Saw cuts in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an analysis of Sawbone preparations

Periprosthetic tibial fracture as a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current insights

Periprosthetic fracture following knee arthroplasty is a rare but devastating complication associated with significant morbidity. With unicompartmental knee arthroplasty being performed far less frequently than total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic fracture following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty presents a particular challenge to orthopaedic surgeons, due to clinical unfamiliarity and sparsity of literature. An up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, and management strategies for PPF after UKA is presented.

Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures

INTRODUCTION

Tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are a rare condition that affects about 1% of cases. Known risk factors include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone density, as well as surgical technique and prosthesis design. The purpose of the study was to determine if undersizing of the tibial component in relation to the femoral component increases the risk of tibial periprosthetic fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a 6-year-period 1542 patients with cemented (n = 363) and uncemented (n = 1179) medial UKA were retrospectively evaluated. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were identified and classified, and epidemiologic data were documented at follow-up. Undersizing was defined as a smaller tibial component compared to the femoral implant. The association of potential risk factors for TPF with the incidence of TPF was investigated with binominal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (0.9%) suffered from TPF at a median of 1 month after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 5.9 ± 1.7 years. Fractures were more common in cases with undersized tibial components [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p < 0.05]. Furthermore, older age (OR 1.1, p < 0.05) and female sex (OR 6.5, p < 0.05) were identified as significant risk factors, while BMI (p = 0.8) and cemented implantation (p = 0.2) had no effect on fracture rate. Revision surgery included open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Undersizing of implant sizes in UKA increases the risk for TPF especially in patients with small tibial implants. Therefore, mismatched implants should be avoided for UKA particularly when risk factors like obesity, older age, or female gender are present. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were successfully treated by open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

Intraoperative avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence in Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Case report

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can provide good postoperative results and long term survival, but there may be complications. We present a rare case of avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence during UKA surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 88-year-old man had right-knee pain with anteromedial osteoarthritis. Oxford partial knee UKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was performed by the senior author by the under-vastus approach using Microplasty instruments. During the final check of the range of motion, an avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence occurred at the terminal extension. A 4.0 mm cannulated cancellous screw was inserted into the intercondylar eminence from just in front of the anterior cruciate ligament to the posterior tibial cortex. Six months postoperatively, bony fusion was confirmed by lateral radiography. Two years after the surgery, the patient was fully satisfied. The flexion angle was 125°, but still with an extension limit of 10°.

DISCUSSION

Avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence can be caused by hyperextension and/or the ACL becoming tighter in full extension of the knee. In this patient, avulsion fracture also probably occurred due to increased tension of the ACL in the fully extended position. After making the horizontal cut, we inserted a thin metal plate to prevent deeper vertical cuts, but an excessive horizontal cut was a possible cause of the fracture. As treatment for avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence, fixation of the cannulated cancellous screw resulted in uneventful bone fusion. We recommend having a cannulated cancellous screw at hand for such complications and for other potential intraoperative problems, such as tibial plateau fracture. Further investigation into limited postoperative extension might be needed.

CONCLUSION

Our patient had intraoperative avulsion fracture of the intercondylar eminence, a relatively rare complication of Oxford UKA which is probably caused by the extension being tight and/or an excessive horizontal cut. Having a cannulated cancellous screw at hand is advised, and attention should be paid to postoperative limit of extension.

Periprosthetic Tibial Plateau Fractures After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Are Successfully Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Periprosthetic tibial fractures after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are rare but devastating events. Given the relative infrequency of these injuries, treatment strategies are not well defined. The goal of this retrospective case series is to report the findings for a series of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of periprosthetic fracture after UKA, including radiographic alignment, Knee Society Score (KSS), and failure rate. Patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases code for periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures. Electronic medical records and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture patterns and coronal and sagittal alignment of UKA components were measured on radiographs. Clinical outcomes, including range of motion assessment, visual analog scale pain score, and KSS, were collected at final follow-up. Eight patients satisfied the inclusion criteria for this study. Fractures occurred at a median of 14 days (range, 5-52 days) after UKA, and all showed a vertical shear pattern that exited at the meta-diaphyseal junction. Of the 8 fractures, 7 (87.5%) healed to radiographic and clinical union after the initial ORIF. One patient required reoperation for hardware failure. Mean visual analog scale pain score and KSS at final follow-up were 3 and 85±14, respectively. Periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures after UKA commonly occur as a vertical shear fracture exiting at the metadiaphyseal junction. The use of ORIF with a 3.5-mm plate in buttress mode is a reliable method for treatment of these fractures. Restoration of alignment and motion is achievable, but residual pain may affect patient-reported outcome scores. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):287-292.].

The risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture with bi-unicondylar knee arthroplasty : a finite element analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of tibial eminence avulsion intraoperatively for bi-unicondylar knee arthroplasty (Bi-UKA), with consideration of the effect of implant positioning, overstuffing, and sex, compared to the risk for isolated medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA-M) and bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA).

METHODS

Two experimentally validated finite element models of tibia were implanted with UKA-M, Bi-UKA, and BCR-TKA. Intraoperative loads were applied through the condyles, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and the risk of fracture (ROF) was evaluated in the spine as the ratio of the 95^th percentile maximum principal elastic strains over the tensile yield strain of proximal tibial bone.

RESULTS

Peak tensile strains occurred on the anterior portion of the medial sagittal cut in all simulations. Lateral translation of the medial implant in Bi-UKA had the largest increase in ROF of any of the implant positions (43%). Overstuffing the joint by 2 mm had a much larger effect, resulting in a six-fold increase in ROF. Bi-UKA had ~10% increased ROF compared to UKA-M for both the male and female models, although the smaller, less dense female model had a 1.4 times greater ROF compared to the male model. Removal of anterior bone akin to BCR-TKA doubled ROF compared to Bi-UKA.

CONCLUSION

Tibial eminence avulsion fracture has a similar risk associated with Bi-UKA to UKA-M. The risk is higher for smaller and less dense tibiae. To minimize risk, it is most important to avoid overstuffing the joint, followed by correctly positioning the medial implant, taking care not to narrow the bone island anteriorly.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(8):575-584.

Periprosthetic fractures after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

On rare occasions, fractures of the tibial plateau may occur after uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and account for 2% of total UKA failures. The purpose of this narrative review is to identify and discuss potential risk factors that might lead to prevention of this invalidating complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic database of Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar were searched. A total of 457 articles related to the topic were found. Of those, 86 references were included in this narrative review.

RESULTS

UKA implantation acts as a stress riser in the medial compartment. To avoid fractures, surgeons need to balance load and bone stock. Post-operative lower limb alignment, implant positioning, level of resection and sizing of the tibial tray have a strong influence on load distribution of the tibial bone. Pain on weight-bearing signals bone-load imbalance and acts as an indicator of bone remodeling and should be a trigger for unloading. The first three months after surgery are critical because of transient post-operative osteoporosis and local biomechanical changes. Acquired osteoporosis is a growing concern in the arthroplasty population. Split fractures require internal fixation, while subsidence fractures differ in their management depending of the amount of bone impaction. Loose implants require revision knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Peri-prosthetic fracture is a rare, but troublesome event, which can lead to implant failure and revision surgery. Better knowledge of the multifactorial risk factors in association with a thorough surgical technique is key for prevention.

The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions

Aims

The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation.

Methods

Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system.

Results

At the main fixation zone, the twin peg shows less relative movement at 70°/115°. At the transition zone, relative movements are smaller for the single peg for both angles. The single peg shows higher compression at 70° flexion, whereas the twin peg design shows higher compression at 115°. X-displacement is significantly higher for the single peg at 115°.

Conclusion

Bony defects should be avoided in OUKA. The twin peg shows high resilience against push-out force and should be preferred over the single peg.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):82–90.

Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

(I) To determine the incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and (II) to summarize the existing evidence on characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic fractures in UKA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases were comprehensively searched. Any clinical, laboratory or case report study describing information on proportion, characteristics or risk factors of periprosthetic tibial fractures in UKA was included. Proportion meta-analysis was performed to estimate the incidence of fractures only using data from clinical studies. Information on characteristics and risk factors was evaluated and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies were considered to be eligible for inclusion. Based on 41 clinical studies, incidences of fractures were 1.24% (95%CI 0.64-2.41) for cementless and 1.58% (95%CI 1.06-2.36) for cemented UKAs (9451 UKAs). The majority of fractures in the current literature occurred during surgery or presented within 3 months postoperatively (91 of 127; 72%) and were non-traumatic (95 of 113; 84%). Six different fracture types were observed in 21 available radiographs. Laboratory studies revealed that an excessive interference fit (press fit), excessive tibial bone resection, a sagittal cut too deep posteriorly and low bone mineral density (BMD) reduce the force required for a periprosthetic tibial fracture to occur. Clinical studies showed that periprosthetic tibial fractures were associated with increased body mass index and postoperative alignment angles, advanced age, decreased BMD, female gender, and a very overhanging medial tibial condyle.

