Bone histomorphometry for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy: a call for harmonization of reference ranges

Retrospective Characterization of Bone Histomorphometric Findings in Clinical Patient Specimens

BACKGROUND

Bone histomorphometry provides comprehensive information on bone metabolism and microstructure. In this retrospective study, we aimed to obtain an overview of the typical indications, referring hospitals, and histomorphometric quantification-based diagnoses of the bone tissue in our histomorphometry laboratory, the only laboratory in Finland carrying out histomorphometric examination of clinical bone biopsies.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2020, 553 clinical bone biopsies were sent to our histomorphometry laboratory for histomorphometric examination. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 0.2-89.9 years), 51% of them were males, and 18% comprised pediatric patients. We received bone biopsy specimens from 23 hospitals or healthcare units. The majority of the samples we sent by nephrologists.

RESULTS

The most common bone biopsy indications were suspicion of renal osteodystrophy (ROD), unknown bone turnover status in osteoporosis, and several or untypical fractures. The most common quantitative bone histomorphometry-based diagnosis was ROD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides information on the clinical application of bone histomorphometry in Finland. Precise and quantitative ROD evaluation is the most common indication for bone histomorphometry, being crucial in clinical decision-making and targeted treatment of this patient group.

Bone aluminum accumulation in the current era

In the last few years, evidence from the Brazilian Registry of Bone Biopsy (REBRABO) has pointed out a high incidence of aluminum (Al) accumulation in the bones of patients with CKD under dialysis. This surprising finding does not appear to be merely a passive metal accumulation, as prospective data from REBRABO suggest that the presence of Al in bone may be independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. This information contrasts with the perception of epidemiologic control of this condition around the world. In this opinion paper, we discussed why the diagnosis of Al accumulation in bone is not reported in other parts of the world. We also discuss a range of possibilities to understand why bone Al accumulation still occurs, not as a classical syndrome with systemic signs of intoxication, as occurred it has in the past.

Pre-treatment bone turnover does not influence the level of the response to alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis at the bone tissue level

PURPOSE

The main effect of anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates is a reduction of bone resorption, with a consequent marked decrease of bone turnover. This post-hoc analysis investigated the changes of histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after alendronate (ALN), according to the baseline turnover.

METHODS

Ninety postmenopausal women underwent a transiliac bone biopsy before and after 6 (n = 44) or 12 (n = 46) months of treatment with ALN (70 mg/week). The dynamic parameters reflecting the bone formation and bone turnover were mineralizing surface (MS/BS; %), bone formation rate (BFR/BS; μm3/μm2/d), and activation frequency (Ac.f; /yr). Biochemical markers sPINP and the sCTX were assessed before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjects were divided into quartiles based on the baseline values of BFR/BS.

RESULTS

At baseline, MS/BS and Ac.f were significantly different (p < 0.0001) among the BFR quartiles. sCTX and sP1NP were not significantly different among quartiles. After ALN treatment, MS/BS was not significantly different among quartiles but Ac.f remained significantly lower in the first quartile compared to the third and fourth ones (p < 0.03). The absolute value of the difference between pre- and post-treatment significantly correlated with the baseline BFR/BS but when expressed in percent of the baseline value, the magnitude of the diminutions of MS/BS, Ac.f, sCTX, and sP1NP was similar in the four baseline BFR quartiles.

CONCLUSION

The percentage response to ALN appeared independent of the baseline level of bone turnover. After treatment, the bone turnover tended to be similar in all BFR quartiles. This analysis investigated the influence of baseline turnover measured by bone histomorphometry on the effect of alendronate. When expressed in percent of pre-treatment values, the decreases of histomorphometric parameters and biochemical markers of bone turnover were independent of the baseline turnover.

Pathophysiology of bone disease in chronic kidney disease: from basics to renal osteodystrophy and osteoporosis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent disease that has become a public health problem. Progression of CKD is associated with serious complications, including the systemic CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Laboratory, bone and vascular abnormalities define this condition, and all have been independently related to cardiovascular disease and high mortality rates. The "old" cross-talk between kidney and bone (classically known as "renal osteodystrophies") has been recently expanded to the cardiovascular system, emphasizing the importance of the bone component of CKD-MBD. Moreover, a recently recognized higher susceptibility of patients with CKD to falls and bone fractures led to important paradigm changes in the new CKD-MBD guidelines. Evaluation of bone mineral density and the diagnosis of "osteoporosis" emerges in nephrology as a new possibility "if results will impact clinical decisions". Obviously, it is still reasonable to perform a bone biopsy if knowledge of the type of renal osteodystrophy will be clinically useful (low versus high turnover-bone disease). However, it is now considered that the inability to perform a bone biopsy may not justify withholding antiresorptive therapies to patients with high risk of fracture. This view adds to the effects of parathyroid hormone in CKD patients and the classical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The availability of new antiosteoporotic treatments bring the opportunity to come back to the basics, and the knowledge of new pathophysiological pathways [OPG/RANKL (LGR4); Wnt-ß-catenin pathway], also affected in CKD, offers great opportunities to further unravel the complex physiopathology of CKD-MBD and to improve outcomes.

Bone Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) comprises alterations in calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), Vitamin D, and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) metabolism, abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth or strength, and vascular calcification leading to an increase in bone fractures and vascular disease, which ultimately result in high morbidity and mortality. The bone component of CKD-MBD, referred to as renal osteodystrophy, starts early during the course of CKD as a result of the effects of progressive reduction in kidney function which modify the tight interaction between mineral, hormonal, and other biochemical mediators of cell function that ultimately lead to bone disease. In addition, other factors, such as osteoporosis not apparently dependent on the typical pathophysiologic abnormalities resulting from altered kidney function, may accompany the different varieties of renal osteodystrophy leading to an increment in the risk of bone fracture. After kidney transplantation, these bone alterations and others directly associated or not with changes in kidney function may persist, progress or transform into a different entity due to new pathogenetic mechanisms. With time, these alterations may improve or worsen depending to a large extent on the restoration of kidney function and correction of the metabolic abnormalities developed during the course of CKD. In this paper, we review the bone lesions that occur during both CKD progression and after kidney transplant and analyze the factors involved in their pathogenesis as a means to raise awareness of their complexity and interrelationship.

Is Adynamic Bone Always a Disease? Lessons from Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) is a common complication of end-stage kidney disease that often starts early with loss of kidney function, and it is considered an integral part in management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Adynamic bone (ADB) is characterized by suppressed bone formation, low cellularity, and thin osteoid seams. There is accumulating evidence supporting increasing prevalence of ADB, particularly in early CKD. Contemporarily, it is not very clear whether it represents a true disease, an adaptive mechanism to prevent bone resorption, or just a transitional stage. Several co-players are incriminated in its pathogenesis, such as age, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, uremic milieu, and iatrogenic factors. In the present review, we will discuss the up-to-date knowledge of the ADB and focus on its impact on bone health, fracture risk, vascular calcification, and long-term survival. Moreover, we will emphasize the proper preventive and management strategies of ADB that are pivotal issues in managing patients with CKD. It is still unclear whether ADB is always a pathologic condition or whether it can represent an adaptive process to suppress bone resorption and further bone loss. In this article, we tried to discuss this hard topic based on the available limited information in patients with CKD. More studies are needed to be able to clearly address this frequent ROD finding.