Genome-wide non-HLA donor-recipient genetic differences influence renal allograft survival via early allograft fibrosis

Genetic versus self-reported African ancestry of the recipient and neighborhood predictors of kidney transplantation outcomes in 2 multiethnic urban cohorts

African American (AA) kidney recipients have a higher risk of allograft rejection and failure compared to non-AAs, but to what extent these outcomes are due to genetic versus environmental effects is currently unknown. Herein, we tested the effects of recipient self-reported race versus genetic proportion of African ancestry (pAFR), and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on kidney allograft outcomes in multiethnic kidney transplant recipients from Columbia University (N = 1083) and the University of Pennsylvania (N = 738). All participants were genotyped with SNP arrays to estimate genetic admixture proportions. US census tract variables were used to analyze the effect of neighborhood factors. In both cohorts, self-reported recipient AA race and pAFR were individually associated with increased risk of rejection and failure after adjustment for known clinical risk factors and neighborhood SES factors. Joint analysis confirmed that self-reported recipient AA race and pAFR were both associated with a higher risk of allograft rejection (AA: HR 1.61 (1.31-1.96), P = 4.05E-06; pAFR: HR 1.90 (1.46-2.48), P = 2.40E-06) and allograft failure (AA: HR 1.52 (1.18-1.97), P = .001; pAFR: HR 1.70 (1.22-2.35), P = .002). Further research is needed to disentangle the role of genetics versus environmental, social, and structural factors contributing to poor transplantation outcomes in kidney recipients of African ancestry.

Polygenic risk score for acute rejection based on donor-recipient non-HLA genotype mismatch

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplantation is an important allograft complication. To reduce the risk of post-transplant AR, determination of kidney transplant donor-recipient mismatching focuses on blood type and human leukocyte antigens (HLA), while it remains unclear whether non-HLA genetic mismatching is related to post-transplant complications.

METHODS

We carried out a genome-wide scan (HLA and non-HLA regions) on AR with a large kidney transplant cohort of 784 living donor-recipient pairs of European ancestry. An AR polygenic risk score (PRS) was constructed with the non-HLA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) filtered by independence (r2 < 0.2) and P-value (< 1×10-3) criteria. The PRS was validated in an independent cohort of 352 living donor-recipient pairs.

RESULTS

By the genome-wide scan, we identified one significant SNP rs6749137 with HR = 2.49 and P-value = 2.15×10-8. 1,307 non-HLA PRS SNPs passed the clumping plus thresholding and the PRS exhibited significant association with the AR in the validation cohort (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = (1.07, 2.22), p = 0.019). Further pathway analysis attributed the PRS genes into 13 categories, and the over-representation test identified 42 significant biological processes, the most significant of which is the cell morphogenesis (GO:0000902), with 4.08 fold of the percentage from homo species reference and FDR-adjusted P-value = 8.6×10-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show the importance of donor-recipient mismatching in non-HLA regions. Additional work will be needed to understand the role of SNPs included in the PRS and to further improve donor-recipient genetic matching algorithms. Trial registry: Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function Genomics (NCT00270712) and Genomics of Kidney Transplantation (NCT01714440) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Non-HLA Antibodies to G Protein-coupled Receptors in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Short- and Long-term Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) and endothelin-type A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Abs) are G protein-coupled receptor activating autoantibodies associated with antibody-mediated rejection, vascular pathology, increased cytokines, allograft dysfunction, and allograft loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the first 2 y posttransplantation. The impact of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab positivity on longer-term 5-y transplant outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

One hundred pediatric kidney transplant recipients were tested for ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab on serially collected blood samples in the first 2 y posttransplant. Biopsies were collected per protocol and 6, 12, and 24 mo posttransplant and at any time during the 5-y follow-up period for clinical indication. Clinical outcomes, including renal dysfunction, rejection, HLA donor-specific antibodies, and allograft loss, were assessed through 5 y posttransplantation.

RESULTS

AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab were positive in 59% of patients. AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was associated with greater declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and de novo AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab was associated with allograft loss in the first 2 y posttransplant. There was no association between antibody positivity and rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, or allograft loss in the first 5 y posttransplant. In a model controlled for age, sex, immunosuppression, and HLA mismatch, AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was significantly associated with the development of HLA donor-specific antibodies at 5 y posttransplant (odds ratio 2.87, P  = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest temporally distinct clinical complications associated with AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity in pediatric patients; these injury patterns are of significant interest for developing effective treatment strategies.

