Long-term immunological outcomes of early subclinical inflammation on surveillance kidney allograft biopsies

Long-term Kidney Transplant Survival Across the Globe

BACKGROUND

The outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT), including access, wait time, and other issues around the globe, have been studied. However, issues do vary from one country to another.

METHODS

We obtained data from several countries from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, including the number of patients awaiting KT from 2015, transplant rate per million population (pmp), proportion of living donor and deceased donor (LD/DD) KT, and posttransplant survival. We also sought opinions on key difficulties faced by each of these countries with respect to KT and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Variation in access to KT across the globe was noted. Countries with the highest rates of KT pmp included the United States (79%) and Spain (71%). A higher proportion of LD transplants was noted in Japan (93%), India (85%), Singapore (63%), and South Korea (63%). A higher proportion of DD KTs was noted in Spain (90%), Brazil (90%), France (85%), Italy (85%), Finland (85%), Australia-New Zealand (80%), and the United States (77%). The 5-y graft survival for LD was highest in South Korea (95%), Singapore (94%), Italy (93%), Finland (93%), and Japan (93%), whereas for DD, it was South Korea (93%), Italy (88%), Japan (86%), and Singapore (86%). The common issues surrounding KTs are access and a limited number of LDs and DDs. Key issues identified for long-term survival were increasing age of donors and recipients, higher recipient comorbidity, and posttransplant events, such as alloimmune injury to the kidney, infection, cancer, and suboptimal adherence to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A unified approach is necessary to improve issues surrounding KT as the demand continues to increase.

T-bet + B Cells in Humans: Protective and Pathologic Functions

The humoral immune system comprises B cells and plasma cells, which play important roles in organ transplantation, ranging from the production of both protective and injurious antibodies as well as cytokines that can promote operational tolerance. Recent data from conditions outside of transplantation have identified a novel human B-cell subset that expresses the transcription factor T-bet and exerts pleiotropic functions by disease state. Here, we review the generation, activation, and functions of the T-bet + B-cell subset outside of allotransplantation, and consider the relevance of this subset as mediators of allograft injury.

Subclinical rejection and allograft survival in kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Subclinical rejection (SCR) refers to the presence of acute rejection without accompanying kidney allograft dysfunction. The impact of SCR on long-term graft survival remains a subject of ongoing debate.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform a systematic search of databases including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central, from January 1995 to November 2023. We will include English-language studies involving adult kidney transplant patients who investigated SCR. We will exclude studies focused on 'for-cause' biopsies. Both title, abstract screening and full-text screening will be performed by two or more reviewers. The primary outcome of this study will be death-censored allograft loss. The secondary outcome will include development of subsequent rejection. For time-dependent outcomes, we will prioritise HRs and the 95% CIs. In cases where HRs are unavailable, we will calculate risk ratios based on the recorded events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. We will employ a random effects model. We will evaluate heterogeneity using the I2 variable. We will assess publication bias by funnel plots, Begg and Mazumdar test, and Egger's test.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval does not apply as no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023463536.

Blood Gene Signature as a Biomarker for Subclinical Kidney Allograft Rejection: Where Are We?

The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.

Borderline rejection: To treat or not to treat?

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether kidney transplant recipients with a biopsy diagnosis as a "borderline" acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) requires the treatment with intravenous (iv) steroids pulse plus/minus intensification of the maintenance therapy (TRT) in comparison with the simple clinical follow-up (F-UP).

METHODS

We retrospectively followed a consecutive series of kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with a borderline acute TCMR at biopsy by surveillance or clinical indication for 12 months and compared TRT and F-UP groups. We evaluated trends in renal function by measuring estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using multiple regression models. Repeated eGFR measures (REML) were adjusted for potential confounding factors for 12 months. The difference in 12-month eGFR values were observed in the TRT vs F-UP groups, type of biopsy, as well as the surveillance vs. clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 59 included patients, 37% of them were in the TRT group and remaining 63% in the F-UP group. As expected, the TRT group had, at the time of biopsy, lower eGFR value of 39.0 ml/min/m2 [16.5] in comparison to 49.6 [19.6] ml/min/m2 in the F-UP group (P = 0.043), Similarly, the TRT group required more frequent clinical biopsies vs. F-UP group (68% vs. 32%; P = 0.014). However, the TRT group recovered kidney function reaching the eGFR values of the F-UP group at 12 months; the increase being significant only in patients who received indication biopsies (P < 0.001). The estimated adjusted TRT effect on 12-month eGFR change after indication biopsy was improved by +15.8 ml/min/1.73m2 (95%CI: +0.1 to +31.4 ml/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.048 by three-way interaction term) compared to the F-UP group.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary study supports the indication for the treatment of acute borderline TCMR only in cases with biopsies performed by clinical indication.

The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Work Plan: Data-driven refinement of the Banff Classification for renal allografts

The XVIth Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Alberta, Canada, from September 19 to 23, 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. In addition to a key focus on the impact of microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis on the Banff Classification, further sessions were devoted to other aspects of kidney transplant pathology, in particular T cell-mediated rejection, activity and chronicity indices, digital pathology, xenotransplantation, clinical trials, and surrogate endpoints. Although the output of these sessions has not led to any changes in the classification, the key role of Banff Working Groups in phrasing unanswered questions, and coordinating and disseminating results of investigations addressing these unanswered questions was emphasized. This paper summarizes the key Banff Meeting 2022 sessions not covered in the Banff Kidney Meeting 2022 Report paper and also provides an update on other Banff Working Group activities relevant to kidney allografts.

