relapse rate was observed in UGFS treated patients.