Multiscale genetic architecture of donor-recipient differences reveals intronic LIMS1 mismatches associated with kidney transplant survival

Donor-recipient (D-R) mismatches outside of human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) contribute to kidney allograft loss, but the mechanisms remain unclear, specifically for intronic mismatches. We quantified non-HLA mismatches at variant-, gene-, and genome-wide scales from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of D-Rs from 2 well-phenotyped transplant cohorts: Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR; n = 385) and Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-01/17 (CTOT-01/17; n = 146). Unbiased gene-level screening in GoCAR uncovered the LIMS1 locus as the top-ranked gene where D-R mismatches associated with death-censored graft loss (DCGL). A previously unreported, intronic, LIMS1 haplotype of 30 SNPs independently associated with DCGL in both cohorts. Haplotype mismatches showed a dosage effect, and minor-allele introduction to major-allele-carrying recipients showed greater hazard of DCGL. The LIMS1 haplotype and the previously reported LIMS1 SNP rs893403 are expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) in immune cells for GCC2 (not LIMS1), which encodes a protein involved in mannose-6-phosphase receptor (M6PR) recycling. Peripheral blood and T cell transcriptome analyses associated the GCC2 gene and LIMS1 SNPs with the TGF-β1/SMAD pathway, suggesting a regulatory effect. In vitro GCC2 modulation impacted M6PR-dependent regulation of active TGF-β1 and downstream signaling in T cells. Together, our data link LIMS1 locus D-R mismatches to DCGL via GCC2 eQTLs that modulate TGF-β1-dependent effects on T cells.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

The Impact of Donor and Recipient Genetic Variation on Outcomes After Solid Organ Transplantation: A Scoping Review and Future Perspectives

At the outset of solid organ transplantation, genetic variation between donors and recipients was recognized as a major player in mechanisms such as allograft tolerance and rejection. Genome-wide association studies have been very successful in identifying novel variant-trait associations, but have been difficult to perform in the field of solid organ transplantation due to complex covariates, era effects, and poor statistical power for detecting donor-recipient interactions. To overcome a lack of statistical power, consortia such as the International Genetics and Translational Research in Transplantation Network have been established. Studies have focused on the consequences of genetic dissimilarities between donors and recipients and have reported associations between polymorphisms in candidate genes or their regulatory regions with transplantation outcomes. However, knowledge on the exact influence of genetic variation is limited due to a lack of comprehensive characterization and harmonization of recipients' or donors' phenotypes and validation using an experimental approach. Causal research in genetics has evolved from agnostic discovery in genome-wide association studies to functional annotation and clarification of underlying molecular mechanisms in translational studies. In this overview, we summarize how the recent advances and progresses in the field of genetics and genomics have improved the understanding of outcomes after solid organ transplantation.

Non-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Immunity and Genetic Insights

The polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system has been considered the main target for alloimmunity, but the non-HLA antibodies and autoimmunity have gained importance in kidney transplantation (KT). Apart from the endothelial injury, secondary self-antigen exposure and the presence of polymorphic alloantigens, respectively, auto- and allo- non-HLA antibodies shared common steps in their development, such as: antigen recognition via indirect pathway by recipient antigen presenting cells, autoreactive T cell activation, autoreactive B cell activation, T helper 17 cell differentiation, loss of self-tolerance and epitope spreading phenomena. Both alloimmunity and autoimmunity play a synergic role in the formation of non-HLA antibodies, and the emergence of transcriptomics and genome-wide evaluation techniques has led to important progress in understanding the mechanistic features. Among them, non-HLA mismatches between donors and recipients provide valuable information regarding the role of genetics in non-HLA antibody immunity and development.

Microvascular Inflammation of the Renal Allograft: A Reappraisal of the Underlying Mechanisms

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcomes and was identified as a leading cause of graft failure after kidney transplantation. Although the hallmark histological features of ABMR (ABMRh), i.e., microvascular inflammation (MVI), usually correlate with the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs), it is increasingly recognized that kidney transplant recipients can develop ABMRh in the absence of HLA-DSAs. In fact, 40-60% of patients with overt MVI have no circulating HLA-DSAs, suggesting that other mechanisms could be involved. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding of the different pathogenic processes underpinning MVI. These processes include both antibody-independent and antibody-dependent mechanisms of endothelial injury and ensuing MVI. Specific emphasis is placed on non-HLA antibodies, for which we discuss the ontogeny, putative targets, and mechanisms underlying endothelial toxicity in connection with their clinical impact. A better understanding of these emerging mechanisms of allograft injury and all the effector cells involved in these processes may provide important insights that pave the way for innovative diagnostic tools and highly tailored therapeutic strategies.