CONCLUSION

Comparable low incidences of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented UKA can be achieved. However, surgeons should be aware that an excessive interference fit in cementless UKAs in combination with an impaction technique may introduce an additional risk, and could therefore be less forgiving to surgical errors and patients who are at higher risk of periprosthetic tibial fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Minimising tibial fracture after unicompartmental knee replacement: A probabilistic finite element study

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic tibial fracture after unicompartmental knee replacement is a challenging post-operative complication. Patients have an increased risk of mortality after fracture, the majority undergo further surgery, and the revision operations are less successful. Inappropriate surgical technique increases the risk of fracture, but it is unclear which technical aspects of the surgery are most problematic and no research has been performed on how surgical factors interact.

METHODS

Firstly, this study quantified the typical variance in surgical cuts made during unicompartmental knee replacement (determined from bones prepared by surgeons during an instructional course). Secondly, these measured distributions were used to create a probabilistic finite element model of the tibia after replacement. A thousand finite element models were created using the Monte Carlo method, representing 1000 virtual operations, and the risk of tibial fracture was assessed.

FINDINGS

Multivariate linear regression of the results showed that excessive resection depth and making the vertical cut too deep posteriorly increased the risk of fracture. These two parameters also had high variability in the prepared synthetic bones. The regression equation calculated the risk of fracture from three cut parameters (resection depth, vertical and horizonal posterior cuts) and fit the model results with 90% correlation.

INTERPRETATION

This study introduces for the first time the application of a probabilistic approach to predict the aetiology of fracture after unicompartmental knee replacement, providing unique insight into the relative importance of surgical saw cut variations. Targeted changes to operative technique can now be considered to seek to reduce the risk of periprosthetic fracture.

Instruments to reduce the risk of tibial fracture following cementless unicompartmental knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Tibial plateau fracture is an important complication of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. The press fit between the keel and the bone's keel slot is responsible for primary fixation and also contributes to fracture risk. This study investigates whether the fracture risk could be reduced without compromising primary fixation, by using different instruments to widen the keel slot.

METHODS

Keel slots were made in polyurethane blocks (n = 60) using the standard keel cut saw blade or a new blade that was 0.2 mm wider, with adjuvant use of the cemented pick or a prototype rasp. A tibial component was pushed into and pulled out of the slots using a Dartec materials testing machine. It was assumed that the 'push-in' force was related to the risk of fracture and 'pull-out' force was related to fixation. Reproducibility studies with 10 different tibial components were undertaken.

RESULTS

The new blade required significantly lower push-in forces than the standard blade (789 N SD 130, 1411 N SD 180; P < 0.001), but the pull-out forces were not different (240 N SD 47, 230 N SD 56; P > 0.999). With the standard blade the pick decreased the push-in (818 N SD 318; P < 0.001) and pull-out (128 N SD 58; P < 0.001) forces, but the rasp had no effect. With the new blade the pick had no effect, but the rasp increased the push-in force (1390 N SD 202; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the fracture risk will be reduced with the new blades, with no compromise in fixation. If the new blades are used routine use of the cemented pick appears to be of no benefit.

The Valgus Inclination of the Tibial Component Increases the Risk of Medial Tibial Condylar Fractures in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Medial tibial condylar fractures (MTCFs) are a rare but serious complication after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Although some surgical pitfalls have been reported for MTCFs, it is not clear whether the varus/valgus tibial inclination contributes to the risk of MTCFs.

METHODS

We constructed a 3-dimensional finite elemental method model of the tibia with a medial component and assessed stress concentrations by changing the inclination from 6° varus to 6° valgus. Subsequently, we repeated the same procedure adding extended sagittal bone cuts of 2° and 10° in the posterior tibial cortex. Furthermore, we calculated the bone volume that supported the tibial component, which is considered to affect stress distribution in the medial tibial condyle.

RESULTS

Stress concentrations were observed on the medial tibial metaphyseal cortices and on the anterior and posterior tibial cortices in the corner of cut surfaces in all models; moreover, the maximum principal stresses on the posterior cortex were larger than those on the anterior cortex. The extended sagittal bone cuts in the posterior tibial cortex increased the stresses further at these 3 sites. In the models with a 10° extended sagittal bone cut, the maximum principal stress on the posterior cortex increased as the tibial inclination changed from 6° varus to 6° valgus. The bone volume decreased as the inclination changed from varus to valgus.

CONCLUSION

In this finite element method, the risk of MTCFs increases with increasing valgus inclination of the tibial component and with increased extension of the sagittal cut in the posterior tibial cortex.

