Effect of inferior vena cava filter placement position on device complications

Characterization and risk factors of inferior vena cava thrombosis in situ detected by computed tomography venography following filter placement: A single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize radiographic characteristics on computed tomography venography and risk factors of inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) in situ after retrievable vena cava filter (VCF) placement.

METHODS

Between September 2018 and June 2023, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with or without IVCT in situ following VCF placement. Patient baseline demographics, presentation of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT), thrombus characteristics, concurrent pulmonary embolism, comorbidities and risk factors for LEDVT, and IVCT and VCF-related information were collected and analysed. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen eligible patients were included, regionally isolated filling-defect surrounding the support pillars of VCF and contacting inferior vena cava (IVC) wall on computed tomography venography images were identified, clots were more frequently found on the minor axis or anterior wall of IVC. Univariable analyses suggested that the incidence of IVCT in situ (31.6%, 37/117) was closely associated with age (P = .001), thrombus limb (left (P = .001) and bilateral side (P = .001)), hypertension (P = .008), filter shapes (P < .001), short IVC diameter (P = .009) or magnification percentage (P = .004), and long IVC diameter (P = .006). Multivariable analyses suggested that bilateral side LEDVT (OR, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.56-15.51; P = .007) and increased short IVC magnification percentage (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .013) statistically significant increase the IVCT in situ risk, whereas increased age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .013) and short IVC diameter (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .026) were associated with decreased odds against IVCT in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

IVCT in situ represents regionally isolated filling-defect at points of filter contact with IVC wall. Bilateral side LEDVT and increased short IVC magnification percentage may be potential risk factors impacting the occurrence of IVCT in situ, while increased age and short IVC diameter may decrease the incidence of IVCT in situ and seem to be protective factor against IVCT in situ emergence.

The development of a novel endovascular grasper for challenging inferior vena cava filter retrieval

OBJECTIVE

Although inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly retrieved using a snare, lateral tilt and fibrosis around struts can complicate the procedure and sometimes require the use of off-label devices. We describe the development of a novel articulating endovascular grasper designed to remove permanent and retrievable IVC filters in any configuration.

METHODS

For in vitro testing, the IVC filters were anchored to the inner wall of a flexible tube in a centered or tilted configuration. A high-contrast backlit camera view simulated the two-dimensional fluoroscopy projection during retrieval. The time from the retrieval device introduction into the camera field to complete filter retrieval was measured in seconds. The control experiment involved temporary IVC filter retrieval with a snare. There were four comparative groups: (1) retrievable filter in centered configuration; (2) retrievable filter in tilted configuration; (3) permanent filter in centered configuration; and (4) permanent filter in tilted configuration. Every experiment was repeated five times, with median retrieval time compared with the control group. For in vivo testing in a porcine model, six tilted infrarenal IVC filters were retrieved with grasper via right jugular approach. Comparison analysis between animal and patient procedures was performed for the following variables: total procedure time, the retrieval time, and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

The in vitro experiments showed comparable retrieval times between the experimental groups 1, 2, and 4 and the control. However, grasper removal of a centered permanent filter (group 3) required significantly less time than in the control (29 vs 79 seconds; P = .009). In the animal model, all IVC filters were retrieved using the grasper with no adverse events. The total procedure time (21.2 vs 43.5 minutes; P = .01) and the fluoroscopy time (4.3 vs 10 minutes; P = .044) were significantly shorter in the animal model compared with the patient group. Moreover, in the patient group, 16.7% of retrievals required advanced endovascular techniques, and one IVC filter could not be retrieved (success rate = 91.7%), whereas all the IVC filters were successfully retrieved in the animal model without the use of additional tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel endovascular grasper is effective in retrieving different types of IVC filters in different configurations and compared favorably with the snare in the in vitro model. In vivo experiments demonstrated more effective retrieval when compared with matched patient retrievals.