Antibody Responses to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens After Solid Organ Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major barrier to long-term graft survival following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Major histocompatibility antigens mismatched between donor and recipient are well-recognized targets of humoral alloimmunity in SOT and thought to drive most cases of AMR. In contrast, the implication of minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs) in AMR has not been fully investigated, and their clinical relevance remains controversial. Recent technological advances, allowing for genome-wide comparisons between donors and recipients, have uncovered novel, polymorphic mHA targets with potential influence on the graft outcome following SOT. Here, we review these latest studies relating to mHAs and discuss their clinical significance.

Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms

Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic HLA genes are routinely evaluated between donor and recipient pairs as part of organ allocation process, and utilized for patient-tailored induction and maintenance immunosuppression. However, a growing body of data have characterized specific variants in donor and recipient genes, outside of HLA loci, that induce phenotypic changes in donor organs or the recipient immune system, impacting transplant outcomes. Newer mechanisms for “mismatches” in these non-HLA loci have also been proposed during donor–recipient genome interactions with transplantation. Here, we review important recent data evaluating the role of non-HLA genetic loci and genome-wide donor-recipient mismatches in kidney allograft outcomes.

Allorecognition and the spectrum of kidney transplant rejection

Detection of mismatched human leukocyte antigens by adaptive immune cells is considered as the main cause of transplant rejection, leading to either T-cell mediated rejection or antibody-mediated rejection. This canonical view guided the successful development of immunosuppressive therapies and shaped the diagnostic Banff classification for kidney transplant rejection that is used in clinics worldwide. However, several observations have recently emerged that question this dichotomization between T-cell mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, related to heterogeneity in the serology, histology, and prognosis of the rejection phenotypes. In parallel, novel insights were obtained concerning the dynamics of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, the immunogenicity of donor-recipient non-human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and the autoreactivity against self-antigens. Moreover, the potential of innate allorecognition was uncovered, as exemplified by natural killer cell-mediated microvascular inflammation through missing self, and by the emerging evidence on monocyte-driven allorecognition. In this review, we highlight the gaps in the current classification of rejection, provide an overview of the expanding insights into the mechanisms of allorecognition, and critically appraise how these could improve our understanding and clinical approach to kidney transplant rejection. We argue that consideration of the complex interplay of various allorecognition mechanisms can foster a more integrated view of kidney transplant rejection and can lead to improved risk stratification, targeted therapies, and better outcome after kidney transplantation.

Noninvasive Assessment of the Alloimmune Response in Kidney Transplantation

Transplantation remains the optimal mode of kidney replacement therapy, but unfortunately long-term graft survival after 1 year remains suboptimal. The main mechanism of chronic allograft injury is alloimmune, and current clinical monitoring of kidney transplants includes measuring serum creatinine, proteinuria, and immunosuppressive drug levels. The most important biomarker routinely monitored is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with the frequency based on underlying immunologic risk. HLA-DSA should be measured if there is graft dysfunction, immunosuppression minimization, or nonadherence. Antibody strength is semiquantitatively estimated as mean fluorescence intensity, with titration studies for equivocal cases and for following response to treatment. Determination of in vitro C1q or C3d positivity or HLA-DSA IgG subclass analysis remains of uncertain significance, but we do not recommend these for routine use. Current evidence does not support routine monitoring of non-HLA antibodies except anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies when the phenotype is appropriate. The monitoring of both donor-derived cell-free DNA in blood or gene expression profiling of serum and/or urine may detect subclinical rejection, although mainly as a supplement and not as a replacement for biopsy. The optimal frequency and cost-effectiveness of using these noninvasive assays remain to be determined. We review the available literature and make recommendations.

A Multi-Marker Test for Analyzing Paired Genetic Data in Transplantation

Emerging evidence suggests that donor/recipient matching in non-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) regions of the genome may impact transplant outcomes and recognizing these matching effects may increase the power of transplant genetics studies. Most available matching scores account for either single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) matching only or sum these SNP matching scores across multiple gene-coding regions, which makes it challenging to interpret the association findings. We propose a multi-marker Joint Score Test (JST) to jointly test for association between recipient genotype SNP effects and a gene-based matching score with transplant outcomes. This method utilizes Eigen decomposition as a dimension reduction technique to potentially increase statistical power by decreasing the degrees of freedom for the test. In addition, JST allows for the matching effect and the recipient genotype effect to follow different biological mechanisms, which is not the case for other multi-marker methods. Extensive simulation studies show that JST is competitive when compared with existing methods, such as the sequence kernel association test (SKAT), especially under scenarios where associated SNPs are in low linkage disequilibrium with non-associated SNPs or in gene regions containing a large number of SNPs. Applying the method to paired donor/recipient genetic data from kidney transplant studies yields various gene regions that are potentially associated with incidence of acute rejection after transplant.