Treatment of periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: plates versus cannulated screws

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare but represent a serious complication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The most common treatment for these fractures is osteosynthesis with cannulated screws or plates. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different treatment options for periprosthetic fractures. The hypothesis was that angle-stable plates show significantly higher fracture loads than fixation with cannulated screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve matched, paired fresh-frozen tibiae with periprosthetic TPF were used for this study. In Group A, osteosyntheses with cannulated screws were performed, whereas in Group B plates fixated the periprosthetic fracture. DEXA bone density measurement and standard X-rays (AP and lateral) were performed before loading the tibiae under standardised conditions with a maximum load of up to 10.0 kN. After the specimens had been loaded, fracture patterns and fracture loads were analysed and correlated with BMD, BMI, bodyweight (BW), age and size of the tibial implant.

RESULTS

In the plate group all tibiae fracture occured with a median load of F (max) = 2.64 (0.45-5.68) kN, whereas in the group with cannulated screws fractures occurred at a mean load of F (max) = 1.50 (0.27-3.51) kN. The difference was statistically significant at p < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

Angle-stable plates showed significantly higher fracture loads than fixation with cannulated screws. Cannulated screws show a reduced stability of the tibial plateau. Therefore in periprosthetic TPF, osteosyntheses with angle-stable plates should be recommended instead of cannulated screws.

Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures represent a rare but serious complication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and are associated with extended sagittal tibial bone cuts. These can occur during the surgery, weaken the posterior cortex of the tibia and are associated with periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures. Although excellent long-term results have been reported with cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, there is high interest in cementless fixation. The aim of the study was to compare fracture loads of cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Tibial components of the Oxford Uni were implanted in six paired fresh-frozen tibiae with a defined extended saw cut (10°) at the dorsal cortex of each specimen. In one set, surgery was performed with cement fixation, and in the other, cementless components were implanted. Vertical loads were then applied under standardised conditions to fracture the specimens.

RESULTS

Median loads of 3.7 (0.7-6.9) kN led to fractures in the cemented group, whereas cementless fixated tibiae fractured with a median load of 1.6 (0.2-4.3) kN (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The loading capacity in tibiae with cementless components is significantly less compared to cemented fixation. The results show that in case of an extended sagittal bone cut patients especially those with poor bone quality who are treated with a cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are at higher risk for periprosthetic tibial fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibial behavior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty: modified resected surface with corresponding surgical technique

Persistent pain and periprosthetic fracture of the proximal tibia are troublesome complications in modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). Surgical errors and acute corners on the resected surface can place excessive strains on the bone, leading to bone degeneration. This study attempted to lower strains by altering the orthogonal geometry and avoiding extended vertical saw cuts. Finite element models were utilized to predict biomechanical behavior and were subsequently compared against experimental data. On the resected surface of the extended saw cut model, the greatest strains showed a 50% increase over a standard implant; conversely, the strains decreased by 40% for the radial-corner shaped model. For all UKA models, the peak strains below the resection level increased by 40% relative to an intact tibia. There was no significant difference among the implanted models. This study demonstrated that a large increase in strains arises on the tibial plateau to resist a cantilever-like bending moment following UKA. Surgical errors generally weaken the tibial support and increase the risk of fractures. This study provides guidance on altering the orthogonal geometry into a radial-shape to reduce strains and avoid degenerative remodeling. Furthermore, it could be expected that predrilling a posteriorly sloped tunnel through the tibia prior to cutting could achieve greater accuracy in surgical preparations.

Periprosthetic tibial fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a function of extended sagittal saw cuts: an experimental study

Periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare but represent a serious complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As TPFs usually occur perioperatively, these can be associated with extended sagittal saw cuts during surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate TPF as a function of extended sagittal saw cuts. The hypothesis was that extended sagittal saw cuts reduce the loading capacity of the tibial plateau and increase the risk of periprosthetic TPF. In a randomised study, standardised cemented Oxford UKA tibial component implantation was performed in six matched, paired fresh-frozen tibiae. In group A, a regular preparation of the tibial plateau was performed, whereas in group B a standardised extended sagittal saw cut was made at the dorsal cortex of the tibia. All tibiae were fractured under standardised conditions and fracture patterns and fracture loads were analysed. In group A, tibiae fractured with a mean load of F(max)=3.9 (2.3-8.5) kN, whereas in group B fractures occurred at a mean load of F(max)=2.6 (1.1-5.0) kN. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Extended sagittal saw cuts in UKA weaken the tibial bone structure. Our results show that descendent extended sagittal saw cuts of 10 degrees reduce fracture loads by about 30%. Surgeons should be aware of the potential pitfalls of an extended sagittal saw cut, as this can lead to reduced loading capacity of the tibial plateau and increase the risk of periprosthetic TPF.