The value of primary vascular stents in management of early portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation

The experience of use of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainages for early biliary complications after liver transplantation

This study aimed to describe our experience and discuss the results, controversies, and the use of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT). Between November 2009 and August 2020, 76 consecutive patients who underwent 77 LTs (44 deceased donor LTs and 33 living donor LTs [LDLT]) were enrolled retrospectively. Endoscopic therapy as initial approach and PTBD as rescue therapy were used for patients with biliary complications. There were 31 patients (31/76, 40.8%) with biliary complications, and two of them died (2/31, 6.5%). Clinical success rate of endoscopic therapy alone was 71.0% (22/31). The remaining nine patients received salvage PTBD and their clinical results were observed according to whether their intrahepatic bile ducts (IHBDs) was dilated (group A, n = 5) or not (group B, n = 4). In group A, the technical and long-term clinical success rates of PTBD were 100% and 20%, respectively. These five patients received PTBD ranging from 75 to 732 days after their LTs, and no procedure-related complications were encountered. In group B, the technical and long-term clinical success rates of PTBD were 50% and 25%, respectively. Three group B patients (75%) underwent PTBD within 30 days after LDLT and had lethal complications. One patient had graft laceration and survived after receiving timely re-transplantation. The other two patients died of sepsis due to PTBD-related bilioportal fistula or multiple liver abscesses. Our experience showed salvage PTBD played a limited role in biliary complications without dilated IHBDs within 1 month after LT.

Portal Vein Complications After Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Time of Onset and Deformity Patterns Affect Long-Term Outcomes

Portal vein complications (PVCs) after adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are potentially lethal. We categorized PVCs by the time of onset (early versus late, <1 month versus ≥1 month, respectively) and deformity patterns (portal vein stenosis [PVS], portal vein thrombosis [PVT], and portal vein occlusion [PVO]) to establish optimal treatment strategies. Overall, 35/322 (10.9%) recipients developed PVCs between 2000 and 2019. Pretransplant PVT (odds ratio [OR], 15.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.70-62.40; P < 0.001) was the only independent risk factor for PVS. In contrast, male sex (OR, 5.57; 95% CI, 1.71-18.20; P = 0.004), pretransplant PVT (OR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.64-14.00; P = 0.004), and splenectomy (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.23-8.57; P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for PVT. PVS was successfully treated with interventional radiology regardless of its time of onset. On the other hand, late PVT and PVO had significantly lower treatment success rates (2/15, 13%) compared with those that occurred in the early period (10/11, 91%) despite aggressive intervention (P < 0.001). Deformity patterns had a significant impact on the 5-year cumulative incidence of graft loss as a result of PVC (PVO + Yerdel grades 2-4 PVT group [n = 16], 41% versus PVS + Yerdel grade 1 PVT group [n = 19], 0%; P = 0.02). In conclusion, late grades 2 to 4 PVT and PVO are refractory to treatment and associated with poor prognoses, whereas PVS has a good prognosis regardless of time of onset. A tailored approach according to the time of onset and deformity patterns of PVC is essential.

The Application of Interventional Radiology in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Owing to improvements in surgical techniques and medical care, living-donor liver transplantation has become an established treatment modality in patients with end-stage liver disease. However, various vascular or non-vascular complications may occur during or after transplantation. Herein, we review how interventional radiologic techniques can be used to treat these complications.

Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic stent placement for portal vein (PV) stenosis after liver transplantation (LT) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

Methods

Retrospective study of 455 patients who underwent LT and 522 patients who underwent resection of the pancreatic head between June 2011 and February 2016. Technical success, clinical success, patency, and complications were evaluated for both groups.

Results

A total of 23 patients were confirmed to have postoperative PV stenosis and were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement. The technical success rate was 100%, the clinical success rate was 80%, and the long-term stent patency was 91.3% for the entire study population. Two procedure-related hemorrhages and two early stent thromboses occurred in the HPB group while no complications occurred in the LT group. A literature review of selected studies reporting PV stent placement for the treatment of PV stenosis after HPB surgery and LT showed a technical success rate of 78–100%, a clinical success rate of 72–100%, and a long-term patency of 57–100%, whereas the procedure-related complication rate varied from 0–33.3%.

Conclusions

Percutaneous transhepatic PV stent is a safe and effective treatment for postoperative PV stenosis/occlusion in patients undergoing LT regardless of symptoms. Due to increased risk of complications, the indication for percutaneous PV stent placement after HPB surgery should be limited to patients with clinical symptoms after an individual assessment.