Recipient APOL1 risk alleles associate with death-censored renal allograft survival and rejection episodes

Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk-alleles in donor kidneys associate with graft loss but whether recipient risk-allele expression impacts transplant outcomes is unclear. To test whether recipient APOL1 risk-alleles independently correlate with transplant outcomes, we analyzed genome-wide SNP genotyping data of donors and recipients from two kidney transplant cohorts, Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GOCAR) and Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (CTOT1/17). We estimated genetic ancestry (quantified as proportion of African ancestry or pAFR) by ADMIXTURE and correlated APOL1 genotypes and pAFR with outcomes. In the GOCAR discovery set, we observed that the number of recipient APOL1 G1/G2 alleles (R-nAPOL1) associated with increased risk of death-censored allograft loss (DCAL), independent of ancestry (HR = 2.14; P = 0.006), and within the subgroup of African American and Hispanic (AA/H) recipients (HR = 2.36; P = 0.003). R-nAPOL1 also associated with increased risk of any T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) event. These associations were validated in CTOT1/17. Ex vivo studies of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed unanticipated high APOL1 expression in activated CD4+/CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells. We detected enriched immune response gene pathways in risk-allele carriers vs. non-carriers on the kidney transplant waitlist and among healthy controls. Our findings demonstrate an immunomodulatory role for recipient APOL1 risk-alleles associating with TCMR and DCAL. This finding has broader implications for immune mediated injury to native kidneys.

The Problem of Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Defined as histologic evidence of rejection on a protocol biopsy in the absence of kidney dysfunction, subclinical rejection has garnered attention since the 1990s. The major focus of much of this research, however, has been subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Herein, we review the literature on subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which may occur with either preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or upon the development of de novo DSA (dnDSA). In both situations, subsequent kidney function and graft survival are compromised. Thus, we recommend protocol biopsy routinely within the first year with preexisting DSA and at the initial detection of dnDSA. In those with positive biopsies, baseline immunosuppression should be maximized, any associated TCMR treated, and adherence stressed, but it remains uncertain if antibody-reduction treatment should be initiated. Less invasive testing of blood for donor DNA or gene profiling may have a role in follow-up of those with negative initial biopsies. If a protocol biopsy is positive in the absence of detectable HLA-DSA, it also remains to be determined whether non-HLA-DSA should be screened for either in particular or on a genome-wide basis and how these patients should be treated. Randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

LIMS1 Risk Genotype and T-Cell Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This study aims to examine the association of LIM Zinc Finger Domain Containing 1 (LIMS1) genotype with allograft rejection in an independent kidney transplant cohort.

METHODS

We genotyped 841 kidney transplant recipients for LIMS1 rs893403 variant by Sanger sequencing followed by PCR confirmation of the deletion. Recipients who were homozygous for LIMS1 rs893403 genotype GG were compared to AA/AG genotypes. The primary outcome was T-cell mediated (TCMR) or antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) and secondary outcome was allograft loss.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 11.4 years, the rate of TCMR was higher in recipients with the GG (n = 200) compared to AA/AG (n = 641) genotypes [25 (12.5%) vs 35 (5.5%); p = 0.001] while ABMR did not differ by genotype [18 (9.0%) vs 62 (9.7%)]. Recipients with GG genotype had 2.4-times higher risk of TCMR than those who did not have this genotype (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.442.434.12, p = 0.001). A total of 189 (22.5%) recipients lost their allografts during follow up. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year (94.3% vs. 94.4%, p = 0.99) and 10-year graft survival rates (86.9% vs. 83.4%, p = 0.31) did not differ significantly in those with GG compared to AA/AG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that recipient LIMS1 risk genotype is associated with increased risk of TCMR after kidney transplantation, confirming the role of LIMS1 locus in allograft rejection. These findings may have clinical implications for the prediction and clinical management of kidney transplant rejection by pretransplant genetic testing of recipients and donors for LIMS1 risk genotype.