Tubulo-interstitial inflammation increases the risk of graft loss after the recurrence of IgA nephropathy

Background

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most frequent recurrent disease in kidney transplant recipients and its recurrence contributes to reducing graft survival. Several variables at the time of recurrence have been associated with a higher risk of graft loss. The presence of clinical or subclinical inflammation has been associated with a higher risk of kidney graft loss, but it is not precisely known how it influences the outcome of patients with recurrent IgAN.

Methods

We performed a multicentre retrospective study including kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven recurrence of IgAN in which Banff and Oxford classification scores were available. 'Tubulo-interstitial inflammation' (TII) was defined when 't' or 'i' were ≥2. The main endpoint was progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 or to death censored-graft loss (CKD5/DCGL).

Results

A total of 119 kidney transplant recipients with IgAN recurrence were included and 23 of them showed TII. Median follow-up was 102.9 months and 39 (32.8%) patients reached CKD5/DCGL. TII related to a higher risk of CKD5/DCGL (3 years 18.0% vs 45.3%, log-rank 7.588, P = .006). After multivariate analysis, TII remained related to the risk of CKD5/DCGL (HR 2.344, 95% CI 1.119-4.910, P = .024) independently of other histologic and clinical variables.

Conclusions

In kidney transplant recipients with IgAN recurrence, TII contributes to increasing the risk of CKD5/DCGL independently of previously well-known variables. We suggest adding TII along with the Oxford classification to the clinical variables to identify recurrent IgAN patients at increased risk of graft loss who might benefit from intensified immunosuppression or specific IgAN therapies.

Systemic inflammation early after kidney transplantation is associated with long-term graft loss: a cohort study

Background

Early graft loss following kidney transplantation is mainly a result of acute rejection or surgical complications, while long-term kidney allograft loss is more complex. We examined the association between systemic inflammation early after kidney transplantation and long-term graft loss, as well as correlations between systemic inflammation scores and inflammatory findings in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation.

Methods

We measured 21 inflammatory biomarkers 10 weeks after transplantation in 699 patients who were transplanted between 2009 and 2012 at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway. Low-grade inflammation was assessed with predefined inflammation scores based on specific biomarkers: one overall inflammation score and five pathway-specific scores. Surveillance or indication biopsies were performed in all patients 6 weeks after transplantation. The scores were tested in Cox regression models.

Results

Median follow-up time was 9.1 years (interquartile range 7.6-10.7 years). During the study period, there were 84 (12.2%) death-censored graft losses. The overall inflammation score was associated with long-term kidney graft loss both when assessed as a continuous variable (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.005) and as a categorical variable (4th quartile: hazard ratio 3.19, 95% CI 1.43-7.10, P = 0.005). In the pathway-specific analyses, fibrogenesis activity and vascular inflammation stood out. The vascular inflammation score was associated with inflammation in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after transplantation, while the fibrinogenesis score was associated with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a systemic inflammatory environment early after kidney transplantation was associated with biopsy-confirmed kidney graft pathology and long-term kidney graft loss. The systemic vascular inflammation score correlated with inflammatory findings in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after transplantation.

Tracking kidney transplant fitness

An implantable bioelectronic device detects the early signs of kidney transplant rejection in rats.

Pathological Approach to Kidney Allograft Infection

Infectious agents can pose a significant challenge in kidney transplantation, as they have the potential to cause direct infections in the transplanted kidney. These infections can lead to a decline in kidney function and reduce the longevity of the transplanted kidney. Common post-transplant allograft infections include bacterial pyelonephritis and the BK virus infection, while adenovirus, JC virus, and cytomegalovirus are less frequent but can also lead to significant allograft dysfunctions. The histopathological features of these infections are characterized by the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the kidney interstitial area and the presence of viral nuclear inclusions or cytopathic changes in the renal tubular epithelial cells. The confirmation of causative organisms can be achieved by immunohistochemical staining or the visualization of viral particles using electron microscopic examination. However, these methods typically require a longer turnaround time and are not readily available in developing countries, unlike standard hematoxylin-eosin staining. Notably, the differential diagnosis of interstitial inflammation in kidney allografts almost always includes T cell-mediated rejection, which has a different treatment approach than allograft infections. The aim of this review was to prompt clinicians to identify diverse pathological alterations as observed in kidney allograft biopsies, thereby facilitating further investigations and the management of suspected kidney allograft infections.

Non-Traditional Non-Immunological Risk Factors for Kidney Allograft Loss-Opinion

Rates of late allograft loss have improved slowly in the last decades. Well described traditional risk factors that influence allograft survival include cardiovascular events, rejection, infections and post-transplant neoplasia. Here, we critically evaluate the influence of several non-immunological, non-traditional risk factors and describe their impact on allograft survival and cardiovascular health of kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the following risk factors: arterial stiffness, persistent arteriovenous access, mineral bone disease, immunosuppressive drugs residual levels variability, hypomagnesemia, glomerular pathological alterations not included in Banff criteria, persistent inflammation and metabolic acidosis.