Stent insertion and balloon angioplasty for portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation: long-term follow-up results

PURPOSE

It is not easy to determine whether balloon angioplasty or stenting should be performed in patients with portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation. We aimed to propose appropriate indication by evaluating long-term outcomes of balloon angioplasty and stent insertion in adult liver transplant patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with portal vein stenosis among 1369 patients who underwent adult liver transplantation from January 2001 to December 2015. When stenosis was confirmed by venography, angioplasty was performed first. When there was no flow improvement or pressure gradient was not decreased after angioplasty, stent insertion was performed. We also performed primary stent insertion without angioplasty for diffuse stenosis, kinking, external compression, and near occlusion of portal vein in venography. We assessed patency in patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent insertion through regular outpatient follow-up and evaluated technical and clinical success and long-term results.

RESULTS

Technical success was 85% and 100% in balloon angioplasty and stent insertion, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 78% of balloon angioplasties and in 100% of stent insertions. At 1, 5, and 10 years after balloon angioplasty, patency rates were 87%, 82%, and 68% respectively, and the rates of stent patency were all 100%. Portal vein size measured during the operation of patients with and without recurrence were 19±4.2 mm and 19±3.0 mm (P = 0.956), respectively. The balloon size of patients with and without recurrence were 11±1.95 mm and 14±1.66 mm, respectively (P = 0.013), when balloon angioplasty was performed after stenosis diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Stent insertion can be considered when fibrotic changes are expected due to repeated inflammation and when the balloon size to be used is small. Balloon angioplasty seems less risky for anastomotic ruptures in portal vein stenosis in the early post liver transplantation period.

Intra-operative portal hemodynamics in pediatric LDLT: Doppler ultrasound surveillance

Doppler ultrasonography is useful in monitoring intra-operative PV flow in LDLT. A retrospective cohort study included 550 pediatric recipients (<18 years) who underwent LDLT from October 2006 to August 2016 in our hospital. A total of 33 recipients (incidence 6%) were found to have insufficient intra-operative PV flow after PV reperfusion. The treatments included intra-operative stent placement (n=25), anticoagulation (n=3), thrombectomy and re-anastomosis (n=2), graft repositioning (n=1), collateral ligation (n=1), and replaced PV (n=1). The peak PV velocity, HAPSV, HARI, and HV velocity before and after the interventions were significantly improved 0(0,5.5) cm/s vs. 37.36±15.30 cm/s, 38.68±8.92 cm/s vs. 62.30±16.97 cm/s, 0.55±0.08 vs. 0.76±0.10, and 32.37±10.33 cm/s vs. 40.94±15.01 cm/s, respectively (P<.01). Insufficient PV flow and decreased HARI are two significant criteria indicating need for intra-operative PV management. Dramatic changes in the hepatic hemodynamics were detected after proper treatment. Immediate resolution of PV flow is feasible in pediatric LDLT.

Management of Portal Hypertension After Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Post-transplantation portal hypertension has severe complications, such as esophageal varix bleeding, therapy refractory ascites, extreme splenomegaly, and graft dysfunction. The aim of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of the therapeutic strategies and how to visualize the procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective study involving liver transplantation patients from the Semmelweis University Department of Transplantation and Surgery was performed between 2005 and 2015. The prevalence, etiology, and leading complications of the condition were determined. The applied interventions' effects on the patients' ascites volume, splenic volume, and the occurrence of variceal bleeding were determined. Mean portal blood flow velocity and congestion index values were calculated using Doppler ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The prevalence of post-transplantation portal hypertension requiring intervention was 2.8%. The most common etiology of the disease was portal anastomotic stenosis. The most common complications were esophageal varix bleeding and therapy refractory ascites. The patients' ascites volume decreased significantly (2923.3 ± 1893.2 mL vs. 423.3 ± 634.3 mL; P < .05), their splenic volume decreased markedly. After the interventions, only one case of recurrent variceal bleeding was reported. The calculated Doppler parameters were altered in the opposite direction in cases of pre-hepatic versus intra- or post-hepatic portal hypertension. After the interventions, these parameters shifted towards the physiologic ranges.

CONCLUSION

The interventions performed in our clinic were effective in most cases. The patients' ascites volume, splenic volume, and the prevalence of variceal bleeding decreased after the treatment. Doppler ultrasonography has proved to be a valuable imaging modality in the diagnosis and the follow-up of post-transplantation portal hypertension.