Histologic Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection in the Absence of Donor Specific HLA Antibodies

Histologic antibody-mediated rejection (hAMR) is defined as a kidney allograft biopsy satisfying the first 2 Banff criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR): tissue injury and evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with the endothelium. In approximately one-half of such cases, circulating HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are not detectable by current methodology at the time of biopsy. Some studies indicated a better prognosis for HLA-DSA-negative cases of hAMR compared to those with detectable HLA-DSA, whereas others found equally poor survival compared to hAMR-negative cases. We reviewed the literature regarding the pathophysiology of HLA-DSA-negative hAMR. We find 3 nonmutually exclusive possibilities: 1) HLA-DSA are involved, but just not detected; 2) non-HLA DSA (allo- or autoantibodies) are pathogenically involved; and/or 3) antibody-independent NK cell activation is mediating the process through "missing self" or other activating mechanisms. These possibilities are discussed in detail. Recommendations regarding the approach to such patients are made. Clearly, more research is necessary regarding the measurement of non-HLA antibodies, recipient/donor NK cell genotyping, and the use of antibody reduction therapy or other immunosuppression in any subset of patients with HLA-DSA-negative hAMR.

Kidney Allograft Fibrosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Interstitial fibrosis with tubule atrophy (IF/TA) is the response to virtually any sustained kidney injury and correlates inversely with kidney function and allograft survival. IF/TA is driven by various pathways that include hypoxia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling, cellular rejection, inflammation and others. In this review we will focus on key pathways in the progress of renal fibrosis, diagnosis and therapy of allograft fibrosis. This review discusses the role and origin of myofibroblasts as matrix producing cells and therapeutic targets in renal fibrosis with a particular focus on renal allografts. We summarize current trends to use multi-omic approaches to identify new biomarkers for IF/TA detection and to predict allograft survival. Furthermore, we review current imaging strategies that might help to identify and follow-up IF/TA complementary or as alternative to invasive biopsies. We further discuss current clinical trials and therapeutic strategies to treat kidney fibrosis.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C141.

Chronic Histologic Changes Are Present Regardless of HLA Mismatches: Evidence from HLA Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplants

BACKGROUND

At 5 and 10 years after kidney transplantation, chronic histologic changes such as arteriolar hyalinosis and mesangial expansion are common, however, determining etiology is difficult. We compared surveillance biopsies in living donor kidney transplants (LDKTx) from HLA matched siblings (termed HLA-identical (HLA-ID)) to HLA non-ID to investigate which histologic changes were likely due to alloimmune injury and which were due to non-alloimmune injury.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, cohort study comparing HLA-ID sibling LDKTx (n=175) to HLA non-ID LDKTx (n=175; matched for age, sex and year of transplant +/- 2 years) performed at a single institution from 03/1999 to 11/2018.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and maintenance immunosuppression were similar. Mortality rates were similar, but in the HLA-ID group, 10-year death-censored graft survival was higher (93.8% vs 80.9% HLA non-ID LDKTx, p<0.001), rejection rates were lower (after 1 year 9.6% vs 27.1%; p<0.001) and Banff inflammation scores including glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were lower on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5 and 10 years. In contrast, chronic Banff scores (interstitial fibrosis, arteriolar hyalinosis, mesangial expansion, etc.) were similar in prevalence and severity on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5 and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-ID LDKTx have less inflammation and less transplant glomerulopathy, but most chronic histologic changes were similar to less-well matched LDKTx. We conclude that these types of chronic changes are not associated with HLA mismatches and may be due to non-immunologic causes (hypertension, obesity, etc.) suggesting that new management approaches to prevent these lesions may be needed.

The relationship between donor-recipient genetic distance and long-term kidney transplant outcome

Background: We set out to quantify shared genetic ancestry between unrelated kidney donor-recipient pairs and test it as a predictor of time to graft failure.   Methods: In a homogenous, unrelated, European cohort of deceased-donor kidney transplant pairs (n pairs = 1,808), we calculated, using common genetic variation, shared ancestry at the genic (n loci=40,053) and genomic level. We conducted a sub-analysis focused on transmembrane protein coding genes (n transcripts=8,637) and attempted replication of a previously published nonsynonymous transmembrane mismatch score. Measures of shared genetic ancestry were tested in a survival model against time to death-censored graft failure. Results: Shared ancestry calculated across the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) significantly associated with graft survival in individuals who had a high serological mismatch (n pairs = 186) with those who did not have any HLA mismatches indicating that shared ancestry calculated specific loci can capture known associations with genes impacting graft outcome. None of the other measures of shared ancestry at a genic level, genome-wide scale, transmembrane subset or nonsynonymous transmembrane mismatch score analysis were significant predictors of time to graft failure. Conclusions: In a large unrelated, deceased-donor European ancestry renal transplant cohort, shared donor-recipient genetic ancestry, calculated using common genetic variation, has limited value in predicting transplant outcome both on a genomic scale and at a genic level (other than at the HLA loci).